The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.
The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.
Environment Scrutiny Panel Meeting No. 38
22nd January 2007 Blampied Room
Present Deputy R.C. Duhamel (Chairman) (RD)
Connétable K. A. Le Brun of St Mary (KB)
Deputy S. Power (SP)
Deputy R. Le Hérissier (RLH)
Apologies Deputy G.C.L. Baudains (Vice Chairman)
In attendance M. Robbins, Scrutiny Officer (MR)
Mr Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of Planning and Environment Time Started 2.30 pm
Ref Back | Agenda matter | Action |
1 | Business Plan of Planning and Environment Department. The Panel welcomed Senator F.E. Cohen, Minister for Planning and Environment and Mr Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of Planning and Environment. It was noted that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss the Business Plan for the Planning and Environment Department and the discussion covered the following areas –
|
|
becoming a more acceptable idea as the community was
becoming more environmentally conscious. Whilst it was accepted that there was only so much taxation would be acceptable, there seemed to be an acceptance towards environmental taxes provided that the money went directly to fund environmental solutions and projects. The Minister supported an increased usage of the bus service and any plan which reduced car usage.
3.15 pm. Deputy Le Hérissier arrived.
- The Fisheries and Tourism Departments were of concern as there was much work to be done with a very small team in each area. There were many financial implications that were current and pressing, which were the responsibility of the Minister for Economic Development. There was a sharing of responsibility with the Environment Minister holding responsibility for the Environmental aspects of Fisheries.
- It was accepted that in the case of a major environmental incident, the Environment Minister would take on responsibility over the Economic Development Minister for the duration of the emergency.
- The merger of the Jersey and Guernsey Meteorological Departments would provide a more cost effective service but that efficiency would provide a less accurate service. The proposal had been made at ministerial level but had not been pursued. RD
- With regard to the new plant to deal with Jerseys' residual waste and the proposition for an Energy from Waste plant in Guernsey, it was accepted that the Islands should maintain and enjoy their independence and work together in some areas. It was not known if any proposed plant in Jersey would be assessed on Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO). The examination of the application in Jersey was to be from the viewpoint of impact on the environment. The Minister was not sure at that time exactly what Transport and Technical Services were asking him to look at but invited Scrutiny to be involved in discussions and to make all options known to him.
- The Minister accepted that it was unrealistic to say there was no risk of tourism cabins becoming residential properties, as this was difficult to control should the industry cease to require such cabins;
- Delays in the planning application process would be increased because of the introduction of the Design Review Group. However, it should improve the overall quality of design in the Island. It was accepted that the Planning and Environment Department would not be appointing more staff, however, a further two qualified architects would make the Department much more efficient.
At 4.00 pm the Panel thanked the Minister and his Officer for attending and they withdrew.
Signed Date ..
Chairman, Environment Panel