The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.
The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.
Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel
Record of Meeting
Date: 15th April 2013 Meeting No: 83
Present | Senator S.C. Ferguson, Chairman Deputy J.G. Reed, Vice-Chairman Deputy S. Power |
Apologies | Connétable D.J. Murphy Deputy R.J. Rondel |
Absent |
|
In attendance | Senator I.J. Gorst , Chief Minister [Item 1] Senator Sir P.M. Bailhache , Assistant Chief Minister [Item 1] Mr. T. Walker , Director – International Affairs [Item 1] Mr. W. Millow , Scrutiny Officer |
Ref Back | Agenda matter | Action |
10/04/13 Item 6 513/37(3) | 1. Minister for External Relations The Panel received Senator I.J. Gorst , Chief Minister, for a public hearing relating to proposals to establish a Minister for External Relations. The Chief Minister was accompanied by Senator Sir P.M. Bailhache , Assistant Chief Minister with responsibility for external relations, and the Director of International Affairs. The hearing was recorded in order that a transcript could be made. |
|
10/04/13 Item 1 513/37(2) | 2. Deposit Loan Scheme The Panel noted that the Ministerial Response to Starter Home Deposit Loan Scheme (SR5/2013) had been received from Senator P.F.C. Ozouf , Minister for Treasury and Resources, on 12th April 2013. Consideration was given to the Panel's subsequent course of action. The Panel recalled its agreement that, on the basis that it had not yet received information from the Executive and that the debate on Starter Home Deposit Loan Scheme (P.131/2012) was imminent, it would propose that P.131/2012 be referred back under Standing Order 83. The Panel considered draft speeches which had been prepared by the Vice-Chairman in anticipation of the debate on P.131/2012. Consideration was also given to the questions the Panel had raised during the review; the questions raised by its expert advisor; and the responses provided by the Minister. It was ultimately agreed that the Panel would not initially seek a reference back but that Members would instead speak against the proposition. It was noted, however, that dependent upon the course of the debate, a proposition under Standing Order 83 would potentially still be required. |
|
160
15.04.13