Skip to main content

Amendment

Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment. (P.70/2025 Amd.(31)) – amendment. Empty Residential Properties

Published on: 1 December 2025

Lodged by: Council of Ministers

Debate date: 9 December 2025

Reference: P.70/2025 Amd.(31).Amd.(2).

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

PROPOSED BUDGET (GOVERNMENT PLAN) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): THIRTY- FIRST AMENDMENT (P.70/2025 AMD.(31)) – SECOND AMENDMENT

Lodged au Greffe on 1st December 2025 by the Council of Ministers

Earliest date for debate: 8th December 2025

STATES GREFFE

2025  P.70 Amd.(31) Amd.(2)

PROPOSED BUDGET (GOVERNMENT PLAN) 2026-2029  (P.70/2025): THIRTY-FIRST AMENDMENT (P.70/2025 AMD.(31)) SECOND AMENDMENT

____________

1  PAGE 3, PARAGRAPH (b) viii. –

Substitute the words "£250,000 of" with "within" 2  PAGE 3, PARAGRAPH b (viii) –

Substitute the words "should be reserved as a ring-fenced budget line" with ", resources should be made available"

3  PAGE 3, PARAGRAPH b (viii) –

Substitute the words ", with this funding not to be drawn from the existing Housing budget within the Cabinet Office Head of Expenditure." with "should it be required."

 COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

Note:  After this amendment, the amendment would read as follows – 1  PAGE 3, PARAGRAPH (b)(viii) –

After the words "Appendix 2 – Summary Table 5(i) and (ii) of the Report", insert the words –

", except that, in "Summary Table 5(i) – Revenue Heads of Expenditure", within the Cabinet Office Head of Expenditure for 2026 resources should be made available for the development of policy mechanisms to address empty residential properties, should it be required.

Note:  After this amendment, the proposition would read as follows –

THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion

  1. In accordance with Article 16 of the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2019 (the Law) to approve an amendment to the Government Plan 2025 – 2028 (entitled "Budget 2025 – 2028") to a reduction in the 2025 head of expenditure "Grants to States Funds" as included in Table 5(i) Revenue Heads of Expenditure of that Government Plan from £119,821,000 to £69,821,000.
  1. To receive the Government Plan 2026 – 2029 (entitled "Budget 2026-2029") specified in Article 9(1) of the Law and specifically –
  1. to approve the estimate of total States income to be paid into the Consolidated Fund in 2026 as set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 1 to the Report, which is inclusive of the proposed taxation and impôts duties changes outlined in the Government Plan, in line with Article 9(2)(a) of the Law.
  2. to refer to their Act dated 24th June 2003 in which they approved that no new user pays' charges be introduced without any such charge receiving prior in principle approval by the States Assembly and accordingly to approve the introduction of two new charges, to be levied by Health and Care Jersey to promote appropriate use of the  Emergency  Department  and  for  repeated  non-attendance  of outpatient  appointments,  detailed  in  the  section  entitled "Departmental Income Sources" as set out in the Appendix to the accompanying Report.
  3. to  approve  the  proposed  Changes  to  Approval  for financing/borrowing for 2026, as shown in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 2 to the Report, which may be obtained by the Minister for Treasury and Resources, as and when required, in line with Article 9 (2)(c) of the Law, of up to those revised approval amounts.
  4. to approve the transfers from one States fund to another for 2026 of up to and including the amounts set in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 3 in line with Article 9(2)(b) of the Law.
  5. to approve a transfer from the Consolidated Fund to the Stabilisation Fund in 2026 of up to £50 million, subject to a decision of the Minister for Treasury and Resources based on the availability of funds in the Consolidated Fund as at 31st December 2025 in excess of the estimates provided in this plan, or from budgeted underspends identified before 31st December 2026.
  6. to approve a transfer from the Consolidated Fund to the Agricultural Loans Fund in 2026 of up to £5 million, subject to a decision of the Minister for Treasury and Resources based on availability of funds in the Consolidated Fund as at 31st December 2025 in excess of estimates  provided  in  this  plan,  or  from  budgeted  underspends identified before 31st December 2026;
  7. to approve each major project that is to be started or continued in 2026 and the total cost of each such project and any amendments to the  proposed  total  cost  of  a  major  project  under  a  previously approved Government Plan, in line with Article 9(2)(d), (e) and (f) of the Law and as set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 4 to the Report.

viii.  to  approve  the  proposed  amount  to  be  appropriated  from  the Consolidated Fund for 2026, for each head of expenditure, being

gross  expenditure  less  estimated  income  (if  any),  in  line  with Articles 9(2)(g), 10(1) and 10(2) of the Law, and set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Tables 5(i) and (ii) of the Report, , except that, in "Summary Table 5(i) – Revenue Heads of Expenditure", within the Cabinet Office Head of Expenditure for 2026 resources should be made available for the development of policy mechanisms to address empty residential properties, should it be required.

  1. to approve the estimated income, being estimated gross income less expenditure, that each States trading operation will pay into its trading fund in 2026 in line with Article 9(2)(h) of the Law and set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 6 to the Report.
  2. to approve the proposed amount to be appropriated from each States trading  operation's  trading  fund  for  2026  for  each  head  of expenditure in line with Article 9(2)(i) of the Law and set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 7 to the Report.
  3. to approve the estimated income and expenditure proposals for the Climate Emergency Fund for 2026 as set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 8 to the Report.
  4. to  approve,  in  accordance  with  Article  9(1)  of  the  Law,  the Government  Plan  2026-2029,  as  set  in  the  Appendix  to  the accompanying Report.

REPORT

It's unacceptable that, in an island of our size, we have so many properties lying empty when so many Islanders want to find a home that meets their needs – and at a price they can afford. For this reason, the Minister for Housing is grateful to the Environment, Housing and Infrastructure Scrutiny Panel – and the work and emphasis of the Jersey Youth Assembly – for once again raising this issue.

Upon taking office in January 2023, one of the Minister for Housing's first actions was to investigate the progress being made in respect of empty properties. Although the previous Government had £500,000 to deal with the issue of empty homes, only a fraction was spent to fund an additional role within the housing team. The rest of the budget had fallen away as an underspend yet the cost was still being borne on an unfunded basis – and it was not apparent that a single home had been brought back into use.

It became very clear to the Minister that, whilst the former Minister had established the Empty Homes Service, it was not delivering tangible results, and was nothing short of a data collection exercise. The Minister therefore quickly determined that this service should end, and all work be paused until such a time as when work to develop meaningful policy with real impact might be done.

The Assembly are well aware of this Council of Ministers' commitment to ensure that, as a government, we work within our means. This is vital for the sustainability of public finances, reducing reliance on consultants and preventing the continued swell of the public service. For this reason, the Minister made the difficult decision not to prioritise work to address the empty homes issue in Jersey for the time being, instead focusing their resources to support more Islanders into home ownership, improve the experience of  renters,  and  address  the  plight  of  homelessness.  These  were  the  Minister's commitments upon entering office, which he has been duty-bound to uphold.

However, as we continue to make good progress in those areas [and move closer to an election], now is the time to start thinking about how housing policy resource can be best allocated to make progress on those wider issues prevalent in our housing market, such as tackling the issue of empty homes.

The  Minister  has  already  explored  promising  concepts,  such  as  the  potential introduction of a legal framework to implement Empty Dwelling Management Orders. But this type of work is not extraordinary. It is policy and legislation development, which could be delivered within existing resources.

Buying  in  consultancy,  or  re-prioritising  staff  resource  from  another  Ministerial portfolio is therefore not the answer. It will be more efficient and effective to deliver this through our established housing policy expertise, and should additional resource be deemed necessary, it can be sought when a clear plan has been developed.

Whilst well-intended, the Panel's amendment seeks to ring-fence money from within the Cabinet Office, but without any clarity as to why this level of funding would be needed, and what exactly it would be spent on. This would not only be imprudent, but potentially  disastrous  for  the  Ministerial  portfolio  which  would  then  suffer  the corresponding loss of budget], comprising their ability to deliver other high-priority work to improve the lives of Islanders.

To be clear, since the formation of this Council of Ministers, the Cabinet Office has saved almost £3.6 million in total. On a like-for-like comparison, it has reduced by 32.6 full-time equivalent staff to a new total of 173.7 FTE, a 16% reduction.

Financial and staffing implications

This amendment removes the direct and immediate financial implications of the original amendment.

Children's Rights Impact Assessment

It is considered that this amendment has no direct or indirect impact on children and that the duty to have due regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child does not arise. Accordingly, a Children's Rights Impact Assessment is not required under the Children (Conventions Rights) (Jersey) Law 2022.

Related Publications

Propositions

Amendments

Comments

CRIAs

Votes

Minutes

Hansard