Skip to main content

What design changes the Minister made to the original specification to the Energy from Waste plant

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

1240/5(4447)

WRITTEN QUESTION TO THE MINISTER FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT BY DEPUTY A.K.F. GREEN OF ST. HELIER

ANSWER TO BE TABLED ON TUESDAY 28th APRIL 2009

Question

Could the Minister -

  1. advise the Assembly what,ifany, design changeshe, as the Minister for Planningand E nvironment, made to theoriginal specification totheEnergy from Waste plantwhich w as discussed at a meetingon 6th November2008?
  2. Provide a copyof the minutes of the meeting of 6th November 2008?

Answer

  1. A s Minister for Planning and Environmentmy first formalinvolvement with the Energy from Waste Plant was in consideringanapplicationfor outline planning permission – PP/2007/0050- submitted in January 2007. That application sought only to establish theprinciple of developmentof the Energy from Waste Plant.

D u r in g consideration of that application I was conscious that the scale of the building would have to be

such that its impact could only be mitigated by an architectural design of exceptional competence complimented by similarly excellent landscaping proposals. I felt that the originally proposed armadillo like' steel building would not achieve the necessary high standards and therefore Hopkins Architects were appointed to advise on appropriate architecture.

H o p k ins agreed that the existing scheme was unacceptable and suggested a completely revised design

whereby the building mass was reduced by externally expressing the roof structure. Hopkins have used this device in other building designs, most notably at Glyndebourne where it helps to reduce the perceived bulk of their multi award winning fly-tower.

T T S retained Hopkins to prepare an outline planning application. I determined the outline application in

October 2007, requiring that the details of the scheme be the subject of a further reserved matters application.

I m  u st emphasis that I was not party to the decision by TTS to engage Hopkins as their architects for the

preparation of the reserved matters application.

T h e r eserved matters application was prepared by Hopkins and a consent was given. Conditions attached

to the consent will ensure the quality of construction and the delivery of the detailed finishes are all of the necessary high standards.

It w  o uld appear that if the cost of the building rose it was between the outline application and the reserved

matters application. During that period I was not materially involved in progressing the design and therefore cannot be held responsible for any cost increases.

T h i s is a hugely important building as it will have a massive impact on the southern approach. Not only

will it have an impact from the perspective of Islanders but it will also be seen by the approximately one million who enter the port. I have been clear throughout my tenure as Minister for Planning and Environment that Jersey deserves outstanding architecture and design. This must apply to all buildings whether public or private and only by adhering to my philosophy will the quality of the built environment of the Island improve to the standards which I consider reflect the unique nature and character of the Island.

I fu l ly accept that the approved proposals are likely to be more costly than the cheapest alternative.

However this is always the case with proposed buildings and it is my job as Minister to deliver buildings of architectural competence and to set a high standard.

F u r th ermore I made it very clear throughout the development of the proposals that Hopkins should

endeavour to work within TTS's budget and indeed was complimented by the former TTS Minister for taking this approach.

  1. I w ould like toclarify the situation regarding the meetingof 6 November 2008 referred toin the question. That meeting was, I understand, held betweenTTSand the Treasuryandno-one from myDepartmentwas involved. I am only awareof the meeting through the disclosures that have been made in respect of the finance issuesregardingtheEfWproject. Consequently I havenonotesorminutes.