Skip to main content

Machinery of Government: establishment of Ministerial Boards and revised system of Scrutiny (P.120/2010) – third amendment – comments.

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

STATES OF JERSEY

MACHINERY OF GOVERNMENT: ESTABLISHMENT OF MINISTERIAL BOARDS AND REVISED SYSTEM OF SCRUTINY (P.120/2010) – THIRD AMENDMENT (P.120/2010 Amd.(3)) – COMMENTS

Presented to the States on 11th October 2010 by the Privileges and Procedures Committee

STATES GREFFE

2010   Price code: A  P.120 Amd.(3)Com.

COMMENTS

Subject to the adoption of the amendment of the Deputy of St. Peter to P.120/2010, the Privileges and Procedures Committee (PPC) opposes paragraph 1 of the amendment of the Deputy of St. John .

The  financial  and  manpower  implications  detailed  within  Senator  A.  Breckon's proposition:  Machinery  of  Government:  establishment  of  Ministerial  Boards  and revised system of Scrutiny, suggest that 5 posts could be redeployed from the current Scrutiny team to provide support for the proposed Ministerial Boards.

The Deputy of St. Peter 's amendment to the proposition suggests that these 5 posts should be retained within the States Greffe to service the Boards (P.120/2010 Amd.(2) refers). PPC supports this amendment over and above the amendment of the Deputy of St. John ,  which  puts  forward  an  alternative  proposal  that  the  posts  should  be transferred  out  of  the  Scrutiny  section  to  provide  research  assistance  for  States members.

If the Deputy of St. Peter 's amendment and the Deputy of St. John 's amendment are both adopted, additional resources will be required to fill the new research assistant' posts. If the amendment of the Deputy of St. John is adopted in isolation, there will still be resource implications associated with the creation of the new role of research assistant'. Although PPC agrees that some form of research facility could be beneficial for private members, it is difficult to justify the creation of an entirely new service for States members at a time when spending cuts are being made across a whole range of public services.

PPC has no comment to make in respect of paragraph 2 of the Deputy of St. John 's amendment,  which  proposes  that  Scrutiny  Panels  should  be  renamed  "Select Committees".

Page - 2

P.120/2010 Amd.(3)Com.