Skip to main content

Historical Child Abuse: request to Council of Ministers (P.19/2011) – comments.

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

STATES OF JERSEY

HISTORICAL CHILD ABUSE: REQUEST TO COUNCIL OF MINISTERS (P.19/2011) – COMMENTS

Presented to the States on 1st March 2011 by the Minister for Treasury and Resources

STATES GREFFE

2011   Price code: A  P.19 Com.(3)

COMMENTS

Senator Le Gresley is correct to state in his report and proposition that there are no financial implications as a direct result of it. However, should the proposition be carried, the  requirement for the  Council  of  Ministers to reconsider their  decision would seem to imply an expectation that a Committee of Inquiry be pursued. The financial consequences of such a route are considerable – estimated at anywhere from £3 million  to  £10 million  by  the  Council  of  Ministers.  The  comments  provided separately by the Council of Ministers clearly indicate that any benefits to be derived from a Committee of Inquiry may not justify the financial costs involved – although it is important to stress that the Council of Ministers' decision was not taken on this basis.

The answer to the Senator's recent Written Question 6031 clearly indicates that the Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund is not considered by the Attorney General likely to be suitable as a source of funding for any potential Committee of Inquiry.

Page - 2

P.19/2011 Com.(3)