Skip to main content

Children’s Rights Impact Assessment

Draft Crime (Strangulation) (Jersey) Law 202- (P.8/2026) – Children’s Rights Impact Assessment

Published on: 13 January 2026

Presented by: Minister for Justice and Home Affairs

Debate date: 10 March 2026

Reference: P.8/2026 Add.

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

DRAFT CRIME (STRANGULATION) (JERSEY) LAW 202- (P.8/2026): CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Presented to the States on 13th January 2026 by the Minister for Justice and Home Affairs

STATES GREFFE

2026  P.8 Add.

CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT (CRIA)

PART 1: SCREENING

Mary Le Hegarat , Minister for Justice Name and title of Duty Bearer:

& Home Affairs

Type of Duty Bearer:  Minister

(Minister, Elected Member or States

Assembly Body)

Assessment completed by (if not  Assistant Policy Officer

completed by duty bearer):

Date: 03/12/2025

 

1)  Name and brief description of the proposed decision

The subject of your CRIA may be a proposed law, policy or proposition and in accordance with the Law is referred to in this template as the decision'

What is the problem or issue the decision is trying to address?

Do children experience this problem differently from adults?

The purpose of the proposed Crime (Strangulation) (Jersey) Law is to create a new offence, with a penalty of imprisonment for a maximum term of 10 years or a fine, for someone intentionally strangling another person. There will be defence of consent where the victim did not suffer serious harm, or where the victim did suffer serious harm, but the perpetrator can establish that this was not intentional or inflicted recklessly.

The purpose of this Law is to ensure that the offence captures these behaviours separate to existing customary offences of assault, in order to lower the threshold for prosecution and raise the penalty. This is intended to act as a deterrent, as well as to recognise the uniquely harmful effects of strangulation.

This Law is a result of a recommendation from the Violence Against Women & Girls (VAWG) Taskforce Report, which is as follows:

Recommendation 25; Non-fatal strangulation should be named as a standalone offence

This recommendation was accepted by the Chief Minister in March 2024.

Furthermore, other recommendations are also seeking to address related issues, such as a non-fatal strangulation medical pathway, and online training for health practitioners in recognising the signs and symptoms of non-fatal strangulation.

2)  Which groups of children and young people are likely to be affected?

Groups of children could include early years, primary or secondary education; young adults; children with additional learning needs; disabled children; children living in poverty; children from particular ethnic backgrounds; migrants; refugees; care experienced children and LGBTQ+ children

All children and young people could potentially be affected by this decision.

 

3)  What is the likely impact of the proposed decision on children and on their rights?

Identify any potential positive OR negative impacts and include indirect impacts on children and their rights as described in the UNCRC

Will different groups of children be affected differently by this decision?

This proposed Law will positively impact children and young people by highlighting the uniquely harmful effects of strangulation, which is becoming a more common sexual behaviour amongst young people.

However, the intention of the legislation is not that young people who engage in this behaviour will be criminalised, especially considering the hurdle of passing the public interest test for such a prosecution. Overall, it is considered that young people are more likely to be protected by this legislation than prosecuted under it.

4)  Is a full Children's Rights Impact Assessment required?

If you have identified impacts on children and their rights, a full CRIA should be completed. If no impacts are identified then a Full CRIA is not required, but please explain your rationale and how you reached this conclusion

Yes, because children will be affected, mostly positively, by this Law amendment.

If screening determines that a full CRIA is needed, complete Part 2

Part 2: FULL CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT

5)  What will be the impacts (positive or negative) of the proposed decision on children's rights?

For each of the UNCRC articles described below, click to identify any that may be relevant ☒

Category  UNCRC Article  Impact? YES NO

Non-discrimination (Art 2)    Best interests of the Child (Art 3) to be a top priority    

Guiding

Principles  Right to Life survival and development (Art 6)    

Respect for the child's views (Art 12)   

Right to birth registration, name and nationality (Art 7)   

Right to an identity (Art 8)    Civil Rights

& Freedoms  Freedom of expression (Art 13)     Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion (Art 14)   

 

 

Every child has the right to think and believe what they choose

 

 

Freedom of association (Art 15)

Every child has the right to meet with other children and to join groups and organisations

Right to Privacy (Art 16) including family and home life

Access to information from the media (Art 17) Right to access reliable information from a variety of sources, in a format that children can understand

Protection against torture or other cruel, degrading or inhumane treatment or punishment (Art 37(a))

Family Environment and Alternative Care

Respect for the responsibilities, rights and duties of parents (or where applicable, extended family or community) to guide their child as they grow up (Art 5)

Responsibilities of both parents in the upbringing and development of their child (Art 18)

Children must not be separated from their parents

against their will unless it is in their best interests (Art 9)

Family reunification (Art 10)

Abduction and non-return of children abroad (Art 11)

Right to a standard of living that is good enough to meet the child's physical and social needs and support their development (Art 27)

Special protection for children unable to live with their family (Art 20)

Best interests of the child in the context of Adoption (Art 21)

Review of treatment whilst in care (Art 25)

If a child has been placed away from home for the purpose of care or protection (for example, with a foster family or in hospital), they have the right to a regular review of their treatment, the way they are cared for and their wider circumstances.

Protection from violence, abuse or neglect (Art 19)

Recovery from trauma and reintegration (Art 39) Children who have experienced neglect, abuse, exploitation, torture or who are victims of war must receive special support to help them recover their health, dignity, self-respect and social life.

Basic Health and Welfare

Rights of disabled children (Art 23)

Right to health and health services (Art 24)

 

 

Right to social security (Art 26)

Right to adequate standard of living (Art 27)

Education, Leisure and Cultural Activities

Right to education (Art 28)

Goals of education (Art 29)

Education must develop every child's personality, talents and abilities to the full

Leisure, play and culture (Art 31)

Every child has the right to relax, play and take part in cultural and artistic activities

Special Protection Measures

Special protection for refugee children (Art 22)

Children and armed conflict (Art 38 and Optional Protocol #1)

Governments must do everything they can to protect and care for children affected by war and armed conflict.

Children and juvenile justice (Art 40)

Right to be treated with dignity and respect, right to legal assistance and a fair trial that takes account of age.

Inhumane treatment and detention (Art 37 (b)-(d)) Children should be arrested, detained or imprisoned only as a last resort and for the shortest time possible.

Recovery from trauma and reintegration (Art 39) Children who have experienced neglect, abuse, exploitation, torture or who are victims of war must receive special support to help them recover their health, dignity, self-respect and social life

Child labour and right to be protected from economic exploitation (Art 32)

Drug abuse (Art 33)

Sexual exploitation (Art 34)

Abduction, sale and trafficking of children (Art 35)

Protection from other forms of exploitation including for political activities, by the media or for medical research (Art 36)

Children belonging to a minority or an indigenous group (Art 30)

Optional Protocol on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography

Optional protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict

 

6)  Information and research

What evidence has been used to inform your assessment?

Evidence collected (include links to relevant publications)

What did the evidence tell you?

What are the data gaps, if any?

VAWG Taskforce Report 2023

Non-fatal strangulation as a common aspect of domestic abuse has gained attention from researchers and legislators in recent years around the English-speaking world. This is now recognised as a common coercive controlling behaviour.

The Report notes that there are between 1 to 4 cases of non-fatal strangulation per month in Jersey. This is based on data from the Forensic Medical Examiners, though overall prevalence is difficult to gauge without data from the criminal justice system.

Furthermore, 99% of respondents to the VAWG Taskforce's general public survey agreed that non-fatal strangulation without consent should be a crime.

There is a lack of data on strangulation within the criminal justice system, including SoJP, LOD, and, to a lesser extent, amongst the specialist victim support services. This should be remedied partly by the introduction of this Law, which will allow for SoJP to directly pull reporting, charging, and conviction data without having to rely on case management notes.

Some data has been gathered from Jersey Domestic Abuse Support (JDAS) and Dewberry House SARC from 2023 and 2024. This data, though not entirely reliable, indicates a rough total of 100 cases per year.

 

7)  Engagement with children

What groups of children and young people (or those who speak on their behalf, such as social workers, teachers or youth workers) have been directly or indirectly involved in developing the decision?

Groups consulted

How they were involved

What were the findings?

VAWG Taskforce, which includes:

- JDAS

- SARC

These services have been shared the legislative drafting instructions and draft law, alongside presentations to facilitate

Though a number of the services included within the VAWG Taskforce do not exclusively work with children, many are

 

- -

-

- -

-

Freeda Children's Commission Jersey Youth Service Caritas Jersey Health Safeguarding JCG, Victoria College, Le Landes, St Mary's

discussion of the Law's intention and impact.

involved in cases and have a client base which includes children.

These discussions have largely been positive in their feedback, though a number of service heads have questioned the extent of the Law's positive impact due to a lack of focus on improving the education of this topic amongst children.

 

8)  Assessing Impact on children's rights

Based on the information collected and analysed above, what likely impact will the proposed decision have on the specific children's rights identified in question 5)?

Relevant UNCRC Articles (rights) identified in Q5

Describe the positive or negative impacts on these rights

Which group(s) of children are likely to be affected?

Protection from violence, abuse or neglect (Art 19);

Protection from torture or other cruel, degrading or inhumane treatment or punishment (Art 37(a);

Right to health and health services (Art 24);

Sexual exploitation (Art 34);

The proposed Law would help to protect children from the physical and mental violence of strangulation.

This article is relevant to the proposed Law, since its enforcement would, as a matter of course in the event, involve a child's detention.

This article is relevant due to the associated health pathway being setup to support the medical evidencing of non-fatal strangulation, as well as in the lower threshold for medical attention.

The proposed Law would help in the prevention of the sexual exploitation of children, in terms of a deterrent, when

All children

 

Inhumane treatment and detention (Art 37 (b)-(d);

Right to Life survival and development (Art 6);

Freedom of expression (Art 13);

committed in the context of domestic or sexual abuse.

This article is relevant in regard to the potential negative impact, were on the rare occasion a child to be detained on account of this offence.

This article is relevant in consideration for the severe harms, psychological and long- term health risks, of strangulation.

This article is relevant in regard to the freedom of expression to commit sexual acts involving strangulation at the age of consent with a mutual partner. This is covered by the proposed Law's provisions concerning a defence of consent.

 

9)  Weighing positive and negative impacts

If a negative impact is identified for any area of rights or any group of children and young people, what options are there to modify the proposed decision to mitigate the impact?

Could any positive impacts be enhanced?  

In total, this proposed Law is considered to have a positive impact on children and young people by highlighting the uniquely harmful effects of strangulation, which is becoming a more common sexual behaviour amongst young people within recent years.

 

10) Conclusions

In summary, what are your key findings on the impact of the proposed decision on the rights of Jersey children?

Although, it is not in this Law's intention to criminalise young people who commit or engage in this behaviour, when considering passing the public interest' test for such a prosecution. Overall, it is considered that young people are more likely to be protected by this legislation than prosecuted under it or harmed by it.