Tevielka, La Rue de la Haye du Puits, Grouville - deed of arrangement

STATES OF JERSEY

r

TEVIELKA, LA RUE DE LA HAYE DU PUITS, GROUVILLE: DEED OF ARRANGEMENT

Lodged au Greffe on 12th May 2006

by the Minister for Treasury and Resources

STATES GREFFE

PROPOSITION

THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion

(a ) to agree that a deed of arrangement should be passed between the public, as the owner of Tevielka,

La Rue de la Haye du Puits, Grouville and Tiptree House ( Grouville ) Limited, as the owner of Tiptree House, La Rue à Don, Grouville , to agree the boundary between the two properties, with each party to bear their respective costs in connection with passing the contract before the Royal Court, the two properties being shown for information on drawing No. 1413/06/100; and

(b ) to authorise the Attorney General and the Greffier of the States to pass on behalf of the Public the

necessary contracts.

MINISTER FOR TREASURY AND RESOURCES

REPORT

When Tevielka was purchased by the Public from the Jersey Hospice Care (Incorporated) on 28th June 1996, it was not possible to confirm a section of the north boundary with the neighbouring property Tiptree House.

Following the acquisition of Tevielka, attempts have been made to agree a mutually acceptable boundary line with Tiptree House ( Grouville ) Limited, though it has taken until now for that agreement to be reached.

It is proposed that the existing timber fence which separates the two properties will form the boundary line, with the fence itself being in Public ownership. The short section of the existing gable at Tevielka which faces onto Tiptree House will be confirmed as being in the ownership of the Public, with the external face of the wall being the boundary line. The overhanging eaves will be permitted to remain as presently established, as will any buried foundations. Tiptree House ( Grouville ) Limited will grant the Public access rights onto its land for the purpose of maintaining the above-mentioned fence and gable.

Each party will meet their own legal fees in connection with drafting, agreeing and passing a deed of arrangement before the Royal Court to ratify the above-mentioned terms.

There are no additional financial implications for the States other than meeting its own costs in connection with the transaction, and there are no manpower implications.