This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.
Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.
STATES OF JERSEY
r
REG'S SKIPS LIMITED – PLANNING APPLICATIONS (R.118/2010): COMPENSATION AND FURTHER ACTION (P.130/2010) –
FIFTH AMENDMENT
Lodged au Greffe on 26th October 2010 by the Deputy of St. John
STATES GREFFE
2010 Price code: A P.130 Amd.(5)
REG'S SKIPS LIMITED – PLANNING APPLICATIONS (R.118/2010): COMPENSATION AND FURTHER ACTION (P.130/2010) –
FIFTH AMENDMENT
PAGE 2, PARAGRAPH (a) –
For the sum "£157,000.00" substitute the sum "£249,000".
DEPUTY OF ST. JOHN
Page - 3
P.130/2010 Amd.(5)
REPORT
As Mr. and Mrs. Pinel have been the victims of poor working practices by the Planning Department, this being borne out by the public apology by the Minister for Planning and Environment, I believe that we owe a duty of care to Island residents, and that no member of the public should have to go through the planning system as happened to Mr. and Mrs. Pinel of Reg's Skips Ltd.
In paragraph 17.3 of the Committee of Inquiry's Report the following is stated –
"Our conclusion from the examination of all relevant records made available to us is that RSL incurred costs of £249,000 as a direct consequence of the complaints made by Mr. and Mrs. Yates, of the subsequent "enforcement" action by the Department, of the voisinage action and the other related matters heard by the Court".
Their out-of-pocket expenses are made up as follows –
Le Gallais & Luce | £40,873.73 |
Southdowns Environmental Consultants Ltd. | £16,667.67 |
Sinels | £87,497.72 |
Appleby | £80,000.00 |
Total | £225,039.12 |
To this can be added the expenses of the legal costs expert and the contractor engaged for the manual sorting making a total, as indicated in the report, of £249,000. I believe Mr. and Mrs. Pinel should be reimbursed this total sum.
Financial and manpower implications
There are no manpower implications. The financial implications are clearly set out in the amendment.
Page - 4
P.130/2010 Amd.(5)