The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.
The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.
Jersey Island Plan 2002 – Assessment of Proposed Energy from Waste Facility against all Planning Policies General Policies
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
G1 | Sustainable Development | Yes | The purpose of this facility is to provide an upgraded energy from waste facility in accordance with the Waste Strategy and to replace the existing incinerator at Bellozanne. The location at La Collette would minimise environmental impact and the design would aim to minimise nuisance. |
G2 | General Development Considerations | Yes | The Environmental Impact Assessment demonstrates compliance with General Development principles through site specific investigations. Site pollution control would be implemented via the site licencing procedure and the on site Working Plan. |
G3 | Quality of Design | Yes | Incorporated within the Environmental Impact Statement. See also G4. |
G4 | Design Statements | Yes | A Design Statement may be requested to accompany planning applications at the discretion of the Planning & Environment Department. Certain types of proposals will however always require a statement including those developments involving a building more than 5 storeys high. The Energy from Waste would be higher than a 5 storey building. Notwithstanding the above, the Minister is keen to see Design Statements for most applications. To that end, Design Statements will be required for any development comprising more than 100m2 of new building (gross internal area (GIA). |
G5 | Environmental Impact Assessment | Yes | An Environmental Impact Assessment has been carried out and an Environmental Impact Statement is submitted with the planning application. |
G6 | Transport Assessments | Yes | Included within the Environmental Impact Statement due to potential impacts of traffic movements to and from the proposed site. |
G7 | Control of Unauthorised Development | No | The application is in accordance with the formal planning application process. The Client (TTSD) is intending to obtain outline planning permission prior to awarding the contract to the preferred bidder thereby removing any possibility of construction proceeding without planning approval |
G8 | Access for All | Yes | No public access to Energy from Waste plant and Bulky Waste Facility. Planning application does include infrastructure improvements to adoptable highway and also to the coastal path. The design would also include an amenity walkway on the seaward side of the screening mound as an additional public amenity feature. |
G9 | Designing Out Crime | Yes | The site would be surrounded by secure fencing. |
G10 | Planning Obligations | Yes | Road infrastructure is being incorporated into the design. This would be to an adoptable standard. |
G11 | Sites of Special Interest | Yes | Site investigations and consultations indicate that the site would not directly affect any Sites of Special Interest. The South East Coast of Jersey Ramsar Site would not be directly affected by the proposed facility. Discharge of cooling water to the sea would be within the existing discharge consent conditions. |
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
G12 | Archaeological Resources | Yes | Consultations indicate that no sites of archaeological interest would be directly affected |
G13 | Buildings and Places of Architectural and Historic Interest | Yes | Indirect visual impact from Elizabeth Castle would be mitigated by design of the facility building and landscape bunding |
G14 | Protection of Trees | No | No trees would be felled at the site |
G15 | Replacement Buildings | No | No buildings are to be replaced at the site |
G16 | Demolition of Buildings | No | No buildings are to be demolished at the site |
G17 | Contaminated Land | Yes | A watching brief during excavations would be implemented. |
G18 | Signs and Advertisements | Yes | The facility would have an external site noticeboard as specified within the Working Plan. Signage would be controlled via a planning condition |
G19 | Satellite Antennae | Yes | Applications for the installation of satellite dishes will be judged on their merits, having particular regard to:
|
G20 | Light Pollution | Yes | The site would be lit however this is in context of the industrial area at La Collette. The facility would be partially screened from Havre Des Pas by landscape bunding / mounding |
Countryside
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
C1 | Sustainability and Stewardship of the Countryside | No | La Collette falls within the Built Up Area boundary as shown on Jersey Island Plan 2002 Town Proposals Map and not the countryside. |
C2 | Countryside Character | Yes | La Collette falls within the Character Area G3 St Aubins Bay however the proposed development is in context of the industrial use of La Collette reclamation area |
C3 | Biodiversity | Yes | The facility would have minimal impact on biodiversity or the coastal Ramsar site. Site investigations revealed no biodiversity interest on the site and the drainage at the facility is designed to prevent pollution to the Ramsar site. Pollution control measures are specified within the Environmental Impact Statement and would be incorporated within the Working Plan. Discharge of cooling water to the sea would be within the existing discharge consent conditions. |
C4 | Zone of Outstanding Character | No | Site is not within this zone |
C5 | Green Zone | No | Site is not within this zone |
C6 | Countryside Zone | No | Site is not within this zone |
C7 | St. Ouen 's Bay Planning Framework | No | Site is not within the St. Ouen Bay area |
C8 | Landscape Management Strategy | No | See policies C4, C5 and C6 |
C9 | Trees and Woodlands | No | None of these present at the site |
C10 | Walls, Fosses, Banques and Hedgerows | No | None of these present at the site |
C11 | Countryside Access and Awareness | No | Not in the countryside |
C12 | Tourism and Recreation Support Facilities in the Countryside | No | Not applicable as facility is in Built Up Area Zone and not the Countryside Zone |
C13 | Safeguarding Farmland | No | Site is not farmland |
C14 | Stewardship in Agriculture | No | Ditto |
C15 | Diversification of Agriculture | No | Ditto |
C16 | New Agricultural Buildings and Extensions | No | Ditto |
C17 | New Dwellings for Agricultural Workers | No | Ditto |
C18 | Change of Use and/or Conversion of Traditional Farm Buildings | No | Ditto |
C19 | Change of Use and/or Conversion of Modern Farm Buildings | No | Ditto |
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
C20 | Redundant Glasshouses | No | Not applicable |
Built Environment
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
BE1 | St. Helier Urban Character Appraisal | Yes | La Collette is not within the urban townscape of St. Helier town but it is within the built up area boundary as defined by the Town Proposals Map. The proposed facility is within context of the La Collette reclamation area which has industrial / commercial sites. |
BE2 | Proposals in the Town of St. Helier | Yes | As above |
BE3 | Town Centre Vitality | No | Not within the Town Centre Area of St. Helier |
BE4 | Waterfront Development Area | No | Not within the Waterfront Development Area |
BE5 | Tall Buildings | Yes | The proposed Energy from Waste facility would be a tall building however it would be in context of the La Collette reclamation area. The height is estimated at 35m. The building would be partially screened by landscape bunding. |
BE6 | Action Areas | No | Just outside of Havre des Pas Action Area |
BE7 | Settlement Plans | No | Not within a settlement plan area |
BE8 | Important Open Space | No | Not open space in the context of the policy which refers to green spaces. Not within defined Open Space Area. The nearest Defined Open Space is La Collette Gardens |
BE9 | Conservation Areas | No | La Collette reclamation area is not within a Conservation Area |
BE10 | Green Backdrop Zone | No | Not within Green Backdrop Zone |
BE11 | Shoreline Zone | No | Not within the shoreline zone |
BE12 | Percent for Art | No | Site not suitable as a general access area for public recreation. |
BE13 | Frontage Parking | No | Not applicable |
BE14 | Street Furniture and Materials | No | No street furniture associated with facility other than signing - See G18 |
Marine Environment
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
M1 | Marine Protection Zone | Yes | The proposed Energy from Waste facility is not within the inter-tidal or Marine Protection Zone. See comments in C3. It will however discharge to the Marine Protection Zone under an existing Trade Effluent consent |
M2 | Coastal Zone Management Strategy | No | This policy refers to the development of a strategy. |
M3 | Marine Biodiversity | Yes | A coastal Ramsar site lies to the south and east of La Collette reclamation area. The designed drainage systems and pollution control measures are specified within the Environmental Impact Statement. See comments in C3 |
M4 | Shoreline Management | No | Policy refers to the development of a Shoreline Management Plan. |
M5 | Fishing and Fish Farming | No | Facility not relevant to fishing or its support industry. |
M6 | Marine Sites of Special Interest | Yes | Policy refers to South East Coast Ramsar site. This policy is dealt with under the provisions of Policy G11. Also see comments on Policy M3 and C3 |
Housing
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
H1-H14 | Housing Policies | No | None |
Social and Community
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
SC1- SC11 | Social and Healthcare policies | No | None |
Industry and Commerce
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
IC1 | Provision of Office Accommodation | No | Not applicable. |
IC2 | Offices in St. Helier Town Centre | No | Ditto |
IC3 | Offices Outside of St. Helier Town Centre | No | Ditto. This facility is not designed to provide office provision. |
IC4 | Conversion of Upper Floors of Commercial Buildings for Office Accommodation | No | Not applicable. |
IC5 | Other Small Scale Office Developments | No | Not applicable |
IC6 | Businesses Run from Home | No | Not applicable |
IC7 | Provision of Industrial Land | Yes | Land comprising 21 acres/47 vergéesis designated at La Collette 2 for industry, storage and warehousing. Site footprint falls partially within Site Proposed for Industry |
IC8 | Protection of Existing Industrial Sites | No | Proposed facility does not fall within designated existing industrial sites or within the area of La Collette 1. |
IC9 | Proposals for New Industrial Buildings | Yes | The proposed facility is designed to be in accordance with this policy. Pollution and nuisance control measures are specified in the Environmental Impact Statement. Traffic impact is assessed in the Environmental Impact Statement. |
IC10 | Relocation of Bad Neighbour Uses | Yes | The existing facility at Bellozanne is currently not meeting environmental air quality standards and traffic congestion is causing a nuisance to local residents. A Health Impact Assessment will be carried out as part of the planning process in order to consider community effects. |
IC11 | Extensions or Alterations to Existing Industrial Buildings | No | Works within the Jersey Electricity Company power station are not included within this planning application as they classed as exempt works under the Island Planning (Exempt Operations) (Jersey) Regulations 2002. |
IC12 | New Industrial Development in the Countryside | No | Ditto |
IC13 | Protection and Promotion of St. Helier for Shopping | No | Ditto |
IC14 | Protection and Promotion of Local Shopping Centres | No | Ditto |
IC15 | Development of Local Shops | No | Ditto |
IC16 | Development of Evening Economy Uses | No | Ditto |
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
IC17 | Food Retailing Proposals | No | Ditto |
IC18 | Retail Warehouses | No | Not a retailing facility |
IC19 | Retailing within Industrial Sites | No | Ditto |
IC20 | Retail Development Outside the Built-up Area | No | Ditto |
IC21 | Take-away Food Outlets | No | Not applicable |
IC22 | Beach Kiosks | No | Ditto |
Tourism and Recreation
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
TR1 | Development of New Tourist Accommodation | No | Not applicable |
TR2 | Tourist Destination Areas | No | Havre Des Pas is listed as A Tourist Destination Area. Potential nuisance from the site to Havre Des Pas is covered under General Development Policies. |
TR3 | New or Extended Tourism and Cultural Attractions | No | Not applicable |
TR4 | Protection of Recreational and Cultural Resources | No | There would be no loss of recreational or cultural facilities due to the proposed facility. |
TR5 | Development of Recreation Resources | No | This policy is aimed more at sporting facilities and is therefore not applicable to the proposed facility. |
TR6 | Land for Recreation | Yes | The site of the proposed Energy fromWaste is in the main on land identified within the Island Plan as Land for Recreation. This proposal is addressed at Policy TR6 of the Plan which identifies the site as being part of a larger area that had the potential to provide new recreation facilities. In particular through the approved planning framework for La Collette 2 this larger area was seen as providing the opportunity for a major landscaped feature and public open space along with access to water at all states of the tide and facilities for small leisure craft. |
Travel and Transport
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
TT1 | Strategic Travel Policy | Yes | A transport assessment is included as part of the Environmental Impact Statement. Junction improvements would be required and form part of the transport assessment. Infrastructure improvements would be to adoptable standard. |
TT2 | Travel Awareness Campaign | No | Refers to a campaign to alter public modes of travel to reduce congestion. The facility would not affect the campaign. |
TT3 | Island Route Network | No | Facility does not affect designation of island route network. |
TT4 | Protection of the Footpath and Cycle Network | Yes | Existing footpath or cycle routes would not be adversely be affected by the proposed facility. See TT10. |
TT5 | Primary Route Traffic Studies | Yes | Refers to traffic studies for the junction of Commercial Buildings and the A17 and new road construction to facilitate the flow of traffic and improve access at Mount Bingham both close to La Collette. See comments in TT1. |
TT6 | Improvement Lines | No | None of the access points to La Collette are designated as improvement lines. |
TT7 | Town Centre Movement Strategy | No | Not applicable |
TT8 | Pedestrian Improvement Areas | No | Ditto |
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
TT9 | Walking Strategy | No | Ditto |
TT10 | Cycle Network | Yes | An existing cycle path runs along side the Jersey Electricity Company power station. A cycle lane is being incorporated within the adoptable highway infrastructure improvements within La Collette. The footpath around the perimeter of La Collette as part of the landscaping / recreation proposals would include a cycle lane. |
TT11 | Cycle Facilities | No | This policy refers to cycle lock up facilities etc. where members of the public have access. There would be no public access to the Energy from Waste facility by cycle due to safety issues of vehicles delivering waste to the facility |
TT12 | Safe Routes to Schools | No | See comments in TT1 |
TT13 | Public Transport Services | No | Not applicable – unlikely that the Energy from Waste development would generate the need for a bus route, however in the longer term it is probable that future development of the reclamation area would generate sufficient need. |
TT14 | Bus Priority Corridor | No | Ditto |
TT15 | Facilities for Bus Passengers | No | Ditto |
TT16 | Community Transport | No | Ditto |
TT17 | Transport Centre | No | Ditto |
TT18 | Relocation of Bus Depots | No | Connex operate a bus depot at La Collette. Access to the depot would not be adversely affected by the proposed Energy from Waste plant. Junction improvements would improve access to the Connex depot. |
TT19 | Accessibility Audits | Yes | Junction improvements and new highway layout are included as part of the submission. Infrastructure improvements would be to adoptable standards and in line with current guidance for the mobility impaired. |
TT20 | Shopmobility Centre | No | Not applicable |
TT21 | Reducing Traffic Pollution | Yes | See comments for TT1. The potential impact of traffic generated by the facility and its impact is assessed in the Environmental Impact Statement |
TT22 | Travel Plans | No | Travel Plans are required for major developments where the floor area of an industrial building is greater than 5,000 metres squared. Assuming a wall thickness of 200mm the floor area of the BW and Energy from Waste combined is 4947 metres squared and the proposal does not need a Travel Plan. |
TT23 | Traffic Calming and Road Safety in Urban Areas | No | Not applicable |
TT24 | Road Safety in Rural Communities | No | Ditto |
TT25 | Parking Strategy | No | Not a parking facility therefore not applicable |
TT26 | Parking Guidelines | Yes | The parking standards are based on areas as defined by a map that does not show any of La Collette 2, however, the worst case scenario would be 1 space per managerial staff with 1 space |
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
|
|
| for every 2 other members of staff plus 10% visitor parking |
TT27 | Provision of Public Parking Space | No | Ditto |
TT28 | Private Car Parks | No | Ditto |
TT29 | Parking for the Disabled | Yes | A disabled parking space will be provided. |
TT30 | Commuted Payment in Lieu of Parking | No | Not applicable the development meets TT26 |
TT31 | Proposals for New Car Parks outside St. Helier | No | Not a car park |
TT32 | Operational Development at Jersey Airport | No | Not applicable |
TT33 | Aircraft Noise Zones | No | Ditto |
TT34 | Airport Public Safety Zone | No | Ditto |
TT35 | Jersey Harbour Operational Area | No | Not within the Jersey Harbour Area but see policy TT36 |
TT36 | St. Helier Waterfront, Harbour and La Collette Related Traffic | Yes | Not within the Jersey Harbour Operational Area. A traffic assessment has been carried out for the proposed waste facilities arising out of the Waste Strategy including the use of La Collette. This is presented within the Environmental Impact Statement. |
Natural Resources and Utilities
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
NR1 | Protection of Water Resources | Yes | This includes coastal waters surrounding La Collette. Engineered drainage systems and pollution control measures would be incorporated into the design of the facility. These are outlined in the Environmental Impact Statement. |
NR2 | Foul Sewerage Facilities | Yes | This proposed facility would use the foul sewerage network served by Bellozanne. Discharge to foul sewer would be controlled by Trade Effluent Consent. |
NR3 | Water Conservation | Yes | Development proposals will be encouraged to incorporate water conservation and management measures to conserve the Island's water resources.The feasibility of utilising clean roof water will be considered during the detailed design stage |
NR4 | Renewable Energy Proposals | No | This facility is a renewable energy scheme. It is re use of a disposed waste. There are wider implications but these are captured in the EIS. |
NR5 | Energy Efficiency | Yes | The building would not be heated. Only the control room would possibly have heating provided. |
NR6 | New or Extended Mineral Workings | No | Not applicable |
NR7 | Use of Planning Conditions on Mineral Workings | No | Ditto |
NR8 | Use of Legal Agreements | No | Ditto |
NR9 | Secondary Aggregates | No | Not applicable. This scheme does not produce secondary aggregates. However the scheme does produce a cut volume of approximately 1,500 cubic metres and a need for approximately 30,000 cubic metres of landscaping fill that could be provided by the disposal of inert waste from the nearby aggregate recycling operations. |
NR10 | New Off-Loading Facilities for Imported Aggregates | No | Not applicable |
NR11 | Utilities | No | This scheme is not a new facility for a utility company. |
NR12 | Telecommunications Masts | No | Not applicable. This facility would not have a telecommunications mast. |
NR13 | Safety Zones for Hazardous Installations | Yes | Site falls within the safety zone for the La Collette fuel farm (consortium made up Jersey Gas, Shell, Total and Esso Mobil). Consultations have been carried out with the Health & Safety Officer, Fire Chief, the Emergency Planning Officer and the Port Energy Group for a Major Hazard Assessment. |
Waste Management
Policy | Policy | Applicable? | Comments / Design mitigation to achieve compliance |
WM1 | Waste Minimisation and Recycling | Yes | This facility arises out of the Solid Waste Strategy (2005) – Changing the way we look at waste. This facility is an energy recovery facility from waste and therefore is in compliance with the policy. |
WM2 | Construction and Demolition Wastes Plan | Yes | No buildings would be demolished in order to construct this facility. There would be some inert waste from excavations for foundations which either would be reused on site on deposited in the La Collette Phase reclamation area. This development would not generate a significant amount of waste and would not therefore require a Waste Management Plan as specified by the policy. |
WM3 | New and Expanded Waste Management Facilities | Yes | This proposed new waste management facility is submitted for planning approval and is accompanied by a full Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with policy G5. Potential impact from pollution and nuisance is assessed within the Environmental Impact Statement and the design would incorporate measures to mitigate these. Design measures and Operational practices would be specified within the Site Working Plan in accordance with the site Licence Conditions. |
WM4 | Safeguarded Waste Site | Yes | This refers to Bellozanne as a safeguarded site for redevelopment of the incinerator however the favoured option for the site is La Collette Phase 2 Reclamation. |
WM5 | Land Reclamation and Landfill Sites | No | Policy refers to landfill at La Gigoulande Quarry and to landfill reclamation sites elsewhere on Jersey (other than La Gigoulande and La Collette). La Collette is still referred to as a potential landfill area and although not specifically identified for ash disposal the policy seems to leave the option available. |
WM6 | Restoration of Land Reclamation and Landfill Sites | Yes | This facility is not a new land reclamation or landfill site. The proposed facility would include proposed landscaping plans for the La Collette area |