Skip to main content

Annual Business Plan 2008 (P.93-2007) - eleventh amendment

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

r

ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN 2008 (P.93/2007): ELEVENTH AMENDMENT

Lodged au Greffe on 14th September 2007 by the Chief Minister

STATES GREFFE

ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN 2008 (P.93/2007): ELEVENTH AMENDMENT ____________

In paragraph (a)(i), after the words"pages 11 to 13 of the Annex" insert the words

" ex c ept that in Objective 7, after Performance/success criteria (v), insert the following new Performance/success criteria –

( v i) N  eed for an independent person or agency to receive approaches from persons raising serious

concerns to be assessed.".

CHIEF MINISTER

NOTE

This amendment has been lodged by the Chief Minister less than 14  days before the start of the debate in accordance with the provisions of Article  11(5) of the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005. Paragraphs (4) and (5) of Article  11 are in the following terms

(4 ) A draft annual business plan is not capable of being amended during a debate in the States on the

draft except in accordance with an amendment lodged at least 14  days before the start of the debate.

(5 ) P a ragraph  (4) does not apply to an amendment moved by the Chief Minister if the States agree that

the amendment may be debated forthwith or at a time approved by the States.

In accordance with the provisions of paragraph  (5) the Chief Minister will seek the agreement of the States to debate this amendment during the debate on the Annual Business Plan 2008.

REPORT

This amendment mirrors and replaces the Eighth Amendment proposed by the Deputy of St.  Saviour.

The Council accepts the principle of the amendment and agrees that an independent arrangement for persons raising serious concerns should benefit the whole States. In order for a proper assessment to be made, the feasibility study should therefore be undertaken under the auspices of the Chief Minister's Department to ensure that any resulting process can be used appropriately States-wide.

Accordingly, this amendment seeks to transfer the responsibility for delivering arrangements for an independent assessment of persons raising serious concerns to the Chief Minister.

Related Publications

Propositions

Votes

Vote: Adopted 17 September 2007

Minutes

Hansard