Skip to main content

Public Elections (Expenditure and Donations) (Jersey) Law 2014: proposed review (P.7/2019) comments [P.7/2019Com.]

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

STATES OF JERSEY

PUBLIC ELECTIONS (EXPENDITURE AND DONATIONS) (JERSEY) LAW 2014: PROPOSED REVIEW (P.7/2019) COMMENTS

Presented to the States on 21st February 2019 by the Privileges and Procedures Committee

STATES GREFFE

2019  P.7 Com.

COMMENTS

Deputy J.M. Maçon of St. Saviour 's proposition (P.7/2019) proposes a review of the Public Elections (Expenditure and Donations) (Jersey) Law 2014 and the way it is administered.

The Committee supports this proposition and wishes Members to be aware that this work forms an integral part of its current work plan.

Shortly after it was constituted, the Privileges and Procedures Committee established a Sub-Committee  to  review  and  implement  the  recommendations  made  by  the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association's Election Observers Mission in 2018. This is the most important work that the Committee has to undertake during its tenure.

The Sub-Committee has been working through the 18 recommendations made by the Election Observers, many of which are interlinked, and this includes a broad review of the electoral system and all of the associated legislation. The work suggested by Deputy Maçon is part of this process.

RECOMMENDATION 13

Consideration should be given to provide for and undertake a systematic scrutiny of all financial declarations submitted by candidates and political parties and make public the result of such scrutiny, in order to enhance transparency of campaign finances as stated in Article 7.3 of the UN Convention against Corruption.

We accept that work needs to be undertaken with the Judicial Greffe, who are currently responsible for this aspect of the election process. The oversight is currently insufficient, and recent events have shown that there are failings with the way in which the Law has been implemented and administered to date. It should be noted that, in the United Kingdom, responsibility for assessing the validity of candidates' expenses sits with the Electoral Commission, which has the vires to take legal action against those who do not adhere to the rules.

Part  of  the  Committee's  deliberations  have  included  whether  responsibility  for administration of the Law could be removed from the Judicial Greffe and a local Electoral Commission established. The Committee expects to be bringing the first of its propositions relating to the reform of the electoral process for debate by the Assembly before the summer.

Page - 2

P.7/2019 Com.