Draft Assisted Dying (Jersey) Law 202- (P.65/2025): addendum
This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.
STATES OF JERSEY
DRAFT ASSISTED DYING (JERSEY) LAW 202- (P.65/2025): ADDENDUM
Presented to the States on 27th October 2025 by the Minister for Health and Social Services
STATES GREFFE
2025 P.65 Add.(2)
COMMENTS
Response to Scrutiny Assisted Dying Review Panel Recommendations Background and contents of report
- The Scrutiny Assisted Dying Review Panel established to examine proposals for assisted dying, as set out in P.18/2024, made several recommendations in their review report published in May 2024.1 These recommendations included placing a requirement of the Minister to publish additional information about the planned implementation of an assisted dying service, and to do so no later than 2 months before the draft law is scheduled for debate.
- This addendum provides the information requested in the Scrutiny recommendations, as well as an update to the list of risks presented in P.18/2024
Scrutiny recommendation number and theme | Page reference in this report | |
| Section 1: End of life care | Page 4 |
|
| |
1* | The Minister for Health and Social Services should publish a plan to evidence the quality and availability of palliative and end of life care in Jersey. | |
2 | The Minister for Health and Social Services should confirm the timeline for the development of a Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy beyond 2026. | |
| Section 2: Training & guidance | Page 24 |
|
| |
2* | Minister for Health and Social Services should publish an appendix to the final proposals for assisted dying, setting out the training requirements, that comprehensively cover the identification and prevention of coercion. | |
6 | The Minister for Health and Social Services should publish the full details and processes for establishing refusal or resistance to an assisted death for a person who has lost decision-making capacity. | |
10 | The Minister should publish details and plans about assisted dying training and guidance that include: A detailed summary outlining all items of assisted dying guidance to be developed and produced. The items of guidance to be prioritised, shared and presented to States Members. Details and plans about the development of the assisted dying training programme | |
1 States Assembly | Report - Review of Assisted Dying - 14 May 2024
| Section 3: Location of assisted deaths | Page 44 |
|
| |
7 | The Minister for Health and Social Services must provide details about the timeline and stakeholders involved in discussions regarding appropriate places within the Jersey General Hospital for assisted dying. | |
8 | The Panel is keen to ensure that assisted dying is only carried out within the Jersey General Hospital as a last resort, and the Minister for Health and Social Services must ensure that the Jersey Assisted Dying Service is not headquartered within the Jersey General Hospital. | |
9 | The Minister for Health and Social Services must ensure robust planning is in place to mitigate the potential impact of assisted dying on any other residents or patients of Government of Jersey owned and / or managed care and nursing facilities. | |
| Section 4: Staff & recruitment | Page 48 |
|
| |
11 | The Minister for Health and Social Services should provide details about how general recruitment and staffing challenges across the Health and Community Services Department will be addressed in relation to the additional resource implications associated with the Assisted Dying Service. | |
12 | The Minister for Health and Social Services should provide details and plans to mitigate and respond to the risk of Health and Community Services not being able to recruit sufficient staff to the Assisted Dying Service. | |
| Section 5: Risks | Page 51 |
|
| |
|
| |
- | Assisted dying risk assessment - the list of risks from P18/2024 have been updated, with risk rating provided for updated risks | |
* indicates a key recommendation of the Scrutiny Panel
Section 1: End of Life Care
- This section of the report provides a response to key recommendation 1 and recommendation 2.
1* | End of life care | The Minister for Health and Social Services should publish a plan to evidence the quality and availability of palliative and end of life care in Jersey. |
2 | End of life care | The Minister for Health and Social Services should confirm the timeline for the development of a Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy beyond 2026. |
Report on the quality and availability of palliative and end of life care in Jersey Contents:
• Executive summary
• Part 1: Background
• Part 2: Strategy delivery / activity
• Part 3: Evidence of quality of services in Jersey
• Part 4: Evidence of availability of services in Jersey
• Part 5: Delivery against Strategy success criteria
• Part 6: Conclusion
• Part 7: Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy post 2026
• Appendix 1: Impact Report for the Palliative and End of life Care Strategy for Adults in Jersey 2023-2026, Jersey Hospice Care, April 2025.
• Appendix 2: Assessment of Jersey palliative and end of life care services against NHS service specification and NICE guidance
Executive summary
4. This report is published in accordance with recommendations2 from the Scrutiny Review Panel established to examine proposals for assisted dying in Jersey. The purpose of the report is to:
• evidence the quality and availability of palliative and end of life care in Jersey
• confirm timelines for the development of Jersey's Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy beyond 2026.
5. Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people who have a life- threatening illness, and their families. It focuses on treating pain and easing suffering (physical, emotional and spiritual). End of life care is palliative care that is provided to people who have a 12-month life expectancy.
Quality and availability of palliative and end of life care in Jersey
6. Jersey's End of Life Partnership ("EOL Partnership") was established in 2021 to develop and oversee delivery of the Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy 2023 – 2026 [3]published in 2023 ("the Strategy").
7. The EOL Partnership has undertaken significant work to improve the quality and availability of palliative and end of life care services, in accordance with the Strategy's aim and objectives.
8. In 2023/4 the EOL Partnership undertook an assessment of service availability / capacity based on population size and benchmarking data from the UK. The assessment identified that Jersey had sufficient specialist hospice beds but had gaps in community provision. These gaps have now been largely addressed via the Strategy delivery.
9. A service assessment was undertaken in July 2025. That assessment provides evidence:
a. of improvements to the quality and availability of services which have already been achieved since the launch of the strategy (with work ongoing to drive further improvements); and
b. that services provided in Jersey are in largely in line with UK best practice evidence.
10. Key improvements to date include:
• Bridging the gap between generalist and specialist palliative and end of life care and introducing a new nursing team (the Living Well Team') to focus on those in the last year of life
• Increasing access to specialist advice and support to 24/7
• Launch of an island-wide education programme
• Improving access to LTC funding for those at the end of life
11. Evidence that services align with UK best practice:
• Current services meet the criteria set out in the NHS service specification for palliative and end of life care
• Current services are compliant with NICE guidance
• Services which are registered with the Jersey Care Commission (JCC) are compliant with JCC standards
12. Delivery of these improvements has been enabled, in part, by the £3m additional annual investment into palliative and end of life care provided through the 2023 Government Plan:
£'000 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 |
End of Life Care | £2,029 | £2,851 | £3,014 | £3,076 | £3,076 |
Timelines for the development of Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy beyond 2026
- An updated strategy, for the period 2027 to 2031, with updated recommendations and an updated action plan will be published at the end of 2026.
- The updated strategy will be informed by a review of palliative care provision, to be undertaken in Q2 2026. The Q2 2026 review will provide further insight into the progress made since 2023. This is in addition to the quarterly strategy implementation reviews.4 As with all change processes, it takes time for new services and ways of working to be fully established, so the impact of the changes can be fully assessed.
4 Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy for Adults in Jersey 2023-26 Action Plan update.pdf Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy for Adults in Jersey 2023-26 Action Plan progress report.pdf
FULL REPORT
Part 1: Background Background to this report
- The Assisted Dying Review Panel was established to review proposals related to assisted dying in Jersey as set out in P18/2024. The Panel's review report included the following recommendations:[4]
- "the Minister for Health and Social Services should publish a plan (report) to evidence the quality and availability of palliative and end of life care in Jersey, by no later than two months before the assisted dying legislation is scheduled for debate by the States Assembly." (Recommendation 1)
- "the Minister for Health and Social Services should confirm the timeline for the development of a Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy beyond 2026, by no later than two months before the assisted dying legislation is scheduled for debate by the States Assembly." (Recommendation 2).
16. The purpose of this report, in line with Scrutiny recommendations, is to:
• evidence the quality and availability of palliative and end of life care in Jersey
• confirm timelines for the development of Jersey's Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy ("the Strategy") beyond 2026.
17. The report provides an update on work done to date to implement the Strategy and provides evidence related to the quality and availability of palliative care and end of life care services in Jersey. It also highlights some areas of work that are still in train (as anticipated given the Strategy end date of December 2026).
18. The Panel's recommendations mirror a commitment of the previous Minister for Health and Social Services [5] to "support the development of end-of-life and palliative care services to ensure that no person chooses an assisted death on the basis that they cannot access – or believe they cannot access – high quality end-of-life or palliative care services."
19. Furthermore, the Panel's recommendations also mirror the previous assisted dying propositions which state that, at the point at which the draft assisted dying law is presented to the Assembly, Members will be asked to agree, that:
"legislation permitting assisted dying should not be brought into force until the Assembly is satisfied that decision taken in the 2023 Government Plan to provide for additional investment in end of life and palliative care is supporting improvements in quality and availability of those services".
- Assuming the draft law is adopted in December 2025, Assembly Members will not take the decision to bring the adopted law into full force until after the anticipated 18-month implementation period (i.e. c. July 2027). As such, they are not required to be satisfied as to improvement in palliative care until that
point, however, the information set out in this report will provide the Assembly assurance as to the progress currently in train.
- Note: Article 94 of the draft law provides a power for the Assembly, by Regulations, to place a statutory duty on the Minister for Health and Social Services to provide end of life care.
Background to the Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy
- The Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy for Adults in Jersey was published on 14 November 2023. It was developed by the Jersey End of Life Care Partnership Group ("EOL Partnership"). The Strategy was informed by the voices of patients, families and carers7.
- The overarching aim of the strategy is to enhance the quality of palliative and end of life care services in Jersey, regardless of the person's underlying illness or care setting.
- A particular focus of the EOL Partnership was, over the 4-year course of the strategy, to deliver the changes necessary to enable more people to die in their preferred place. In 2021 a significant number of people who were receiving care from Jersey's Specialist Palliative Care Team were not able to die in their preferred place:
| Preferred place of death | Actual place of death |
Hospital | 9% | 35% |
Hospice | 27% | 25% |
Private home | 39% | 20% |
Nursing / residential home | 25% | 20% |
- The Strategy identified six outcomes, and the key actions required to help achieve those outcomes.
Strategy Outcomes |
Outcome 1 - People in Jersey who need palliative and / or end of life care will be seen and treated as individuals who are encouraged to make and share advance care plans and to be involved in decision regarding their care |
Outcome 2 – People in Jersey who need palliative and / or end of life care will have their needs and conditions recognised quickly and be given fair access to services regardless of their background and characteristics |
Outcome 3 – People in Jersey who need palliative and / or end of life care will be supported to live well as long as possible taking account of their expressed wishes and maximising their comfort and wellbeing |
Outcome 4 – People in Jersey who need palliative and / or end of life care will receive care that is well coordinated |
7 EOL Partnership members include Health and Care Jersey, Jersey Hospice Care, Family Nursing and Home Care, Jersey Doctors on Call, Primary Care board, Jersey Care Federation, LV Care Group, Macmillan Jersey, Maillard's Funeral Directors, Picher and Le Quesne, patient representatives and Education, Social Security and Housing.
Outcome 5 - People in Jersey who need palliative and/or end of life care will have their care provided by people who are well trained to do so and are receiving ongoing training to maintain their skills and competencies |
Outcome 6 - People in Jersey who need palliative and/or end of life care will be part of communities that talk about death and dying and that are ready, willing and able to provide the support needed |
- The Strategy also set out key metrics for success to support evidence of improvements (see Section 5 below).
- Delivery of these improvements has been enabled, in part, by the £3m additional annual investment into palliative and end of life care provided through the 2023 Government Plan:
£'000 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 |
End of Life Care | £2,029 | £2,851 | £3,014 | £3,076 | £3,076 |
Part 2: Strategy delivery / activity
- As set out above, the Strategy identified the key actions required to ensure delivery of the six strategy outcomes. Those key actions were clustered into a series of delivery projects, the details of which are set out in the table below.
- Overall good progress is being made in delivery of the Strategy outcomes, and in accordance with the timeframe set out in that Strategy, and as evidenced in:
- Note: a number of areas of activity are still in development as anticipated given the Strategy end date of December 2026.
Project |
Bridge gap between palliative diagnosis and last days of life by ensuring that all |
patients receive support from a dedicated practitioner / case coordinator whose role |
is to: |
deliver holistic, personalised palliative care and support throughout the final |
year of life, and |
support professionals in the generalist field (e.g. GPs) by sharing and |
reviewing care plans, supporting identification of end of life and joint |
working. |
|
Ensure support available 24/7 |
|
Link to Strategy Outcome 1 action plan: - Continue the development of Gold Standards Framework across health care professionals in the community and hospital Outcome 2 action plan: - Design and build a robust 24/7 model of palliative care that is accessible to, and meets the needs of, patients and families at a generalist and specialist level (see Figure 1 of the Strategy for definition of generalist and specialist) Outcome 3 action plan: - Develop standard operating procedures across all partnership providers - Improve and build on these community services (see page 33 of the Strategy) and initiatives as we face an ageing demographic and therefore an increased need for these services - Differentiate between specialist / generalist provision to ensure the most cost- effective model is designed with patient preferences built in - Ensure hospital referrals to community services are completed in a timely manner - Develop a transfer of care process Outcome 4 action plan: - Expand / realign hospital discharge processes to present the opportunity to enable more people to transfer from inpatient settings to their preferred place of care, with the care they require to support them, as appropriate - Ensure people receive the right care, at the right time, in the place consistent with their wishes and preferences, avoiding the disruption of non-value-added hospital admissions - Develop a single point of access for referrals to help ensure patients have timely access to the most appropriate care in the most efficient way possible |
Progress update: Project complete. New Living Well Team established June 2025 |
Some patients require a level of care beyond generalist care (i.e. care provided GPs and district nurses) but do not require specialist palliative care. This called targeted care.' In June 2025, a new Living Well service was established to provide targeted care. The Living Well service is led by qualified nurses who: - work in accordance with the Gold Standards Framework (best practice model in end of life care which supports a consistent approach to palliative and end of life care) and support health care professional colleagues to do so - recognise terminal ill health early to provide appropriate support - identify long term condition patients by integration into key patient MDT meetings and support clinical staff to diagnose terminal illness |
- play an active role in crisis response and admissions avoidance - ensure all patients have an advanced care plan (where this accords with their wishes) - maintain active shared palliative care register and provide information sharing point and key handovers - act as a case co-ordinator for all those in their last year of life Overnight telephone advice for professionals |
In April 2025, a new on island Overnight Telephone Consultation Line became operational, providing specialist advice and support to health and care providers. This means that specialist advice and support is now available 24/7. |
Benefits - Provides increased hours of operation to 24/7 access to specialist palliative care advice - Improved quality of care and patient experience through early identification of needs - Improved care planning and communication between health care professionals - Prevention of avoidable admissions to inpatient areas - A nurse-led service that supports long-term workforce sustainability as it supports succession planning and gives greater opportunity to work in the field of palliative and end of life care. |
Project |
Improve access to medical equipment out of hours (such as beds and hoists) and |
medication |
Link to strategy Outcome 4 action plan: - Develop an agreed pathway for access to anticipatory medicines / equipment out of hours |
Progress update: Project ongoing - The Living Well Team will support better care planning reducing but not eradicating the need for medical equipment / medicines out of hours. EOL Partnership exploring options for 24/7 provision. - Project to be completed in 2026. |
Benefits - Avoids unnecessary hospital admissions - Improved patient experience |
Project |
Improve access to long term care funding for people at the end of life at short notice |
for those identified at end of life late, or unexpectedly deteriorating rapidly |
Link to strategy |
Outcome 2 action plan: - Arrange access to emergency funding for end-of-life care and to responsive care in the community at end of life either from the Long Term Care Fund or alternative sources Outcome 4 action plan: - Address care needs to support people to remain in their own home |
Progress update: Project complete. - A new LTC process has been established to support early identification and prioritisation of LTC applicants who are at end of life - In June 2025, Assembly approved a change in the law to make it easier for people with less than a year to live to access benefits - Long term care advice and drop-in support to be provided to public and professionals at Jersey Hospice, commencing Q4 2025 |
Benefits - Reduced financial stress for patients and families - Supports advance care planning |
Project |
Raise awareness and encourage conversations about death and dying |
Link to strategy Outcome 6 action plan: - Ensure everybody's voice is heard through engagement on palliative and end of life care - Develop a proactive approach and plan to galvanise support and spread the message across our communities - Combine all Third Sector elements to develop a robust, multifaceted model of care delivery which is supported by members of our community who are then reinforcing the need by spreading the message and having conversations |
Progress update: Project ongoing. - May 2025: Jersey Hospice Care ("JHC") open day for professionals to learn about the work of the EOL Partnership and the new services (i.e. the Living Well Team, overnight telephone consultation line and education service) - May 2025: Public engagement event at Charing Cross to share information about end of life care and encourage open conversations about death and dying - Nov 2025: anticipate publication of a book which will help people at end of life consider what's important to them, and to support and guide families |
Benefits - Support all people to be more comfortable to talk about dying, know what support is available and make plans earlier |
Project
Establish an Island wide education programme recognising that education is a key enabler in improving care
Link to strategy Outcome 1 action plan: - Continue the development of Gold Standards Framework across health care professionals in the community and hospital Outcome 2 action plan: - Educate / develop the workforce / volunteers and increase public awareness in relation to palliative care Outcome 3 action plan: - Improve communication across all areas of the health system - Develop an educational focus for GPs and care homes around advance care planning and end of life care to seek to and prevent avoidable admission to hospital Outcome 5 action plan: - Undertake a needs analysis of the health and care workforce in terms of their knowledge and competence in palliative and end of life care - Develop an island wide training plan and competency framework to support the entire workforce - Develop consistent measurable standards and robust evaluation methods for quality education and training, and ensure it is delivered by skilled and qualified providers - Ensure all key staff are able, encouraged and supported to attend training programmes around core principles of palliative and end of life care - Adopt a system wide approach to the provision of palliative and end of life education that should include all training providers across the island |
Progress update: Project complete - Weekly education sessions are being delivered in partnership between the Health and Care Jersey Faculty of Health Education and Jersey Hospice Care. Sessions provide for both health and care professionals (not just those working in end-of- life care) and informal carers and families. - The syllabus has been developed in line with the Health Education England Palliative and End of Life Care Core Learning Skills framework - Delivery is flexible and tailored to the needs of the learners e.g. sessions provided at GP meetings, care homes, the hospital, community venues - Sessions are evaluated and CPD accredited |
Benefits - Help equip professionals with the necessary knowledge and skills to manage symptoms effectively, enhance patient comfort, and provide quality end-of-life care, leading to greater job satisfaction and retention. - Enhance communication skills among healthcare professionals to facilitate open discussions with patients and families, promote shared decision-making, and respect individual autonomy. |
- | Optimise care delivery and advance care planning: minimise unnecessary | |
| hospital admissions, empower community-based providers, promote advance | |
| care planning discussions, and ensure patient preferences are clearly | |
| communicated and respected, resulting in more personalised and patient-centred | |
| care. | |
- | Enhance patient and family experience: ensure the provision of compassionate, | |
| culturally sensitive end-of-life care that improves satisfaction and emotional | |
| support for patients and families. | |
|
| |
|
| |
Part 3: Evidence of quality of services in Jersey
- The quality of services provided in Jersey can be evidenced in the following ways:
- compliance with contractual requirements
- compliance with independent regulatory standards
- alignment with UK national standards (NICE [7] and NHS services specifications [8]and NHS Ambitions Framework)[9]
- compliance with the Gold Standards Framework.[10]
Contractual arrangements
- HCJ make a financial contribution to hospice inpatient, community generalist and specialist palliative care, targeted care, bereavement support and palliative care education services, delivered by a number of providers. This arrangement is covered by contracts which set out the outcomes to be achieved and key performance indicators. Performance against outcome and indicators are reviewed at quarterly meetings. Key quality related measures show:
- waiting and response times are within target levels as set out in the contract
- consistent 100% patient and carer satisfaction ratings for services provided by Jersey Hospice Care and Family Nursing & Home Care.
Independent regulatory standards
- The Jersey Care Commission (JCC) inspects the following services on an annual basis. During the most recent inspections all services were found to comply with JCC standards:
a. inpatient service provided by Jersey Hospice Care – 2 areas for improvement identified; an action plan to address this was put in place
b. specialist palliative care nursing service provided by Jersey Hospice Care
– no areas for improvement identified
c. district nursing service provided by Family Nursing & Home Care – no areas for improvement identified.
UK national standards
- NICE standards, NHS service specifications and the NHS Ambitions Framework for Palliative and End-of-Life Care provide an up-to-date evidence base for gold standard care and person-centred services.
- A July 2025 review, undertaken by the EOL Partnership, demonstrates significant strengths in meeting outcomes and shaping workforce and care delivery around gold standard evidence-based care. Outcomes that were historically absent are being achieved with the introduction of the Living Well Team (LWT), Palliative and End of Life Care Education (PED) and the
Overnight Telephone Consultation Line (OTC). Further detail is provided in Appendix 2.
- A core strength is the proactive positioning of the LWT as clinical coordinators who also provide relational, holistic and practical support to not only patients and their families but the system workforce. They bridge a historic gap between the generalist care – GPs, community nursing services and specialist services. Their training in the Gold Standards Framework (GSF), advance care plan facilitation, recognition of the palliative phase and case coordination ensures a consistent and person-centred approach across the whole last year of life and not just the critical last moments.
- Educational services provide a whole population evidence-based programme with a curriculum developed from the Health Education England EoLC-Core- Skills-Training-Framework.pdf.
- Out of hours specialist telephone support and existing overnight services including Jersey Doctors on Call and Palliative Consultant on Call (off island) adds resilience to the care model.
- The LWT, PED and OTC services are in their infancy but are well-positioned to support enhanced care delivery. Through the commissioning cycle, services will be continuously monitored, reviewed and adapted as necessary to meet the evidenced needs of the population.
- Compliance with standards and delivery of high-quality, timely care would be further enhanced if all patients and professionals had access to an up-to-date centralised patient record. The lack of a centralised record is a recognised deficit across all health and care services which, it is anticipated will be addressed as a matter of priority via additional investment in Digital Health (as set out in the 2026 Government Plan).
Gold Standards Framework
- In addition to the above, work continues to ensure compliance with the Gold Standards Framework, a nationally accredited practical and evidence-based end of life care service improvement programme13. This framework was implemented across Jersey in 2015, with JHC currently being re-accredited against the Framework. Re-accreditation will demonstrate that quality end of life care is embedded through JHC.
13 End of Life Care Training & Accreditation
Part 4: Evidence of availability of services in Jersey
- In 2023/24, the EOL Partnership undertook an assessment of service availability / capacity based on population size and benchmarking data from the UK. It identified that Jersey had sufficient specialist hospice beds but had gaps in community provision. These gaps have now been largely addressed by the establishment of the Living Well Team.
- Using a UK forecasting model adapted for Jersey, the assessed need is 11 inpatient hospice beds based on the population size. However, over the last 4 years average usage has not exceeded 8 beds, suggesting that 8 beds is a more appropriate level for Jersey. Waiting times and inability to access beds due to lack of capacity are monitored as part of the quarterly service review process and have not been an issue of concern to date.
- The UK forecasting model indicated that specialist palliative care community nursing capacity is sufficient for the population size. However, research into palliative and end of life care models in other jurisdictions and broader commissioning activity, including system wide workshops supported by an independent UK subject matter expert, identified a gap in provision between the generalist and specialist palliative care available.
- The table below compares pre-Strategy and current availability. Changes to hours of provision are highlighted in grey.
Service | Availability 2023 (before Strategy roll-out) | Availability July 2025 |
Generalist health care and support | ||
GPs | 24/7 | 24/7 |
Community nursing (provided by Family Nursing and Home Care | 08:00-23:00 daily | 08:00-23:00 daily |
Hospital and ambulance (provided by HCJ) | 24/7 | 24/7 |
Care/Nursing homes (various providers) | 24/7 | 24/7 |
Domiciliary care (various providers) | 24/7 | 24/7 |
Mental Health counselling (various providers) | 10:00-22:00 Mon-Sun | 10:00-20:00 Mon-Sat |
Living Well Service – targeted palliative care | ||
| ||
Targeted palliative care nursing (provided by Jersey Hospice Care (JHC)) | N/A | 07:30-20:30 daily in the community 07:30-16:30 Mon-Fri in the hospital |
Specialist palliative care | ||
| ||
Hospice inpatient unit (provided by JHC) | 24/7 | 24/7 |
Specialist palliative care in the community and hospital (provided by JHC) | 09:00-17:00 Mon-Fri | 24/7 09:00-17:00 person Mon-Fri in Telephone on call service at all other times |
Bereavement support (provided by JHC) | 09:00-17:00 Mon-Fri with some flexibility | 09:00-17:00 Mon-Fri with some flexibility |
Hospital inpatient care (provided by HCJ) | 24/7 | 24/7 |
Enhanced education provision
- In addition to the above, enhanced education provision has been introduced. This provision, which is generally in core working hours, but with some flexibility includes opportunities:
- in community settings (for example, nursing homes for staff; classes for family carers and members)
- across the hospital / hospice (for example, classroom-based provision to external professional such as GPs, ward-based provision to all ward staff).
- The Strategy identifies education as one of four essential key enablers to achieving the strategic outcomes. The need for palliative care education that is delivered in an integrated, collaborative and cost-effective way is recognised by the World Health Organization, amongst others.
- In addition to this, recent serious incident reviews carried out by HCJ have highlighted the need for palliative and end of life care training for hospital staff to prevent future recurrence of serious incidents.
- A system-wide working group consisting of EOL Partnership members was formed to assess the need and codesign a service that meets the palliative and end of life care education needs of the Island. The service proposals were ratified by the EOL Partnership and the HCJ Executive in July 2024.
Part 5: Delivery against Strategy success criteria
- The Strategy set out clear metrics against which to measure success. The table below details progress against those metrics, as identified in the July 2025 service assessment.
- As with all change processes, it takes time for new services and ways of working to be fully established, and the benefits to be fully realised. As stated in P18/2024, it was never anticipated that all the metrics set out below will have been fully realised by December 2025.
Key metric (as per Strategy) | Current position (July 2025) | Further information |
100% of health and care professionals working across community, hospital and Hospice will have access to educational sessions around palliative care and end of life care on a monthly basis | Achieved | 100% of health and care professionals have access to education, but not all have yet actually accessed this Numbers of staff trained are being monitored to ensure as wide coverage as possible A training needs analysis will be carried out in 2026 |
100% patients at home have access to 24/7 model of palliative care | Achieved (generalist, targeted and specialist as required) | Out of hours specialist support is not face to face |
Services will be set up to enable more patients to achieve their wishes with these set out in their advance care plans where at least: • 75% of patients will achieve their preferred place of care • 75% of patients will achieve their preferred place of death | Preferred place of care and death is only reliably recorded for people under the care of the Specialist Palliative Care Team (approx. 20% of those at end of life). For Q2 2025: • 93% achieved preferred place of care • 85% achieved preferred place of care This information is not currently known for people under care of general or targeted care | The Living Well Team will establish and maintain a register of people in the last year of life and record and report on preferred place of care and death in the future, giving a better picture of care across the Island Expected to be in place by the end of 2026 |
100% of carers will be supported throughout the palliative care experience of their loved one | Support is offered to all carers in contact with specialist and targeted | A review of support for all carers is currently taking place, including carers of those at the end of life |
| palliative and end of life care services | The working group undertaking the review includes various government departments and third sector organisations The review will result in recommendations and an action plan and is expected to be completed in 2026 |
Part 6: Conclusion
- The additional investment into palliative and end of life care is supporting improvements in the quality and availability of those services. There are now more services available and for extended hours. There are still improvements to be made and further work to be done to fully achieve the aims and outcomes of the strategy. There are active work streams ongoing which are nearing completion. The new Living Well and Education Services are expected to drive the changes that will enable people to be cared for and die in their preferred place by the time that assisted dying legislation is in force.
- Progress towards achievement of the Strategy outcomes is measured and reviewed on a quarterly basis and there are processes in place to ensure that if the new services do not deliver the expected improvements corrective action will be taken.
Part 7: Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy post 2026
- It will take time for the new services and ways of working to be established and to be at a point where the impact on closing the gaps can be fully assessed. A review of palliative and end of life care provision will be undertaken in Q2 2026. This will result in updated strategy document, recommendations and an action plan covering 2027- 2031.
Appendix 1: Impact Report for the Palliative and End of life Care Strategy for Adults in Jersey 2023-2026, Jersey Hospice Care, April 2025.
Strategy Outcome 1: People in Jersey who need palliative and or end of life care will be seen and treated as individuals who are encouraged to make and share advance care plans and to be involved in decisions around their care
Jersey Hospice Care – Every patient in the last 12 months in contact with the Community Specialist Palliative care team had Advance Care Planning discussions.
Jersey Hospice Care has continued to use and promote the Gold Standards framework (GSF), the GSF is a practical and evidence-based end of life care service improvement programme, which supports staff to deliver a gold standard of care for people with a life limiting condition. The Inpatient Unit has completed and submitted an application to be GSF accredited during summer 2025.
Emotional support and the Community Bereavement Service is provided by trained and specialist counsellors and is available to adults and children of all ages in need of support. For those accessing the Bereavement Service the team can support islanders, irrespective of whether or not they have come into contact with Jersey Hospice Care. Emotional support can be offered to islanders facing a life limiting diagnosis, along with their family members, to give support to people at a very difficult time and can continue to support the family members after the death of their loved one.
Services are delivered at Jersey Hospice at Mont Cochon, however, during the last year, the team have delivered sessions in a variety of locations including nursing homes, schools, patients own homes and the prison.
The Emotional and Bereavement Service at Jersey Hospice is a very busy service that supported over 400 islanders in 2024, some of whom were children and young people.
Referral rates for adults have continued to increase year on year. During 2022 - 2023 there was an increase in referrals of over 4% and in the following year, this jumped to 12% increase. As a result, the average caseload has increased by 38% over two years.
Over the period of 2022 – 2024, the total number of appointments for adults has increased by 29% There has also been an extension of child bereavement support, particularly in the community where the team have facilitated Grief and Loss sessions for pupils in two of our schools as part of their timetable.
Strategy Outcome 2: People in Jersey who need palliative and or end of life care will have their needs and conditions recognised quickly and be given fair access to services regardless of their background and characteristics
Timely access to the specialist palliative care services remains a priority for Jersey Hospice Care as evidenced in the turnaround time from point of referral to being seen. For urgent and non-urgent referrals, this time remains consistently within the benchmarked target of 48 hours, urgent and 14 days, non-urgent. The longest wait for urgent being just over a day (shortest 6 hours) and longest wait for non- urgent has been 7 days (with shortest at 3 days).
The team have remained busy undertaking 24% more patient home visits in 2024 than in the previous twelve months, in addition to which they have also undertaken 25% more telephone consultations than in the previous year.
Jersey Hospice Care have been working with colleagues in Government to improve the process for Long Term Care Funding applications for islanders approaching the end of their life when they have care needs, the work will ensure those who are eligible are processed in a timely manner.
Jersey Hospice Care in partnership with the Government of Jersey have developed a Living Well Service that will extend the reach of palliative and end of life care services to more islanders by connecting with them much earlier at the point at which they receive life limiting diagnosis and before they need the input of specialist palliative and end of life services. This team will provide support to islanders and their families and will complement the work of other services. Their focus is primarily on supporting people to live well and to have a good quality of life, whilst providing support in co- ordinating and signposting to appropriate services, which could be of a financial, spiritual, social, psychological or physical nature.
During 2024 much of the groundwork for the Living Well Service was undertaken with other providers from across the health and care system, which meant that in early 2025 JHC was able to successfully recruit to the 5 nursing posts for the Living Well Service. JHC will be working towards starting the new service within the second quarter of 2025.
From mid-April, Jersey Hospice Care will be providing an out of hours specialist telephone on-call advice service to give 24-hour access to specialist advice and support to health and care providers. Jersey Hospice Care already provides telephone access to an off-island specialist consultant on call; this enables GPs working out of hours access to 24-hour specialist advice.
Strategy Outcome 3: People in Jersey who need palliative and or end of life care will be supported to live as well as long as possible taking account of their expressed wishes and maximising their comfort and wellbeing
Quote from a family member: "Thanks for all the loving care you gave to my lovely dad in his last days. The kindness and respect shown to Dad warmed my heart and made this time more bearable. Also, a big thank you for all the love and kindness you gave mum who was so in need of a rest from caring for dad. And of course, how you helped us all as a family to manage a peaceful farewell."
Admissions to Jersey Hospice in patient unit have increased year on year and, over the two-year period since the island's strategy was launched, Jersey Hospice Care has seen an increase of over 50% in total patient admissions, with a higher number of patients accessing the service for end of life care.
There are some patients who access the in-patient service for specific needs, such as symptom management, and they return home after their stay. These patients represent about 12% of the total number of admissions.
Strategy Outcome 4: People in Jersey who need palliative and end of life care will receive care that is well co-ordinated
Patient's daughter "Thank you for all the care you gave us during the final weeks of my father's life. Your advice was invaluable and the speed you could sort things out such as medication. But most of all we appreciated the kindness to us as a family. My father dealt with his illness in his own way, and you were so patient with him, allowing him to remain in control. This was so important to him. We will always be grateful to you".
100% of patients known to Jersey Hospice Care Community Specialist Palliative Care team had a documented initial assessment, this ensures all of their immediate needs are identified and that the patient and family can be supported in the best way possible.
During 2024 Jersey Hospice Care achieved the preferred place of death as Hospice inpatient unit in 100% of patients who expressed it.
All patients known to the community specialist palliative care team during 2024 had a documented record regarding their preferred place of care.
Strategy Outcome 5: People in Jersey who need palliative and or end of life care will have their care provided by people who are well trained to do so and are receiving ongoing training to maintain their skills and competencies.
The Education Team at Jersey Hospice Care have continued to strengthen partnerships, connect with key providers, and offer targeted training. As a result during 2024, Jersey Hospice Care delivered 84 education sessions with a total of 725 attendees in the community.
In the following care settings:
• Age Concern (Future Planning/Advance Care Planning)
• 10 sessions Les Amis support homes (Advance Care Planning)
• 86 people attended Dementia End of Life Care (3 sessions in care homes and 2 held in JHC)
• 11 sessions delivered to 6 care homes – each care home was offered two training sessions
• 25 sessions delivered to 12 Home Care Providers – each provider was offered two training sessions
• Adult Learning Disabilities Team
• Mental Health Nursing Team
• St Saviours Hospital
• Prison Nursing Team
• 1 session delivered for 8 people from the LGBTQ+ community.
Sessions covered Fundamentals of Palliative and End of Life Care, The Gold Standard Framework, and Syringe Pump training (7 sessions)
In addition, many educational sessions delivered in JHC have a mix of external and internal attendees.
Strategy Outcome 6: People in Jersey who need palliative and or end of life care will be part of communities that talk about death and dying and that are ready, willing and able to provide the support needed.
Jersey Hospice Care has a strong, large, volunteer workforce who provide significant support to Jersey Hospice Care and the wider community, through a broad range of roles, covering patient care areas, reception roles, retail, driving, supporting fundraising events and many more. During 2024, a total of 26,337 hours were donated by volunteers. This is a further 4.7% increase on the previous year's activity and equates to a fulltime workforce of 13.5 FTE. Our volunteers come from our local community, from a range of backgrounds, and bring to the roles many experiences, skills and knowledge which are invaluable to the work of Jersey Hospice in Palliative and End of Life Care.
Compassionate Neighbours scheme was launched by Jersey Hospice Care in April 2024.This scheme connects islanders with a life limiting diagnosis with a volunteer who meets with them on a regular basis. The scheme helps reduce loneliness and social isolation, Evidence has shown that Compassionate Neighbours can also lower rates of depression, improve social skills, improve self-management, build a sense of purpose and reduce the use of emergency services. During its first year, 22 patients were supported by volunteers in the community on the scheme. The scheme not only benefits islanders but also the volunteer, knowing you are making a difference in someone's life, improving your own social skills and feeling their own confidence grow.
"Being a compassionate neighbour volunteer is such an honour. The lady I have been visiting was so interesting and I really enjoyed her company, she was so easy to get along with. I used to look forward to our weekly chats over a coffee so much and I learnt so much from her, listening to her stories from her younger years, she really lived life to the full. I thoroughly enjoyed building a relationship with her and with her family. They told me that they felt she had made a new friend on the island, and they were so grateful. I think we both got as much out of our meetings as each other and it's a great feeling knowing you have provided company and support to someone when they needed it most" Sarah, Volunteer.
Appendix 2: Assessment of Jersey palliative and end of life care services against NHS service specification and NICE guidance
The following Jersey services were assessed against UK standards: the Living Well Team (LWT), Specialist Palliative Care Team (SPCT), Hospice Inpatient Service, Bereavement and Emotional Support Service, and Education Services.
Compliance with NHS service specification14
- Referral
UK Specification Requirement | Pro | vision in Jersey | RAG | Link to Strategy Outcomes |
|
| Referral is based on need, not |
|
|
|
| diagnosis. RAG system, GSF and |
|
|
Defined referral criteria, |
| prognostic indicators in use. |
|
|
including complex physical, psychological, social and/or |
| LWT supported by the wider JHC MDT who are skilled to meet all |
| Outcome 1 |
spiritual need |
| needs, psychological care is offered |
|
|
|
| by our internal and third-party |
|
|
|
| organisations. |
|
|
14 B1674-specialist-palliative-and-end-of-life-care-services-adult-service-specification.pdf
UK Specification Requirement | Pr | ovision in Jersey | RAG | Link to Strategy Outcomes |
|
| Bereavement support is offered by |
|
|
|
| the service. |
|
|
|
| Education for all islanders supports |
|
|
|
| all of these elements. |
|
|
|
| GSF coding and RAG rating used to |
|
|
Referral process includes an auditable prioritisation system |
| prioritise. GSF register to be created and shared. Data sharing in place to enable analysis and development of service quality and |
| Outcome 3 |
|
| reach. |
|
|
Accept referrals based on need, not diagnosis |
| Embedded practice across services. No bias for referral and an outcome to ensure all are supported. |
| Outcome 1 & 2 |
- Assessment and Care
Provision in Jersey | RAG |
Outcomes |
SPCT and Southampton provide out of
7-day medical/nursing cover hours by telephone. LWT provides face to Outcome 3 & 6 and 24/7 telephone advice
face 12 hours/day, 365 days/year
Timely access to medication
Work in progress Outcome 3 and equipment
Personalised care planning
with patients, carers and LWT supports advance care planning, Outcome 1 & 4
navigation, and options at any time
families
families/carers, includintog LWT integrates into family life and Outcome 2 Holistic support
prepares carers
pre-bereavement
Services are designed and developed to allow flexibility and seek support for individual needs |
Outcome 2 Outcome 4 & 5
GSF, regular MDTs, holistic LWT delivery. LWT integrate into multiple services and meetings that discuss islanders approaching EOL. |
- Co-ordination and Partnership Working
Provision in Jersey | RAG |
Outcomes |
Effective partnership with Macmillan, Cancer Jersey, YES, Education Outcome 4 third sector & services Services, JTT
Provision in Jersey | RAG |
Outcomes |
Workaround in place; awaiting digital overhaul |
|
Outcome 4 Outcome 5
Standard operating policy to be finalised post service mobilisation |
|
- Leadership and Governance
Provision in Jersey | RAG |
Outcomes |
Community Lead Nurse (strategic oversight) |
|
Outcome 5 Quframalityewo/grokverninancl.ce /IT audit, Imneapsurores gressd; eveloaudpit ingplanalos ngasnidd e oustcoervmice e Outcome 6 outcomes, patient feedback,
rollout
clinical info sharing
Education Service in place for universal/core/specialist level |
|
Outcome 5 CPD and education for wider CPD delivery via HCJ Education Service & Outcome 5
workforce JHC
Innovation, evidence-led Shared learning via Education Services, Outcome 6 practice, shared learning public awareness supported
Public/community
engagement, compassionate JHC and Education Services involved in Outcome 6
outreach
communities
Compliance against NICE Guidance15
Provision in Jersey | RAG |
Steps |
GSF-trained staff; use of prognostic indicators; LWT promotes MDT-based identification |
|
Strengthen early conversations with carers and key people where possible. Education programme being rolled out.
Delivered via LWT and education; supported by Macmillan and other services |
| Maintain integrated support for emotional, financial, and spiritual care |
15 Overview | End of life care for adults: service delivery | Guidance | NICE
Provision in Jersey | RAG |
Steps |
Carer-specific education, bereavement services, youth and crisis support available |
Monitor uptake and feedback from carers to ensure continued relevance
"Last Wishes" leaflet; whole islander education service |
Expand availability in multiple languages or accessible formats if needed
LWT as case coordinator; symptom control taught through education |
Consider real- time review protocols for sudden deterioration
LWT accountable; specific advance care plan training; integrated into digital systems |
Reinforce consistent ACP review and documentation
Use patient feedback to
Embedded in LWT's ongoing case ensure regular
- Reviewing needs
coordination role reassessment
remains person- centred
- Regular audits to Advance care plans uploaded to
Communicating/sharing ensure accuracy
EMIS/Maxims; information sharing in
information between and timely
development
services updates
Multi-disciplinary teams supported by LWT and SPCT; enhanced telephone access |
Promote stronger integration with JDOC and OOH services
LWT positioned for case coordination |
Consider creating a designated EOLC coordinator role/system across all providers
Develop clear and
1.11 Transferring between Policy is in place, will require review when consistent policy care settings services are embedded for care transitions and
Provision in Jersey | RAG |
Steps |
|
|
communicate widely. Allow service to embed and learn activity and demographic to finalise SOP.
SPCT and Southampton provide out of hours advice by telephone. LWT provides face to face 12 hours/day, 365 days/year. JDOC and nurses available face to face overnight. Training being rolled out. |
|
Ensure clear escalation plans and visibility of OOH, monitor the service and integrate service data into strategic overnight service review plans to aide arrangements and involve all parties
Section 2: Training and guidance
- This section of the report provides a response to key recommendation 2, and recommendations 6 and 10:
2* | Training & guidance | Minister for Health and Social Services should publish an appendix to the final proposals for assisted dying setting out the training requirements that comprehensively cover the identification of and prevention of coercion. |
6 | Training & guidance | The Minister for Health and Social Services should publish the full details and processes for establishing refusal or resistance to an assisted death for a person who has lost decision-making capacity. |
10 | Training & guidance | The Minister should publish details and plans about assisted dying training and guidance that include: • A detailed summary outlining all items of assisted dying guidance to be developed and produced. • The items of guidance to be prioritised, shared and presented to States Members. • Details and plans about the development of the assisted dying training programme |
* indicates a key recommendation of the Scrutiny Panel Key Recommendation 2: Training requirements
Key Recommendation 2 requested the Minister to set out the training requirements that comprehensively cover the identification of and prevention of coercion
- Appendix 4 of P18/2024 set out a summary of key elements of the assisted dying training.
- P18/2024 also set out that the Assisted Dying Assurance and Delivery Committee would be responsible for overseeing the establishment and operations of the Assisted Dying Service, including development of training programmes and that, in doing so, the Committee will be required to consult with relevant parties, such as the professional regulatory bodies.[11]
- In accordance with P18/2024, the draft law provides the following:
- Article 65 requires the Committee to arrange for mandatory training that must be completed by an assisted dying practitioner, certifying doctor or care navigator before they can act in that role.
- Article 65 sets out that the training must cover:
• the aspects of the assisted dying process that are relevant for each role, including training about –
(a) the requirements of the Law;
(b) operational guidance;
(c) risk; and
(d) the safety and well-being of the professional performing the role
• the technical knowledge required to perform each role, such as –
(a) the administration of approved drugs by an administering practitioner, including how to deal with a medical complication; or
(b) the certification of an individual's assisted death by a certifying doctor
• domestic abuse and whether someone has been coerced or pressured to do something, including coercive control and financial abuse.
- Articles 80 and 81 provide that an assisted dying practitioner or certifying doctor may only be registered (or have registration renewed) if they have completed the training required for their role.
- Article 66 requires the Committee to develop general training to be available to all on-island health and care professionals.
- Article 67 requires the Committee, in developing the training, to consult with persons and organisations with relevant expertise, including for example the professional regulatory bodies.
- The training requirements will be confirmed by the Committee following consultation. They cannot be confirmed prior to adoption of the law, as any amendments to the draft law may impact the training requirements. However,
in line with the Minister's response to Key Recommendation 2, additional information is set out below. This includes information related to:
- training requirements for all assisted dying practitioners
- training requirements for specific roles
- training available to all on-island health and care professionals
Training requirements for all assisted dying practitioners
Format
- Largely in-person, group/cohort delivery, with supplementary online/digital elements. Training modules will include periods of reflection to pause, discuss and reflect on learning.
- Will incorporate case studies, role play & simulation – including identifying and assessing risk at each step of the process.
- A professional may withdraw from training at any point if they change their mind about participating in the Assisted Dying Service [which would mean the professional would not go on to register and act as an assisted dying practitioner].
- To include input from experienced assisted dying practitioners, from jurisdictions where assisted dying is permitted, with similar legislative frameworks – e.g. Australia and New Zealand.
- As set out in the draft law, the Committee will determine the required intervals for refresher training. As set out in P18/2024, this is anticipated to be required (as a minimum) every 3 years.
- In addition, ad hoc training will be provided to Assisted Dying Service staff as and when the need arises (for example, if review undertaken by the Review Panel finds that there is a requirement to strengthen any part of the process) as well as ongoing peer support, clinical supervision and case management.
- Expected outcomes of assisted dying practitioner training:
- Understand the key provisions of the assisted dying law, including
- eligibility criteria
- steps in the assisted dying process
- Understand the role of the Assisted Dying Service
- Demonstrate knowledge of roles of the bodies involved in the regulation and oversight of assisted dying
- Demonstrate understanding of the assisted dying roles, and the involvement of wider health and care professionals in the assisted dying process
- Demonstrate in-depth understanding of the professional's individual duties and requirements under the law and in guidance, for their specific role
- Exhibit the knowledge and competencies required to undertake their specific assisted dying role
- Apply knowledge of professional and personal resilience, including how and when to access to wellbeing support
Content
- Overview of assisted dying, eligibility criteria, assessment and approval
- eligibility criteria:
- additional focus on capacity and decision criteria (including voluntary nature of decision and potential coercion)
- overview of assessing eligibility criteria
- roles of professionals involved
- assisted dying process & steps
- working with the operational guidance
- consent for information sharing and disclosure of information
- communication support and independent advocacy for individuals
- appeals process
- Overview of post-approval process
- care planning
- waiver of future capacity and confirmation of consent to proceed
- places for assisted deaths
- the approved drugs, including:
- Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics
- Prescribing
- Dispensing
- Preparation
- Facilitation of Administration
- Interactions/Reactions/Unsuccessful Outcomes
- Acting in the event of medical complications
- the assisted death, involvement of the witness
- post-death procedures
- Oversight, regulation and protections
- role of:
- Assisted Dying Service
- Assurance and Delivery Committee
- Assisted Dying Review Panel
- Jersey Care Commission
- Professional Regulatory Bodies and professional representative bodies
- right to refuse and protections for professionals
- safe access zones
- investigation of professionals and offences under the law
- Other matters
- extended team meetings
- record keeping & the assisted dying person record
- service standards and procedures for complaints
- disclosure of interests
- reporting concerns
- personal and professional resilience (professional & skills development, wellbeing, counselling, self-care)
- bereavement training – support for self, colleagues, family and friends of individual
- trauma-informed practice – impact of current or past trauma on individuals and on professionals
Training requirements for specific roles
- The training outlined above will be undertaken by all assisted dying practitioners. In addition, there will be specific elements of training required for the individual roles. In most cases this will provide additional depth and detail or practical training in addition to matters already covered above:
- Care Navigator
a. elements specific to the Care Navigator role, including additional training on providing support to:
- assessing doctors and extended team during assessment phase
- administering practitioner during care planning and delivery phase
- individuals and their family members
b. handling referrals and enquiries into the Assisted Dying Service
c. record management
j. Assessing Doctors
- assessing eligibility criteria – to cover all criteria in depth, with specific modules on:
- assessing capacity
- voluntary nature of decision – including domestic abuse and whether someone has been coerced or pressured into decision, including coercive control and financial abuse and additional steps to take where this is suspected, e.g. onward referrals
- seeking relevant opinions
- decisions on requests to proceed to next step
- review and decision on request for assisted dying
- supporting individuals whose request for assisted dying has been declined
- independence of Independent Assessment Doctor
- Second Opinion Assessments
- role of family and friends in the assessment process
- record management
k. Administering Practitioners
- care planning
- approval of location for assisted deaths
- role of friends/family in the assisted death & support
- role of administration witness
- additional considerations around individual's wishes for the assisted death – e.g. inclusion of consideration of beliefs or faith
- prescribing the approved drugs, and detail of the approved drugs:
- pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics
- prescribing
- dispensing
- preparation
- facilitation of Administration
- interactions/Reactions/Unsuccessful Outcomes
- acting in the event of medical complications
- administration of approved drugs – clinical skills e.g. cannulation, equipment, care after death
- establishing refusal or resistance to administration of drugs, where waiver of future capacity is in place [see paragraph 82]
- disposal of unused/partially used drugs
- medical complications
- process after assisted death
- Pharmacy Professionals
- discussion with Administering Practitioner and individual on method/mode of assisted death and prescription of approved drugs
- process for preparation and dispensing of approved drugs
- detail of the approved drugs:
- pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics
- prescribing
- dispensing
- preparation
- facilitation of Administration
- interactions/Reactions/Unsuccessful Outcomes
- acting in the event of medical complications
- process for disposal of unused/partially used drugs
m. Extended team members
- providing relevant opinions
- role of extended team meetings
- professional check and challenge for assessing doctors
- voluntary nature of decision and supporting assessing doctor with identification of possible coercion – including additional steps to take where this is suspected, e.g. onward referrals
- signposting and support for individual and family members
n. Certifying Doctors
- attending the individual prior to the assisted death
- certification of an assisted death – completion of the Medical Certificate of the Fact and Cause of Death (MCFCD)
Training available to all on-island health and care professionals
- It is envisaged that training made available to all on-island health and care professionals will be available in a digital format, and professionals will have the choice to complete the training either in a self-guided format online or at in- person group sessions delivered by a trainer.
- In addition to health and care professionals, it is anticipated that the training module will also be made available to relevant voluntary and community organisations who support islanders who may consider assisted dying – for example, cancer charities.
- Expected outcomes of training:
- Understand the basics of assisted dying in Jersey
- Awareness of the appropriate conversations guidance, and what is/is not appropriate when talking about assisted dying with patients
- Awareness of where to find out further information about assisted dying, including professional guidance, and how to signpost patients to further information
- Understand considerations related to providing ongoing care and treatment for a patient seeking an assisted death.
73. The training for all on-island health and care professionals will consist of three key topics:
• Part A: Overview of the assisted dying law
• Part B: Appropriate conversations around assisted dying
• Part C: Continuing Care for Patients requesting / having an assisted death.
74. It is intended that Part A of the training will cover an overview of the assisted dying law:
- What is assisted dying?
- definition and overview
- key terms
- eligibility criteria
- Overview of assisted dying process
- outline of steps 1 to 8
- relevant opinions
- Role of the Assisted Dying Service
- how to contact Service
- referring patients
- information & support the Service provides to professionals
- Rights and protections for professionals
- right to refuse
- employment protections
- safe access zones
- Offences under the law
- Signpost to information produced by Professional regulatory bodies (GMC, NMC etc.)
i. information how on assisted dying law relates to professional's requirements to act in accordance with guidance issued by their professional body.
- It is intended that Part B of the training will cover appropriate conversations around assisted dying:
- Training will support guidance produced by Committee
- It will set out process for when a patient raises the issue of assisted dying and steps for professional to take
- It will include the limited circumstances where it may be appropriate for professional (doctor) to raise the subject of assisted dying with a patient (e.g. when discussing all care and treatment options, including palliative care, with a patient with a terminal diagnosis)
- Steps to take when a patient appears to talk about assisted dying without using the words of assisted dying'
- Actions for professional to take if they have a conscientious objection to assisted dying and wish to exercise their right to refuse participation
- It is intended that Part C of the training will cover Continuing Care for Patients requesting / having an assisted death:
- Continuing care of a patient who has requested assisted dying:
- respecting the patients views and wishes
- discussion with family members
- interaction with the Assisted Dying Service
- supporting a patient who has had their assisted dying request declined or chooses to withdraw from the process
- Continuing care of a patient who has requested assisted dying where the professional chooses to exercise their right to refuse
- What to do if the professional is concerned their patient is experiencing coercion and pressure in relation to their assisted dying request.
Development of training package during implementation period
- As set out in P65/2025, £459,619 has been allocated in the 2026 Government Budget for assisted dying training for the 2026-2029 period. This includes costs associated with the development of a training package, as well as the costs associated with delivering training.
- Development of a bespoke training package for assisted dying practitioners will require external expertise, which is anticipated to involve UK professional bodies and specialists from jurisdictions where assisted dying training for professionals is currently provided.
- Acquiring a training provider will be a commercially sensitive matter and subject to Government procurement processes. Work on securing a preferred training provider will begin early in the implementation period, should the draft law be approved by the Assembly.
- It is anticipated that Jersey will be seeking to secure specialist training development support at broadly the same time as the UK government/Isle of Man government. Officers will seek to liaise with UK counterparts.
- As set out in paragraph 56, the Assurance and Delivery Committee will have responsibility for developing the training and will be required to consult with relevant on and off-island persons and organisations in doing so.
Recommendation 6: Process for establishing refusal or resistance to an assisted death, where person does not have capacity
Recommendation 6 requested the Minister to publish the full details and processes for establishing refusal or resistance to an assisted death for a person who has lost decision-making capacity.
- The guidance on the process for establishing refusal or resistance to an assisted death (where the person no longer has capacity and has waived their requirement for future capacity) will be confirmed by the Committee following consultation (in accordance with all other guidance and training).
- As set out in paragraph 69 above, the assisted dying training programme would also include a module on refusal or resistance to an assisted death.
- It is intended that the guidance will set out:
a. that whilst an individual may have lost the capacity to consent to assisted dying, they always retain the legal ability to refuse the administration of approved drugs
b. that the guidance applies at Step 7 (final review and carrying out of assisted death) in relation to Article 9 of the draft law – where the practitioner is satisfied that the individual does not have capacity but the individual has (at Step 6) made their final request for assisted dying and waived the required for future capacity, the practitioner may carry out an individual's assisted death if:
• the individual does not show any refusal of, or resistance to, the approved drugs' administration (Art 9 (1) (k))
c. that signs of refusal or resistance to the carrying out of the assisted death may include:
• refusal by words, sounds or gestures
• any physical or verbal resistance to administration of the approved drugs
d. that signs of refusal or resistance are not considered to include involuntary words, sounds or gestures made in response to contact. This means any reactions to touch, restraint, or discomfort during the establishment of IV access (e.g., twitching or physical recoiling from contact or insertion of a needle) do not constitute a demonstration of refusal or resistance
e. that if the administering practitioner decides it is not appropriate to carry out the assisted death as a result of a demonstration of resistance, they may choose to delay or end the process in accordance with Article 11 of the draft law. If the process is ended the assisted death must not go ahead (unless overridden by appeal).
f. the circumstances where it is appropriate for the administering practitioner to stop the assisted death (and the process ends), for example:
- where the individual does not have capacity and is showing clear signs of refusal or resistance; and
- is not anticipated to regain capacity at a later date
g. the circumstances where it is appropriate for the administering practitioner to delay the assisted death (which may then be rescheduled for an alternative date), for example:
- where the individual does not have capacity and is showing possible signs of refusal or resistance; and
- the administering practitioner determines the individual has fluctuating capacity, for example as a result of the administration of pain medication
h. if the administering practitioner decides to delay the assisted death, the guidance will set out the considerations for the circumstances where the assisted death may be rescheduled, for example, if decision to pause the process was made as a result of the individual's fluctuating capacity, then the administering practitioner may reschedule, and the process proceed if:
- the individual has capacity at time of rescheduled assisted death and gives their consent to proceed;
- the individual does not have capacity at the agreed time of the rescheduled assisted death but has regained capacity at times during the intervening period prior to the rescheduled date, and at those times they consistently expressed a wish for the assisted death to be carried out.
Recommendation 10: Details and plans about assisted dying training and guidance
Recommendation 10 requested the Minister to provide details and plans about assisted dying training and guidance that include:
• a detailed summary outlining all items of assisted dying guidance to be developed and produced
• the items of guidance to be prioritised, shared and presented to States Members
• details and plans about the development of the assisted dying training programme.
- Appendix 3 of P18/2024 provided a summary of the guidance that would be brought forward during the implementation phase.
- In P65/2025, the development of guidance has been provided for in the draft law:
- Article 62 requires the Committee to arrange for the development of guidance by the Service (or another supplier)
- Article 62 (2), in line with P18/2024, sets out that there must be operational guidance about:
- the right to refuse to participate in assisted dying;
- having appropriate conversations with patients about assisted dying;
- the places of assisted deaths;
- independent advocacy, communication support and support for interpretation of languages;
- assessing individuals for assisted dying;
- care planning for individuals;
- prescribing and dispensing approved drugs;
viii. administering approved drugs, including detailed protocols for how
to deal with a medical complication; and
ix. donating organs.
- In addition, Article 62 (2) also requires the Committee to develop guidance about:
- holding, indexing and giving access to individuals' records;
- the registration of assisted dying practitioners;
- disclosing interests and deciding whether they conflict; and
- disclosing information about health professionals to a body that regulates their profession or to an enforcement authority (in Jersey or elsewhere).
- Article 63 requires the Committee to develop general guidance for families and carers of an individual.
- Article 67 requires the Committee in developing the guidance, to consult with persons and organisations with relevant expertise including, for example, the professional registration bodies.
- Guidance will also be brought forward on death certification for assisted deaths.
- Operational guidance published by many other jurisdictions where assisted dying is permitted is not publicly available, however, examples of published guidance issued by Australian states are provided below:
• New South Wales, Australia: NSW Voluntary Assisted Dying Clinical Practice Handbook
• Queensland, Australia: Queensland Voluntary Assisted Dying Handbook | Queensland Health
• Western Australia: Western Australian Voluntary Assisted Dying Guidelines
- Further detail on the intended contents of the operational and general guidance is described in the following paragraphs. These paragraphs set out many of the intended key elements of the guidance but do not present an exhaustive list. Full detail of the guidance will be confirmed by the Committee during the implementation phase.
- Guidance on right to refuse to participate will:
- summarise key provisions in law relating to the right to refuse to participate
- provide examples of activities that are participation in assisted dying (and so may be refused)
- provide examples of activities that are not participation in assisted dying (and so are not covered by the right to refuse)
- set out what steps a health professional must take if they exercise their right to refuse to providing information about assisted dying to a patient, i.e. they must inform patient:
- they are exercising their right to refuse
- the Assisted Dying Service may be able to help the person
- how the person may find the contact details of the Service
o including information produced by the Service, such as leaflets the professional may give to patient
- set out protections for professionals (for either involvement or non- participation in assisted dying) and the steps a person may take if they believe they have suffered an employment (or partnership) detriment (for example, if they have lost their job or been denied a promotion as a result of their views towards assisted dying.)
- provide information on how right to refuse in assisted dying law relates to the professional's requirements to act in accordance with guidance issued
by their professional body
Target audience for Guidance: Any person who may choose to exercise their right to refuse, or employs someone who chooses to exercise their right, including all on- island health and care professionals
- Guidance on appropriate conversations will:
a. set out the process for when a patient raises the issue of assisted dying, including the steps for professionals to take
b. confirm the limited circumstances where it may be appropriate for professional (doctor) to raise the subject of assisted dying with a patient (e.g. when discussing all care and treatment options, including palliative care, with a patient with a terminal diagnosis)
c. set out the circumstances in which it would not be appropriate to raise the issue of assisted dying with a patient
d. set out steps to take when a patient appears to talk about assisted dying without using the exact term assisted dying', such as I would like to die on my own terms'
e. confirm actions for professional to take if they have a conscientious objection to assisted dying and wish to exercise their right to refuse participation
f. set out considerations for professionals when having conversations with a patient who is going through the assisted dying process, whilst providing ongoing care and treatment to that patient, including:
- respecting the patients views and wishes
- discussion with family members
- interaction with the Assisted Dying Service
- supporting a patient who has had their assisted dying request declined or chooses to withdraw from the process
g. detail actions to take, if the professional is concerned their patient is experiencing coercion and pressure in relation to their assisted dying request
Target audience for Guidance: All on-island health and care professionals and other professionals whose clients may request assisted dying (e.g. staff of cancer support charities)
- Guidance on places of assisted deaths will:
- set out where an assisted death may take place, and key provisions in the law relating to the approval of a place for an assisted death
- including that in many instances this may be the individual's own home.
b. confirm how the administering practitioner should assess the suitability of a location, including identification of risks that may make the place unsuitable
c. set out considerations to be taken into account by the administering practitioner when deciding to approve a place for an assisted death, to include:
- wishes of the individual
- views of others who live in the place
- suitability of location and any risks that may make the place unsuitable
- views of the manager or provider, if that place is a care home
d. set out the process for the administering practitioner to approve a place for an assisted death
e. detail the steps to take where an individual believes their landlord may seek to prevent them having an assisted death in their home (which is contrary to the law)
f. set out additional considerations in relation to assisted deaths in care homes, including where the provider exercises their right to refuse, and the approval of an alternative place
g. see also paragraph 132 – for further detail of what the guidance will cover in relation to for assisted deaths taking place in care homes
h. set out additional considerations in relation to assisted deaths in the Jersey General Hospital, including:
- managing staff rotas on the ward where the assisted death will take place [in an assigned private room]
- transportation of the individual to the hospital, where they are not already an inpatient.
Target audience for Guidance: Administering practitioners, care home providers, any person who owns or resides in a place which is being considered as a place for an assisted death.
- Guidance on independent advocacy, communication support and support for interpretation of languages will:
- set out how an assessing doctor / administering practitioner will:
- decide the communication support or advocacy requirements for the individual, and when additional relevant opinions may be required to reach a decision
- arrange for communication support/advocacy for the individual considering factors such as: where a person may require more than one type of communication support and/or advocacy; where remote communication may be appropriate compared to when in-person support is required
- record details of the support provided on all assisted dying forms
- describe matters related to:
- requirements related to providers of communication support, including:
- requirements for qualifications and experience
- circumstances in which it may be appropriate for a connected person (i.e. a family member) to provide communications support, plus associated benefits and risks
- requirements on providers to disclose interests in relation to the individual
- requirements related to additional time required during the assessment process if communication support and / or advocacy is provided to the individual
- the circumstances where a pre-brief or debrief between the assessing doctor / administering practitioner and person providing communication support may be required
- the process for arranging wellbeing support for those providing communication support
- full guidance relating to independent advocacy will be developed alongside the development of the Regulations which will provide for the appointment of independent advocates. See P65/2025 paragraph 313.[12]
Target audience for Guidance: All assisted dying practitioners, in particular, assessing doctors and administering practitioners. Any person who may provide communication support, including interpretation or advocacy support to an individual.
- Guidance on assessing individuals for assisted dying will confirm legal requirements associated with the assessment process, and provide specific guidance related to the different criteria including health, capacity, decision, age and residency criteria (as per following paragraphs.)
- The health criteria section of the assessment guidance will include:
- process for determining whether the individual meets the life expectancy criteria, including review of individual's medical records and seeking relevant opinion of the person's treating consultant or a professional who specializes in that condition, which may include examination of the individual.
- matters for consideration when establishing whether the individual's suffering arises from the person's terminal illness, as opposed to other reasons – for example the person's living situation, if the individual's relationship with their partner has recently broken down. To include:
- onward referral to services that may be able to address / support individual with these other matter
- role of extended team
- how to document the individual's determination of whether they can bear their suffering
- how to appropriately challenge the individual's determination of their expected suffering
- The capacity criterion section of the assessment guidance will include:
- set out details related to the specific capacity test in law, clarifying that capacity is time and decision specific i.e., the assessing doctor should assess an individual's ability to make an assisted dying decision at the time that decision needs to be made
- matters related to requirement on assessing doctors to be satisfied as to the individual's capacity (i.e., cannot be presumed, must be determined)
- the assessment approach, which may, in order to determine the individual's ability to receive information; understand the information and matters relevant to their decision (including the effect of their decision), include asking the individual to describe in their own words:
- the problem with their health now
- their care and treatment options (including palliative care) and risks/benefits of these
- what they expect to happen if they have an assisted death/ do not have an assisted death
- what will happen as a result of administering the approved drug – i.e. that they will die
- how they have made their decision
- what makes their decision for assisted dying preferable to the other options available
- their thoughts and feelings about their health, treatment options and an assisted death
- red flag' responses to the questions above, requiring further investigation could include that the individual:
- fails to remember or understand their medical condition
- cannot describe the possible care and treatment options, and benefits/risks
- cannot accurately explain what will happened when they are administered the approved drugs – i.e. that they will die
- does not express their choices consistently or cannot remember previous decisions
- makes an unusually quick decision
- makes a decision that does not appear to be based on their expressed beliefs or values
- frequently changes their decision
- the assessment approach, which may, in order to determine whether the individual can communicate their assisted dying decision, include:
- listening to the individual's request and seek clarification if necessary
- if the individual has not decided on a treatment option, ask what is making it hard for them to decide
- red flags' in the individual's response include inconsistent responses to questions
- consideration of capacity where the individual is experiencing depression or cognitive impairment, which is either pre-existing or as a result of their condition/terminal prognosis – neither of which necessarily mean the individual does not have capacity, but do require additional exploration
- requirement on the assessing doctor to seek the relevant opinion of a professional with specific expertise to undertake a capacity assessment
(e.g.: psychiatrist, geriatrician, psychologist or specialist social worker) if assessing doctor cannot be satisfied of capacity, including where complexity arises due to the individual's medical condition and / or any comorbid mental illness
- confirmed actions to be taken where the individual has fluctuating capacity, meaning they may lack capacity to make a specific decision at one point in time but may have capacity to make the same decision at a different point in time. The assessing doctor must be satisfied that there is no evidence that the individual lacks capacity at the point at which an assisted dying decision is made but, between those decision-making points, it is accepted the person may not have capacity. Where the individual who has known fluctuating capacity, and does not have capacity to make an assisted dying decision at the point in time at which it is envisaged that the decision will be taken, the assessing doctor may decide to delay decision- making until a point in time when they determine the person has capacity. This is because it must be recognised that the drugs used to manage pain may have a temporary / fluctuating impact on decision making capacity.
- The decision criteria section of the assessment guidance to include matters related to:
- a decision on the voluntary nature of the wish including:
i. matters related to discussions with:
- the individual's family / friends about how they feel about the individual's decision and what they understand to be the individual's underlying motivations and wishes, along with observation and assessment of family dynamics
- other professionals providing care and treatment to the individual. These professionals may have specific observations or may have had conversations with the individual or their carers, family or friends which may provide useful insights into the motivation behind the person's decision
ii. indicators of possible coercion that may be detected during a consultation with carers, family or friends present which could include:
- excessive deferment by the person to their carers, family or friends for answers, reassurance or explanation
- carers, family or friends talking over the person and answering on their behalf
- inconsistencies in the person's answers to questions about their suffering, illness experience or assisted dying in general
- inconsistencies between what the person says in private to the assessing doctor, and what the person says in the presence of others.
iii. potential requirement to talk with the person away from others to determine if there is potential coercion. Questions they could ask in their discussion with the person could include:
- are you feeling any pressure from others to request assisted dying?
- do you have or are there any significant financial concerns?
- do you have any concerns about your family after you die?
- is there anything we need to know that you don't want your family to know?
- what about your family/friends (may include partners, spouse, children, parents, siblings)? / Are they aware of your request for assisted dying? / How do they feel about it? / Do they support your decision?
- is your GP aware of your request for assisted dying? / Does your GP support it?
- Set out process where there are concerns around coercion and/or abuse. If there is a concern that the person may be experiencing coercion and/or family and domestic violence, financial abuse or elder abuse these issues should be discussed with the individual. These concerns should also be considered at an extended team meeting, and the assessing doctor must make a referral to the appropriate adult safeguarding team if there are any safeguarding concerns regarding abuse.
- a decision on whether wish is clearly expressed and settled including:
i. setting out that, in order to determine that the individual's wish is clear and settled, the assessing doctor must:
- discuss their reasons for requesting an assisted death
- fully explore with the individual their request for an assisted death and the fears, anxieties and suffering that gives rise to that request as well as their understanding of the impact of requesting and having an assisted death
- explain the purpose of these discussions to understand the individual's wishes and why the individual thinks accessing assisted dying will address their fears / concerns
- ask the individual how they reached their decision, including what or who may have influenced them.
ii. if the individual is requesting access to assisted dying because they are concerned that they are a burden on their carers or family, their situation should be explored.
- This may include the assessing doctor requesting that another member of the extended team, for example the social worker, reviews with the person their current care package and explores additional options for supportive care or respite care.
- The assessing doctor should also seek to understand why the individual has raised this concern and what they mean by it. Some people may say they feel like they are a burden because they believe or know that their family members are struggling to support them at the end of their life, while others may use this to start a discussion about their struggles with their current situation such as their sense of burden or loss of dignity.
- Such comments should also raise a red flag' to the assessing doctor to explore whether there may be any element of explicit or implicit coercion underlying the person's request for assisted dying [see above]
- confirm that the assessing doctor must also consider any previous assisted dying requests, withdrawal of requests or requests the pause the process, in terms of what this indicates about the settled nature of the individual's wish.
- a decision on whether a wish is informed including:
- setting out the information the assessing doctor is required to tell the individual under the law, including both the general information about assisted dying, and specific information relating to the individual
- providing additional detail on how this information should be delivered, and what should be discussed with the individual
- setting out that when informing the individual about the care and treatment options available to them (and the likely outcome of those care and treatment options), the assessing doctor must also offer to arrange consultations with the professionals providing such services or care that may be available to the individual.
- The age criterion section of the assessment guidance will include:
- reminder that age will be determined at Step 1 (First request).
- that proof of age documentation may not be required if it is self-evident the person is aged over 18 (for example, they are elderly and their date of birth is on their medical record)
- The residency criterion section of the assessment guidance will include:
- reminder that residency will be initially determined at Step 1 (First request) and reconfirmed at all subsequent steps in the process to ensure continued residency in Jersey
- set out that residency checks will generally be undertaken by the HCJ team that currently deals with eligibility matters for accessing other HCJ services. In order to undertake these checks, the team may need to request information from the person (via the Care Navigator) or from other Government Departments. If consent is not given for information about residency to be shared, the individual may be found not to meet the criteria.
100. In addition, the assessment guidance will also set out:
- additional considerations for the assessment of individuals with learning disabilities and/or autism spectrum disorders, including requirement to allow additional time for assessments (to accord with guidance on independent advocacy and communications support)
- additional considerations where the individual has chosen not to provide consent for the assessing doctors to share information with others, for example: when consent is not given to speak with the person's family or GP
- processes related to establishing the extended team including determining the skills / knowledge of the members of the team (as relevant to the circumstances of the individual)
- matters related to holding extended team meetings (frequency, attendance, etc.) and associated record keeping
- process for review of requests for second opinions, and process for second opinion assessments including examples of thresholds for second opinion assessment
- considerations in relation to seeking relevant opinions, including:
- when relevant opinions may or must be sought
- who may provide relevant opinions
- steps the assessing doctor must take when requesting a relevant opinion, e.g.:
• informing the person they are requesting the opinion in relation to a request for assisted dying
• explaining to the person they have a right to refuse under the law
• where the person is not based in Jersey, that they should consider the law that applies in the location they are based in
- when relevant opinions by mental health practitioners should be sought
g. process for change of practitioner, for example where a Coordinating Doctor is no longer able to carry out the role due to illness
h. process for identifying and arranging for wellbeing support, if it is required by the individual (or their family member or carer)
- Including considerations for the assisted dying process where the individual has children/dependents aged under 18.
i. process for supporting individuals who are assessed as not meeting the eligibility criteria, including signposting to additional support services.
Target audience for Guidance: Assessing doctors, all assisted dying practitioners and any person who may be asked to provide a relevant opinion for the purpose of an assisted dying assessment
101. Guidance on care planning for an individual's assisted death will:
- confirm requirements for care planning as required by the law including matters related to the information that the administering practitioner is required to tell the individual at Step 6, which include:
- information about the approved drugs, including who will administer them and how they may be administered and risks associated with each option
- options for place of assisted death [with reference to the location guidance]
- involvement of family or friends in the assisted death / managing family and friends' refusal to be involved / understanding and managing the potential impact on family and friends of their involvement
- individual's choice to –
- consent to continued carrying out of assisted death, and/or
- make their final request and waive requirement for future capacity as Step 6
- that the individual is expected to die if the approved drugs are administered to them
- that the individual may withdraw their request at any time before the drugs are administered
- set out process for developing care plan with the individual and all matters to be considered in that care plan
- set out process for amending the care plan (when and how it can be amended)
- detail considerations regarding involvement of family or friends in the care planning phase (i.e. may be appropriate to include them in the care planning, but all decisions must be made by the individual)
- detail how the administering practitioner can support the individual to decide on method and mode of the assisted death (e.g. self-administer or practitioner administer and whether drugs will be administered orally, or intravenously, plus any additional considerations, for example administration via nasogastric tube)
- detail as to how administering practitioner can support individual to decide on whether to:
- consent to continued carrying out of assisted death
- make their final request and waive requirement for future capacity
- make an advance decision to refuse treatment (if they have not already done so)
- confirm steps administering practitioner must undertake to decide whether they are satisfied individual has capacity to make final request, and is doing so voluntarily
- confirmation of involvement of family or friends during the assisted death, and confirmation of who will be in attendance
- requirements for who may act as an administration witness, and steps for administering practitioner to confirm who will act as the witness
- include specific guidance for professionals who may act as an administration witness, to include:
- scope of right to refuse
- requirements for acting as a witness – including witnessing the administering practitioner preparing the approved drugs and:
- providing them to the individual to self-administer; or
- administering to the individual
iii. additional tasks the witness may carry out, for example providing practical and emotional support to the individual or any family who are present
iv. tasks the witness may not undertake – e.g. administration of the approved drugs to the individual
v. signing the post-death review form confirming it has been accurately completed by the administering practitioner
- and steps to take where the witness believes the assisted death was not carried out in accordance with the law
- support additional considerations around the individual's wishes for the assisted death – e.g. consideration of inclusion of belief or faith ceremony, if music is to be played, etc.
Target audience for Guidance: Administering practitioners and other assisted dying practitioners
102. Guidance on prescribing and dispensing approved drugs will:
a. confirm requirements for the prescribing, preparation and dispensing of approved drugs as required by the law
b. confirm arrangements for ensuring information about approved drugs is secure and will not be publicly available
c. set out process for clinical decision making as to the regimen of approved drugs to be prescribed by the administering practitioner, including requirements to:
• taking into account the views and wishes of the individual, including their preferred method and mode of administration of the approved drugs
• consultation with a pharmacy professional as to the most suitable prescription
d. set out process for Pharmacy Professionals in the preparation and dispensing of the approved drugs, following the principles that:
• a minimal number of individuals handle the approved drugs
• there is a clear chain of command' and clear documentation
• the approved drugs are always held securely
e. confirm process for disposal of any unused approved drugs (and equipment, such as IV lines used to support administration) following the assisted death, or if the assisted death is not carried out
Target audience for Guidance: Administering practitioners and Pharmacy Professionals
103. Guidance on administration of the approved drugs will:
- set out the process for undertaking the final review of the individual at Step 7 of the assisted dying process, to include:
- steps for confirming individual has capacity and decision is voluntary; OR
- for confirming individual has a valid waiver of requirement for future capacity
steps to take if individual appears to refuse or resist administration [see paragraph 82]
- set out the requirements for the administration witness, including who may act as a witness and what the witness is required to do [see also care planning guidance above]
- confirm process for delaying or stopping the assisted death if the administering practitioner is unable to continue, for example the administering practitioner does not reasonably believe the person's request at the final review is voluntary
- process for preparation and administration of approved drugs (either self- administration or administration by practitioner)
- to set out steps for oral administration, including by a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or nasogastric tube (NG) and intravenous (IV) administration
- and process where self-administration is to be supported by family member/friend under direction of administering practitioner
- requirements of practitioner following administration of drugs, including requirement to remain nearby until the individual dies
- process for completion of post-death administration form
- confirm process for disposal of any unused approved drugs [as per prescribing and dispensing guidance]
- confirm process for responding to administration complications that could arise during the administration process (for example, moving to IV administration if an individual who is orally self-administering the drugs losses consciousness / vomits before all the drugs have been taken; providing more drugs for oral administration if drugs accidently spilt by family members supporting oral administration)
- and considerations where a confirmation of consent to continued carrying out of an assisted death is not in place
- confirm process for responding to any medical complications that arise after the administration of the approved drugs (for example, a longer than expected interval between administration of approved drugs and death)
Target audience for Guidance: Administering practitioners and other assisted dying practitioners, any person who may act as the administration witness.
104. Guidance on organ donation will:
- be developed by the Committee, in consultation with the Jersey Organ Donation Committee and the NHS Blood and Transplant service.
- set out the circumstances, if any, where it may be appropriate to donate organs following an assisted death or circumstances where the NHS Blood and Transplant service may accept organs from an individual who has had an assisted death
- if the individual having an assisted death may be a suitable organ donor, the guidance will set out:
- process for discussions with the individual, during the care planning phase, once they have had approval for an assisted death
- if the person does wish to donate their organs, this will include discussion with the NHS Blood and Transplant service
- discussions with family members before and after the assisted death (as is standard for all organ donations)
- all practical considerations and procedures for donating organs following an assisted death.
Target audience for Guidance: All assisted dying practitioners, the individual and their family/carers.
105. Guidance on holding, indexing and giving access to individuals'
records will:
a. summarise key provisions in relation to individuals' data and records under the Assisted Dying Law and other relevant legislation, for example the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2018, and any other relevant policies and procedures. To include:
- who may access individuals' records and under what circumstances
- what information must not be disclosed under the assisted dying law
- the limited circumstances where information about the individual may be disclosed under the assisted dying law
- details on the offence to disclose information under the assisted dying law
- details and requirements related retention schedules for individuals' records
Target audience for Guidance: All assisted dying practitioners, certifying doctors, care navigators, other professionals involved with the Assisted Dying Service (e.g. if providing a relevant opinion), any person who may be involved in holding or accessing individuals' assisted dying records
106. Guidance on registration of assisted dying practitioners will:
- summarise the key provisions of the assisted dying law relating the registration of practitioners and certifying doctors
- set out the roles which require registration
- detail requirements for registration (e.g. competencies as agreed by the Committee; training requirements etc.)
- the application process including how to apply, how applications will be processed (e.g.: cross referencing with Jersey Care Commission; confirmation of details of Responsible Officer where relevant including associated target timeframes
- the renewal of application process including how to apply, how applications will be processed including associated target timeframes
- detail requirements for disclosure of interests when registering for a role or applying to renew registration
- confirm process for removal from the register at the person's request (surrender of registration)
- detail requirements and process if a person's registration is suspended or cancelled, including as a result of:
- changes to their UK or Jersey professional registration
- investigation into the professional's practice by the Committee (in accordance with Regulations to be brought forward – See P65/2025 paragraph 311)
- confirm process and timeframe for making changes to details on the register, including updating the Service about a person's UK or Jersey professional registration
- set out what information will be held on the register, and who may access that information and the circumstances in which they may do so (i.e. register will not be publicly held, details may be provided to the professional's employer or regulatory body for the purposes of investigation or disciplinary proceedings)
Target audience for Guidance: professionals who are or are considering registering as an assisted dying practitioner or certifying doctor
107. Guidance on disclosing interests will:
- confirm requirements for disclosing interests, as required by the law, including:
- who is required to disclose interests and when they are required to disclose interests
- the steps they must take to disclose their interests
- describe process for review of interests by the interests review officer including:
i. what interests could be problematic and be considered as a conflict of interest, e.g.:
- for an assisted dying practitioner disclosing interests in relation to the individual - they are a close relative of the individual or may benefit from the individual's will
- for an independent assessing doctor disclosing interests in relation to the coordinating doctor – they are directly line managed by the coordinating doctor
iii. what interests are unlikely to be considered a conflict e.g.:
- for an assisted dying practitioner disclosing interests in relation to the individual - they are a neighbour of the individual
- for an independent assessing doctor disclosing interests in relation to the coordinating doctor – they previously played on a sports team with the coordinating doctor
iii. steps to be taken where:
- the professional has not yet been involved in an individual's assisted dying process
- the professional has already been involved in an individual's assisted dying process (i.e., if there is a requirement to repeat steps in the process)
- set out process for the Medical Director to appoint a person to act as the interests review officer (e.g., appointing the Chief Pharmacist to review the disclosed interests of pharmacy professionals)
- set out processes for recording matters relating to conflicts of interest review and decision making
Target audience for Guidance: any professional who may be required to disclose interests under the assisted dying law and the interests review officer
108. Guidance on disclosing information about health professionals will be
developed alongside the development of the Regulations which will provide for the investigation by the Committee of the practice of assisted dying practitioners, care navigators and certifying doctors (See paragraph 311 of P65/2025)
Target audience for Guidance:
Primary audience: Members of the Assurance and Delivery Committee; employees of the Assisted Dying Service;
Secondary audience: employers and professional regulatory bodies who require information to be disclosed to them for the purpose of investigating the practice of a practitioner; other enforcement authorities
109. Guidance for families and carers will:
- provide an overview of the assisted dying process, professionals involved in the process, and key provisions of the law
- set out how families and carers may be involved in the assisted dying process
- set out what happens where an individual chooses not to involve family or carer in the process, or if a family member chooses not to be involved in the process
- set out actions to take if an individual informs a family member that they wish to withdraw from the process (e.g. that they should inform the Service.)
- provide information on decisions the individual may make following approval of an assisted death – for example, consent to proceed, waiver of requirement for future capacity or any advance decisions to refuse treatment [not directly related to the assisted death] and decisions on the location and mode of assisted death
- provide information on wellbeing support available to families and carers
- provide information on related matters (e.g. impact life insurance; death certification process; continuation of end-of-life care; safe access zones)
- signpost to further information, including the assisted dying service standards, appeals process and the complaints policy
Target audience for Guidance: any person who is a family member, carer, friend or connected person to an individual who has or is considering making a request for assisted dying
110. Guidance on certifying assisted deaths will:
- describe legal requirements under Assisted Dying Law and other legislation (e.g.: Marriage and Civil Status (Jersey) Law 2001)
- set out process for:
- attending the individual prior to the assisted death, during the care planning phase at Step 6
- viewing the individual's body after the assisted death
- certification of an assisted death – how the Medical Certificate of the Fact and Cause of Death (MCFCD) should be completed
- confirm circumstances where there is a duty to notify the Viscount of a death – i.e. if there are concerns that the assisted death was not carried out in accordance with the law.
Target audience for Guidance: Certifying doctors and administering practitioners 111. Details and plans about the development of the assisted dying training
programme are set out in paragraphs 54 to 81 above.
Section 3: Location of Assisted Deaths
112. This section of the report provides a response to recommendation 7, 8
and 9:
7 | The Minister for Health and Social Services must provide details about the timeline and stakeholders involved in discussions regarding appropriate places within the Jersey General Hospital for assisted dying. |
8 | The Panel is keen to ensure that assisted dying is only carried out within the Jersey General Hospital as a last resort, and the Minister for Health and Social Services must ensure that the Jersey Assisted Dying Service is not headquartered within the Jersey General Hospital. |
9 | The Minister for Health and Social Services must ensure robust planning is in place to mitigate the potential impact of assisted dying on any other residents or patients of Government of Jersey owned and / or managed care and nursing facilities. |
Recommendation 7: Assisted Deaths in Jersey General Hospital
Timeline and stakeholders involved in discussions
113. Initial discussions regarding appropriate places within the Jersey
General Hospital for assisted dying are ongoing and will be given consideration as part of the New Healthcare Facilities ("NHF") work.
114. Assuming the draft law is adopted by the Assembly, the Assurance and
Delivery Committee (the "Committee") will develop a policy on assisted deaths
in the hospital. The policy will be developed during the implementation phase
and will be published before the draft law comes fully into force in mid-2027. 115. The membership of the Committee will include:
a. an independent chair
b. external (non-HCJ) members, including representation from:
- organisations that provide end-of-life care in Jersey
- professionals with experience of supervising / assuring quality of health and care services
- patient and carer representatives
- expert in medical ethics
c. HCJ senior professionals (for example, HCJ Chief Officer, Medical Director, Chief Nurse)
116. In developing the policy, it is anticipated that the Committee will
consult the following stakeholders during Q3 / Q4 2026, ahead of policy publication before mid-2027:
• the HCJ Advisory Board
• the HCJ patient panel
• Head of Estates
• the NHF team
• hospital staff (via a survey)
• hospital users (via a survey)
Number of hospital-based assisted deaths
117. Based on data from jurisdictions with similar legislation we anticipate
around 14 assisted deaths per year once the Service is in full operation. We further anticipate most assisted deaths will take place in private residences, with around 30% taking place in the hospital i.e., around 4 hospital-based assisted deaths per year
Location of hospital-based assisted deaths
118. It is anticipated that construction of the new Hospital at the Overdale
site will not be complete before the end of 2028. As this will be after the draft assisted dying law comes fully into force, the Committee will need to plan for hospital based assisted dying before, and after, the opening of the Overdale facility.
119. It is currently expected that assisted deaths in the Jersey General
Hospital will take place in assigned private rooms that will be made available when required, rather than provision of a single dedicated room- which could result in operational constraints given the small number of assisted deaths in hospital per year (circa 4); and the small possibility of two assisted deaths taking place in hospital at similar times. Designating a singular assisted dying room' may also make it difficult or inappropriate for the room to be used for other purposes when not being used for an assisted death.
120. The NHF work to a design principle of privacy and dignity. 75% of
overnight beds will be in single, en-suite rooms which will provide the required privacy for the individual having an assisted death, and a degree of separation and discretion vis-à-vis other patients.
121. The policy on assisted deaths in the hospital will also address matters
relating to staffing, in response to the right to refuse to participate requirements set out in the draft law.
Safe Access Zones
122. Pending decisions to be taken by the Assembly in relation to Safe
Access Zone Regulations, it is anticipated the facilities in which an assisted death take place will be designated as a Safe Access Zone protecting staff and the public from protest and harassment.
Recommendation 8: Service not headquartered in Jersey General Hospital
123. The Minister agreed with the Panel's view that assisted deaths should only be carried in the Jersey General Hospital as a last resort, noting the requirement to take into consideration the wishes of the patient. The guidance
on places of assisted deaths, to be developed by the Committee will set out that in most circumstances it is anticipated that a person's assisted death will take place in another location, such as their home, but in doing so, the approved location guidance must give consideration to other factors such as whether it is safe or appropriate for a person to have an assisted death in their own home.
124. The Minister noted that the Panel's view that the location of the
headquarters of the Jersey Assisted Dying Service should not be within the hospital but observed that taking this decision would, at this stage, be pre- emptive.
125. The headquarters will be the office facilities from which staff
deliver administrative tasks and coordinate the assessment processes. At this point in time, it is not known whether people requesting an assisted death will attend the headquarters to meet with assessing doctors or whether, to protect patient privacy, this will be undertaken at other locations (for example, in the person's place of residence). These decisions will be made during the implementation phase, if the draft law is adopted.
Recommendation 9: Assisted deaths in GOJ managed care facilities
Assisted deaths in non-HCJ care facilities
126. The draft assisted dying law provides that an assisted death may only
take place in a care home with the agreement of the manager or provider of that care home. This right to refuse does not, however, extend to refusing permission for other steps in the assisted dying process to take place on the care home premises, for example, a care home resident must be allowed to have an eligibility assessment or care planning meeting in their room in the care home, as to do otherwise may deny them access to the Service.
Assisted deaths in HCJ care facilities
127. The right to refuse' to have an assisted death on a care home premises
does not extend to care facilities provided by HCJ, on the basis that HCJ is a provider of public services and should not deny the public access to those services. (It is for this reason that HCJ will provide for assisted deaths to take place in the hospital if a person cannot have the assisted death in their home or care home).
128. That said, whilst the draft law does not provide the manager of an HCJ
care facility the right to refuse an assisted death on their premises, the draft law provides that the place must be approved by the Administering Practitioner and the Administering Practitioner may determine that they cannot approve that place.
129. The draft law explicitly provides that, in considering whether a place
can be approved for an individual's assisted death, the Administering Practitioner must be satisfied that an assisted death can be carried out safely in the location, which includes consideration of:
- any risks that may make it unsuitable; and
- the views of others who live there.
130. Furthermore, the draft law also requires the Assurance and Delivery
Committee to develop operational guidance to setting out the factors to be considered by Administering Practitioner's in making a decision as to whether to approve a place for an assisted dying (see below).
131. Note: there are currently 5 care homes provided by HCJ. All residents
in the facilities have private rooms. This includes:
- one nursing home that can accommodate up to 25 residents
- facilities that provide temporary support (for example, respite care facilities or recovery units) as opposed to longer-term residential care, or
- residential homes that accommodate 5 or fewer receivers of care (for example, group homes for people with learning disabilities)
Location guidance, considerations for assisted deaths taking place in HCJ-run care homes
132. It is anticipated that the operational guidance on places of assisted
deaths, to be developed by the Committee, will set out the following considerations amongst others (subject to consultation):
The Administering Practitioner will be required to:
- Notify manager or provider of individual's wish for assisted death to take place in care home during the care planning phase (Step 6) [Or, if it is clear at an earlier stage during the assessment phase, the Coordinating Doctor may arrange for the care home to be notified at an earlier stage that this is a possibility.]
- Meet with the manager and / or provider to talk them through what will happen on the day including - what the Administering Practitioner will do (prepare the approved drugs, undertake the Final Review, remain nearby until the individual's death etc.); how long the process is expected to take; and what will happen after the death.
- Give the manager/provider specific information on the:
- planned date/time for assisted death
- specific details of the assisted death – including who will be present (for example, family members); any details that may be necessary for the planning of the assisted death (for example, matters related to the method/mode of assisted death and if additional equipment is required, such as a nasogastric tube)
- arranging for wellbeing support for staff that may be involved in the process
- Visit the care home, if required, to satisfy themselves that:
- there are no risks at the location that may make the location unsuitable (for example, if the room in which the assisted death will take place is too small to provide additional care in the event of medical complications)
- the views of other residents do not create the risk that an assisted death cannot take place safety on the premises (for example, either because those residents are opposed to assisted dying and may be disruptive, or that the potential impact on other residents cannot be mitigated against if the fact of the pending assisted death is likely to be known amongst those residents and likely cause undue distress beyond a principled objection to assisted dying)
Care home manager / provider will be required to:
- Consider the views of other residents and make arrangements or accommodations as required – and discuss these with the Administering Practitioner where required – for example, if it would be more appropriate for the assisted death to take place at a particular time of day
- Make staff aware of the availability of assisted dying training and their rights and protections under the law (i.e., their right to refuse to participate and associated employment protections)
- Consult with staff about the planned assisted death to ascertain whether any staff member does not wish to be working at the planned time of the assisted death (Note: some managers may determine that it is appropriate to consult with staff members in advance of the law coming into effect, so that those who wish to exercise their right to refuse can make this known in advance)
- Plan staffing arrangements for the day to take into account any employee's right to refuse. This may include the staff member not working on that day or being engaged in duties away from where the assisted death is planned to take place.
- Consideration of any other specific arrangements for other residents that should be undertaken both in advance of the assisted death and on the planned date of the assisted death (For example, supporting the individual to decide whether to inform other residents of their assisted dying request. It may be appropriate for the manager to arrange for the Administering Practitioner to speak with other residents to provide them with information and answer any questions they may have).
- Discuss the planned assisted death with the Administering Practitioner, sharing their views on:
- any potential risks or concerns about whether the location is suitable
- the views of others, including staff members or other residents
- any specific arrangements that should be undertaken in advance or on the planned date of the assisted death
133. NOTE: where the care home is not HCJ provided, the Administering Practitioner will also have an initial discussion with the manager or provider about their agreement or otherwise for any assisted deaths to take place in the care home.
Section 4: Staff and Recruitment
134. This section of the report provides a response to
recommendation 11 and 12:
11 | The Minister for Health and Social Services should provide details about how general recruitment and staffing challenges across the Health and Community Services Department will be addressed in relation to the additional resource implications associated with the Assisted Dying Service. |
12 | The Minister for Health and Social Services should provide details and plans to mitigate and respond to the risk of Health and Community Services not being able to recruit sufficient staff to the Assisted Dying Service. |
135. Given that Recommendation 11 and 12 both relate to HCJ staffing matters, the Minister is providing a collective response.
Numbers of assisted deaths / total staffing requirement
136. As set out in P65/2025, based on other
jurisdictions, it is anticipated that assisted deaths may account for 1.67% of all deaths1. This equates to the following anticipated number of assessments and assisted deaths, per year, once the Service is fully established (in 2029, 2 years post-implementation):
• 28 First assessments
• 24 Second assessments
• 14 Assisted deaths
137. Allowing for an upper-end estimate of 85.5 staff
hours per assisted death (see Section 6, paragraph 332 of P65/2025) the annual staffing costs, as set out in 2026-2029 Government budget, are:
Year | Total staffing costs for Assisted Dying Service (administrative and clinical) |
2027 | £169,408 (6 months of operation) |
2027 | £298,240 |
2029 | £399,342 |
138. Having estimated the total number of assisted
deaths, and the associated total staffing requirement for the Service, the HCJ Director of Workforce has started to plan to the numbers of staff required in each assisted dying role. Preliminary projections indicate the following potential staffing requirement once the Service is fully implemented:
Role | Estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) |
| required for staffing the Assisted Dying Service |
Care Navigator | 1.0FTE |
Administrative support (Service) | 0.5FTE |
Administrative support (Committee & Review Panel) | 0.5FTE |
Assessing Doctor | 0.5FTE |
Administering Practitioner | 0.1FTE |
Pharmacy Professional | 0.05FTE |
Extended team members e.g. nurse, social worker, speech and language therapists and other AHPs | 0.4FTE |
Certifying Doctor | 0.03FTE |
TOTAL Full-time equivalent | 3.08FTE |
employees |
|
In addition to Assisted Dying Service staff relevant opinions / supporting assessments provided by professionals outside of the Service | 156 hours total staff time |
139. In setting out those preliminary projections it is
important to the note that:
- the total staffing requirement will change depending on the numbers of people requesting an assisted death and the complexity of their individual circumstances
- assisted dying practitioners may only opt to support a limited numbers of assisted dying requests per year, due to the potential associated impact on those practitioners, therefore, it should be assumed that the assisted dying workforce is likely to include a number of staff working part time for the service
140. Even accounting for the factors set out above, it
is anticipated that the total numbers of staff required will be fewer than the number of professionals who indicated willingness to participate in the Assisted Dying Service (see below).
Health and Care professionals' participation in assisted dying survey
141. In order to better understand the risk of being
unable to recruit staff to the Assisted Dying Service, survey work was undertaken in early 2025 to ascertain the number of on-island professionals who would be willing to work for the Assisted Dying Service.
142. As set out in Appendix 2 to P65/2025, a number
of Jersey-based professionals indicated, via that survey, that they would be willing to participate in assisted dying. This included:
• 19 doctors who indicated they would be prepared to act as an assessing doctor
• 51 professionals (doctors and nurses) who indicated they would be prepared to act as an Administering Practitioner
• 92 professionals who (nurse, social workers, allied health professionals) indicated they would be prepared to be part of an extended team
• 22 professionals who indicated they would be prepared to act as Pharmacy Professional.
143. Given the response to the survey, the risk of not
being able to recruit sufficient staff to the Assisted Dying Service is considered to be low. Furthermore, over 50% of survey respondents who stated they would be willing to participate in the assisted dying service are existing HCJ staff, indicating that the need to external recruitment may not be required – except where appropriate to help ensure a degree of separation between Coordinating Doctors and Independent Assessment Doctors.
144. As per Risk Section of this addendum report, it is
recognised that delivery of assisted dying could, potentially, deter people from applying to work for HCJ in future. The risk is, however, considered to be relatively low due to:
- the protections provided to employees (i.e. no staff members could be required to work for the assisted dying service)
- the likelihood that, over the next 2 – 5 years, prospective HCJ employees who are currently working in other jurisdictions will be working in jurisdictions which also permit assisted dying (assuming legislation in the UK and other British Isles jurisdictions progresses as envisaged).
Mitigations
145. Whilst it is not anticipated that the establishment
of the Assisted Dying Service will have a significant negative impact on general recruitment, or that there is a high risk of HCJ being unable to recruit staff for the work for the Service, matters related to potential recruitment challenges have nevertheless been considered:
- Recruitment process for on-island professionals: the assisted dying budget includes specific monies to support recruitment to the assisted dying service (as per the 2026-2029 Government budget and P65/2025). Given this is a new Service, and is providing something not previously lawful, standard recruitment procedures would likely not be sufficient. It is therefore proposed that there will be an expanded recruitment process which will include:
• information sessions for all interested professionals (to include workshops/talks from assisted dying practitioners currently practising in other jurisdictions, to provide real life experience of professionals working in assisted dying)
• online information aimed at potential candidates explaining the roles, the Service and key aspects of the law (this would go beyond a standard job description)
• separate communications that make it clear that all assisted dying roles are opt- in', that no one is obliged to apply, and that outlines professionals' right to refuse to participate, and the associated employment protections provided under the law
- Recruitment of off-island professionals: if staffing needs cannot be met via recruitment of on-island professionals, the draft law does not preclude the
recruitment of professionals who are not based on-island, on a similar basis to UK-based locum doctors and other health care professionals who practise in Jersey. HCJ has long established processes for the recruitment, on-boarding and deployment of locum staff.
All locum staff who opt to be work in the assisted dying service would be required to meet all the registration requirements for assisted dying practitioners under the draft law e.g.:
• registration with General Medical Council (or relevant UK professional regulatory body) and Jersey Care Commission
• completion of mandatory assisted dying training
• demonstration they have the required competencies (skills, knowledge and professionalism required to undertake the role)
Section 5: Risks
146. This section sets out the risk assessment - the list of risks from P18/2024 have
been updated, with risk rating provided for updated risks.
147. A list of risks was presented to the Assembly in P18/2024. These were the key
risks identified in relation to the development of assisted dying legislation, the establishment and ongoing delivery of an assisted dying service and the impact of permitting assisted dying in Jersey.
148. P18/2024 set out that a full risk assessment would be presented alongside the
draft law (see below). This updated full risk assessment takes into account:
- the Assembly's decision to proceed with assisted dying for those with a terminal illness only (Route 1')
- the detail set out in the draft law as lodged
- input from the health and care professionals working group.
149. The updated list of identified risks has been assessed and provided a risk score
(see below).
150. The risks have been assessed on the basis that the draft law will be approved as
lodged. Any amendments to the draft law could impact the scoring of the risk assessment.
151. Nearly all of the risks identified are future risks -i.e. would only become a risk
should the law be adopted, with the exception of 2, as listed below.
Risk assessment scoring
152. Risk analysis and evaluation has been undertaken in line with Government of
Jersey's risk management guidance.[13]
153. The risk assessment involves an evaluation and scoring of:
- consequences or impact of the risk
- the likelihood of the risk occurring
154. A risk score is developed multiplying those scores: impact score x likelihood
score = risk score
155. The risk scores are set out in the table below:
Li | kelih | Impact | |||||
| Negligible (1) | Minor (2) | Moderate (3) | Major (4) | Catastrophic (5) | ||
Almost certain (5) | 5 – moderate | 10 – high | 15 – very high | 20 – very high | 25 – very high | ||
Likely (4) | 4 – moderate | 8 – high | 12 - high | 16 – very high | 20 – very high | ||
Probable (3) | 3 – low | 6 – moderate | 9 - high | 13 - high | 15 – very high | ||
Unlikely (2) | 2 – low | 4 - moderate | 6 - moderate | 8 - high | 10 - high | ||
Rare o (1) | 1 - low | 2 – low | 3 – low | 4 – moderate | 5 – moderate | ||
156. Note: All risks that result in a person wrongly having an assisted death (e.g. a
person wrongly assessed as eligible') have been scored as 5' in terms of impact, however given the safeguards and mitigations provided in the draft law have been rated as 1' in terms of likelihood – i.e. extremely rare/unlikely, however given the high impact rating this results in a moderate total risk score of 5.
157. The impact of risks includes consideration of difference categories, these
include:
- people/individual rights, health & safety - risks that may impact the rights of individuals or their safety and wellbeing
- safeguarding – ensuring sufficient safeguards for patients and professionals within the assisted dying process
- service delivery/operational – disruption to process or delivery of Service
- reputational – to Jersey as a jurisdiction and / or the Government of Jersey
- professional – risks to professionals either engaged by Jersey Assisted Dying Service or undertaking assessments, or other on-island health and care professionals
- financial/economic – financial impact on individuals, professionals or Government of Jersey
- societal or environmental – risks related to changes in public perception of the value of life for older people, people with disabilities or life limiting conditions or people requiring palliative or end of life care
- legal and compliance – risk of legal challenges or breach of standards, guidance or law.
Pre-adoption risks
No. | Risk summary | Impact score | Plans, mitigations + controls | Likelihood score | Total risk score | ||
1. | The report and proposition is constructed to provide multiple safeguards that work to protect both people requesting an assisted death and wider society. RISK: Lobbying of States Members prior to States Assembly debate may result in amendment that removes key safeguards. | 3 |
| Majority of States Members previously vote to support safeguards set out in P18/2024 – s significant changes to this is not anticipated. Continued engagement with public and States Members is being undertaken during lodging period to support understanding of safeguards, and impact of potential amendments whic would erode the safeguards. This includes a series of public meetings (detailed information on gov.je/assisteddying), 3 full States Members briefing sessions and a fortnightly surgery' giving States Members the opportunity to discuss the draft law with polic officers. In the event that amendments to the draft law are adopted, and those amendments erode key safeguards to extent they were not sufficient to protect individuals and the wider public, th Council of Ministers may need to consider withdrawing the draft law. | d o h y e | 1 | 3 - low |
2. | Suicide (Current risk) someone with a terminal illness or unbearable suffering attempts suicide due to: - degree of suffering - inability to access palliative / end of life care and no assisted dying law Associated emotional and potential financial impact on family and friends. | 2 |
| Additional annual investment of £3million towards palliative and end of life care from 2023 Government Plan. Section 1 of this report evidences improvements in quality and availability of end-of-life care as a result of the investment, and work of End-of-Life Partnership. Bereavement & support services available to family and friends. [See also post-adoption risk 29] |
| 1 | 2 - Low |
Post-adoption risks
No. | Risk summary | Impac t score | Plans, mitigations + controls | Likelih ood score | Total risk score | |||||
1. | The introduction of assisted dying in Jersey may impact wider societal attitudes towards people who are disabled, ill or require care and treatment. Risk that this could result in: - wider society dismissing / failing to recognise the value of those people's lives - individual people perceiving their lives having diminished value / perceiving themselves as a burden | 4 | Continued consultation during law drafting process with key groups including health and care professionals (building on previous consultation undertaken) Assisted dying ONLY for those wit terminal illness and <6 months lif | 1 | 4 - moder ate | |||||
| expectancy [Route 2' for those without a short life expectancy was not progressed] Policy principles set out that: • assisted dying will not replace investment in the palliative care and end-of-life care services whic provide for people who require car and treatment • evidence from other jurisdictions indicates that the majority of individuals requesting assisted dying, do so whilst receivin palliative care • Section 1 of this addendum report demonstrates ongoin improvements to quality an availability as a result of additional £3m per year investment from 2023 Government Plan • P73/2025 (to be debated at the sam States sitting as the draft assisted dying law) requests the Minister to bring forward an end of life law' t introduce statutory provision of palliative care for those with lif expectancy of less than 12m to be considered by Assembly before full AD law comes into effect – i.e putting end of life care on equal statutory footing with AD Assisted dying law sets out that a person may only be eligible for assisted dying if they have a voluntary, settled and informe wish to do so. | h e g g d e o e . d |
|
| ||||||
|
|
| The draft law creates a number of new offences and confirms that assisted dying is not suicide: • offence to promote or advertise assisted dying – i.e. no person/organisation must put information in public domain about AD with intent of persuading or encouraging anyone to have an AD • the Homicide (Jersey) Law 1986 will be amended to clarify that suicide is not an offence, but that encouraging or assisting another person's suicide is an offence. |
|
|
2. | A lobby group / individual makes a successful challenge against assisted dying eligibility criteria or process in European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Challenge could be that criteria / process is:
Failure to take account of requirements of international conventions which are extended to Jersey (e.g. UNCRC) could result in potential reputational damage and / or associated civil action. |
| Work has been undertaken with Law Officers Department to ensure development of proposals aligns with European Convention on Human Rights and with key international conventions including UNCRC (United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child) and UNCRPD (United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities). Throughout development of draft law, there has been continued consideration of issues under international human rights frameworks, with no major concerns raised. |
|
|
2 A | Too restrictive - As set out above | 3 | As above | 1 | 3 – low |
2 B | Too open - As set out above | 4 | As above | 1 | 4 - moder ate |
3. | If the law is not fit for purpose and safeguards established in the law do not work effectively there is a risk that this may result in individual having an assisted death who should not be eligible for assisted dying | 5 | Draft law confirms two-stage assessment process with registered, specially trained doctors to ensure compliance with eligibility safeguards (plus legal requirement to seek supporting assessment / opinions where assessing doctors are not satisfied that eligibility criteria has been met). Additional checks on the voluntary nature of an individual's request and their capacity are required to progress through the steps of the process, where the individual must make a request to proceed. Draft law provided for extended team members who will support robust assessment of eligibility criteria as assessing doctors will benefit from different professional perspectives / challenge and may undertake supporting assessments, where required (particularly in relation to assessment of family dynamics to support detection of coercion) Draft law requires Assurance and Delivery Committee to monitor and ensure compliance with standards and process. Professional standards for professional - all assisted dying practitioners: • must be registered with the Assisted Dying Service • are required to meet professional competencies are required to have undertaken mandatory training (with 3-year refreshment) | 1 | 5 - moder ate |
4. | The operational guidance does not fully align with the law, with risk that this could result in: | 3 | Draft law provides for Assurance and Delivery Committee whose main function is to supervise the Service's establishment and to continue to supervise the provision of the Service. Requirement for Committee to arrange for development of operational guidance, training programme and competencies for AD practitioners. And in developing these, the must consult with individuals or organisations with relevant expertise. | 1 | 3 - low |
|
|
|
| Assisted Dying Review Panel required to review all assisted deaths (and requests that did not result in an assisted death) – to determine whether process was carried out in accordance with the law and guidance, and report findings to Committee including, for example, concerns with guidance or the operation of the law. | – |
|
|
4 A | Individual wrongly assessed as eligible' | 5 |
| Option for person with special interest in care of treatment of person to appeal to Royal Court |
| 1 | 5 - moder ate |
4 B | Individual wrongly assessed as ineligible' | 2 |
| Option for individual to appeal to Royal Court |
| 2 | 4 - moder ate |
No. | Risk summary | Impac t score | Plans, mitigations + controls | Likelih ood score | Total risk score | ||
5. | Incorrect application of a robust assessment process individual practitioner level, with risk that this could result in: |
|
| Draft law provides for systems to support identification of systemic risks at Service level or practitioner failings including: • registration and inspection of Assisted Dying Service by Jersey Care Commission • Assisted Dying Review Panel to review all assisted deaths, immediately after that death (i.e. review of individual AD practitioners) Plus, as above, extensive processes in draf law to ensure Service and practitioners are well placed to accurately assess for eligibility (e.g. training and competencies requirements, provision of extended team to check and challenge' decisions) Draft law allows for appeals against incorrect decisions on eligibility prior to the AD going ahead – i.e. the Court can overtur an incorrect decision if it is challenged by appeal. Creation of new offences in draft law: • offence to unlawfully administer approved drugs • offence to coerce or dishonestly induce decision | t n |
|
|
5 A | an individual being wrongly assessed as eligible' | 5 | As above, plus option for person with special interest in care of treatment of person to appeal to Royal Court | 1 | 5 – moder ate |
5 B | an individual being wrongly assesses as ineligible' | 2 | As above, plus option for individual to appeal to Royal Court | 2 | 4 – moder ate |
6. | Limitations of safeguards: An individual may not be subject to direct coercion (for example, from family member) but may make the decision to request an assisted dying as a result of: |
| The assessment process allows for the assessing doctors to seek independent psychiatric assessments to help support identification of people who do not want to die but feel pressure to end their lives. If individual meets all eligibility criteria set out in law (i.e., has capacity, decision is voluntary and meets all health eligibility criteria), there is a requirement to accept personal decision making as a motivation (i.e., the personal desire to die sooner to avoid being a burden to a loved one). Draft law requires assessing doctor to tell the individual if they are of the opinion that the individual would actually be able to bear the suffering their condition, or the treatment for it, is expected to cause them – i.e. that their concerns about future suffering are misplaced. |
|
|
6A | perceived societal pressure ("I feel I must die sooner as I am ill and therefore of no value" or "the high cost of my care would be better spent elsewhere") | 2 |
| 3 | 6 - moder ate |
6B | individual circumstances and associated choice ("I want to die sooner so I am not a burden to my wife.") | 1 |
| 3 | 3 - low |
6C | misplaced concern about anticipated suffering | 1 |
| 3 | 3 - low |
7. | Emotional impact on family members, if the individual requesting an assisted death does not inform them / excludes them from decision making process. | 3 | Coordinating Doctors will encourage the individual to inform family members – the draft law requires assessing doctor to inform individual that they should talk to friends and family about request, unless it is not reasonable to do so [e.g. coercive partner] Members of the extended team and the Care Navigator will also support conversations with the family. The draft law requires counselling and bereavement support to be made available to family members / friends via the Jersey Assisted Dying Service. | 2 | 6 - moder ate |
8. | Risk the people will elect to have an assisted death if unable to access palliative care and end of life care | 3 | Ongoing additional £3m per year investment in palliative and end of life care from 2023 Government Plan. The report [see Section 1] demonstrates improvements in quality and availability of end of life care as a result of that investment. AD law requires assessing doctor to discuss with individual all options for care and treatment, including EOL & palliative care. P73/2025, to be debated alongside the draft assisted dying law, requests the Minister to bring forward an end of life law for statutory provision of palliative care for those with life expectancy of less than 12m [to be considered by Assembly before full AD law comes into effect] – i.e. putting end of life care on equal statutory footing with AD and requiring ongoing investment in services. | 1 | 3 - low |
9. | Service and safety complaints and / or legal challenges made (regardless of whether the complaints / challenges are upheld) resulting in reputational | 3 | Assessment criteria clearly defined in law and operational guidance. All assisted dying practitioners required to undergo mandatory training. (Draft law provides that a professional does not commit an offence (or be subject to civil claims) if acting in accordance with law and making decisions 'in good faith', | 2 | 6 - moder ate |
| damage to the Service, and HCJ more widely. |
| having taken reasonable steps even if subsequent evidence to the contrary were to come to light.) Operational guidance, standards and supervision developed by Assurance and Delivery Committee, in consultation with professional bodies and regulators. A referral would be made to a professional regulatory body if fitness to practise concerns around a professional amount to a serious departure from the professional standards. Failure to comply with standards and guidance may also result in investigation by their employer. Assisted dying law will create offences of: giving false or misleading information or forging a document' and unlawfully administering approved drugs'. These penalties act as a deterrent for any person who might intentionally act outside of the legislation and would warrant police involvement if professional is suspected to have committed an offence under the law. The draft law provides for an appeals process and a legitimate legal pathway for those wanting to challenge decisions to approve or decline AD Review Panel process will proactively identify issues that may give rise to safety concerns so the Committee may act to address the issues. The draft law provides a regulation making power for the Committee to investigate the practice of an assisted dying practitioner where there are concerns about the professional's practice. |
|
|
10. | Assessing an individual's capacity to make an assisted dying request is complex (and can be |
| Specific capacity test for assisted dying is set out in draft law. As part of the process the individual will be asked to consent to the assessing doctors accessing their medical record. The |
|
|
| particularly challenging where they have a psychiatric disorder, such as severe depression, which can impair decision-making capacity.) Risk A: Assessing Doctor incorrectly decides an individual has capacity and that person goes on to have an assisted death Risk B: Assessing Doctor incorrectly decides an individual does not have capacity and that person cannot have an assisted death |
| individual will be informed that if they do not provide consent, it is likely that the assessing doctor will not be able to make a determination of their eligibility, and the individual could not then be assessed as eligible for assisted dying. Assessing doctor must seek a supporting opinion or assessment of specific matters related to an individual's eligibility for assisted dying, if the assessing doctor is unable to make a determination on any of the criteria, including decision-making capacity. Costs associated with capacity assessments including engagement of capacity specialists are provided for in outline budget. Depending on the individual's medical condition and any comorbid mental illness, a suitable professional will carry out a supporting capacity assessment (this may include a psychiatrist, geriatrician, psychologist or specialist social worker). AD practitioners must be satisfied that individual has capacity at multiple times throughout the process, or the process cannot proceed. This includes: • the 2 independent assessments • when the individual makes their second request for assisted dying • when agreeing the care plan at Step 6 • when making their final request (at either step 6 or Step 7) Draft law allows persons with special interest to appeal decision that individual has capacity. |
|
|
10A | As above | 5 | As above | 1 | 5 - moder ate |
10B | As above | 2 | As above | 2 | 4 - moder ate |
11. | Risk that an individual is deemed to have capacity at the time | 5 | Draft law updated proposals to require individual to make their final request at Step 6 (care planning phase), if they are waving the requirement for future capacity. | 1 | 5- moder ate |
| waiving the requirement for future capacity of consent, but shows signs of resistance at the time of the scheduled assisted death and the administering practitioner continues to administer approved drugs against their wish |
| Even if the individual has waived the requirement for future capacity, if the individual shows signs of refusal or resistance at the point of administration of the approved drugs, the Administering Practitioner must not proceed with the assisted death. |
|
|
12. | Risk of poor medical practice during administration of the approved drugs resulting in a serious untoward incident or Never Event, potentially including distress to the individual and /or their family, possible injury or protracted death. [A never event is a serious incident or error that should not occur if safety procedures are followed.] | 3 | All assisted dying practitioners are required to meet professional competency framework standards. Mandatory training to include training on correct administration of approved drugs. Administering approved drugs guidance developed by Assurance and Delivery Committee in consultation with professional bodies and regulators. Agreement to be developed between HCJ, JCC and UK professional regulatory bodies regarding fitness to practise referrals. Practitioners may be removed from assisted dying practitioner register and either the JCC and / or UK professional registers. Medical malpractice insurance for Assisted Dying Service to cover all practitioners whilst working for service. | 1 | 3 - low |
13. | Potential for the individual's treating healthcare practitioner to be distracted' by assisted dying request when treating the patient, leading to substandard or inadequate care or treatment or not giving sufficient consideration to alternative pain | 3 | The draft law sets out that the individual's ongoing care and treatment continues throughout the assisted dying process and is not affected by their request for an assisted death. This includes, but is not restricted to, any palliative or end of life care and treatment they are receiving. Failing to provide adequate care or treatment to the individual may amount to a departure from the practitioner's professional standards, which could result in a fitness to practise investigation. Failure to comply with standards and guidance may also result in investigation by their employer. | 1 | 3 - low |
| relief/ treatment options. |
|
|
|
|
14. | Jersey is seen a destination for assisted dying tourism. | 3 | Draft law provides that only Jersey residents can be eligible for assisted dying. Residential eligibility criteria clearly defined as 12 months + ordinarily resident. Legislation being progressed in a number of other British Isles jurisdictions – IOM, Scotland and UK. | 1 | 3 – low |
15. | Existing HCJ staff who are opposed to assisted dying may choose not to continue to work for HCJ. | 3 | Draft law establishes that all health and care professionals have right to refuse participation in assisted dying, including any supporting opinions or assessments. Professional must 'opt in' to become assisted dying practitioners. Guidance on right to refuse will be provided to all staff / potential staff. Employment protections in assisted dying law both for those who choose to participate and those who exercise their right to refuse, with power to provide for civil remedies by Regulation. | 1 | 3 - low |
16. | Potential new staff may choose not to accept offers of employment with HCJ (even though no staff would be required to work in the assisted dying service). May impact HCJ's existing recruitment and retention issues. | 3 | Draft law establishes that all health and care professionals have right to refuse participation in assisted dying, including any supporting opinions or assessments. Professional must 'opt in' to become assisted dying practitioners. Guidance on right to refuse will be provided to all staff / potential staff. Employment protections in assisted dying law both for those who choose to participate and those who exercise their right to refuse, with power to provide for civil remedies by Regulation. | 1 | 3 - low |
17. | HCJ may not be able to recruit sufficient staff to deliver Jersey Assisted Dying Service. |
| The survey published in Appendix 2 of P65/2025 [see also paragraph 142 of this report] indicates there are sufficient numbers of on-island professionals who are willing to participate in assisted dying, including being engaged as assisted dying practitioners, both |
|
|
| Either due to professionals being unwilling to participate or demand for Service exceeds projected numbers. |
| for projected levels of demand and for increased demand. There will be an c.18-month implementation period post adoption of any assisted dying law. This will allow for focused recruitment and training activity (costs are accounted for in costs in 2026 Budget). Jersey Assisted Dying Service will work to try to ensure that capacity matches anticipated demand for service. Projections of numbers of assisted deaths are based on figures from Western Australia, the jurisdiction that is most similar to Jersey in terms of the law's eligibility criteria and assessment process. If staffing requirements cannot be met on- Island, HCJ will look to engage UK-based staff to work on a contract basis for Assisted Dying Service. |
|
|
17A | RISK A: Service cannot be fully staffed | 2 |
| 1 | 2 - low |
17B | RISK B: Patients may experience delays to assessments if no assessing doctor is available. | 2 |
| 2 | 4 - moder ate |
18. | Implementation of assisted dying legislation may be perceived to conflict with professional registration bodies practice guidance. | 3 | There has been extensive dialogue with relevant professional regulatory bodies. This will continue throughout the process of developing secondary legislation (i.e. powers to investigate practitioners practice) and developing both the training and operational guidance- with a view to ensuring compatibility with professional standards. | 1 | 3 - low |
19. | Risk that the emotional and mental health and wellbeing of professionals working for Jersey Assisted Dying Service could be adversely impacted, due to | 2 | Practitioner training to be trauma informed, taking into consideration impact of current or past trauma on professionals. Service to include provision of professional supervision, debriefing/ peer-support and access to psychological support (costs are accounted for in proposed budget). | 1 | 2 - low |
| experiencing trauma whether from a single incident or the cumulative effect of assisting with multiple assisted deaths. |
| This will be in addition to peer mentoring with experienced practitioners from other jurisdictions. |
|
| ||
20. | Harassment or public pressure from individuals or campaigning groups towards professionals who opt-in to become assisted dying practitioners. | 2 | List of assisted dying practitioners will not be publicly held. Draft law provides for protection for professionals including employment protections and safe access zones. | 1 | 2 - low | ||
21. | Failure to engage fully with stakeholder groups during implementation phase leading to potential unsafe practice; conflict; harassment of staff; and reputational damage. | 3 | Continue engagement with all relevant stakeholders, throughout implementation phase. | 1 | 3 - low | ||
22. | Risk that individual patient's life insurance policies may not pay out in the event of their assisted death. This could: - have financial implications for surviving relatives - give rise to GoJ reputational damage and / or calls for financial recompense | 2 | 1 | 2 – low | |||
• initial consultation with insurance bodies indicates that an assisted death would not impact life insurance policies • continued dialogue with Association of British Insurers during the law drafting and implementation phases. People and their families |
|
| |||||
• ensure people requesting an assisted death are advised to contact their insurance providers • requirement placed on Coordinating Doctor to advise the individual to check insurance arrangements as part of assessment process | |||||||
23. | Risk that GoJ cannot adequately insure AD practitioners professional indemnity insurance & medical malpractice insurance due to exclusions associated with an Assisted Dying Service. Could result in uninsured loses / individual practitioners at risk of being sued without insurance cover. | 3 | Initial discussions with relevant insurance providers indicate that insurance cover for health professionals takes account of the legislation in the jurisdiction in which the health professional is working. Therefore, if assisted dying becomes legal in Jersey, medical indemnity insurance could extend to assisted dying professionals operating within that legislative framework. Medical indemnity insurance is provided for professionals undertaking assisted dying in jurisdictions where assisted dying is already permitted (e.g. Australia, Canada and New Zealand) Continue discussions with relevant professional bodies and Medical Defence Unions, GoJ Insurance Brokerage during implementation phase. | 1 | 3 - low |
24. | Risk that GoJ cannot adequately insure assisted dying practitioners under professional indemnity insurance and medical malpractice insurance due to exclusions associated with an Assisted Dying Service. This could result in uninsured loses and individual practitioners at risk of being sued without insurance cover. | 3 | Initial discussions with relevant insurance providers indicate that insurance cover for health professionals takes account of the legislation in the jurisdiction in which the health professional is working. Therefore, if assisted dying becomes legal in Jersey, medical indemnity insurance could extend to assisted dying professionals operating within that legislative framework. Medical indemnity insurance is provided for professionals undertaking assisted dying in jurisdictions where assisted dying is already permitted (e.g. Australia, Canada and New Zealand) Continue discussions with relevant professional bodies and Medical Defence Unions, GoJ Insurance Brokerage during implementation phase. | 1 | 3 - low |
25. | Risk that GPs and other private practitioners may not be able to secure the necessary insurance to operate as an | 2 | HCJ will employ / engage all practitioners working for Assisted Dying Service and would arrange the necessary insurance cover. | 1 | 2 - low |
| assisted dying practitioner. |
|
|
|
|
26. | In the event of a successful malpractice claim, the HCJ would be required fund any excess, which may be a significant amount per claim. Excesses associated with claims have recently increased. | 5 | This is a live risk which would apply to any HCJ malpractice claims. | 1 | 5 - moder ate |
27. | Risk that cost of premiums and excesses have negative impact on HCJ overall budget, requiring costs savings in other areas of activity. | 2 | Budget set out in proposition states that costs do not include insurance as this cannot be determined until draft law adopted. If additional costs incurred HCJ will seek within 2027 Government Budget to ensure no impact on HCJ core budget | 1 | 2 - low |
28. | Report and proposition includes breakdown of anticipated service costs. Risk that these costs are incorrect or rise. | 2 | Updated cost estimates for the implementation and delivery of assisted dying were presented alongside the draft law prior to debate on the draft law. These costs will be reviewed annually and significant changes to the costs will be considered within future Government budgets. | 2 | 4 - moder ate |
29. | Suicide (Future risk) someone who wishes to have an assisted death does not meet the criteria under the Law, so decides to attempt suicide leading to possible further harm to themselves or completion of suicide. Associated emotional and potential financial impact on family and friends. | 2 | Introduction of assisted dying law provides a legal framework for an individual to who meets the eligibility criteria, which includes suffering that they determine to be unbearable, to end their life. That legal framework provides support for the individual and their loved ones and works to reduce loneliness and fear associated with their death. Report and proposition proposes that assisted dying law would not come into effect until: -Assembly is satisfied with impact of recent investments in palliative and end of life care (which will support wider access). - an end of life care law, has been presented to the Assembly, which provides for | 2 | 4 - moder ate |
|
|
|
| statutory provision of palliative care at end of life. Proposals set out pathways for accessing support and additional care or treatment for those assessed as not eligible for assisted dying. The Homicide (Jersey) Law 1986 will be amended to clarify that suicide is not an offence, but that encouraging or assisting another person's suicide is an offence. [See also pre-adoption risk 2] |
|
|
|
30. | Jersey law not sufficiently closely aligned with other UK jurisdictions, and potential for differences between assisted dying laws to be problematic for professionals and public | 2 |
| Policy team and Minister to continue to liaise with key stakeholders including UK Government departments (Ministry of Justice (MOJ) and Department of Health an Social Care (DHSC)), UK professional regulatory bodies (e.g. GMC, NMC, GPhC, HCPC, Social Work England) and UK professional representative bodies (to include BMA and RCN) and other jurisdictions (e.g. Scotland and Isle of Man) Professionals who register to be A practitioners will need to undergo specific training for Jersey law. Plus, clear public communication during implementation phase about the introduction of the law. | d | 1 | 2 – low |
31. | Privy Council not supporting Royal Assent to assisted dying law (e.g. not approving law or delaying approval) | 5 |
| Mitigation: As above, Policy team to continues to liaise with MOJ and other UK Gov departments, at an early stage (i.e. prior to approval of law by States Assembly) Low risk as UK bringing forward own legislation. |
| 1 | 5 - moder ate |
32. | An individual not being able to exercise genuine choice due to an organisational position on AD (i.e. a perceived lack of choice) – e.g. are resident of a care home who | 2 |
| Ongoing work with professionals and organisations, prior to and during implementation period (including care homes) in terms of awareness raising of the law and the rights of organisations and persons seeking assisted dying (e.g. right to have an assessment on the premises, if not the assisted death itself) |
| 1 | 2 - low |
| has engaged their right to refuse' |
| Plus, alternative options provided in draft law, e.g. individual can have AD in hospital if care home refuses. |
|
|
33. | If an individual is denied AD in Jersey they may seek and be successful in obtaining AD in another jurisdiction, which could lead to a civil claim against GoJ for prolonging suffering and the incurring of additional cost to the applicant to obtain these services off-island. | 2 | If an individual is not eligible under the criteria set out in the Jersey law, it is possible they may seek an assisted death in another jurisdiction where there are different eligibility criteria. However, Jersey draft law clearly sets out process for eligibility and provision of AD in Jersey only and has been reviewed by law officers as ECHR compliant. A person may appeal to Royal Court against a negative decision on their eligibility for assisted dying. | 1 | 2 - low |
[6] Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy for Adults in Jersey 2023-26 Action Plan progress report Q2 2025.pdf
[9] NHS England » Ambitions for Palliative and End of Life Care: A national framework for local action 2021-2026
[11] Professional regulatory bodies: Jersey Care Commission (JCC); General Medical Council (GMC); Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC); Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC); General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) and Social Work England (SWE).