Skip to main content

Submission - Overpayment of Income Support Benefits Review - Children's Commissioner

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

Office of the Children's Commissioner

Brunel House

Old Street

St Helier, Jersey

JE2 3RG

Tel: +44 (0)1534 867310

Deputy Rob Ward c/o Morier House Halkett Place

St Helier

Jersey

By email: J.Hahn@gov.je;  s.mckee@gov.je

26 July 2023 Dear Deputy Ward

Health and Social Security Scrutiny Panel Overpayment of Income Support Benefits Review

Many thanks for your letter in relation to your review of overpayments of Income Support and the impact this has on children in a household and on their rights under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).

I have conducted a brief review of the enquiries that have been forthcoming to the Office since its inception in shadow form in 2018. To date we have received only 14 enquiries in relation to Income Support.

I was a little surprised that there were not more however this could be due to a number of reasons not least privacy of the adults and not linking specifically to the impact on their child's rights in the first place.

To that end I have only been contacted once in relation to overpayment of Income Support and the impact of this on a family with children.

On reviewing the enquiries, we have had I can see clear themes emerging, all of which are underpinned by practice, policy and legislation that does not consider children's rights. When conducting your review, I would encourage curiosity regarding the potential for discrimination because of this. These are families who are of lower social

1

economic  status  and  for  whom  any  negative  impact  on  their  income  support contribution will impact on all members of the household. I would advise the panel to review  the  Legislative  Gap  Analysis  completed  in  2019  as  it  highlights  the incompatibility of the Income Support (Jersey) Law 2007 and the UNCRC.

Most specifically the issues raised with this Office relate to the stopping of an income support component when medical treatment is required for a child off island that cannot be provided in Jersey. Other enquiries have included the assessment of personal  care  allowances,  requirement  to  seek  full  time  employment  when  the youngest child commences secondary school (age 11) and the five-year residency rule and the particular impact of this on those fleeing domestic abuse.

One parent contacted us to say she would be leaving the island as she could not access support. When this Office raised this with the relevant department, repatriation funding was offered. How can a child born in Jersey be repatriated to another country. Jersey is their place of birth.

The  issues  through  our  casework  mirror  the  gaps  separately  identified  in  our Legislative Gap Analysis

Specifically,  Articles  26  and  27  require  that  all  children  should  have  access  to assistance and support programmes that support their healthy child development, this includes the right to benefit form social security. Children should be ensured a standard of living that is adequate to this development.

There are also wider considerations of children's rights in relation to policies levied toward adult income support claimants and these are around dignity, respect, family, life and survival.

Yours sincerely

Andrea Le Saint

Acting Children's Commissioner for Jersey