Skip to main content

Social Security Medical Appeal Tribunal: Re-Appointment of member.

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

STATES OF JERSEY

SOCIAL SECURITY MEDICAL APPEAL TRIBUNAL: RE-APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER

Lodged au Greffe on 15th August 2023 by the Minister for Social Security

Earliest date for debate: 12th September 2023

STATES GREFFE

2023  P.61

PROPOSITION

THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion

in accordance with Article 33A of the Social Security (Jersey) Law 1974 and further to a process overseen by the Jersey Appointments Commission, to appoint Dr Benjamin Griffiths as a panel member of the Social Security Tribunal, for a period of 4 years

MINISTER FOR SOCIAL SECURITY

REPORT

  1. Background

Article 6 of the Social Security (Determination of Disablement Questions) (Jersey) Order 1974 provides  for the constitution of the  Social Security Medical Appeals Tribunal (“SSMAT”).

The SSMAT hears appeals regarding the award of Long-Term Incapacity Allowance following assessments regarding loss of faculty made by a Medical Board. The Tribunal will review all facts placed before it by the Appellant and the Minister for Social Security and may confirm, reverse or vary the decision made by the Medical Board.

The constitution of the SSMAT comprises a Chairman (or Deputy Chairman) holding a qualification in law, and 2 Medical Practitioners (selected from a panel of up to 8 members).

The  Medical  Practitioners  to  the  SSMAT  must  be  currently  licensed  to  practice medicine with the UK’s General Medical Council. The assessment of award for Long Term Incapacity Allowance is based on the determination of a loss of faculty, the degree of loss of faculty and the period of the award.

Because of the medical nature of the test, it requires the knowledge and experience of a medical practitioner. In the Tribunal, the medical practitioner is there to interpret and understand specific clinical information and its relevance in the determination.

This  report  recommends  the  re-appointment  of  a  medical  practitioner,  who  has completed their initial 5 year term.

  1. Tribunals

The Minister is responsible for the constitution of 3 different Tribunal Panels, the Social Security Medical Appeal Tribunal, the Social Security Tribunal (“SST”) and the Income Support Medical Appeal Tribunal (“ISMAT”). Where appropriate, Panel members are appointed to other Tribunals, ensuring a stronger pool available for each Tribunal.

  1. Terms of appointment

The Social Security (Determination of Disablement Questions) (Jersey) Order 1974 provides  that  members  of  the  Tribunal  are  appointed  by  the  States  on  the recommendation of the Minister, after consultation with the Jersey Appointments Commission.

The Minister therefore recommends this re-appointment. The proposed candidate has completed their initial term of office, which was for 5 years, and is now eligible for reappointment for a further 4 years, to comply with the Appointment Commission’s guidance of a maximum of nine years served. The Minister is confident that the individual proposed has the skills necessary to uphold the fairness and integrity of the tribunal system.

  1. Member proposed for appointment

Medical Practitioner to the Social Security Medical Appeal Tribunal:

Page - 3

P.61/2023

Dr. Benjamin John Griffiths was born and schooled in Jersey. He worked for the Chief Minister’s Department from 2006 to 2008 and qualified in Medicine in London in 2012. Dr. Griffiths covers anaesthetics, peri-operative medicine and intensive care medicine.

He has, separately, been appointed as a Medical Member of the First Tier Tribunal of England and Wales. Dr. Griffiths has been a member of the Social Security Medical Appeal Tribunal since 10th April 2018.

Financial and staffing implications

There are no financial or staffing implications for the States arising from the adoption of this Proposition.