Skip to main content

Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twentieth amendment. (P.51/2024 Amd.(20)) – comments. Jersey Business and Digital Jersey Savings

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

PROPOSED BUDGET (GOVERNMENT PLAN) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): TWENTIETH AMENDMENT (P.51/2024 AMD.(20)) – COMMENTS

Presented to the States on 22nd November 2024 by the Council of Ministers

STATES GREFFE

2024  P.51 Amd.(20) Com.

COMMENTS

This amendment proposes to reduce savings targets without identifying alternative savings proposals, instead seeking to fund a reduction in savings from the contingency budget held in the Central Reserve. This goes directly against advice from the Fiscal Policy Panel.

The Budget included savings to allow funding to be prioritised to the delivery of the Common Strategic Policy agreed by the Assembly, without resorting to unsustainable increases in public sector spending. These savings and efficiencies are also vital for the wider economy to ensure that the private sector can be optimised with less crowding out from the public sector.

Arm's  Length Organisations  provide  an important role in supporting the Island's business community and operate in close cooperation with the rest of Government.

The savings allocated to ALOs recognise that the need for efficiency is not only a matter for direct government spend but extends to the taxpayers' money entrusted to our partner organisations. Delivery of these savings on a recurring basis is vital to ensure we balance the books and to ensure that taxpayers receive value for money services.

This amendment proposes removing part of these savings, with the funding being taken from the Central Reserve. Such a reduction in the budgeted provision held in the Central Reserve of £286k will reduce Government's ability to respond to unforeseen events, not only in 2025, but in each of the future years of the plan. This places further pressure on public finances and does not represent a prudent stance to financial management.

The General Reserve held within the Central Reserve head of expenditure (table 16, page 49), includes only £5 million to cover unforeseen expenditure in year (in addition £2m is ringfenced for benefits funding). In previous years Government has relied on this allocation for contingency funding being supplemented by significant sums carried forward from unspent budgets. Due to overspends in Health budgets and other pressures this  is  unlikely to  be  possible  for  2025.  Removing  budget  allocations  from  this contingency reserve is therefore likely to hamper the Government's ability to respond to financial pressures in year.

Accordingly, the Council of Ministers urge Members to reject this Amendment.

Page - 2

P.51/2024 Amd.(20) Com.