Skip to main content

Publication of number of complaints received by the Department between 2006 to 2011

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

1240/5(6904)

WRITTEN QUESTION TO THE MINISTER FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT BY DEPUTY M. TADIER OF ST. BRELADE

ANSWER TO BE TABLED ON TUESDAY 29th MAY 2012

Question

Will the Minister –

  1. produce a table showing the number of complaints received regarding his officers between 2006 and 2011, breaking the complaints down into planning, environment, enforcement sections; years; officer grade; and indicating whether multiple complaints were received against any one officer in these areas?
  2. explain the complaints procedure;
  3. explain how many complaints, if any, were upheld and how they were dealt with for example an official warning, suspension, dismissal etc?

Answer

  1. Our records for logging comments, compliments and complaints go back to 2008. The table below lists the number of complaints received against department officers for the period 2008 to 2012
  2. The Department of the Environment Customer Feedback Policy and procedure (including complaints) is as follows:

Comments, Complaints, Compliments Department of the Environment Customer Feedback Policy

We recognise that in certain circumstances customers may  wish to make a complaint, or a suggestion to help us improve our services, or indeed compliment us on the service provided. We welcome all such feedback and this document sets out our policy in this regard.

Our key aims  

  • To fully investigate and respond to all formal complaints.
  • To record and analyse all formal complaints
  • Set and monitor response targets for responding to feedback
  • To ensure complimentary feedback is registered and recognised
  • To ensure suggestions are appropriately responded to

Customer feedback  Our customers can:

  • Give us feedback about our services – online, by fax, by phone, by letter or in person
  • Expect us to use plain language when communicating with them
  • Know the name of the person that is communicating with them
  • Expect to be kept informed when we are unable to give a full response within the target time
  • Escalate a complaint when dissatisfied with our initial response

How feedback will be handled  

  1. Compliments  

A compliment is when a customer gives us feedback about how we delivered a good level of service or how an employee has done more than would normally be expected of him.

Any compliments received in writing (letter or email) will be acknowledged within 3

working days.

All written compliments will be recorded for performance monitoring purposes and

appreciation for excellent service will be passed on by the senior management team to those involved.

  1. Suggestions  

A suggestion is when a customer gives us feedback on how we can improve our service delivery.

We will send a response to the customer within 10 working days that either explains how

we  will implement the suggestion or explains why we are unable to implement the suggestion

  1. Complaints  

A complaint is any grievance or concern about the service we provide which can include allegations of one or more of the following:

Non compliance with our service level agreement

Failure to provide a reasonable level of service

Incorrect advice given

Poor customer service

Inappropriate charging for a service

An employee's behaviour causes upset to a customer We unfairly discriminate against a customer

  1. Informal complaints  

Where a customer wishes to make an informal complaint by telephone or in person we will:

Try to resolve the problem with the customer straight away

If the problem has arisen because of a mistake we will take action to put it right

If no satisfactory immediate resolution is possible we will arrange for you to be contacted by a senior manager within 3 working days. If you are still dissatisfied, we will advise you to make a formal complaint.

  1. Formal complaints  

Where a customer wishes to make a formal complaint, this needs to be made in writing (email or letter) to the line manager of the Officer that you have been dealing with, who will ensure that it is fully investigated. This is a stage 1 complaint.

We undertake to:

Acknowledge your formal complaints within 3 working days

Fully investigate and respond in detail within 20 working days.

Give you the name of the person dealing with your complaint.

If you are not satisfied with the result of the investigation by the line manager, you can request that the complaint is reconsidered by the relevant Director. This is a stage 2 complaint.

At this stage, the relevant Director will:

Review the evidence relating to the complaint

Review your comments on the Line Manager's findings

Respond in detail within 20 working days

If you are not satisfied with the result of the investigation by the relevant Director, you can request that the complaint is reconsidered by the Chief Executive Officer This is a stage 3 complaint and is the final stage of the Departmental complaints procedure.

At this stage, the Chief Executive Officer will:

Review the evidence relating to the complaint

Review your comments on the Director's findings

Respond in detail within 20 working days

Advise you of the procedure for complaints to the States of Jersey Complaints Board

Note: All parties will be kept informed throughout the process. If the complaint is about the conduct or performance of a named member of staff they will have access to all the correspondence received from the complainant. The complainant will also have access to all correspondence relating to their complaint.

The Complaints Monitoring System  

As a service organisation we respect our customers and their right to know we will treat any complaints they may make in an appropriate manner. We will endeavour to deal with all complaints efficiently and effectively. In this regard we will record and monitor the number, nature and response to all formal complaints and report the findings annually.

If you have any queries regarding this policy please contact:

Business Support Officer

Planning and Environment Department

South Hill, St Helier

In addition to the above department policy, member of the public are able to complain to the States of Jersey Complaints Board. The Board is established under the Administrative Decisions (Review) (Jersey) Law 1982, as amended, to look into complaints by members of the public into any matter of administration by any Minister or department of the States, or by any person acting on their behalf. The States of Jersey Complaints Board information leaflet and the Administrative Decisions (Review) (Jersey) Law 1982 can be downloaded from the States website.

  1. During the period 2008 to 2012 no complaints received have resulted in an officer being dealt with under the department's disciplinary or capability policy.

Complaints against officers can be dealt with as disciplinary or capability issues as follows:

  1. Disciplinary

In the case of disciplinary issues (for civil servants), the following procedure would take place;

Investigation (informal or formal as deemed appropriate by the relevant Director and with Chief Officer approval). Investigations can take place internally or with the use of two external investigators for formal cases, all depending on the extent of the issue. It is hoped that investigations will take place as soon as possible. In the case of what is deemed a minor fault, managers will bring the error to the attention of the employee and establish a course of action, set objectives, timescales and provide additional training if appropriate.

The States of Jersey emphasises that a full and proper investigation should take place into allegations, prior to a decision being taken to progress the matter formally under the procedure. Suspension from work may be required in certain circumstances, and must always be for the shortest possible period of time.

All issues are investigated with the aim of dealing with potential inappropriate behaviour immediately. The aim of the disciplinary policy is to deal with all matters fairly, consistently and promptly. The aim is to correct behaviour immediately, and in the cases where disciplinary rules have been thought to have been breeched, formal action is implemented immediately. States Human Resources is involved with all formal stages of this procedure.

This policy is used in conjunction with the States of Jersey Code of Conduct (which all Department of the Environment staff have access to on the States of Jersey website, as well as their departmental website.).

The formal disciplinary categories are; minor misconduct, serious misconduct, gross misconduct.

The formal disciplinary sanctions available are:

  • formal verbal warning
  • first written warning
  • final written warning (with or without additional penalties)
  • dismissal, with or without notice
  • right of appeal.

All disciplinary cases are recorded with the Human Resources department.

  1. In the case of capability issues (for civil servants):

If  the  matter was formal  or informal,  managers  would  ensure  individuals  are aware  of  the standard of requirements, the reason for any action and the implications of not achieving an improved performance.

If the matter was dealt with formally, they would be advised at all stages and given the opportunity to be accompanied by a colleague or representative.

Managers would be tasked with investigating all of the facts, advise or warn employees of the problem and give them written notification that their performance is being monitored, give the employee a specific period in which they have a chance to improve, take any relevant action to assist and support the employee during this period, and maintain complete written records of all discussions throughout this process.

In the cases where there was deliberate or wilful ignoring of instructions or producing sub- standard work, the disciplinary procedure would be used.

 

Complaints received by the Department of the Environment against department officers (2008 to 2012)

Date received

Received by

Stage

Department

Nature of Complaint

 Summary of Complaint

Passed to

Comment

Total

19.06.08

E-mail

1

Development Control

Poor level of service

No acknowledgement of Planning Application Submitted in Dec 2007

Assistant Director

Investigated. Apology given.

2008 5

25.06.08 & 04.07.08

Telephone and E- mail

1 & 2

Development Control

Poor level of service

Poor level of Service and turnaround time on Planning Application

Director

Investigated. Delays due to workloads. Apology given.

24.01.08

Letter

2

Building Control

Discrimination allegation

Alleged discrimination by staff members

Director

Investigated. No further action taken.

25.06.08

Letter

2

Building Control

Discrimination allegation

Alleged discrimination by staff members

Director

Investigated. No further action taken.

3.07.08

E-mail

1

Building Control

Discrimination allegation

Alleged discrimination by staff members

Assistant Director

Investigated. No further action taken.

20/01/2009

Card

1

Development Control

Poor level of service

Timescale too long. Poor service, staff attitude, lack of information.

Assistant Director

Investigated. Application processed within target. No further action.

2009 7

16/03/2009

letter

1

Development Control

Poor level of service

Telephone manner following queries over disturbance caused neighbour

Senior Planning Officer

Investigated. No reason for further action identified.

25/03/2009

e-mail

1

Building Control

Poor level of service

Phone calls not returned

Assistant Director

Assistant Director met with customer, who did not want to pursue the complaint further.

08/04/2009

e-mail

2

Development Control

Delay in Response

Delay in responding and determining application

CEO and Senior Planning Officer

Investigated. Apology given.

25/06/2009

E-mail

1 & 2

Development Control

Delay in Response / Poor service

Complaint re length of time of planning application. No one returning calls

Assistant Director

Investigated. Response via applicant's agent.

11/09/2009

Letter

 1

Development Control

Delay in Response

complaint about delays/staff handling of application

Director

Investigated. Application processed within target. No further action.

15/09/2009

e-mail

 1

Development Control

Poor level of service

Complaint from objector feeling she had been mislead

Assistant Director

Investigated. No further action taken.

16.3.10

card

1

Department

Poor level of service

Reception service

Director

Investigated. No further action.

2010 3

28.07.10

Letter

1

Development Control

Poor level of service

Objected to PAP decision in their absence

CEO

No further action.

13.09.10

Letter

1

Development Control

Poor level of service

Lack of response to phone calls and email

Director

Investigated. Apology given.

04.07.11

email

1

Development Control

Poor level of service

application was not dealt with properly

Director

Complaint dismissed.

2011 1

14.03.12

Letter

1

Building Control

Poor level of service

Staff - inconsistent advice

Director

Complaint not justified. Complaint resulted from remedial work required by surveyor.

2012 1

Total

17