Skip to main content

Suspension of drive to Net Zero

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

SUSPENSION OF DRIVE TO NET ZERO'

Lodged au Greffe on 10th March 2022 by Senator S.C. Ferguson

Earliest date for debate: 25th April 2022

STATES GREFFE

2022  P.70

PROPOSITION

THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion

to refer to their Act dated 26th February 2020, in which they adopted the defining principles  for  the  Carbon  Neutral  Strategy,  and,  in  view  of  the  uncertainty surrounding fuel costs following the United Kingdom's decision to stop buying Russian oil and gas and the impact of any subsequent rise in costs of these supplies and the effects on lower-income families, middle earners and local businesses, to request the Government of Jersey to suspend the drive to Net Zero' until the war in Ukraine and the uncertainty are resolved.

SENATOR S.C. FERGUSON

Page - 2

P.70/2022

REPORT

At the moment the United Kingdom obtains 3% of its gas supplies and under 5% of its oil supplies from Russia. However, Europe is much more heavily dependent on Russia for both oil and gas supplies. As a result, the changes in the supply chain through the embargo on Russian Oil and Gas, even if made gradually, will affect the world prices and will mean increases in oil and gas prices.

We already have lower income families and pensioners who are starting to feel the pinch and some who are already in fuel poverty.

The increase in costs will also detrimentally affect local businesses, especially the 70% of companies which are small businesses.

Both these families and businesses will find it difficult to afford electric vehicles whilst the provision of additional charging outlets will be expensive. It will also be a factor in increasing electricity prices.

Given that increasing taxes will also be extremely difficult in the general economic climate, the Net Zero' Policies should be restrained until the international situation is resolved.

However, this does not mean that such environmental projects as marine exclusion zones and the planting of sea grass and eel grass in those zones should be neglected since these should not be an enormous expense for a maximal reward.

Scrutiny has spoken of £250 million being required to achieve carbon neutrality. The estimates from the U.K. talk of costs of £100,000 per household for insulation and electrical systems, but this varies depending on the effectiveness of the insulation. What is becoming obvious is that there has been insufficient accurate costing of the effects of Net Zero' on the general public. According to Swiss Re the effect on the U.K. will represent around 10% of GDP – or around £450 million. If this is extrapolated to Jersey, this is a significant burden for an Island already facing the prospect of a debt burden of £1.5 billion and a very narrow tax base.

Pausing the effects of the Net Zero' programme, whilst the situation in Ukraine is dealt with, would not only provide support for lower income households but would also give an opportunity to make more accurate calculations of the costs of the policy.

Financial and manpower implications

There are no manpower or cost implications of this proposition.

Page - 3

P.70/2022