Skip to main content

Island Plan 2011: approval (P.48/2011): fifty-second amendment.

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

r

ISLAND PLAN 2011: APPROVAL (P.48/2011): FIFTY-SECOND AMENDMENT

Lodged au Greffe on 20th June 2011

by the Minister for Planning and Environment

STATES GREFFE

2011   Price code: A  P.48 Amd.(52)

ISLAND PLAN 2011: APPROVAL (P.48/2011): FIFTY-SECOND AMENDMENT

PAGE 2 –

After the words "the revised draft Island Plan 2011" insert the words –

"except that in Policy TT10 Off Street public parking provision in St. Helier (page 322), after the first paragraph, insert a new paragraph, as follows –

During the Plan period, the Minister for Planning and Environment will support  proposals  that  increase  the  proportion  of  short-stay  off-street public parking and which limit or reduce the quantity of long-stay off- street public parking in St. Helier , in accord with the objectives of the Sustainable Transport Policy (2010), and in accord with the overall level of off-street public parking provision permitted.' ".

MINISTER FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT NOTE:

This amendment has been lodged by the Minister for Planning and Environment for less than 8 weeks before the start of the debate in accordance with the provisions of Article 4A of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002. Paragraphs 4A(2), (3) and (4) are in the following terms –

4A  Procedure for and following lodging of draft Island Plan

"(2)  An amendment to a draft Island Plan cannot be debated by the States

unless it has been lodged for a minimum period of 8 weeks.

  1. An amendment to an amendment to a draft Island Plan cannot be debated by the States unless it has been lodged for a minimum period of 6 weeks.
  2. Paragraph (2)  or  (3)  does  not  apply  to  an  amendment  lodged  by  the Minister if the States agree that the amendment may be debated forthwith or on a day or at a time approved by the States."

In accordance with the provisions of paragraph (4) the Minister for Planning and Environment will seek the agreement of the States to debate this amendment during the debate on the Island Plan 2011: approval' (P.48/2011).

Page - 2

P.48/2011 Amd.(52)

REPORT

This amendment relates to Part 19 of the 38th amendment brought by the Connétable of St. Helier .

The Minister is sympathetic to the intent of the Connétable 's proposed amendment, which seeks to increase the level of short-stay off-street public parking – of benefit to visitors to the town, be they shoppers or tourist. As drafted, however, the Minister considers that parts (a), (b) and (c) of the proposed amendment would have damaging consequences  for  the  objectives  of  both  the  revised  draft  Island  Plan  and  the Sustainable  Transport  Policy  (2010)  and  are  undeliverable  through  the  planning system.

On the basis of the above, the Minister for Planning and Environment is required to reject  the  form  of  the   Connétable 's  amendment,  but  proposes  his  own  further amendment which seeks to support the intent of the original amendment, whilst also seeking  to  accord  with  the  Sustainable  Transport  Policy  (2010)  in  a  way  that  is relevant, and not beyond the appropriate remit, of the planning system.

The Minister's amendment seeks to rebalance public parking in St. Helier from long stay (commuter) parking towards increased short stay (shopper/visitor) provision, for which there is widespread support, but within an overall cap on the number of spaces. This approach accords with the aims of the Sustainable Transport Policy (2010) and the strategic aims of the revised draft Island Plan, each of which is founded on the approved States Strategic Plan (2009-14).

The  independent  planning  inspectors  offer  support  for  the  Minister's  proposed amendment.

Financial and manpower implications

There  are  no  additional  financial  or  manpower  implications  arising  from  this amendment.

Page - 3

P48/2011 Amd.(52)

Related Publications

Propositions

Amendments

Comments

Votes

Vote: Adopted 27 June 2011

Minutes

Hansard