This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.
Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.
STATES OF JERSEY
ISLAND PLAN 2022-25: APPROVAL (P.36/2021) – EIGHTY-FIFTH AMENDMENT
(P.36/2021 AMD.(85)) – SECOND AMENDMENT
Lodged au Greffe on 14th February 2022 by the Connétable of St. Brelade
STATES GREFFE
2021 P.36 Amd.(85)Amd
ISLAND PLAN 2022-25: APPROVAL (P.36/2021) – EIGHTY-FIFTH AMENDMENT (P.36/2021 AMD.(85)) – AMENDMENT ____________
PAGE 2 –
Replace the number "58" with "136."
CONNÉTABLE OF ST. BRÉLADE
Note: After this amendment, amendment eighty-five would read as follows –
After the words "the draft Island Plan 2022-25" insert the words ", except that within Policy EV1 the following paragraph should be inserted after the sixth paragraph –
"Changes of use of visitor accommodation offering more than 136 beds will not be supported in St. Brelade 's Bay unless it is demonstrated that:
- there is no market demand for the continued use of the premises for visitor accommodation including if refurbished or redeveloped through further investment for such purpose; and
- there is no unacceptable adverse effect on the intrinsic character of St. Brelade 's Bay as a tourist destination area."
After the amendment, if amended by this amendment, the main proposition would read as follows –
THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion
to approve, in accordance with Article 3(1) of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002, as amended by the Covid-19 (Island Plan) (Jersey) Regulations 2021, the draft Island Plan 2022-25, except that within Policy EV1 the following paragraph should be inserted after the sixth paragraph –
"Changes of use of visitor accommodation offering more than 136 beds will not be supported in St. Brelade 's Bay unless it is demonstrated that:
- there is no market demand for the continued use of the premises for visitor accommodation including if refurbished or redeveloped through further investment for such purpose; and
- there is no unacceptable adverse effect on the intrinsic character of St. Brelade 's Bay as a tourist destination area."
Page - 2
P.36/2021 Amd.(85)Amd
REPORT
This amendment has been submitted pending the outcome of discussions with the Minister for Economic Development, Tourism, Sport and Culture regarding the granting of year-round work permits and licences to properties affected, with a view to making them more viable.
Financial and manpower implications
There are no financial or manpower implications in relation to the proposed amendments.
Child Rights Impact Assessment implications
These amendments have been assessed in relation to the Bridging Island Plan CRIA. Improved well-being of children will arise from improved public enjoyment of a public beach and recreation area.
Page - 3
P.36/2021 Amd.(85)Amd