Skip to main content

States Strategic Plan 2009 – 2014 (P.52/2009): tenth amendment.

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

r

STATES STRATEGIC PLAN 2009 – 2014 (P.52/2009): TENTH AMENDMENT

Lodged au Greffe on 19th May 2009 by Deputy M.R. Higgins of St. Helier

STATES GREFFE

2009   Price code: A  P.52 Amd.(10)

STATES STRATEGIC PLAN 2009 – 2014 (P.52/2009): TENTH AMENDMENT

1  PAGE 2 –

After the words "attached as Appendix 1" insert the words –

", except that in Priority 2 on pages 12–13, in the section entitled "What we will do", for the second bullet point, substitute the following bullet point –

Lay the foundations for a genuinely diverse economy."

2  PAGE 2 –

After the words "attached as Appendix 1" insert the words –

", except that in Priority 4 on pages 15–16, in the section entitled "What we will do", after the last bullet point insert the following additional bullet point –

Examine whether borrowing is an alternative and optional

way forward for long-term capital projects."

DEPUTY M.R. HIGGINS OF ST. HELIER

Page - 3

P.52/2009 Amd.(10)

REPORT

Amendment 1

There has been constant talk of a diversified economy, but moves in this direction have always been thwarted by the overwhelming dominance of financial services. Other sectors continue largely because they rely on imported low cost labour.

There  must  now  be  fresh  innovative  thinking  on  a  way  forward  through  the establishment of an Economic Commission.

Amendment 2

It has become an article of faith that the States will not borrow, although "off account sheet" activity like the developments of housing trusts, the financing of Hautlieu and some Airport development appear to breach this article.

It seems irrational that large projects like the incinerator, which will serve future generations,  should  be  paid  essentially  out  of  revenue.  While  it  seems  to  reflect prudence  as  financial  pressures  increase,  so  such  projects  will  impose  enormous burdens – hence the need to consider alternative approaches.

Financial and manpower implications

There are no financial or manpower implications unless measures are adopted by the States at a later date.

Page - 4

P.52/2009 Amd.(10)

Related Publications

Propositions

Amendments

Comments

Votes

Vote: Adopted 3 June 2009
Vote: Adopted 3 June 2009

Minutes

Hansard