Skip to main content

Annual Business Plan 2009: variation in respect of pay freeze – rescindment (P.143/2009) – comments

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN 2009: VARIATION IN RESPECT OF PAY FREEZE – RESCINDMENT (P.143/2009) – COMMENTS

Presented to the States on 20th October 2009 by the Council of Ministers

STATES GREFFE

2009   Price code: A  P.143 Com.

COMMENTS

The States Employment Board opposes part a) of this proposition because it seeks to overturn the decision of the States Assembly taken in July this year to remove the funding provision for a public sector pay award. That decision would cost £3.5 million in 2009 for the period June – December 2009.

The role of the States is to make financial provision through the annual budget for a public sector pay award. In September 2008 budgetary provision was made for a 2% increase in the annual pay bill.

In March 2009, the SEB decided to propose a pay freeze and in April 2009, took this proposal to the Council of Ministers who endorsed the decision to revisit the budget provision  for  a  2%  increase  in  the  pay bill  as  the  world  economic  position  was deteriorating and impacting on the local economy. This was a reflection of the concern about pressures on public finances.

In May 2009 the Deputy of St. John brought the pay negotiations into the States Chamber  when  he  lodged  proposition  P.68/2009  which  proposed  that  all  States employees be awarded a pay increase of £400 p.a. This, and the amendment from Deputy Southern to award all States employees £1,250 per annum pay increase, were both rejected when debated in July.

The  Treasury  and  Resources  Minister  lodged  proposition  P.78/2009  in  late  May proposing the withdrawal of the 2% previously agreed in the Annual Business Plan and Budget for 2009. When this was debated on 14th July it received overwhelming support and was adopted by 31 votes to 10. Based on the full year savings of removing the £6.2 million which was the provision in the cash limits for 2010, the Council of Ministers, when considering the many funding pressures on Departments especially Health and Social Services, has been able to meet many of the growth demands for 2010.

Nothing  has  changed  since  the  decision  on  P.78/2009  was  taken.  The  ongoing economic situation warrants tight control of public sector spending. This was the right decision three months ago and remains the right decision.

For these reasons P.143/2009 part (a) should be rejected.

Part  (b)  requests  that  the  States  Employment  Board  restore  the  process  of  free collective bargaining for public sector pay groups and to re-open pay negotiations with the relevant public sector employee representatives with immediate effect.

The States Employment Board maintains that it has not withdrawn from this process and at the latest meeting on October 9th 2009, when the States Employment Board met the Employee representative groups the Chief Minister encouraged the employee groups to continue negotiations and include the 2010 pay round and suggested that any agreement could be effective from as early as 1st January 2010, subject to overall 2010 cash limits.

Page - 2

P.143/2009 Com.