This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.
Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.
Hello,
I don't think I'm going to make any stunning observations beyond the most obvious.
Cash is still rather useful for hedge veg' honesty boxes mobile data to facilitate payment, or some sort of phone wants them).
– cashless here would imply the need to payment. Not everybody has these (or
Cash is good for tipping, leaving do collections, charity collections etc. Cash allows for anonymity ( I see this as a plus!)
Cash allows better spending control (easier to see how much you have left)
I think that for as long as cash is valid businesses should be compelled to accept it – not sure how they can justify the refusal of cash to pay for something when cash is legal tender.
Going cashless would probably cause difficulties for visitors, who may not have facility to access funds via phone. (had the opposite problem in Portugal recently where many places only accepted cash, which required frantic searches for ATM's).
Thanks,
Riki Maguire