Skip to main content

Cannabis: possession of cannabis for treatment purposes – petition (P.128/2014) – comments.

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

CANNABIS: POSSESSION OF CANNABIS FOR TREATMENT PURPOSES – PETITION (P.128/2014) – COMMENTS

Presented to the States on 8th December 2014 by the Minister for Health and Social Services

STATES GREFFE

2014   Price code: A  P.128 Com.(2)

COMMENTS

The supply and use of cannabis for the treatment of certain conditions has been a controversial and sensitive issue for some considerable time, both in Jersey and the UK, as well as further afield.

Nevertheless, this petition is not about the rights and wrongs of cannabis use or whether it should be legalised in Jersey. That is a different debate.

This petition specifically relates to the issuing of a special licence to an individual allowing  for  the  possession  and  use  of  cannabis,  in  its  raw  form,  for  medicinal purposes.

Background

Discretionary powers vested in the Minister for Health and Social Services grant the authority to issue a licence for the possession of cannabis for "research or other special purposes".

Jersey legislation is identical to that of UK legislation in this matter. While there is no legal  definition  of  "special  purpose",  the  long  standing  interpretation  of  "special purpose" in the UK has been confined to industrial hemp production.

It is unlikely that "special purpose" was ever intended to cover medicinal use, as any substance which is acknowledged as having recognised medicinal benefit would be classified differently under misuse of drugs legislation. As such, any requirement for such a licence would be negated.

The broader and more fundamental question, therefore, is whether or not cannabis, should be classified in the same way as, for example morphine, to allow for medicinal use.

However, the classification of cannabis for medicinal use is not the issue in question in this proposition, nor the appropriate subject of this debate.

Issues

The petitioner is a named person, supported by a States Member, who is seeking the granting of an individual licence for possession of raw cannabis, a drug that is illegal, unlicensed, uncontrolled and unsupervised through any clinical oversight.

Even were it not an illegal drug the decision on its appropriateness for prescription for an individual would have to rest with professional medical experts, and not politicians. It also requires the approval of the Misuse of Drugs Council (MDAC) and it would not be appropriate for the Minister to take any decision on the licensing of any drug, without the advice of this Panel of professional experts.

While the Law allows for the Minister for Health and Social Services to issue a licence for research and special purposes' it does not provide for the Minister to step into the shoes of a doctor and, in effect, take clinical decisions in respect of an individual case.

Unless  guidance  from  the  Misuse  of  Drugs  Advisory  Council should  move  to a considerably different position than that which currently exists, no licence application

Page - 2

P.128/2014 Com.(2)

for the importation, possession and/or use of cannabis in its raw form would be considered, even in circumstances where "special purpose" was to subsequently be defined in a way that would allow the Minister for Health and Social Services to do so.

Summary

Cannabis is an illegal drug and, without the ability to effective control its use, quality, composition  of  the  product,  safety,  purity  or  dosage,  the  importation and  use  of cannabis, in its raw form, could never be endorsed.

Certainly, without considerable change to current professional guidance on the use and legality of cannabis from the Misuse of Drugs Advisory Council, it would be wholly irresponsible to take a decision on the issuing of any licences for the importation, possession and/or use of an illegal substance.

I  cannot  support  a  proposition  that  proposes  the  granting  of  permission  to  an individual for the possession, use or supply of illegal cannabis in its raw form, and I would urge members to vote firmly against this proposition.

Page - 3

P.128/2014 Com.(2)