Skip to main content

Le Marais, St. Clement - redevelopment of low rise Phase I

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

r

LE MARAIS, ST.  CLEMENT: REDEVELOPMENT OF LOW RISE PHASE  I

Lodged au Greffe on 31st August 2004 by the Housing Committee

STATES GREFFE

PROPOSITION

THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion

(a ) to approve drawing Nos. 4027/19J, 22, 28D, 29C, 30A, 31A, 32A, 33A, 34B, 40A, 41A, 42, 43,

44A, 45A, 46, 47, 50A 51A, 80 and D/01 Rev P2 showing the construction of 14  one-bedroom flats and 23  three-bedroom houses and associated external works with onsite car parking as Phase  1 of the redevelopment of Le Marais Low Rise;

(b ) to authorise the Greffier to sign the said drawings on behalf of the States.

HOUSING COMMITTEE

Notes: 1. T h e Environment and Public Services Committee granted planning permission on 15th April 2004

under Planning Permit P/2003/2660 and development permission on 7th June 2004 under Building Permit B/2004/0302.

2 .  T h e comments of the Finance and Economics Committee are to follow.

REPORT

The States will recall that proposals for the redevelopment of Le Squez and Le Marais, St. Clement were approved by the Assembly on 9th March 2004 (P.19/2004).

The first phase, of what will be a three-phased redevelopment of the low-rise blocks of flats at Le Marais, is for the construction of 14 one-bedroom flats and 23 three-bedroom houses with associated external works, onsite parking and J.E.C. sub-station.

The first 3 blocks of low-rise flats will be demolished, the tenants having been re-housed in alternative social rented accommodation. Construction work should commence later this year.

The financial implications of the redevelopment project were outlined in full within P.19/2004 and there are no additional manpower implications for the States.