This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.
Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.
Food 2030
CONTENTS
Foreword 3 Introduction 4 Our approach 5 Our vision 7 Priorities for Food 2030: 9
- Enabling and encouraging people to eat a healthy, sustainable diet 10
- Ensuring a resilient, profitable and competitive food system 20
- Increasing food production sustainably 31
- Reducing the food system s greenhouse gas emissions 42
- Reducing, reusing and reprocessing waste 53
- Increasing the impact of skills, knowledge, research and technology 60
Delivering Food 2030 68 Measuring progress indicators for sustainable food 72 Glossary 80
Front cover photographs
Left: Defra Photo Library
Middle: North News and Pictures (students from Linthorpe Primary School, Middlesbrough) Right: Defra Photo Library
FOREWORD
Good safe food on our plates is taken for granted by most people and so it should be.
The last few decades have seen a transformation in the choice, quality,
safety and affordability of the food we all eat day in, day out.
But we face big challenges today which mean we need to think differently about food. We can t carry on just as we are. We need to produce more food without damaging the natural resources air, soil, water and marine resources, biodiversity and climate that we all depend on. We need to feed more people globally, many of whom want or need to eat a better diet. We need to tackle increasing obesity and encourage healthier diets. And we need to do all these things in light of the increasing challenge of climate change and while delivering continuous improvement in food safety.
I am proud of Britain s food sector, and I believe it has a vital role to play as we build
a flourishing low-carbon economy for the future. Food contributes over £80 billion to
our economy and is our largest manufacturing sector, with food and farming employing 3.6 million people. Looking forward, we will work to help ensure it can thrive as an innovative, competitive and resilient sector, and a sustainable source of growth and jobs.
Everyone has a role to play. That is why this strategy has been developed with, and will be delivered together with, a wide range of partners:
• Consumers can support healthy and sustainable food, and can try to throw less food away;
• Food producers farmers and fishermen
can reduce the impact they have on the
environment, manage natural resources and biodiversity even better, and adapt to a changing climate;
• Food businesses can strive to be as efficient as possible in the ways they use energy and transport;
• Food manufacturers, retailers and caterers can help consumers to eat a healthy, sustainable diet;
• Government can help to lead the change, bringing people together to act in partnership, through legislation where
that is needed, by funding research, and campaigning for change in Europe and internationally.
This strategy sets out the Government s vision for a sustainable and secure food system for 2030, and the steps we will take to get there. Working together, we can make Britain a world leader in food policy and production, and we can help to ensure that everybody has the chance to eat safe, healthy, affordable and sustainable food, now and in the future.
3
INTRODUCTION
This new strategy for food has been drawn up This is a challenge for the world that will
following the publication of the Cabinet Office require action by a lot of people. To help this,
Strategy Unit s report in July 2008[1]. Food the UK Government s Chief Scientific Adviser
Matters called for better integration of food is leading a Foresight project on Global Food
policy across Government and highlighted two and Farming Futures bringing academics and
challenges: climate change and obesity. 2008 experts together.
also saw food prices rising sharply for the
This strategy is a response both to the big
first time in a generation, provoking riots in
food challenges sustainability, security and
some parts of the world. In August 2009 we
health and to the call for more joined up
published our assessment of UK food security
food policy. It sets out the priorities for the
and set out what we need to do to maintain
UK Government on food.
it. This document brings all of the challenges
together for the first time. Many of the things we need to do to move
It is now clear that we face a big challenge in towards a sustainable, secure and healthy food Defra Photo Library
system are already in place, for example the
feeding the world. With a growing population,
Change4Life campaign, the UK Low Carbon
climate change and the pressure we are
Transition Plan, and our approach to ensuring
putting on land, we will have to produce more
the UK s continued food security. But there
food sustainably. We also need to provide the
are other things we need to do. We hope that
right information for people to make more
farmers, fishermen, food businesses, local and
informed choices about what they eat. Diet
regional government, voluntary organisations
will have a huge impact not only on our health
and others will use this as a basis for deciding
and our economy, but most importantly on
what they will do. This is a matter for all of us;
sustainability.
it is time to get on with it.
OUR APPROACH
Coordinating food policy across This includes sharing knowledge and We will look to learn from previous Government good practice with others in Europe and experiences and build on successful examples
internationally, in support of our EU and of delivering sustainability in the food system, Defra coordinates all UK Government
international objectives, particularly given for example the Milk Roadmap[1], and the Love policies on food. The Secretary of State for
much of what Government and industry is Food Hate Waste campaign2.
Environment Food and Rural Affairs chairs a
doing in the UK is seen as new and innovative.
dedicated Cabinet sub-committee on food, Using the most appropriate ways of
Likewise we will continue to look for achieving what we want
formed in October 2008. And to make sure
opportunities to learn from others.
that Government gets the best advice on food
We will try and find the best way of doing policy, a Council of Food Policy Advisers was Basing our work on sound science
things and will only regulate where we need to. established at the same time, for a duration
High quality research and evidence will be
of two years.
really important in guiding what we do and Working in partnership with the food in making things fit together. Alongside Food and farming industries, consumers, 2030, a cross-Government Strategy for Food the third sector and international Research and Innovation has been launched organisations to provide a framework to coordinate food
Achieving a sustainable and secure food system research and innovation.
for 2030 depends on everyone in the food Building on existing work
system working together.
There is a lot of good work going on across
The final section of this document describes the food supply chain. Reviewing and
how all parts of the food system can help evaluating the success of this work will inform us achieve our goal, and sets indicators for what further action will need to be taken to measuring our progress. achieve our vision.
Working across the UK, EU and internationally
This is a UK Government strategy. Many aspects of food policy are devolved. There are separate food policy arrangements in Scotland[1], Wales2 and Northern Ireland3 and we can learn from each other. We are working with the Devolved Administrations to ensure that as the UK, we share a common understanding of the future of food policy and can collaborate whenever it makes sense to do so.
As members of the European Union, the UK food sector benefits from being part of the single market. It also means much of our food policy is influenced by EU legislation. And as the biggest trading block in the world, the EU is a powerful figure on the international stage. EU engagement will therefore continue to be a priority, particularly in emphasising the importance of integrated food policy that meets the needs of Europe s citizens, and enables a competitive and sustainable food system that supports global food security.
Beyond Europe we will continue to ensure that food security, including the food security of developing countries is given the highest international attention.
Defra Photo Library
OUR VISION FOR A SUSTAINABLE AND SECURE FOOD SYSTEM FOR 2030
What we want by 2030
• Consumers are informed, can choose and afford healthy, sustainable food. This demand is met by profitable, competitive, highly skilled and resilient farming, fishing and food businesses, supported by first class research and development.
• Food is produced, processed, and distributed, to feed a growing global population in ways which:
use global natural resources sustainably,
enable the continuing provision of the benefits and services a healthy natural environment provides,
promote high standards of animal health and welfare,
protect food safety,
make a significant contribution to rural communities, and
allow us to show global leadership on food sustainability.
• Our food security is ensured through strong UK agriculture and food sectors and international trade links with EU and global partners, which support developing economies.
• The UK has a low carbon food system which is efficient with resources any waste is reused, recycled or used for energy generation.
GOVERNMENT S ROLE IN CREATING A SUSTAINABLE AND SECURE FOOD SYSTEM
Government s core role in the UK food system To play our part in delivering Food 2030 the needs of the consumer and a competitive is to correct market failures where they arise we will: and sustainable food system that supports (for example distortions to the food economy global food security.
Encourage change through voluntary,
caused by poor information, imperfect
regulatory, or economic approaches. Enable change by providing tools, evidence, competition, the failure to price externalities
Government will favour voluntary industry- and advice to businesses, and information to and the under-provision of public goods), and
led and owned measures wherever possible, consumers, as we have already done through to ensure that social equity is safeguarded.
but we recognise that regulation may be PAS 2050 for measuring the embodied Generally, this will be achieved through the
required in some instances. Where we do greenhouse gas emissions in goods and
tax and benefit system, but special measures
need regulation, we will make sure that it services4, and will do through integrating may be needed in some cases to ensure that
is proportionate, accountable, consistent, nutrition and sustainability information and the more vulnerable in society have adequate
transparent and targeted, helping to ensure advice to consumers on the eatwell website5. access to nutritious food, for example through
benefits are delivered, costs kept as low as
the Healthy Start[1] scheme. Build evidence on sustainability in the food possible, and that perceptions are positive3.
system, make research publicly available, and Government also has a role in setting the tone We will continue to work with the supply
help to translate research into practice.
and direction of public debate about food, chain and European institutions, to reduce
and a role in fostering cultural and behavioural unnecessary burdens on industry. Provide policy leadership by finding ways change. This leadership and agenda-setting to reconcile the big choices and tensions
Lead by example by making the changes
role can be a powerful complement to direct between achieving our vision for food and
that we are aiming for across the whole of the
interventions, but needs to be based on an other major challenges.
food chain in what we do, for example food
understanding of its place and influence
procured in the public sector. We will also
national government is only one part of a big,
promote the importance of integrated food
diverse and influential sector2.
policy in Europe and beyond, that emphasises
PRIORITIES FOR FOOD 2030
This Strategy considers the food system The Strategy is structured around six core issues for the food system:
at national, EU and global levels. A secure
and sustainable food system will need us
government, farmers, fishermen, business and 2. Ensuring a resilient,
other stakeholders to focus on a number of profitable and
important issues. The Strategy is structured competitive food
around these issues what the challenges are, system
our goal for 2030, and the steps we will need
1. Encouraging people 3. Increasing food
to take to achieve this. to eat a healthy, production sustainably Particular focus is given to the global sustainable diet
dimensions of food policy in sections 2 and
3 on having a resilient, profitable and
competitive food system, and on increasing
food production sustainably. 6. Increasing the impact 4. Reducing the food
of skills, knowledge, system s greenhouse research and gas emissions technology
5. Reducing, reusing and reprocessing waste
- ENABLING AND ENCOURAGING PEOPLE TO EAT A HEALTHY, SUSTAINABLE DIET
Diet-related disease and rising levels of obesity are a significant public health concern in the UK. Many people want to eat healthily, but often do not follow nutritional advice.
• 90% of people claim that healthy eating is important to them1 and public awareness of the health implications of diet is fairly high. This has been achieved over a number of years, through campaigns by Government (for example 5-A-DAY, Change4Life, the Food Standards Agency s (FSA) salt and saturated fat campaigns), NGOs and the media, with support from the food industry.
• National nutrition surveys indicate some positive changes in the diet of adults in the UK over the past 15 years, but we are still eating too much salt, saturated fat, and sugar, and not enough fruit and vegetables.
• Poor diet is estimated to account for a third of all cases of cancer, and a further third
of cases of cardiovascular disease. Obesity, which has more than doubled in the last 25 years, increases the risk of developing Type II Diabetes, cardiovascular disease and some types of cancer. Left unchecked, projections show radical increases in the years ahead with 40% of the population being obese by 2025 and 60% by 20502.
• Diet-related chronic disease is estimated of the guideline the challenge is to make
to cost the NHS £7 billion a year, including up this shortfall from sustainable fish stocks direct treatment costs, state benefits and by actively managing our seas to conserve loss of earnings. The health benefits of fish stocks and by raising awareness and meeting nutritional guidelines are estimated consumption of alternative species of fish.
to reach almost £20 billion a year, and are
• The food industry has already made progress
estimated to prevent 70,000 premature
in helping consumers eat a healthy, balanced deaths a year3.
diet. For example through reformulating food
• Fish contains a range of nutrients and products so that they contain less salt, fat
is a good source of fatty acids. The FSA and sugar, and by giving clear information recommends that we eat at least two about the nutritional content of food, both portions of fish a week, one of which on packaging and on menus in cafØs and should be oily, but this cannot be managed restaurants.
unless we have globally sustainable fish
and aquaculture industries. Our current
consumption of fish falls significantly short
Fish consumption, g per week, UK4,5
Recommendation:
2 portions/week 182 175 184 195
Oily fish White fish
Men low Women low Men Women
income income general population general population
1: FSA (2008) Consumer Attitudes Survey; 2: Foresight (2007) Tackling Obesities: Future Choices; 3: Cabinet Office (2008) Food Matters; 4: FSA Henderson et al (2002); National Diet and Nutrition Survey; vols 1-5; 5: FSA Nelson et al (2007); Low Income Diet and Nutrition Survey (Consumption figures for LIDNS are oily fish and dishes and for NDNS include canned tuna)
[1]Although cases of foodborne illness have reduced in recent years, there were an estimated 926,000 cases in England and Wales in 2007, costing the economy £1.5 billion.
• The food we eat in the UK is the safest and domestically-produced food, to ensure it has ever been. Illness and deaths from the safety of our food system.
eating contaminated food have fallen
• Since the animal disease outbreaks of the
dramatically and we have a robust system to
early 1990s, the food and farming industries get safe food to the consumer.
have worked hard to increase public assurance,
• The public need to feel confident that mainly through certification and traceability the food they eat is safe. Any decline in schemes. 56% of us have confidence in confidence can have negative knock-on the current food safety measures taken by economic effects on the rest of the food everyone in the food system[1].
system. Vigilance is essential for imported
Though reported cases of foodborne illness have reduced since 2000, cases of listeria have more than doubled. Chilled ready-to-eat foods, that are not cooked or reheated before eating, are considered to be the main source of listeria infections. Listeria causes more deaths than salmonella and E.coli combined3.
Trends in the number of cases of food-borne illness in England and Wales, 2000 - 2007 250
200 Listeria
Campylobacter 150 E.coli O157
Salmonella
• In 2007 18,900 people required hospital treatment for food-borne illness, and 440 died. The majority of these cases and their associated costs could have been easily avoided by anyone preparing food adhering to some basic food hygiene and safety precautions such as the 4Cs promoted by the FSA cleaning, cooking, chilling and avoiding cross-contamination.
• Although the number of reported food contamination incidents increased from 421 in 2000 to 1,312 in 20072, this could be because of better reporting and a wider definition of
incidents introduced during that time, and
improved engagement between Government, local authorities and the industry.
• Awareness and understanding of foodborne illness has improved in recent years4. However, to achieve more it is crucial to understand the reasons why people and organisations fail to follow the simple, yet essential, principles of
Affordable, nutritious food is vital for everyone.
In the UK a significant negative factor in diets3. There
are however a number of other barriers to
• Rising food prices over the last two years have
accessing healthy food including lack of exerted great pressure on budgets in low
income, education and skills, which affect income households. UK households spend an
low income and other vulnerable groups average of £36.32 per person per week on
more acutely.
food and non-alcoholic drinks1. This accounts
for 11% of all expenditure for an average • A lot of work is already underway to household, but nearly 17% for a low-income address these barriers, such as increasing household, up from 15% in 20052. In the EU, access to fruit and vegetables through the
the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) keeps Healthy Start4 initiative, and small-scale food prices higher than they should be, as the local initiatives, including food distribution CAP results in higher prices for farmers. In the charities and community food growing UK, this meant that consumers paid an extra initiatives.
£3.2 billion, or £52 each for food in 2007. The
In global terms
associated market price support and high
import tariffs impact on poorer households • High food prices have a greater impact disproportionately. in developing countries. Households in
developing countries spend over 60% of Low income families have poorer health
• their budget on food.
than the general population. The reasons for
this are complex, but diet plays a role. • Maternal and child under-nutrition in
developing countries remains a concern.
• Households need access to affordable,
There are significant new global threats to nutritious food to give them food security.
good nutrition including the volatility of
The Government s UK Food Security
food prices, climate change and its impact. Assessment shows that physical access to
food is not itself a significant problem, nor
on livelihoods, household food security, wcioth tnflhe Aict asnsod gciatoiovn oernf Canocneve. nien ice n paS torerts nership
The Convenience Store Project
• promotes greater consumption of fruit and vegetables in deprived areas, encourages people
to make healthier food choices and achieve their 5-A-DAY.
Healthy Start supports low income families to eat nutritious foods and lead healthier lifestyles. 450,000 families are sent vouchers for fresh fruit, vegetables, milk and infant formula.
£30m has been invested in the Healthy Towns Initiative, which encourages local areas to change their communities built environment
to support people to become more active and promote healthy eating. Two Healthy Towns Middlesbrough and Halifax have incorporated food growing as part of plans to make their towns healthier.
The Change4Life campaign promotes healthy eating and demonstrates how a partnership between Government, the food industry and the third sector is removing barriers to accessible, affordable food.
1: Defra (2009) Food Statistics Pocketbook; 2: Defra (2010) UK Food Security Assessment; 3: Ibid Based on 2007 figures - % of households within 15 minutes of a supermarket or food shop by car, public transport, walking or cycling was 97.8%, and 99.8% within 30 minutes; 4: www.healthystart.nhs.uk
Defining a healthy, sustainable diet will help give consumers clear and consistent information on the impact of what we choose to eat.
• Defining a sustainable diet would make
it easier for people to make informed choices about food, but it is not easy to
do. A sustainable diet has many attributes
health, nutrition, access, affordability,
carbon footprint, and things like production methods, sustainability of supplies (for example fish, palm oil), transport, water use, animal welfare and support for food growers in developing countries (for example Fairtrade or Rainforest Alliance).
• Ways of measuring the footprint of food products tend to focus on single issues, such as carbon or water. Presenting the full picture is a much greater challenge, but would
help consumers cut through confusing and often conflicting information on diets, and would help the food supply chain to develop sustainable choices for consumers.
• People value different aspects of food, but not all consumers are able to purchase foods according to their values. The Government s role is to ensure robust evidence to support people s choices, and to
give advice, for example through the eatwell website[1]. Retailers and food manufacturers can support consumers by offering products that fit with their values.
• Evidence of what constitutes a sustainable diet is still developing, but there are things people can do now in order to reduce the impact of their diet. If we all did the one thing that is most important to us, the impact of our collective action could make a big difference.
Wasting less food food wasted by households in the UK makes up 3% of
total UK greenhouse gas emissions per year, and costs households an average of £480
a year. Wasting less food would mean that greenhouse gas emissions associated with food production would be reduced. Halving household food waste would be equivalent to talking 1 in 8 cars off the road2.
Eating food that is in season food that relies on natural sunlight and temperatures to grow (and tends therefore to be grown in its natural season) tends to cost less
as production and distribution costs are lower. Seasonality also relates to produce grown overseas and imported to the UK, complementing the UK growing season for example importing Seville oranges in January.
Buying food which has been shown to be produced sustainably, indicated by an industry label like the MSC3 certification or equivalent for fish, produced to higher animal welfare standards, or which supports food growers in developing countries.
• Government can also lead by example by developing sustainability criteria for food provided in the public sector. The Healthier Food Mark4 will be awarded to public sector organisations in England meeting a range of criteria for healthier, and more sustainable food. Government is also integrating
its online advice to consumers on food nutrition, sustainability and safety based on the evidence currently available. Advice will be given through the eatwell website.
Education plays an important role in reconnecting us with how and where our food is produced, and in knowing how to cook and prepare healthy, nutritious food.
• Having an interest in and knowing about • Government s reintroduction of cooking
The Hornbeam centre in north east London is food where it is from, how it is produced, to the school curriculum and the uptake
home to a local food hub running a number of what effect it has on our health, and how of cookery clubs, such as Let s Get
local food initiatives, including a market stall selling to prepare and store it are all likely to lead Cooking[1] led by the School Food Trust and local sustainably-grown food, a vegetarian cafØ,
to us eating a better diet, better for our partners, are steps in the right direction a vegetable box scheme, fruit picking projects health and better for the environment. in reintroducing lost food preparation and and regular workshops and events. The centre is
cooking skills. However, this should be managed by volunteers and run by the people who
• Though still a niche interest, public debate strengthened to include education about use it. It brings the community together over food on sustainable diets has become more
the whole food chain, from production and has economic benefits to the local area3. sophisticated with the various complexities,
through to disposal.
trade-offs and knock-on effects of food
choices coming into play, such as different • The popularity of grow-your-own has risen production methods with different significantly over recent years. An estimated environmental, social and economic impacts. 33% of people already grow or intend
to grow their own vegetables2. Growing
• Information alone is only part of the
food at home, in a community garden solution to help us shift to a healthier, more
or allotment can produce a number of sustainable diet. Growing, cooking, and
other benefits including better mental and enjoying food can help this. A number of
physical health, bringing people together community food groups and cooperatives
and improved skills.
have been established teaching food Sophie Tomlinson
growing and cooking skills. Although these
are usually small-scale, the projects are
often innovative and can have real impact in
their local communities.
Our goal for 2030 enabling and encouraging people to eat a healthy and sustainable diet.
Access and • People from all parts of society should be able to choose and eat a sustainable diet with reliable access to affordable,
affordability healthy and safe food.
• People feel connected to their food and treat it as a source of wellbeing and enjoyment, for example through leisure activities such as growing and cooking food.
Education,
information • People take responsibility for their health through the food they choose to eat, understand the impacts their diets can have on their and personal health and the environment, buy what they need and do not waste food.
responsibility
• People are aware of the origins of their food, and understand the environmental and social impacts of their choices. They know that buying some food from developing countries can reduce poverty for some of the world s poorest communities.
Tackling • The neglected crisis of under-nutrition has been effectively tackled, particularly in the poorest countries and for the poorest families. under-nutrition in By 2015, the first millennium development goal on poverty and hunger is achieved and the proportion of underweight children in the
developing countries world is halved (compared to 1990 figures).
Small beginnings, big potential case studies.
Fish & Kids: Serving sustainable fish at school
• The Marine Stewardship
Council s (MSC) Fish &
Kids project encourages
schools and restaurants
in England to serve
sustainable, MSC-labelled
seafood. Through Fish &
Kids, children, teachers,
parents and caterers can Defra Photo Library
find out why choosing sustainable seafood is vital for the future of fish, fishing communities and the environment.
• Three years from launch, 18 Local Education Authorities across the country are now certified, with over 2,400 primary schools in England (around 14%) engaged in the project and offering MSC- labelled seafood school meal choices to over 800,000 pupils.
• The project was set up with support from Defra s Environmental Action Fund. The MSC has now been given support through Defra s new Greener Living Fund to build on the experience gained with the Fish & Kids model to further develop demand for sustainable seafood on a national scale by providing learning opportunities for the food service sector and, more importantly, improved buying behaviour amongst their customers.
Cook4Life
• The Cook4Life Cooking with Families initiative will be piloted in early 2010. It is part of Government s Change4Life campaign to tackle obesity.
• The pilot will develop an effective model for helping at risk families to cook healthy and nutritious food.
• It aims to build confidence and skills in food preparation and cooking among parents and carers and to provide guidance and recipes on weaning, first family foods and beyond.
• The pilot will start in the North West and South West regions and will aim to train staff from 60 Sure Start Children s Centres so that they can deliver cookery programmes.
FACE Farming and Countryside Education www.face-online.org.uk
Action: to enable and encourage people to eat a healthy, sustainable diet.
Who What How Result
Help individuals to identify where they can get access to existing
Improving access
support, for example giving Healthy Start beneficiaries advice Those in socially excluded groups are
to healthy and
and information about breastfeeding and a healthy diet, broader better informed on healthy, sustainable Government sustainable food for
nutritional and public health issues, and other relevant schemes; diets and know where to go for further socially excluded
review Government s online advice (for example DirectGov) on food advice and information.
groups
and social exclusion.
Take forward the Healthy Food Code of Practice[1], on:
• front-of-pack labelling;
• smaller portion sizes for energy-dense foods and those high in salt; Everyone is able to achieve and
• promotion of food to children; maintain a healthy weight;
Reverse the trend in • reductions in consumption and the levels of saturated fat and
Government,
diet-related disease, sugar, particularly sugary drinks; People can easily find out the industry, regulators
including obesity • increasing consumption of healthier foods; nutritional content of their food choices
• single set of healthy eating messages; and understand the impacts on their
• nutritional information on food eaten out; and health.
• raise awareness to achieve and maintain an appropriate energy
balance.
People have confidence in the food Government, Threats to the food system are managed efficiently and quickly; industry s ability to manage food safety
industry, Public confidence in risks;
food safety Continued public awareness campaigns about preparing and
consumers cooking food safely. People know how to ensure food is
safe to eat.
Diet-related ill health is reduced; Consumers adopt
People make use of the opportunities available to learn more about
Consumers healthy, sustainable The food chain responds to demand
food, creating a greater demand for healthy, sustainable food.
diets signals for more healthy, sustainable
food.
Action: to enable and encourage people to eat a healthy, sustainable diet.
Who What How Result
Identify and fill gaps in the evidence through research to define a
Clear information and healthy, sustainable diet.
People can make informed decisions on Government advice on healthy and Deliver clear information and advice on a healthy and sustainable diet
a healthy and sustainable diet. sustainable diets through an enhanced eatwell website[1].
Understand better the role of environmental labelling schemes.
Develop a meanwhile lease for land: facilitate local partnerships
between land owners and community groups to make land available
Government, Making land available on a temporary basis for food growing. More people can have the chance to
for community food
third sector grow their own food.
growing Support a feasibility study for a community land bank which
would act as a broker between land-holders and community groups
wanting land on which to grow food.
Providing additional funding to the Growing Schools Programme2 to People understand the origins of their Learning about how enable a further 65,000 pupils, parents and staff to gain hands-on food, and how the food chain works.
Government, and where our food is experience of growing food; As a result they are more aware of the
industry
produced Food producers and industry to provide more consumer education importance of a healthy, sustainable
(particularly for children). diet.
All schools should be providing food that meets the required nutritional
standards and should be encouraging all pupils to take up the offer of
healthy school lunches. Every pupil should go to a healthy school that People are educated about the health promotes healthy eating, an active lifestyle and emotional health and and sustainability impacts of their diets wellbeing. Cooking and food preparation skills are already on the school and have the right food skills to choose,
Government, third curriculum. We can build on this by: prepare and cook healthy, safe and sector, industry Enhanced food skills • Encouraging community groups to educate people, including the sustainable diets.
vulnerable, on cooking healthy and sustainable food and developing
food skills, for example the Cook4Life initiative; and
• Food manufacturers and retailers producing marketing and
educational aids, for example recipe cards, in-store demonstrations.
- ENSURING A RESILIENT, PROFITABLE AND COMPETITIVE FOOD SYSTEM
The UK s food sector is big, diverse and innovative.
The UK food sector in figures[1] Food is an essential part of our lives and our economy but the food system faces a
number of diverse challenges
£80.5 billion the agri-food • Food sustains life. The food system also provides jobs, adds value to the economy, enables
sector s contribution to the economy in us to eat at home or out, and helps manage the character of our landscape and countryside, 2007 6.8% of the total, and the UK s which in turn attract tourism trade, adding further to the sustainability of rural economies. largest manufacturing sector. A rich food culture has developed in the UK reflecting the diversity of our communities.
3.6 million people • Food production depends on an extensive and complex infrastructure including the national road and rail networks, port facilities, power plants and the national grid, water processing and the number employed in food supply, and sewage treatment.
and farming.
• In order to provide sufficient safe and nutritious food, employment and profitable businesses,
£13.2 billion the sector needs to make sure that the natural ecosystems which provide many of the inputs
the value
it needs are protected and enhanced. Most of these services are currently free for example of food exports from the UK in 2008.
pollination, the water cycle, soil production and nutrient cycles.
We imported £31.6 billion worth
of food. • Climate change is predicted to have a serious impact on food production globally and in the UK. In some countries, this will result in some land changing from arable use to pasture, or
196,000 the number of food going out of production altogether. In others, including the UK, there may be opportunities to
chain enterprises ranging from large grow new crops. As well as continuing to reduce its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, retailers to small cafØs. the food system and its supply chains need to be ready for these changes, while meeting increasing demand.
The realities and opportunities the international trading system presents to the food system.
The realities The opportunities now and in the future
• We live in an inter-connected world with globalised food • International trade has been a major driver of global growth and prosperity, especially systems. Global trade offers a way to manage volatility by important for many developing countries. As trade has expanded, global incomes have grown spreading risk, encourages productivity growth, keeps prices and open economies have been able to harness the power of trade to boost competitiveness competitive and increases diversity of supply it is critical to and productivity, helping to improve living standards and sustain economic growth. However global economic prosperity and food security. despite major reductions in trade barriers, protectionism continues to affect economies, most significantly those of developing countries.
• Expansion of membership of the EU has provided greater
market potential but trade barriers continue to inhibit access to • Government, industry and other stakeholders must work together to ensure food is available new materials and to greater diversity of supply. and accessible, even for the poorest, reducing market volatility, by ensuring national, regional
and international trading systems work efficiently, and that the very poorest have access to
• The UK gains considerable advantages from trading with
social protection measures to enable them to buy enough food. The Global Partnership for over 100 different countries including European and global
Agriculture and Food Security offers a way of co-ordinating national and regional strategies markets.
for food security.
• Continued reform of the CAP should enable farmers to be fully responsive to the market and consumer demand, and enable profitable farming to thrive in a liberalised global market, without the need for subsidies across the EU.
• While working to tackle sustainability challenges for key agricultural products such as biofuels and palm oil, the UK will continue to press for improved market access through trade liberalisation, for trade distorting domestic support to be significantly reduced globally, and for the elimination of all export subsidies by 2013.
• The aim of the UK s approach to reforming the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) is to achieve a prosperous and efficient fishing industry that is managed alongside marine conservation, so that fishing can contribute to vibrant local communities while managing fish stocks within safe biological limits, and providing a high quality sustainable food supply.
• Investment in science and innovation can help improve resource efficiency and productivity, underpinning sustainable global agricultural growth, and CAP and CFP reform to increase competitiveness of farmers and fishermen.
Defra Photo Library
The UK s food system has to cope with a series of risks managing these is central to ensuring the system s short term operation and long term sustainability.
Keeping things going
• A resilient food system can withstand, or quickly recover from sudden shocks. These can be financial such as commodity price spikes; caused by natural disasters such as a large scale flood; or caused by disruption to fuel supply or the road network. They can occur at any point in the food supply chain, including in retail and distribution. They are usually short term, and do not cause profound changes.
• The challenge to the food sector is to plan and prepare for these events, in the interests of long term sustainability. Government works with the food industry to promote business continuity planning.
Markets that work
• Policies designed to make agriculture more efficient would make agricultural production more responsive to price signals (both domestically and internationally).
• No one can guarantee that there will not be price spikes in future. But policies to improve the productivity and responsiveness of agriculture should tend to make it less likely that the conditions for a spike might arise; reduce the size and duration of a price spike, and hence reduce its impact, as well as generating broader benefits such as the growth and jobs arising from international trade. These issues are considered in more detail in the analysis of the 2007-08 price spikes, accompanying this Strategy[1].
Environmental risks
• Climate change may itself be a source of new and unexpected shocks. Possible threats include increased frequency of extreme weather and new pests and diseases arriving in the UK. A profitable and resilient food system will need to be able to meet a variety of economic and environmental challenges by planning, and adapting to these changes.
• Damaging use of natural resources or damage to the ecosystems that produce renewable resources will make food production more difficult in future. The food sector will need to innovate to reduce inputs or discover alternatives2.
Food safety
• Food safety needs to remain a central priority for the entire food system, protecting the health and safety of consumers from both disease and contamination.
The food chain is one element of our Critical National Infrastructure it depends on the
smooth running of the national transport and utilities systems.
• Approximately 99% of our food imports arrive by ship or the Channel Tunnel, as well as much of the chemicals, fuel and machinery needed for food production and processing[1]. Ports are also the main gateway for food exports.
Seaports
• Ports are potentially vulnerable to coastal surges and storm damage, but having a greater number of ports can allow substitution of traffic and help spread the risk.
• Efficient infrastructure is the key to productive supply chains, and is a major difference between developed and developing countries.
• Agricultural inputs, food and waste are all moved around the UK by road and rail.
Transport system
• Increased demand on the transport system, especially the road network, raises the risk of delays, accidents and congestion which imposes extra costs on businesses, especially those with perishable products.
• The food supply chain depends particularly on energy, water and other critical national infrastructure.
• The food sector demonstrated its ability to deal effectively with flooding in Gloucestershire and the South-West in 2007 and more
Energy, water and
recently in Cumbria in 2009, where supermarkets remained open and were able to provide food and drink to those affected. sewage utilities
• Elements of the national infrastructure will face a number of challenges in future from increased demand from a growing population, and from declining supply such as increased water stress due to climate change.
Skills and the right regulatory balance are two factors in the success of the UK food sector.
The UK agri-food sector supports a workforce of 3.6 Applying the principles of better regulation helps protect consumers while million people with a range of skills allowing food businesses to get on with the job
• The farming industry faces particular challenges in • Given the cumulative impact of regulation on the economy, it is important to keep a maintaining and building its skills base, innovating to stay focus on efficiency and effectiveness, only regulate where there is a strong case for profitable, and attracting new entrants to the sector. doing so, and avoid creating unnecessary burdens.
• Similarly, few young people want to join the UK fishing • Policy making and interventions should allow flexibility, so that businesses throughout industry. With the right incentives and reforms, fishing the food chain can develop the best solutions for themselves, society and the
can provide sustainable livelihoods for vibrant coastal environment as well as responding to consumer demand.
communities.
• Better regulation approaches can help identify interventions where benefits justify
• A major problem with training and skills within the food costs, and get the most out of Government intervention. system is a lack of demand rather than a shortage of
• We are committed to regulating smaller businesses in a way that considers simplified
opportunities. It is important to raise the skills levels of current
or more flexible approaches, to find the most effective way to meet intended
owners, managers and workers within the food sector.
outcomes and minimise burdens for them.
Investing in equipping staff with a range of skills will enable
them to be more flexible in responding to future challenges. • We are exploring with business representatives better ways of joining-up inspections where possible and using risk-based criteria. More efficient enforcement can support
• Even at times of rising unemployment in the UK, many British
compliance across the food sector, delivering targeted, effective interventions, without people are unwilling to take critically important jobs in food
unreasonable administrative cost to business.
harvesting or processing.
• Opening up the EU labour market has provided employers •
The Rural Payments Agency has made changes to the way the Single Payment
Scheme operates and is working with farmers organisations to confirm that those with opportunities to bring in skilled workers from other
changes have reduced the administrative burden. We are seeking to influence the Member States.
reform of the Common Fisheries Policy so that fishermen have greater control over
• Recent rises in migrant labour from the EU has raised political their livelihoods through regional management and better regulation. issues as well as placing a strain on rural services.
• We will continue working with the farming industry and the European Commission to
Farming and fishing skills are discussed in more depth in explore further ways to reduce the burden of regulation.
Section 3.
The UK can play a leading role in developing a sustainable global food supply.
• International trade and economic globalisation has improved efficiency and brought jobs and investment to developing countries. At the same time, production
in some developing countries is held back by, among other things, a lack of markets, poor access to credit, poor storage or transport facilities, and poor information and extension services.
• The UK has a moral responsibility to ensure that what we do does not damage the natural resource base of developing countries, or the other services they derive from a healthy, natural environment.
Developing countries produce 55% of world cereal production but use 70%
of world fertilisers, and the use is rising. Developed country fertiliser use has been falling over the last 20 years1;
Some developing countries routinely apply two or three times as much fertiliser to their agricultural land than is necessary. This is both wasteful as yields are barely increased, and is damaging to the environment as too much fertiliser
pollutes water courses. Conversely, in much of Africa the high cost and lack
of availability of fertiliser mean that
too little is applied, leading to depleted soils, and yields barely better than those achieved in the UK 700 years ago. Where fertiliser can be applied, yield can be vastly improved: Malawi has been able to export a substantial maize surplus to neighbouring countries in each of the last three years.
• The UK s food supply chain can have a significant impact on natural resources overseas. Some of these impacts are direct, others are caused by knock-on effects like clearing indigenous habitats for food-related crops. For example the UK imports water- intensive products like palm oil, coffee and cotton and recent studies have shown that 62% of water needed to produce goods consumed in the UK is in the form of water embedded in imported agricultural and industrial goods. It is likely that some of these goods will be grown in water scarce regions, where local water governance may not be suitably robust. Even if sourcing goods from
these countries is set against the provision of potential economic benefits to the region, it is sensible to consider the long term impacts and sustainability of food production and encourage sustainable practices.
• Responsibility for ensuring the sustainability of food supply chains is shared:
The food industry has a business interest in making sure that its supply chains are resilient whether resilient to economic impacts of world financial markets,
or to the environmental impacts of deforestation or climate change;
Civil society plays a role in raising awareness of unsustainable practice and in working with the food industry to improve the sustainability of their supply chains; and
Government can support action by providing research and gathering evidence on both the impacts and potential solutions, and by providing development assistance to improve markets in developing countries which could have a large positive effect on global food supplies.
1: Defra (2009) UK Food Security Assessment; 2: WWF, Chapagain and Orr (2008) The UK Water Footprint
Our goals for 2030: a resilient, profitable and competitive food sector.
• The whole supply chain is able to support profitable businesses, and provides good value for consumers as well as fair prices for suppliers.
• Intellectual property rights are protected and respected encouraging innovation and investment in research. Provision is also made for
A resilient and transferring ideas and innovations to relevant sectors as well as sharing best practice.
competitive food sector • New enterprises, including social enterprises, enter the market stimulating diversity and competition.
• The food system manages risks responsibly financial, environmental, and food safety risks. The food system is able to respond rapidly to changes in world markets and changes in prices, through an increased focus on international trade with less distortion, helping to promote sustainable competitive farming and global food security.
A innovative and skilled • Training opportunities are available and support is provided for career development.
sector, providing good
jobs • The food, farming and seafood industries are seen as attractive sectors for new entrants.
• Food, farming and fishing businesses are provided with clear and consistent guidelines which give them confidence to make investments in improving their long term environmental and economic sustainability.
A constructive
• Government policy, including regulatory flexibility, allows businesses throughout the food chain to do the right thing for themselves,
relationship between
society and the environment as well as responding to consumer demand.
Government and industry
• There is international cooperation over research, innovation, and knowledge sharing on methods for reducing the food system s contribution to climate change and other environmental impacts of food production.
• Food businesses use inputs efficiently, in particular reducing their energy and water demand. As a result of this, waste is reduced, and
Efficient use of resources cost savings are made.
• Environmental and social goods are valued, and incentivised.
The potential examples of how progress is already being made.
Working in partnership with the industry We want to encourage voluntary action where possible, for example with the Campaign for the Farmed Environment. Government and the farming industry agreed on a voluntary approach to achieve environmental benefits rather than legislate. This is an important example of the farming industry, environmental groups and Government showing what they can deliver cooperatively. |
|
Helping make fishing sustainable in Africa
Fishing has great potential for contributing to Africa s food security and economic growth. But while current values of
fish exports from Africa are about $4.5 billion a year, weak governance and management of fisheries has led to serious levels of illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing by both African
and international fleets. Local fisheries and particularly small-scale vulnerable communities often fall foul of illegal vessels conflict is rife, and livelihoods and local economies dependant on effective fisheries are threatened.
Defra is funding work in South Africa with the Sustainable Development Dialogue to help build capacity for regulation of
the trade in fish products. DFID is also funding the pan-African Partnership for African Fisheries with the African Union and the New Partnership for Africa s Development. This aims to create political momentum for fisheries governance reform in Africa, drawing on international best practice and evidence from successful fisheries.
It will also target specific issues of concern to African nations, in particular illegal fishing.
Investing in sustainability to ensure the longevity of supply chains
Kraft Foods are the largest buyer of coffee from Rainforest Alliance Certified farms with approximately 30,000 tonnes purchased in 2008. The Rainforest Alliance is an independent, non profit organisation which promotes standards for sustainability that conserve wildlife and ensure the wellbeing of workers and their communities.
Kraft Foods relationship with the Rainforest Alliance is estimated to have benefitted more than 306,000 farmers and helped preserve more than 61,261 hectares of forest across Latin America and Asia. Consumers are assured that their coffee comes from farms that meet demanding standards for environmental, economic and social improvements. Following a move to using Rainforest Alliance Certified coffee, one of Kraft Foods UK coffee brands, Kenco delivered exceptional business performance with a 17% increase in sales.
By incorporating sustainability as part of its business strategy sourcing sustainably farmed agricultural commodities, reducing water, energy and packaging use, transporting goods more efficiently and minimising waste Kraft Foods aim to ensure the long-term health of their business while minimising their environmental impacts.
Creating sustainable global supply chains by bringing governments, industry and civil society together
Palm oil is the world s most consumed vegetable oil but, according to UNEP, its production is also the greatest cause of deforestation in South East Asia. The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) brings together all sections of the international supply chain and NGOs. It has already developed criteria for sustainable production and has begun certifying some producers. NGOs have played a key role in this through consistent scrutiny of those criteria and WWF recently published a scorecard of European companies on progress in sourcing sustainable palm oil a report that has been linked to a recent rise in sales against ordinary products.
Action: to ensure a resilient and sustainable food sector.
Who What How Result
Improve Business shares best practice and skills, makes improved use of IT, Efficiency is raised across each sector. Food and farming
competitiveness and technology, and more efficient transport, and invests in long term Exchange of skills improves UK sectors
efficiency sustainability. competitiveness.
World Trade
Create and protect Free global markets transmit clear Organisation, Doha Complete the DDA, secure greater tariff liberalisation for agricultural
open and stable world price signals allowing for rational Development Agenda commodities and the removal of distorting and harmful subsidies.
markets management of resources.
(DDA)
Apply better regulation principles, including a preference for Reduced administrative burden on alternatives to regulation such as voluntary agreements where farmers, fishermen and the food sector.
Government, Reduce the regulatory appropriate. Work in partnership with industry to simplify or The application of better regulation industry bodies burden remove unnecessary regulations. Reduce the administrative burden principles will cut unnecessary costs,
of inspection and enforcement while maintaining or improving increase efficiency and remove regulatory outcomes. obstacles to innovation.
Making sure national
Barriers to invest in infrastructure infrastructure is well- Investments are made in advance to adapt to new pressures and pre-
Government, industry are removed and private investment
prepared to withstand empt threats. Business continuity plans are coordinated.
encouraged.
shocks
Identify threats Food businesses manage economic and environmental risks to their
Food businesses plan for climate
and risks resulting supply chains. Risks arising from potential changes to the climate are
Government, food change and future resource scarcity and
in natural capital reported to Government[1]. Government monitors and identifies future
industry can continue to source raw materials
degradation and threats to food security and risks due to climate change and takes steps
and provide food.
scarcity of resources to mitigate them.
Action: to support markets for a diversity of food businesses.
Who What How Result
Establishing rules for Clear and unambiguous country of origin labelling; Encourage wider public interest in Government standard product where food comes from and how it is
labelling Better environmental and welfare information. produced.
Making it easier for small local businesses and social enterprises to Competitive markets are developed, Public sector food
Government access public sector food procurement contracts, for example by improving the quality and value for
procurement
splitting contracts into smaller lots. money of public sector food.
Recognition for farmers and producers who reduce greenhouse gas
The market rewards responsible Industry Assurance schemes emissions, protect the environment and produce food to higher
behaviour.
animal welfare standards.
Competitive markets, enabling food Government, Fairer supply chain businesses to compete freely and fairly,
Profit and risk spread more fairly across the supply chain.
industry practices giving UK consumers more choice and
better value.
Provide farmers and producers with Promoting and a way to add value to their product
Encourage greater uptake of the EU Protected Food Name Scheme and
Industry, marketing traditional and meet consumer demand for more the further development of sustainable farmers markets and other
Government and regional speciality regional and local food and to find
direct sales outlets.
foods alternative routes to market for that
produce.
- INCREASING FOOD PRODUCTION SUSTAINABLY
Defra Photo Library Defra Photo Library Defra Photo Library
Global economic growth, climate change and an increasing population are challenges that will have a significant impact on the natural environment, and therefore on food production.
• Food must be produced in a way that is environmentally sustainable
or we will create problems for the longer term. We need to feed a growing world population in a way that does not degrade the natural resources on which farming and food production ultimately depend. But we also depend on those ecosystems for other things they provide us with drinking water, regulate our climate, stem flood waters and filter pollution. Choices about food production therefore need to take account of the other services we get from the same natural resources.
• The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment showed how, across the world, we are already damaging the natural environment our soils, seas
and biodiversity. Developments in agriculture have increased yields sufficiently to provide enough food for everyone on the planet. Yet over a billion people around the world are not able to obtain enough food while a billion people are overweight or obese. With continued economic growth, a large middle class is emerging in developing countries as it did in the UK in the first half of the nineteenth century increasing demands for goods and lifestyles with higher impacts on the environment.
• Globally, the costs and benefits of converting land for food production, need to be weighed-up carefully. The economic benefits of unconverted land, whose natural systems provide a range of important and valuable services, may outweigh the smaller and short term economic benefits realised through conversion to food production, housing or other use. It is also important to ensure that conversion of land for biofuel or biomass production as well as diversion of crops from food or feed to fuel, does not compromise local or global food security.
Worldwide:
• 60% of the ecosystems examined for the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment were being degraded or used unsustainably[1];
• The economic cost of the disappearance of forests, and the loss of value from the various services that forests perform such as providing clean water and absorbing CO is estimated to be between e1.35 trillion and e3.1 trillion2;
2
• 35% of the Earth s surface is already used for agriculture further expansion has serious implications for forests, peatland and biodiversity (a further 10- 20% of grassland and forestland is projected to be converted primarily to agriculture by 2050)3;
• Livestock grazing uses more land than any other human activity, and in developing countries meat consumption is rising at a rate of 5% a year;
• Land degradation and desertification threatens the livelihoods of around a billion people who rely on land4 two thirds of Africa is desert or drylands. In China, since the 1950s, expanding deserts have reduced cultivated land areas by almost 700,000 hectares5;
• 70% of global freshwater withdrawal is already used for agriculture6;
• In developing countries, harvest and post-harvest waste are major issues. Losses are estimated to exceed 30% for some crops in certain areas due to inefficient methods of harvesting, difficulties in transporting and storing, and poor market information7. Similar levels are wasted in developed countries, but by consumers.
• Globally, agriculture contributes 14% of greenhouse gas emissions, while land use change primarily deforestation driven by the conversion of forest to agricultural lands and cattle ranching now accounts for a further 18% of global greenhouse gas emissions8.
Given the importance of our productive relationship with the environment we should go beyond simply protecting it, but actively engage in managing it for the ecosystem services we need.
• As well as providing the essentials for Farmers have demonstrated that they are • However there are still issues which can producing food, the natural environment taking their environmental responsibilities incur costs to the environment and society: provides a range of other services from seriously through the uptake of these
Soil erosion in England is estimated to supplying drinking water to regulating schemes 66% of utilisable agricultural area
cost agriculture £45 million a year, and the climate. Depending on the way they is currently under agri-environment schemes[1].
may incur further costs by reducing water manage land, farmers can help conserve
Over the last two decades, farmers in the quality and increasing flood risk when and enhance biodiversity and landscapes, •
UK have succeeded in increasing yields while that soil enters our rivers4;
which can in turn also attract tourism
reducing use of fertiliser, and greenhouse gas
which contributes directly to rural economic The food system is a major water user,
emissions:
sustainability. Similarly, fishermen play a vital taking 10% of all industrial abstractions role in conserving and enhancing the marine Potato yields have increased by 18%, and another 10% of total industrial environment, and fishing, aquaculture and and sugar beet by around 45% over the water from the public supply. Although fish processing provides jobs, often in areas last 20 years; wheat yields have increased agriculture uses only 1% of our water where there are few other opportunities. by almost 8% over 10 years, and barley resources, this masks significant seasonal
by 6%2. and regional differences;
• We already have measures in place to ensure
farmers can be productive and protect the Since 1984, the application rate of Over 60% of nitrates, up to 40% of environment, for example Environmental fertiliser has decreased by up to 52% phosphorus and the majority of silt in UK Stewardship schemes, the Rural Development and between 1990 and 2007, total waterways is due to agriculture. Programme for England and the Campaign greenhouse gas emissions from
for the Farmed Environment (see page 28). agriculture have fallen by 20%3.
The natural environment and the economy are intrinsically linked each providing services for
and impacting on the sustainability of the other.
Our whole economy has been built on the • supporting, such as forming soil and cycling its resources, and damaging its ecosystems. base provided by the environment, which has nutrients, These make us poorer in the long term by itself been shaped by the economic use we limiting our ability to continue in this cycle
• cultural, such as recreational (including
have made of it. Many ecosystems provide (figure 3.1 below). We need to consider the
tourism), spiritual, and other non-material
benefits that are still essential to our economy. effects our behaviour has on the health of
benefits.
These benefits are often referred to as ecosystems, as these impact on their ability to ecosystem services and are vital to the entire As we use natural resources to produce food supply us with essential goods and services in food system: and other goods, we create economic benefits. the future.
In doing so we can return some benefits to
• providing inputs, such as food and water,
the natural environment, such as responsible
• regulating systems, such as reducing the risk management of ecosystems to allow them
of floods, land degredation, and disease, to thrive. But we can also incur costs on
the natural environment by over-exploiting
Figure 3.1: the positive and negative relationship between economic activities and the natural environment
Ecosystem management
and cultivation
The Natural Environment The Human Economy
produces inputs for economic Ecosystem services include clean water, Economy processes environmental inputs activity as well as processing and fertile soil and flood control into goods and services and feeds back
recycling waste waste material
Pressures for land clearance and
over-exploitation
Economic waste materials dumped
back into ecosystems
Sustainable increases in food production can be achieved through improving productivity and competitiveness, while conserving and enhancing the natural environment.
• The route to increasing food production The UK is the first country to do a and Food Security, involving effective sustainably is through improving national-level assessment of the state of multilateral institutions including a reformed productivity and competitiveness, while our ecosystems the changes that have FAO, to deliver co-ordinated in-country
using natural resources responsibly: happened to these over the past 60 years action. Reducing post-harvest losses and from a range of pressures, the changes food waste could improve food availability,
Production must become increasingly
likely over the next 50 years and the increase access to food, and reduce the competitive and responsive to demands
economic and social value of these changes need for additional production.
from the market and consumers while
to our country. This will be completed in
allowing food businesses to be profitable The UK Government is also strongly
2011 and, alongside the results from the •
(see also Section 2 of this Strategy). supporting the establishment of a new
forthcoming Foresight Land Use project
Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity Food production needs to make will inform the future development and
and Ecosystem S ervices (IPBES) which could sustainable use of natural resources: implementation of this Food Strategy.
have a similar impact for biodiversity, as Reducing and being more efficient with Farmers are stewards of more than 70% of the IPCC has done for climate change. UN
man-made inputs, like fossil-fuel based EU land. The UK is working for reform of meetings in 2010 will discuss whether an energy and chemical fertiliser and using the CAP so that farmers are subsidised only IPBES should be established and what natural alternatives like biogas and for producing societal benefits (particularly functions it would have, including looking at manure wherever possible; for environmental outcomes) which the agricultural biodiversity and ecosystems.
Using better land management or market cannot otherwise provide (see also
cultivation practices, to allow for wider Section 2 of this Strategy). • Science, innovation and putting research benefits of protecting and enhancing into practice on farms and in the seafood soil, water and wildlife; and • Globally, we will continue to work with industry, are critical to sustainably improving
others, including the EU, to build on the food production helping us produce
Where possible, integrating food
L Aquila Food Security Initiative (through more food and improve efficiency along production flexibly with other types
which the UK committed £1.1bn over three the whole food chain. By focusing on
of land use at the same time or
years) and FAO World Summit outcomes productivity and resource efficiency, the
in rotation to gain multi-purpose
to sustainably increase production in the food sector will be able to compete
benefits from land-use, such as wider
context of climate change and water effectively in an increasingly global economy. water management, outdoor access
scarcity. This includes building support The role of research and development is
and habitat creation.
for the Global Partnership for Agriculture discussed in more detail in Section 6.
Putting a financial value on the natural resources the food system receives from ecosystems could lead to better management and accountability.
• Many of the services and inputs that the global food system receives from the natural environment are free. In some cases, this means that they can be undervalued, or used inefficiently as there is no financial incentive to use them responsibly short term profitable food production is achieved by overusing natural resources. This limits our future ability to use those natural resources for food production and other essential services (such as drinking water).
develop ways to measure and value these natural services. A range of public and private standards are being developed to measure certain aspects of environmental sustainability, and groups such as the EU Round Table on Sustainable Consumption and Production of Food are bringing policy makers, food manufacturers and retailers from around Europe together to develop common standards.
The English Beef and Lamb Executive s (EBLEX) Better Returns Programme is a knowledge transfer initiative for beef and sheepmeat producers. It provides training events and easy- to-use information covering selection, breeding, feeding, health, and systems and costings issues. This initative, which received start-up support from Defra, is supporting our environmental goals by focusing on increasing the productive efficiency of our livestock farmers.
• This is an example of where the real cost of an activity is not fully factored into business decisions. Taking these costs into account when making decisions about production, investment or expansion would give producers a better understanding
of the points in the system at which we
are overdrawn . To do this, we need to
• Industry targets based on the Food Industry Sustainability Strategy, for example the Food and Drink Federation s Five-fold Environmental Ambition[1], the British Retail Consortium s A Better Retailing Climate 2, and food companies own environmental plans show what can be achieved while remaining profitable.
Our goals for 2030: UK farming and fishing need to produce more and impact less on the natural resources on which food production depend.
The benefits of the natural environment are valued, ensuring a sustainable supply of natural resources from which Natural resources people can benefit now and in the future. Extraction and use of natural resources is balanced so that farmers,
are valued fishermen and food businesses can continue to produce food, while ensuring our natural environment is healthy, can function effectively and be resilient to challenges such as climate change.
We see an increase in availability of and access to food in developing countries, in support of our MDG 2015 targets Globally, agriculture and beyond, including through increasing smallholder productivity and sustainable agricultural growth, sustainable needs to produce fish production, improving market efficiency, reducing post-harvest losses, continuing trade reform, establishing
more food sustainably appropriate land tenure arrangements, empowering women farmers and encouraging livelihood diversification.
and impact less Fairer international trading systems and international markets working better through trade reforms, and the end of import restrictions and subsidies to producers.
Domestically, we want a profitable, thriving, competitive UK food sector to continue to play its part in keeping us food secure. UK farming should produce as much food as possible, as long as it is responsive to demand, and recognises the need to protect and enhance natural resources. Our ability to take advantage of global growth in demand will depend primarily on the competitiveness of UK agricultural production, as well as the nature of the demand. So we need to create the conditions for competitive, sustainable, domestic production to thrive. |
|
Fish and seafood products provide for an increasing proportion of our diet, and are a valued, accessible and readily available source of sustainable protein, supported by a strong UK fish and seafood sector. Fishing and aquaculture industries are profitable and balance economic return with responsible long-term stewardship of marine resources and protection of the marine environment and are flexible, skills-led, and attractive industries to young talent. Innovation and resilience in fish and seafood production allows fish to continue to provide an alternative source of protein that can cope with shifting demand. The industries are supported by reform of the Common Fisheries Policy that integrates fisheries management and conservation. |
Competitive, flexible farming and fishing
industries
Improving skills and competitiveness are central aspects of successful and productive UK farming and fishing industries into the future.
A sustainable and profitable agricultural industry will only be There are a number of opportunities for farmers and fishermen to improve their achieved with a highly skilled, motivated, innovative and dynamic competitiveness including sharing knowledge and information, being better workforce Agriskills Strategy (Draft) connected to and aware of their markets and improving resource efficiency.
• Farming requires a high level and wide variety of professional skills, but • The Rural Development Programme for England includes £600 million (over 2007-2013) many farmers do not pay sufficient attention to keeping their technical to improve competitiveness in the agriculture and forestry sectors and to fund wider skills and their craft up-to-date to meet the demands of a changing rural business development and sustainable rural communities. The Programme can world, nor do they all have the business skills needed to maximise their fund a range of activities that will improve farms competitiveness, including vocational profits. training and knowledge transfer, adding value to and marketing agricultural products and modernisation of agricultural holdings.
• Government is supporting a range of initiatives to enhance the skills
of farmers and land managers to produce food in ways that are more • The Fruit and Vegetables Task Force was launched in October 2009. It brings together environmentally sustainable. These include the Farming Futures initiative, growers, processors, wholesalers, retailers and others to tackle the barriers to increasing and support for the work of LEAF (Linking Environment and Farming), the production and consumption of fruit and vegetables in England. It will seek to help and the work of WRAP and Envirowise to improve skills and knowledge our farmers compete better and to encourage young people and low-income families to on resource efficiency and environmental management in the wider food eat more fruit and vegetables.
industry.
• Similarly, the Dairy Supply Chain Forum[1] and the Pig Meat Supply Chain Task Force2
• In April 2009, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural aim to facilitate industry action to address the challenges facing the sectors, and give Affairs hosted a roundtable meeting on skills development. The opportunities to develop collective solutions.
industry is now in the final stages of developing their Agriskills Strategy
which acknowledges the central role that investment in personal and • UK action on climate change should not result in food production, and the associated continual professional development plays in the improvement of business greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, moving to other counties. Some measures to reduce performance, competitiveness and sustainability. greenhouse gas emissions can bring direct cost benefits to farmers (for example reduced
input of fertiliser or increased yields). The Government will work with partners to ensure
• The Agriskills Strategy sets out the actions needed by the industry, that comprehensive programmes of advice are available to farmers so that they are aware training providers and Government to recognise existing and develop of what they can do practically to reduce emissions from their farming activities while new skills, promote skills development as central to business success and saving money in the process. (This is discussed in more detail in section 4.) professionalism, promote the industry as a good place to work and for
industry, Government and the wider public sector to work in partnership • We will continue working with the farming industry and the European Commission to on skills. explore further ways to reduce the burden of regulation.
Action: increasing food production through improving the productivity and competitiveness of farming and fishing, and increasing their responsiveness to the market.
Who What How Result
Greater opportunity for competitiveness
and efficiency, enabling UK and EU Helping to foster an internationally competitive industry without
Policies aimed at farmers to realise their full productive Government reliance on subsidy or protection, and one which does not distort
reforming the CAP potential and provide what the market
international trade and the world economy
requires; consumers benefit from greater choice and better value
Research and New techniques and technologies in Government, Develop new technologies and techniques for sustainable agriculture
development (see practice on farms and in fisheries to research councils, and land use, and better knowledge transfer including through the
also Section 6 of this increase production using less resources industry Sustainable Agriculture and Food Innovation Platform[1]
Strategy) and producing less pollution
Improved business skills will make farmers quicker to respond to the
Industry bodies, Agriskills Action Plan for industry, training providers and Government changing market and able to focus
Government, training Improving skills to recognise existing and develop new skills, promote skills better on improving productivity
sector development and professionalisation and competitiveness; the industry is increasingly seen as a professional and
attractive place to work
Farm businesses more competitive Improving supply and productive; benefits to wider rural
Industry, chain relationships, £600m RDPE funding business development and sustainable Government competitiveness and Work through the Fruit and Vegetable Task Force, Pigmeat Supply rural communities.
responsiveness to Chain Task Force and the Dairy Supply Chain Forum
markets Expand fruit and vegetable production
and consumption in England
Action: protecting and enhancing natural resources while continuing to produce food.
Who What How Result
Applied research looking at how food production and consumption in
Food, farming and the UK links to the value of ecosystem services A better understanding of the points in
the system at which we are overdrawn fishing industries, Valuing ecosystems
Principles for decision-making which help in considering whether to and which points we invest in natural Government
convert land or intensify food production in the UK based on a proper capital and its services
assessment of costs / benefits based on ecosystems services
Encourage development and dissemination of sustainable production
Government, Help meet increased demand for food methods to increase agricultural output without undermining the
farming industry, Increase productivity sustainably while avoiding large-scale
natural resource base and avoiding large-scale land use changes.
international sustainably land use changes; ecosystem losses are
This should incorporate efforts to improve nutrient and water use
stakeholders avoided
efficiency, and sustainable land management techniques.
Protect and enhance the farmed environment through Environmental
Stewardship schemes, the Campaign for the Farmed Environment[1]
and measures described in the Soil Strategy for England2, Future
Managing the
Farming and Water3, and the Water Framework Directive.
farmed and marine Wildlife and biodiversity is protected fishing industries,
environments Adapt or develop new farming and fishing techniques to support and enhanced.
Government
responsibly sustainable production
Continue to build the evidence base through research and development
Action: improving the sustainability of global food systems.
Who What How Result
Build on the L Aquila Food Security Initiative and FAO World Summit
outcomes to develop, and co-ordinate action through the Global
Government, Effective multi-lateral Integrated, country-led processes
Partnership for Agriculture and Food Security, in pursuit of country-
international processes delivering on delivering sustainable agricultural
led sustainable agricultural development on the ground, such as that
stakeholders the ground development
taken through the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development
Programme.
Improve the global sustainability and governance of fisheries, through
Support the growing the Partnership for African Fisheries, by implementing the IUU fishing Seafood is a secure, environmentally Government
global demand for fish regulations and Port States Controls, and by improving conservation friendly, nutritious food source
with ICCAT, CITES and the International Whaling Commission
DFID committing £1.1 bn for sustainable agricultural development
over 3 years, contributing to: reducing post-harvest losses in
Government,
Increased availability developing countries including through improved food storage Supplies are used more efficiently less international
and access to food facilities; better functioning markets; appropriate land tenure pressure to produce more food globally stakeholders
arrangements; empowerment of women farmers; and livelihood
diversification
Develop and implement sustainability criteria for biofuels/bioenergy
at global and EU level, that address both direct and indirect impacts; Bioenergy production and consumption Ensure that biofuel ensure biofuel/bioenergy mandates are sufficiently flexible to enable does not compromise local or global
(and wider bioenergy) adjustment between fuel, food and feed sectors; undertake further food security, including through GHG
Government pcoromdpurcotmioin dse fooeos nod t research, including through Foresight food project, informed by FAO and ecosystems impacts
and other international work; address food security in Commission-
security goals
led review of EU biofuel/bioliquid provisions by 2014 and Commission
proposals on biomass sustainability.
- REDUCING THE FOOD SYSTEM S GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Action on climate change is urgently needed to prevent human suffering, ecological catastrophes and political and economic instability. The UK, like every country, must act now to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
• If greenhouse gases (GHGs), like carbon • Government has put in place a legal • All parts of the food chain have an dioxide from burning fossil fuels or methane framework to ensure that we take important role to play in delivering the from agriculture, are not reduced, global significant steps to decarbonise our targets of the LCTP.
temperatures could rise by up to 6"C by the economy by 2050.
end of the century[1].
The Climate Change Act 2008 the first
• This would increase global instability, of its kind in the world enacts a legal
conflict, public health-related mortality, obligation for Government to reduce GHG
degradation of natural resources and emissions by at least 80% on 1990 levels
migrations beyond any of our recent by 2050.
experience.
The Act also establishes the Carbon
• The Stern Review2 concluded in 2006 that Budget system which sets a cap on
uncontrolled climate change could cost the the amount of emissions allowed over
global economy between 5% and 20% of consecutive five-year periods beginning
global GDP. 2008-2012.
We must limit global average temperature The 2018-2022 Carbon Budget requires increases to 2"C to avoid the most dangerous Government to reduce GHG emissions by consequences of climate change. This means at least 34% compared to 1990 levels.
that global emissions must start falling before • In 2009 the Government published the UK 2020 and reduce by at least 50% by 20503. Low Carbon Transition Plan (LCTP) which
• The UK, like every country, must play its part sets out the responsibilities for reducing
to reduce GHG emissions now. emissions for each sector of the economy
along with policies to enable the UK to meet the first three carbon budgets4.
The greenhouse gas footprint of the UK food chain was 160mtCO e in 2006, an estimated 22% of emissions associated with all UK economic activity1. Emissi2ons arise at all points of the
food chain, so everyone in the chain have a responsibility to help tackle climate change.
• Consumers are responsible for the remaining Onsite investment in renewables or low
Greenhouse Gas Emissions associated
[1] third which is made up of production carbon generation can deliver additional with the UK Food Chain by sector, 2006
emissions embedded in imported products carbon savings. Technologies such as Million tonnes CO2 equivalent (net trade) and the emissions associated with Combined Heat and Power and anaerobic
4 Pre farm the ways we shop, store and prepare food. digestion are well suited to those of the
39 Farming part of the food sector where energy
52 Fisheries For our food system to be sustainable, all needs are intensive and constant.
Manufacturing parts of it need to reduce energy use and
Transportation greenhouse gas emissions. This includes: • Decarbonising business and farming
Retail activities which directly emit GHGs.
21 Catering Reducing electricity use: to reduce demand For example, businesses can reduce emissions
1 Households on the National Grid and consequently reduce by following processes that minimise the
5 13
10 15 Net Trade the total amount of electricity the UK needs need for refrigeration, heating, or transport emissions to generate and the emissions associated with or by using more fuel-efficient equipment.
energy generation. Farms can also reduce nitrous oxide emissions
• Primary production in the UK accounts for a by more efficient fertiliser use.
Green Electricity buying electricity
third of the UK food chain s greenhouse gas
from green tariffs demonstrates Influencing reductions in levels of footprint. This is predominantly methane and •
demand for renewables and other low- embedded emissions in products so
nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture with
carbon electricity generation, but it does that buyers value environmentally friendly
a small amount associated with the fuel used
not deliver additional carbon savings. products and suppliers are incentivised to
by our fishing fleet.
Businesses and consumers on green meet this demand. For example retailers
• Collectively, the industries which process, tariffs, therefore, should still reduce their could choose to stock lower carbon products manufacture, distribute and sell food (through electricity consumption and use it as and so would encourage their suppliers to retail or catering) account for a further third. efficiently as possible. make lower carbon products.
Retailers, manufacturers, distributors, and caterers will be affected by Low Carbon Transition Plan policies to reduce emissions from workplaces and transport.
Workplaces transport emissions related to their own covers around 50% of the energy used in
activities and by influencing consumers to the food manufacturing sector3.
• The energy used in our workplaces accounted
reduce journeys related to food shopping.
for 12% of UK greenhouse gas emissions The CRC, a new mandatory energy
in 2008. To reduce emissions we need to Food businesses can use these reduction efficiency scheme starting in 2010, will change the way we do business to cut down targets as points of comparison to measure extend the coverage of regulatory
the amount of energy and other resources the success of their own efforts to reduce instruments to emissions from large
used this could also help businesses save emissions. organisations4 outside the EU Emissions money and become more competitive. Trading Scheme and CCAs. This will affect
Policies
many large food businesses including
• The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan and
The Low Carbon Transition Plan and retailers and manufacturers. The large wider Government policies aim to deliver a
Department for Transport s Low Carbon corporate clients of food service businesses 13% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions
Transport: A Greener Future2 set out the policies may also be captured in CRC.
on 2008 levels from workplaces by 2020[1].
and initiatives that help or require businesses to
Financial support services such as low cost Transport make reduce emissions. These include: •
loans, and grants for SMEs.
• In 2008 transport accounted for 20% of UK • Regulatory schemes and fiscal incentives
The Carbon Trust, for example, provides greenhouse gas emissions. Government is such as the Climate Change Levy (CCL)
interest free energy efficiency loans. seeking to reduce these by 14% by 2020. Climate Change Agreements (CCA), the CRC
Passenger cars account for the majority Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC) and vehicle • Advisory services including the Carbon Trust, of transport emissions (nearly 60%), with emissions performance standards. Business Link, the Waste and Resource commercial road vehicles the next largest Action Programme, and Envirowise.
Many food businesses are already affected
contributor (approximately 30%).
by a CCA or pay the CCL. For example, the
• Food businesses have an important role Food and Drink Federation s (FDF) CCA
in helping make significant reductions in
Agricultural emissions are a significant part of the UK s contribution to climate change, accounting for 7% of our total direct emissions reported annually to the UN and an estimated 33% of carbon footprint of the UK food chain1.
• The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan target competing demands for land between General, Ban Ki-Moon said in November for agriculture in England is a cut of 3Mt food and bioenergy or between changes 2009 that there can be no food security CO2 by 2020. To deliver this the Government to livestock management for emissions without climate security. 3
committed: reduction and the role of livestock in habitat
• The UK food system is intrinsically linked
management for wildlife. The choices and
To provide advice on how to take cost- to global food security and developing trade-offs between mitigation, the wider
effective actions; countries are far more vulnerable to
natural environment and food production
the effects of climate change and food
To work with the farming industry, and need to be identified.
insecurity. We have a responsibility to encourage an industry-led action plan to
• The problem of greenhouse gas emissions remain engaged with international
deliver emissions reductions;
from agriculture is global and accounts actions on climate change mitigation and To improve the way we measure and for 14% of emissions2. Solutions must be adaptation, sustainable agriculture and food report agricultural emissions so that found nationally but agricultural products for the benefit of other nations and for our positive actions taken by farmers can be are traded internationally. So in reducing own.
recorded accurately; and emissions in the UK we need to make sure
that we do not simply transfer the problem
To maximise the potential use of anaerobic
to other countries. At the same time we
digestion to reduce emissions and
need to facilitate low carbon agricultural
produce renewable energy.
growth in developing countries.
• Some of the actions to reduce greenhouse
• Food security and climate change go
gas emissions in the food system have
hand in hand. This is recognised by the benefits for the wider natural environment.
international community. The UN Secretary But tensions do exist, for example between
Consumers can help develop a lower-carbon food system by creating demand for food with a smaller environmental footprint.
• Producers, manufacturers, retailers and the food service sector all respond to
market signals that originate with consumers it is their demand that drives Food miles is not a helpful measure of food s environmental
footprint. It can mask other important considerations:
the food system. But consumers choices are constrained by knowledge, time,
cost, convenience and retail offers. • Impact on local businesses choosing local produce over imports can help deliver local economic benefits. But this depends on whether local
• Business also plays a role leading demand through advertising and influencing producers would have a market or not should local consumers choose consumer choice by what it chooses to stock. For example retailers that offer to buy goods from further afield. If they do have alternative markets
the economic benefits of buying local products are small. Conversely, only fish certified as from sustainable fisheries prevent consumers making choosing local produce over imports can reduce the prosperity of
unsustainable choices. communities in developing countries that do not have alternative high
value markets for their products. For example, an estimated one million
• Although proportionally small, the number of consumers concerned about the rural African livelihoods depend at least partly on the fruit and vegetable impact of their food on the climate is growing[1]. trade with the UK UK shoppers spend £1 million a day on African fruit and vegetables3.
• If we are to reduce emissions across the food system, while also protecting
consumer choice, we will need to find a comprehensive and accessible way • Seasonality buying foods when they are locally in season can mean
of informing consumers about the climate impacts of their food as well as buying products that have had to use less energy to grow, for example
to heat or light greenhouses or to cold-store products for out of season encouraging and enabling them to change their behaviour. sales.
• Many people consider the food miles associated with a food product as a • Other environmental impacts greenhouse gas emissions are not proxy for its environmental impact. But transport accounts for only 9% of the the only damaging environmental output of food. Food requires water food chain s greenhouse gas emissions, and greenhouse gas emissions are just and fertiliser, for example. Food grown in warmer climates may require higher levels of irrigation which could contribute to water stress.
one of a number of environmental impacts associated with food production
and consumption2. • Mode of transport The type of vehicle and how efficiently it can be
loaded affect the transport emissions associated with a product. Ships,
• Not all systems of production have the same greenhouse gas impact and for example, though individually high emitters, are very efficient in
in many cases, emissions from transporting food will be offset by lower terms of emissions per unit of food transported. Similarly heavy goods production emissions compared to a local alternative. vehicles can be loaded very efficiently, but in the UK they contribute to
congestion which is the most costly social impact of food transport.
Livestock production is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions globally1, and there
are some groups that advocate a diet with less meat as a way for consumers to reduce the environmental footprint of their diet. But the evidence to inform appropriate consumer choices and policy responses is currently unclear. The following are important factors to consider in this debate:
Greenhouse Gas Emissions the carbon intensity (i.e. GHG emissions per • But livestock farming also delivers
kg of meat or litre of milk produced) may be environmental benefits. For example valued
• Ruminant livestock produces methane, a
lower than alternatives. and bio-diverse ecosystems have developed potent greenhouse gas, and accounts for
about 4% of UK direct emissions2. But not all • Livestock can also be part of agricultural to depend on grazing by livestock and these
contribute to the traditional character of types of meat have the same impacts, neither systems that contribute to locking carbon
the UK countryside. This landscape is also do all systems of production. Different types into soil, and upland livestock production
sustained in many areas by the economic and of livestock are responsible for different is often the only economically productive
social support livestock farming provides to levels of emissions the way livestock is fed, activity possible in such areas.
rural communities.
housed, and grazed all affect the level of
GHG emissions. Chicken, for example, is the • Further research is needed to quantify
properly the life-cycle emissions of different
most popular meat protein in the UK and
livestock production systems. Government is
emits fewer GHGs per kg than any red meat.
challenging assumptions about home-grown
• Land-use changes overseas, such as alternatives to soya in order to progress this
deforestation, release GHGs currently locked debate.
in trees and soils. These changes have been
Other Environmental Impacts
associated with the production of feed for
livestock, particularly soya. Grain-fed livestock • The environmental impacts of livestock are
production systems may, therefore, be not limited to GHGs. For example The EU
indirectly responsible for high levels of GHG estimates that it contributes to more than
emissions. However soya is a very efficient 50% of the eutrophication in EU waterways3.
feedstuff for maximising meat production so
Health Impacts
• Meat and dairy products are good sources of essential nutrients, such as dietary iron in red meat and calcium and riboflavin in dairy products (though there are vegetarian and vegan sources of these nutrients).
• Colorectal cancer has been linked with high levels of red and processed meat consumption, and saturated fat (found in some meat and dairy products) can contribute to coronary heart disease, the biggest killer in the UK.
Trade and Economy
• The UK meat and dairy supply chains are international. Reducing GHG emissions from meat and dairy through changes in production need to be matched by changes to demand to avoid simply exporting the climate impacts.
• Eating less meat or dairy does not necessarily mean a reduction in competitive, GHG efficient production with growing global markets, particularly in the developing world.
Going forwards the livestock sector environmental evidence. Government should should work to minimise its emissions and its work with the UK livestock sector to help environmental impact, as far as possible, here reduce its emissions, for example by facilitating and overseas. product roadmaps like the milk roadmap[1].
Government should also work with global Consumers should be able to exercise choice
partners to reduce emissions overseas. For over what to eat including choosing how to
example through initiatives like DFID/Defra s reduce the carbon footprint of their diet.
co-operative work with Brazil which aims to Government should continue to provide improve the efficiency of ranching and avoid advice to allow consumers to make dietary deforestation2.
choices based on up-to-date nutrition and
Defra Photo Library
Our goals for 2030: the UK is using low carbon techniques in producing, processing, and delivering food to consumers and influencing emissions reductions from food internationally.
A competitive,
Businesses in the food system will decouple greenhouse gas emissions from productivity, where technology exists, productive food
in order to deliver economic benefits while making absolute emissions reductions.
sector
Consumers play an essential role in driving demand for food with a low environmental footprint, while business
plays an equally important role in influencing demand and responding to consumer needs. By 2030 consumers will Consumer support for
be better informed about the climate impact of their food, empowered to change their behaviour and have the low carbon food
ability to exercise choice on environmental grounds to reduce this impact (see also Section 1: Encouraging people to eat a healthy, sustainable diet ).
Emissions from businesses across the food chain are reduced in line with the relevant targets for workplaces and A food sector transport in the UK Low Carbon Transition Plan recognising that some sectors may be able to reduce emissions
supporting the more easily than others.
UK Low Carbon
Transition Plan Agricultural emissions are reduced per unit yield, as well as absolutely, to deliver the sector s commitment of a 3
million tonne CO2e reduction in England in the Low Carbon Transition Plan.
Policies and measures for reducing GHG emissions of UK agriculture will be designed to avoid simply exporting the climate impacts of our food choices to overseas economies.
Global goals for low
carbon food The UK will play a lead role in developing low carbon supply chains, deploying research and innovation, and
transferring technology and best practice in order to help global partners, particularly developing countries, to reduce their climate impacts.
Action: to achieve our goal for a low carbon food system.
Who What How Result
Improved livestock management and more efficient fertiliser use reduce
Improved agricultural methane and nitrous oxide emissions per unit output. Reduced GHG intensity of Farmers agriculture and 3m tonne
practices
Better slurry management, including anaerobic digestion, reduces methane saving in England by 2020 and nitrous oxide emissions.
Consumers Market demand drives Government,
empowered to express Clearer information on the climate impacts of food. innovation and invention to retailers,
environmental concerns Provides clear incentives for retailers to supply climate-friendly products. find climate-friendly methods consumers
in the marketplace across the food system
Reduce electricity Identify and implement energy efficiency innovations reducing emissions per
Food retail, use, and decarbonise unit output and absolutely. Reduced emissions as well as manufacturing, business and transport financial savings from reduced
logistics, catering activities that directly Engaging with Government initiatives from the UK Low Carbon Transition energy and other input costs
emit GHGs Plan and using appropriate advice services.
Encourage and
Government, The supply chain supports
support Exert influence on and assist suppliers to provide low-carbon products.
food retail, innovation and uptake of
decarbonisation of Support low carbon initiatives by food chain suppliers and other businesses,
manufacturing, climate-friendly methods across
activities by supply for example providing anaerobic digestion for unavoidable food waste.
logistics, catering the food system
chain partners
Provide clarity on Set trajectory for reducing emissions across the economy and levels of effort
Government expectations for food for key sectors. Reduced emissions from food
sector
businesses Work with industry on emissions reduction action plans.
Policies drive Reduced emissions from food
decarbonisation of Continue to provide advice services, appropriate regulation and financial sector. Responsible businesses Government UK food and support incentives. are not put at a disadvantage
businesses to tackle Assist businesses with interest free loans from the Carbon Trust. in the market through
climate change investment costs
The potential food businesses that are already reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The Tesco train link - Shifting The Cavan Bakery Ltd is a small Middlesex business employing 33 people that used a freight from the road Carbon Trust Energy Efficiency Loan to cut its bills and its carbon emissions.
• The Tesco train link between • The bakery s two gas ovens, installed in 1946 and 1948 were massively Daventry and Grangemouth saves inefficient , according to the bakery s managing director Jeff Greenall
3.18 million road miles per year and they lost a large amount of heat, and relied on two electric steam water reduces CO2 emissions by 2,424 boilers, which required frequent and expensive maintenance. Replacing tonnes per year. them, though necessary, was a big decision since having the originals removed was an expensive proposition in itself, both in terms of labour and
• The link received funding from the
lost income. An interest-free Energy Efficiency loan from the Carbon Trust Department for Transport s Rail
helped the business replace them with an efficient, up-to-date alternative. Environmental Benefit Procurement
Scheme . • The new oven creates its own steam which allowed the bakery to get rid of water boilers that
supplemented the previous gas ovens. This freed up working space in the bakery helping them
• The train carries 28 containers, each
avoid a costly move to larger premises in addition to guaranteeing significant electricity and gas one holding 48 cages. In total 1,344
savings.
cages are carried on the train which
completes 10 trips each week. • The new oven loses far less heat, and there are no electric boilers powering it. The bakery is
now saving 1,000 units of gas and 500 units of electricity each month. In total, it has cut its
• The cages carried by the train were
gas consumption by 75% which has enabled the bakery to counter rising energy costs, and previously moved by road by 18
therefore to help the business ride out the current financial difficulties.
double-deck trailers. This amounted
to a saving of 180 double-deck • The bakery is now looking for an affordable, energy efficient alternative to its delivery vans. journeys per week.
Savings at a glance
From DFT Low Carbon Transport: A Greener
Future. • Annual energy savings: 12,000 units of gas and 6000 units of electricity
Original Source: Freight Best Practice case • Annual CO2 savings: 81.2 tonnes
study 1094 • Size of loan: £31,000; Loan Payback 36 months
- REDUCING, REUSING AND REPROCESSING WASTE
Photography courtesy of WRAP. www.wrap.org.uk Photography courtesy of WRAP. www.wrap.org.uk Defra Photo Library
Reducing waste in the food supply chain has economic and environmental benefits.
Estimates of total food waste in the UK[1]Million tonnes
1.6 3
Retailers
4.1 Food Manufacturers
Food service and restaurants
Households
8.3 3 Other2
• In total, food waste in the UK is estimated to be 18-20 million tonnes. Although household food waste makes the largest single contribution (8.3 million tonnes) more than half of this is food wasted in the supply chain3.
• Every tonne of food waste prevented has the potential to save 4.2 tonnes of CO2 equivalent4. This is from both the emissions released when making the food, as well as the methane released when it decomposes in landfill.
• Biological matter such as food waste can be recycled within the food production system. Appropriate treatment such as anaerobic digestion, composting and wormeries
can produce good quality compost and
soil improvers which provide high organic matter content and essential nutrients, helping maintain the productive capacity of soils (see box 5.1 on page 55).
• Excess packaging is often mentioned by consumers as something they would like
to see retailers reduce5, but consumers
also value the protection and hygiene
that packaging offers6. Signatories to the Courtauld Commitment have halted the growth in grocery packaging waste, and
are on target to meet their 2010 objectives
of reducing such waste. Building on the industry s achievements, the 2009 Packaging Strategy7 contains a raft of measures that will promote eco-design in packaging and build on the current rate of recycling and recovery which in 2008 reached 60% of all packaging used in the UK.
• WRAP (the Waste & Resources Action Programme) is working with producers
and researching new ways of reducing waste and creating new opportunities for recycling. This includes reducing the amount of unnecessary packaging used for food,
as well as making more of the essential packaging recyclable. Work is ongoing
to make packaging lighter, which would
also be cheaper and more fuel efficient to transport (see case study on page 57).
• In developing countries, harvest and post- harvest waste are major issues. Losses are estimated to exceed 30% for some crops in certain areas due to inefficient methods of harvesting, difficulties in transporting and storing, and poor market information.
Households throw away £12 billion worth of food every year wasting money and natural resources, and contributing to climate change.
• UK households throw away 8.3 million tonnes • Some food waste is unavoidable. Egg shells
Box 5.1: Anaerobic digestion and biogas
of food a year, of which 65% is avoidable and banana skins could never be eaten.
this represents £12 billion, or £480 for the WRAP is working with local authorities to Anaerobic digestion is a proven system for
average household every year. encourage more appropriate treatments of producing energy and capturing greenhouse
food waste, for example anaerobic digestion gas emissions. It uses organic materials such as
• The main issues for households are buying or composting to reduce the amount of manures and slurries, food waste and sewage
and preparing too much food, and letting biological waste going to landfill. This sludge to make a gas that can be burnt to generate edible food go off either untouched or in includes incentives and advice on appropriate electricity and heat, further processed into opened packets. solutions for householders, gardeners and transport fuel, or injected into the gas grid. The
left over material (called digestate) can be used as
• The significance of date marking and farmers.
a fertiliser and the technology can be used in large storage instructions on foods is not clearly
and small scale operations.
understood by many consumers, which can Fresh fruit, vegetables and salad make
result in unnecessary food waste (50% of up more than a third of households
people asked in an FSA survey did not fully wasted food[1]
understanding date marking). Proportions of household food waste,
• Food manufacturers and retailers can help by weight
consumers to reduce waste by providing 16% Fresh vegetables
more information about meal planning, 23% and salad
storing food, judging portion sizes more Drink
accurately, and better understanding of date 7% Fresh Fruit
Bakery produce
labelling. Development and uptake of new 7%
Meals
technologies may also give food longer shelf 16% Meat and fish
life and make it easier to store safely, such as 8% Dairy and eggs
re-sealable packaging. 10% 13% All other
Our goals for 2030: reducing, reusing and reprocessing waste.
• Supply chains are efficient and minimise waste.
Food waste is avoided as • Consumers are food- and waste-conscious and plan, store and use food effectively.
far as possible • Food packaging is designed in a way that minimises its environmental impact, but retains its purpose in protecting and prolonging the life
of food products.
• Shared with or redistributed to vulnerable people.
Surplus food is valued • Used to generate energy through anaerobic digestion.
• Used to produce fertiliser through anaerobic digestion or composting to help grow more food.
Tackling waste in • Internationally, post-harvest losses are reduced through better storage facilities in developing countries, and the UK demonstrates developing countries international leadership in developing technological solutions to producing energy from waste food.
The potential case studies.
Staples Vegetables is one of the largest producers
of vegetables in the U.K. Based near Boston in Lincolnshire the company supplies a number of major retailers, packers and processors from its farms located around the country[1]
• Staples Vegetables is developing one of five anaerobic digestion (AD) demonstration projects funded by Government. They are building an anaerobic digester which will process unsold vegetables created by the existing vegetable harvesting and packaging process.
• The AD plant will produce electricity which will be used on-site with the excess fed into the grid. The processed vegetable matter (digestate) will be applied back to the land using an existing irrigation network and spreading equipment, replacing the need for some of the fertiliser currently being used.
• The heat generated by the process will be used to chill processing areas through heat absorption coolers, which will reduce the amount of energy used by the business considerably. Excess heat will be used to heat offices and staff buildings on the site.
Reducing the weight of cans
• WRAP has worked with Heinz to reduce the amount of material used to make their cans. The project resulted in a 10% reduction in the thickness of the can ends. By implementing the lighter weight ends, Heinz is saving 1,400 tonnes of steel and 585 tonnes of carbon emissions a year with corresponding financial savings.
• If similar reductions were achieved across the market, it would result in a saving of 15,000 tonnes of steel. Also, lighter cans need less fuel to transport reducing the greenhouse gases associated with the food.
• WRAP is now working with Heinz on the second phase of this project, which is to lighten the can body.
FareShare is a national charity established in 2004 to support communities to relieve food poverty
• From 12 locations around the UK FareShare aims to help vulnerable groups through the provision of Food Redistribution supplying surplus fit for purpose product from the food and drink industry to organisations working with disadvantaged people in the community.
• Last year FareShare redistributed food to 600 local charities, benefiting 29,000 people a day. The food redistributed contributed towards 7.4 million meals and helped businesses save 14,000 tonnes of CO2 emissions.
Action: reducing food waste in the supply chain and at home.
Who What How Result
Less food waste to landfill and fewer WRAP research, advice and support and £3.5m in grant funding for greenhouse gas emissions;
local authorities seeking to introduce new food waste collection
Government, Divert food waste
schemes. Local authorities increase doorstep food waste collection, opportunity to use food for power local authorities from landfill
support development of infrastructure to process food waste; generation and nutrients are returned Government incentivises reprocessing over disposal. to the soil through the digestate
produced by anaerobic digestion.
Consumers know what they need to WRAP s Love Food Hate Waste campaign and partner campaigns buy, and how much.
Households, with retailers.
consumers/NGOs/ Meal planning Consumers can take full advantage community groups WRAP s work with retailers to help consumers make the best use of of special offers, and know how to
offers, for example recipe suggestions. manage the extra food offered through these promotions.
Easier for consumers to waste less food Help consumers Promotional schemes are sensitive to the need to reduce food waste;
Food industry and take advantage of promotional
reduce food waste flexibility offered in portion sizing.
offers.
Consumers are clear on what to eat, by Clear, unambiguous when and how to store food properly;
Joint work between Defra, the FSA, WRAP and the food industry
Government, date labelling, food
to improve the clarity and consistency of date labelling and storage Enables retailers to manage stock food industry storage and usage
guidance. efficiently;
guidance
Food safety is ensured.
Action: reducing food waste in the supply chain and at home.
Who What How Result
Food appearance and shelf life is still Processors and retailers Measures to optimise packaging set out in the 2009 Packaging protected; Innovative packaging uses
Food industry
reducing waste Strategy and second phase of the Courtauld Commitment. fewer resources such as oil, water, and
energy.
Development of Anaerobic Digestion Implementation Plan, Fewer greenhouse gas emissions;
based on recommendations of Anaerobic Digestion Task Group; Reduces the amount of waste going to Government, food Reducing waste in the
£10m Anaerobic Digestion Demonstration Programme Support landfill; Enables power to be generated industry food supply chain
under financial incentives for renewable energy and capital grant from waste; Digestate can be used as a programmes; Online anaerobic digestion advice portal. fertiliser.
- INCREASING THE IMPACT OF SKILLS, KNOWLEDGE, RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
Defra Photo Library Defra Photo Library FACE Farming and Countryside Education www.face-online.org.uk
Food research is a complex, multi-disciplinary field which requires collaboration between public and private sectors to innovate.
Research and development will be increasingly important
as all countries learn to use the finite resources available Effects of the climate Competition and synergies
change on agriculture and with biofuels and sustainably to produce ever more food to feed the growing aquaculture; water and land biorenewables, and effects global population[1]. use; and biodiversity of energy prices on food
Research could help towards our production and Environment
environmental goals in areas such as developing crop
varieties which require lower inputs but still meet end-user Economics,
and agri-ecological requirements, while recognising the politics and Energy value of agricultural biodiversity including plant genetic social
Global
resources and crop wild relatives (wild plants from which commodities
crops are developed) to this work. Developing precision markets and Food
farming and Integrated Pest Management systems can also world trade
reduce chemical and energy inputs needed to grow our policies
food. Human Emerging
health technologies
GM, like nanotechnology, is not a technological panacea
for meeting the varied and complex challenges of food
security, but could have some potential to help meet Research and
future challenges. Safety must remain our top priority Nutritional development for example
and the Government will continue to be led by science requirements linked nanotechnology in when assessing the safety of GM technologies. The Food to health agri-food Industry
Standards Agency is taking forward a programme of
consumer engagement which will provide an opportunity
to discuss with consumers their understanding of GM, their Underpinning biology, chemistry,
understanding of the benefits, and their concerns. economics, engineering and social science
Realising the potential of UK science, innovation and skills and continuing to translate research into practice will all play a major role in achieving our goals.
• Historically the UK has led the world in the development of new crop varieties, livestock breeds, farming techniques, food manufacturing technology and product innovation. The advanced and sophisticated agricultural sector is well linked to a global system providing chemical, biological and informational inputs.
• We need to make sure that the results of research are transferred into the food system, public policy and our lifestyles, and that best practice is shared across the supply chain both at home and abroad.
• Translation of research into practice is a major part of Government s support of sustainable farming and fishing, especially in developing collaborative projects with industry. This means that the food sector can readily use findings of new research
to improve their products and processes. Closer communication between the research community and the food industry enables researchers to identify the challenges facing the food system, and help them develop
complementary research programmes.
The Technology Strategy Board s Sustainable Agriculture and Food Innovation Platform[1] will bring together business, academia
and Government to understand better the challenges and drive forward innovation in business.
• Total UK Government and Research Council spending on food and agriculture was over £350 million in 2008. Defra and BBSRC2 encourage industry-led agricultural research and development. Government sponsored programmes have supported innovation by industry and will continue to do so through the Technology Strategy Board Sustainable Agriculture and Food Innovation Platform.
• The UK plans to double investment in agricultural research for development to £80 million a year by 2013 to provide poor farmers with access to technologies and help national governments with more effective agricultural policies, based on a robust evidence base. This includes support to the Consultative Group for International
Agricultural Research (CGIAR), and regional research organisations in Africa. The Foresight Global Food and Farming Futures project is looking at the challenge of how a global population of 9 billion by 2050 can be fed healthily and sustainably. The project takes a global view of the food system, considering issues of demand, production and supply as well as broader environmental impacts, to strengthen understanding and analysis of the global uncertainties and interdependencies.
2030 goals for research, development and skills.
Research is joined up
Food research and innovation funded by the public and private sector is developed with end-users of that research, across disciplines and
and is effectively translated into practice in primary production, to promote a thriving agri-food sector, and translated effectively
allow businesses to be more sustainable and efficient in meeting economic, environmental and social goals. into practice
Information and best
Knowledge, best practice and skills are accessible and exchanged across the food system. practice are shared
Skills are at the heart Farmers, fishermen, and employees within the agri-food sector recognise the importance of maintaining and
of successful food, developing their skills and have access to opportunities to learn through advice, informal and formal education, and farming and fishing encourage new entrants to join the sector. Similarly, new entrants are attracted to careers in food research and
businesses development.
The public are
engaged with and People are well informed, and can participate in debate about the risks and opportunities posed by the use of new support food science technologies in the food sector.
and research
The UK is a world leader on food research and innovation and is co-operating with a range of international
The UK is a world partners, through various mechanisms including the EU framework initiatives and Sustainable Development leader on food R&D Dialogues, to find solutions to international challenges including reducing greenhouse gas emissions from primary production.
Government is leading collaboration on research, by helping to connect funders, researchers and users of science.
• Our vision for a sustainable and secure
food system can only be achieved through
a strong contribution from research and innovation. This will provide the evidence to support effective, coordinated policies and ensure the development and dissemination of new knowledge, technologies and skills.
• The UK Strategy for Food Research and Innovation , developed under the leadership of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser, provides a framework to coordinate food research and innovation across Government and the Devolved Administrations. Many of the research issues, by their nature, are complex and multi-disciplinary, and will often cross departmental and organisational remits. Tackling these in an effective way requires strong links between funders to address the key questions while making best use of increasingly pressured resources.
• The Research and Innovation Strategy is centred on the contributions of the public sector, but also considers the important links and shared interests with the wider
research communities and users, in industry and elsewhere.
• The Research and Innovation Strategy
also sets out how we will engage internationally on evidence and innovation to promote policy interests and to influence European and other international research organisations. This collaboration offers opportunities to address common policy challenges through joint research, exploit the complementary strengths of different national research programmes and be
able to fund large-scale projects. We will also promote development and poverty reduction in poorer countries, helping
to provide poor farmers with access
to technologies and helping national governments to make better policies on agriculture.
Action: research, science and skills to underpin the transition to a sustainable and secure food system.
Who What How Result
Better value for money is achieved from Joining-up and
A new research programme on food security, coordinated by BBSRC research budgets; research programmes integrating research
and being developed jointly with Research Councils and Government across disciplines, organisations and Government across Government,
departments, as well as the Devolved Administrations, and including sectors are coordinated and produce private sector and
close engagement with industry and the third sector. high quality research and practical
third sector
applications.
A new Sustainable Agriculture and Food Innovation Platform led by
the Technology Strategy Board, co-funded by Defra and BBSRC with
Government, The whole food chain is supported
Effectively translating £90m over 5 years, to fund innovative technological research and
industry, research in adopting new, more sustainable
research into practice development in areas such as crop productivity, sustainable livestock
community techniques encouraging more to do so. production, waste reduction and management, and greenhouse gas
reduction.
Research and Wider application of traditional
DFID doubling investment in research and development to £80m a
Government, development to and new technologies to support
year by 2013 providing poor farmers in developing countries with
research support improvements sustainable global agriculture, including
access to technology, supported by Defra-sponsored work including
community in sustainable global through the conservation of agricultural
on crop genetic resources and agricultural biodiversity.
agriculture biodiversity.
Future challenges A major Foresight study[1] is looking over the long term at how a future
Long term planning reduces future Government prepared for in world population of 9 billion can be fed healthily and sustainably. It is
threats to the food system. advance set to launch its findings in October 2010.
Action: research, science and skills to underpin the transition to a sustainable and secure food system.
Who What How Result
A new BBSRC Advanced Training Partnership scheme to provide a
Government, skills Greater availability of training for those
Maintain and improve range of specialist high level training (masters, professional doctorate
councils, research in and wishing to enter the food sector,
the food sector s skills and continuous professional development) to meet industry needs in
community, Industry including health and sustainability.
partnership with higher and further education sectors.
The public and civil
Government, society are engaged in
research community, and better informed Make research priorities and outputs of research projects widely
Raised public trust in research. food industry and about research, available and easy to understand.
civil society its outputs and
applications
Demand created for Provide wider opportunities to the workforce and better address
food sector skills; food the needs of the sector, by making training available that supports The food system attracts talented Food businesses, industry is seen as an entry into the sector, career development and vocational learning, people with the skills needed to adapt education system attractive employer for example Lantra s Skills Manager tool an online tool to enable to new challenges, including into R&D
with a highly skilled employers to manage staff more effectively by recognising and roles.
workforce assessing employees training needs in a cost-effective way.
Food system
regulated in ways Producers, processors and retailers that continue to are able to innovate to improve
Evidence based policy development, and appropriate and proportional
Government, EU support and encourage their economic and environmental
regulation.
innovation, while performance while protecting the minimising the public interest.
burdens on industry
Case studies how research can help meet the challenges for sustainable food.
Higher-sugar grasses for sustainable production of ruminant Finding simple ways of reducing fish discards by 57%
livestock and reduced environmental pollution
• Because of the variety of fish species in our coastal waters it is hard for
• Research carried out by the Institute for Biological, Environmental, and fishermen to avoid catching fish that aren t marketable, either because Rural Sciences (IBERS), developed high-sugar ryegrasses and assessed they are too small or because they have little commercial value. Sadly their benefits for meat and milk production increased productivity and this means that the numbers of fish being discarded are high. a reduction in environmental impacts (through increased nitrogen use
• Discarding is widely regarded as a waste of natural resources, disruptive
efficiency).
to marine ecosystems and ethically undesirable. Globally, 7.3 million
• The aim was to provide a better-balanced supply of energy and protein to tonnes of fish are discarded every year. the micro-organisms in the rumen of cattle and sheep to enhance animal
• Using its knowledge of fish behaviour, Cefas (Centre for Environment,
performance, to reduce the excretion in manure of surplus grass protein,
Fisheries & Aquaculture Science) set up a project to see if simple changes and to reduce consequential emissions of ammonia and nitrous oxide to
to fishing nets such as altering mesh sizes and specialist escape panels the environment.
for different species could deliver significant discard reductions.
• Animal feeding trials demonstrated that the new varieties resulted in
• Project 50% a voluntary project involved twelve Devon beam
improved animal performance when grazed and also when made into
trawlers trying out different types of fishing nets to decrease silage. The improved nitrogen usage in dairy cows fed high sugar grass
discards by 50%. Many industry experts believed that target had environmental value as well as economic benefit. The project resulted
to be unrealistically high. The results from the trials showed an in several new varieties of grass being produced and marketed in the UK
unprecedented average reduction of 57%.
and elsewhere.
Reducing the amount of water needed to grow strawberries by 70%
• East Malling Research, through a Defra LINK project, are improving water use efficiency and fruit quality in strawberries. Research shows that a 70% reduction in water use can be achieved through better scheduling of irrigation, with improvements in flavour and shelf-life potential. Results are now being transferred to potatoes - another crop with high water demand.
Defra Photo Library Defra Photo Library
DELIVERING FOOD 2030
There are key challenges for all parts of the food system, for Government and the third sector.
Sector Challenge
Improve profitability, productivity and competitiveness, and produce safe food sustainably and in line with what the market wants. Build Farmers
a highly skilled and innovative sector. Manage risk and plan for climate change.
Ensure that fishing is a highly skilled industry, attractive to new talent and using the right technology to fish sustainably. Help fishing to The fishing industry
provide livelihoods for coastal communities. Manage risk and plan for climate change.
Develop sustainable supply chains. Improve resource efficiency, and build a highly skilled and innovative sector. Manage risks and plan Food processors
for climate change. Ensure food safety.
Develop and maintain resilient supply chains and help consumers lead greener and healthier lives. Improve resource efficiency, and build Retailers
a highly skilled and innovative sector. Manage risks, and plan for climate change. Ensure food safety.
Develop and maintain sustainable supply chains and help consumers lead greener and healthier lives. Improve resource efficiency and Food Service
build a highly skilled and innovative sector. Manage risk and plan for climate change. Ensure food safety.
Set clear strategic goals. Address market failures (through regulation where appropriate). Press for action globally on food security Government and food poverty. Provide accurate information to consumers. Lead by example through public food procurement and support for the
industry.
Local and Regional bodies Support action locally to help businesses, including primary producers, and consumers to get what they need.
Find out more about food how and where it is produced, and how to eat healthily. Use their influence and spending power to support Consumers
those who produce sustainable and healthy food. Waste less food.
Research and education
Undertake high quality research on the challenges we face. Improve public confidence in science. bodies
Use their networks and trust in communities to help deliver some of the goals described in this Strategy, working with all parts of the Third sector
food chain.
Our principles for engaging with partners to deliver Food 2030.
• The importance of working together was recently underlined by the EFRA Committee in its report: Securing food supplies up to 2050, which recommended the development of strong relationships in the food chain to secure food supplies in the long term. We will build on and strengthen our relationships with businesses in the food chain, and those with an interest in food to deliver a sustainable, secure and healthy food system, as set out in this Strategy.
• Our principles for working with stakeholders will include:
Mutual trust, openness and transparency in all our dealings, including no surprises;
Early engagement on issues; Working together collaboratively; Constructive challenge;
Acknowledging disagreement and being open about why we istock photo library disagree;
Basing our discussions on evidence.
Delivering the Strategy and monitoring progress.
Delivering the food strategy
Working together across the whole food system is essential for success
• Working in partnership and across the supply chain is a key theme in this strategy. The Milk Roadmap, the partnership development of PAS2050, the Food and Drink Federation s five- fold environmental ambition and the Campaign for the Farmed Environment show the benefits of this approach.
• Defra has already agreed a collaborative approach with the FDF, BRC and NFU to deliver a secure, sustainable and healthy food system.
• We will work with others, including the Council of Food Policy Advisers, to map out how we deliver this strategy and develop clear timelines for doing so.
• We will work to strengthen the capacity of civil society to provide debate and challenge, and a voice for citizens on food issues.
• Defra is accountable, on behalf of HM Government, for the delivery of this strategy.
Monitoring and scrutinising progress
Making sure that we re taking the right steps, at the right pace to meet our goals
• Government will promote honest and open feedback about how this strategy is being delivered, and we will look to businesses and stakeholders in the food system to provide open, constructive challenge.
• To inform this process, we will continue to update and publish our food sustainability indicators, and develop further metrics where they are appropriate. We will take the indicators and other evidence into account in developing future food policies.
• We will hold an annual food event with food industry stakeholders, experts, and the third sector to take stock of progress towards our goals for secure and sustainable food.
• We will also continue to make updated information available through the UK Food Security Assessment, reviewing risks and indicators as new evidence becomes available.
MEASURING PROGRESS INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE FOOD
Measuring progress indicators for sustainable food.
We have developed a set of indicators for sustainable food which we will use to measure progress in delivering this strategy. Indicators of course only provide a overview of the challenges involved we will use them alongside other evidence gathered, as well as feedback from stakeholders.
The indicator suite will be subject to ongoing development. Although its scope is UK-wide, it also seeks to set the scene within a global context and, subject to data availability, measure the global impact of UK food production and consumption.
The indicators align to each section of Food 2030:
- Enabling and encouraging people to eat a healthy, sustainable diet
- Ensuring a resilient, profitable and competitive food system
- Increasing food production sustainably
- Reducing the food system s greenhouse gas emissions
- Reducing, reusing and reprocessing waste
- Increasing the impact of skills, knowledge, research and technology
The indicators on the following pages should be read in conjunction with the UK Food Security Assessment[1]. Detailed assessments for the sustainable food indicators can be found at www.defra.gov.uk/ foodfarm/food/index.htm
Measuring progress: indicators for enabling and encouraging people to eat a healthy, sustainable diet.
Theme description | Rationale | Headline | Headline indicator: Comparison of current level with base line | Supporting indicators |
Generating consumer-led demand for sustainable food is central to developing a secure and sustainable food system. Informed choice, education, access and affordability of healthy food, and food safety all play a part in creating confidence in food and in creating this demand. | Consumers have access to an affordable, healthy and varied diet | 1. Accessibility and affordability: Relative price of fruit and vegetables | Clear improvement since 1990 (although increase in vegetable prices relative to other food observed since 2000). | • Low income households share of spending on food • Food prices in real terms • Household access to food stores • Purchasing behaviour in at risk groups (under development) |
Consumer understanding and demand for sustainable food | 2. Engaged and informed consumers | Under development understanding the gap between action and attitude towards sustainable food | • Public sector leading by example (no data as yet) • Contextual indicators: Consumer interest in ethical imports; Origins of UK food imports | |
Eating a healthy sustainable diet will create a healthier society | 3. Diet related ill health: Obesity | Deterioration since 1995 (with some decline in obesity levels since 2004) | • Dietary health • Fruit and vegetable consumption | |
Food safety is key to public confidence in the food system | 4. Consumer confidence in food safety measures | Clear improvement since March 2001 | • Public confidence in food availability (under development) |
A number of these headline and supporting indicators are also used in Themes 5 and 6 of the UK Food Security Assessment, Defra (2010)
Measuring progress: indicators for a resilient, profitable and competitive food system.
Theme description Rationale Headline Headline indicator: Supporting indicators
Comparison of current
level with base line
A sustainable food For the agricultural sector to be focussed 1. Gross Value Added per person in the UK Clear deterioration since Contextual measure: system is dependent on the needs of consumers through the compared with EU14 (Direct subsidies 1990 (the measure has Agricultural resilience upon efficient, market, producing more efficiently to are not included and the ratio has fluctuated since 1996
resilient and enhance incomes of competitive farm been adjusted to remove the effects of and increased since
profitable businesses businesses and for a competitive food sector exchange rates) 2004)
throughout the to provide fair prices for the consumer and
production and be driven by productivity gain 2. Total Factor Productivity of the food
supply chain. chain beyond the farm gate
• Retail, wholesale & non residential no change since1998 catering (with some fluctuation over the period)
• Food manufacturing
clear improvement since 1998
Monitoring water usage in food production 3. Water usage post farm gate (under Contextual measure: is essential to ensure water is used within its development) (see also indicator for water usage post environmental and societal limits water abstraction on page 76) farm gate
Food transport has external impacts such as 4. External costs of food transport: urban Clear deterioration since GHG emissions and congestion road congestion; infrastructure costs 1992
Assurance schemes give consumers 5. Traceability of food (assurance schemes) Clear improvement since confidence in safety and provenance of food Q1 2003
Food-borne illness has a serious effect on 6. Food-borne disease incidence
health, medical services and the economy
• E coli, campylobacter and salmonella Improvement since 2000
• Listeria Deterioration since 2000
Animal disease can have a significant 7. Animal Health: Impact on UK cattle Assessment pending latest Incidence and economic impact exports trade following restrictions trade data prevalence of disease
against the UK on animal health grounds
The demand for meat and meat products 8. Animal welfare Little or no change since should not be at the expense of animal 2005
health and welfare.
Some of these headline indicators are also used in Theme 6 of the UK Food Security Assessment. Also of relevance to UK food chain resilience is Theme 4 of the UK Food Security Assessment.
Measuring progress: indicators for increasing food production sustainably.
Theme description Rationale Headline Headline indicator: Supporting indicators Comparison of current level with base line |
Water is used within its 1. Water abstraction for Clear improvement since 1995 • River water quality: nitrate and environmental and societal agriculture (UK) phosphate levels in rivers limits. • Pesticides in water |
Soil is an irreplaceable 2. Soil quality (organic Deterioration • Proxy indicator: sedimentation in resource and an essential matter) [ in absence of (caveat: infrequent sampling for rivers (relating to soil structure and growing medium. other measures and this measure) erosion) noting soil organic matter is only part of the Contextual indicators: equation] |
• UK production Diversity within flora and 3. Biodiversity Action Plan Little or no change since 2002 • Biodiversity (water environment (commodity output) fauna offers resilience in (110 agricultural species (caveat: infrequent sampling for under consideration) potential times of stress and habitats) this measure) • Plant diversity in fields and field • Global food availability along with the ability for margins • Millennium Development the ecosystem to recover Goal 1 more quickly • Farmland Birds • Genetic diversity • Ammonia emissions |
Long term security in fish 4. Fish stocks harvested Improvement since 1990 • Marine system integrity (North Sea) supply also depends on sustainably and at full (but still well below sustainable • Contextual measure: fish imports sustainable sourcing of fish reproductive capacity levels) (under development) and shellfish. • Contextual measure: sustainable fish consumption (under consideration) • Contextual measure: Global fish stocks |
Also relevant to this issue are Themes 1, 2 (including land use change) and 3 of the UK Food Security Assessment
Measuring progress: indicators for reducing the food system s greenhouse gas emissions.
Theme description Rationale Headline Headline indicator: Supporting indicators Comparison of current level with base line |
|
Monitoring progress 2. GHG emissions from the Under development • Trends in food related GHG to reduce emissions is UK food chain emissions from UK households important |
Energy dependency of the UK Food Chain is the headline indicator for Theme 4 of the UK Food Security Assessment. Global land use change (Theme 2 of the UK Food Security Assessment ) is also important within the context of global GHG emissions from agriculture.
Measuring progress: indicators for reducing, reusing and reprocessing waste.
Theme description | Rationale | Headline | Headline indicator: Comparison of current level with base line | Supporting indicators |
Inefficient resource use and waste have significant environmental and economic impacts. For a food system to be sustainable, it must operate eco-efficiently (i.e. generate more value with less impact) across the supply chain and be supported by consumer action on minimising waste. | Waste reduction across the food chain needs to be considered | 1. Food and drink manufacturing waste | insufficient data at present | • Contextual indicator: Waste generated per household per week • Contextual indicator: Consumer attitudes to household food waste |
Measuring progress: indicators to measure the impact of skills, knowledge, research and technology.
Theme description | Rationale | Headline | Headline indicator: Comparison of current level with base line | Supporting indicators |
A resource efficient and technologically advanced agri-food industry depends on harnessing innovative ideas and processes within its working practices. It therefore relies on the appropriate underpinning skills base and research. |
| 1. Investment in training | Under development | • Skills and training pre-farm gate; food and drink manufacturing; and processing • Higher education (under development) |
2. Development and uptake of knowledge and innovation | Under development |
|
Global agricultural research spend is used as a supporting indicator for Theme 1 of the UK Food Security Assessment
Glossary
AD Anaerobic Digestion
BBSRC Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BRC British Retail Consortium
CAP Common Agricultural Policy
CCA Climate Change Agreements
CFP Common Fisheries Policy
CGIAR Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research CRC Carbon Reduction Commitment
CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species DDA Doha Development Agenda
DFID Department for International Development
EBLEX English Beef and Lamb Executive
EFRA Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee
EU European Union
FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations FDF Food and Drink Federation
FSA Food Standards Agency
GHG Greenhouse Gas GM Genetically Modified
ICCAT The International Commission for the conservation of Atlantic Tuna
IPBES Intergovernmental Panel for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IUU Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported Fishing MDG Millennium Development Goal
MSC Marine Stewardship Council
NFU National Farmers Union
NGO Non-Governmental Organisation
NHS National Health Service
PAS 2050 A publicly available specification for measuring greenhouse gas emissions from goods and services.
RDPE Rural Development Programme for England RSPO Round Table on Sustainable Palm Oil SME Small or medium sized enterprise
TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity study
Third Sector voluntary and community organisations, charities, social enterprises, cooperatives and mutuals both large and small
UNEP United Nations Environment Programme WRAP Waste and Resources Action Programme
Published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs January 2010 ' Crown copyright