This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.
Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.
STATES OF JERSEY
REMOTE PARTICIPATION WITHIN THE STATES ASSEMBLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELECTION OF A CHIEF MINISTER OR MINISTER (P.3/2024): CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Presented to the States on 12th January 2024 by Deputy M.R. Scott of St. Brelade
STATES GREFFE
2024 P.3 Add.
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT (CRIA)
Name and title of Duty Bearer: | Deputy Moz Scott |
Type of Duty Bearer: (Minister, Elected Member or States Assembly Body) | Elected Member |
Assessment completed by (if not completed by duty bearer): |
|
Date: | 12/01/2024 |
1) Name and brief description of the proposed decision | |
The subject of your CRIA may be a proposed law, policy or proposition and in | |
accordance with the Law is referred to in this template as the decision' | |
What is the problem or issue the decision is trying to address? | |
Do children experience this problem differently from adults? | |
"Remote participation within the States Assembly for the purpose of election of a Chief Minister or Minister" aims to allow any States Member who is away during the debate for the meetings to select a new Chief Minister, in the event the Vote of No Confidence (P.1/2024) is successful, be allowed to join the sitting remotely. | |
2) Which groups of children and young people are likely to be affected? | |
Groups of children could include early years, primary or secondary education; | |
young adults; children with additional learning needs; disabled children; children | |
living in poverty; children from particular ethnic backgrounds; migrants; refugees; | |
care experienced children and LGBTQ+ children | |
At the time of lodging the Proposition, no travel arrangements involving or affecting children and young people likely to be the cancellation of such arrangements had been identified. | |
3) What is the likely impact of the proposed decision on children and on their rights? | |
Identify any potential positive OR negative impacts and include indirect | |
impacts on children and their rights as described in the UNCRC | |
Will different groups of children be affected differently by this decision? | |
If a travel arrangement involving children and young people would be affected by the proposition not being supported, this may have a negative impact depending on the nature of the arrangement. | |
4) Is a full Child Rights Impact Assessment required? | |
If you have identified impacts on children and their rights, a full CRIA should be | |
completed. If no impacts are identified then a Full CRIA is not required, but | |
please explain your rationale and how you reached this conclusion | |
No impact has been identified. If the outcome of the vote of the Proposition is likely to affect any child, this might reasonably be expected to be raised by a States Member with knowledge of the particular circumstance at the time of debate. |
If screening determines that a full CRIA is needed, complete Part 2 Page - 2
P.3/2024 Add.