Skip to main content

2014-04-28 PPC Minutes (A)

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

AG/JAC/115   270

PRIVILEGES AND PROCEDURES COMMITTEE (31st Meeting)

28th April 2014

PART A

All  members  were  present,  with  the  exception  of  Senator  B.I.  Le  Marquand, Connétable   L.  Norman  of  St.  Clement  and   Deputy  M.   Tadier ,  from  whom apologies had been received.

Deputy J.M. Maçon, Chairman Senator S.C. Ferguson

Deputy J.A. Martin

Deputy J.H. Young

In attendance -

M.N. de la Haye, Greffier of the States

L.M. Hart , Assistant Greffier of the States

A.C. Goodyear, Clerk to the Privileges and Procedures Committee

Note:  The Minutes of this meeting comprise Part A only.

Draft States of  A1.  The Committee, with reference to its Minute No. A2 of 27th April 2014, Jersey  received a further draft comment in respect of the amendment of Senator P.F.C. (Amendment   Ozouf to the proposition "Draft States of Jersey (Amendment No. 8) Law 201-" No. 8) Law  (P.33/2014 Eighth Amendment refers).

201-

(P.33/2014):  The amendment of Senator Ozouf to P.33/2014 proposed the repeal of Article 44 Eighth  of the States of Jersey Law, which related to the remuneration of elected members. Amendment.  The purpose of the amendment was to remove the current inhibition in the Law on 450(16)  a pay structure for elected members that would allow for differential pay. The

Committee recalled that it had presented a comment to the States in connexion with the proposition on 28th April 2014 which had included as an Appendix correspondence dated 24th April 2014 from the States Members' Remuneration Review Body. The Committee agreed that it would wish to present a  further comment to the States concerning the content of the amendment.

The Committee discussed a series of options for the provision of a differential pay structure and identified a number of difficulties that arose whether the structure was based upon hours worked, or roles undertaken, by elected members. The Committee did not consider that different roles within the States automatically required  different  levels  of  time  commitment  from  members.  In  addition,  the Committee was not able to support Senator Ozouf 's view that the repeal of Article 44 "would allow a more diverse group of candidates to stand for elected office" and "would achieve a better accountability for the different roles the public need the States members to have".

The Committee, having considered the draft comment, agreed certain amendments, and  requested  that  the  Greffier  of  the  States  arrange  for  the  comment  to  be presented to the States at the earliest opportunity.