Skip to main content

Income Support: free GP access (P.101/2014) – amendment.

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

INCOME SUPPORT: FREE GP ACCESS (P.101/2014) – AMENDMENT

Lodged au Greffe on 12th June 2014 by Deputy R.G. Le Hérissier of St. Saviour

STATES GREFFE

2014   Price code: A  P.101 Amd.

INCOME SUPPORT: FREE GP ACCESS (P.101/2014) – AMENDMENT

PAGE 2 –

For the words "to introduce" substitute the words "to request the Minister for Social Security to investigate and report to the States on whether it would be appropriate to introduce", and after the words "Household Medical Account" insert the words "and for others who have difficulty paying for primary care".

DEPUTY R.G. LE HÉRISSIER OF ST. SAVIOUR

Page - 2

P.101/2014 Amd.

REPORT

Changing the basis on which primary care is financed is one of the greatest challenges faced in implementing the new Health Strategy. In P.101/2014, Deputy G.P. Southern of   St. Helier  argues  that  those  in  receipt  of  Income  Support  should  receive  free GP visits, as they are the group in greatest need.

Notwithstanding  the  strength  of   Deputy   Southern 's  arguments,  I  am  leery  of identifying one group as being in need of free GP services, particularly before the study of which is the best way forward for Primary Care has been completed.

Squaring the circle of how to incentivise GPs and have adequate access to GP services is a major issue, and it is unfortunate that the debate on this subject has been going on for a long time behind closed doors.

Deputy Southern 's proposition has the merit of formally calling for a study, and I am suggesting that its remit be broadened beyond that called for by Deputy Southern . There is no necessary correspondence between being on Income Support and having high  medical  needs.  For  example,  a  family  who  have  an  ill  child  may  well  be struggling  with  high  medical  bills  and,  if  not  on  Income  Support,  will  get  no assistance.

Furthermore, by simply asking for payment of GP bills it overlooks the issue, for example,  of  whether  a  targeted  reduction  for  various  groups,  incentives  for preventative approaches, the use of practice nurses, should be part of how we structure access to primary care.

In other words, there are a whole series of questions that need to be discussed before we  simply  say  that  one  group  can  receive  free  visits.  Given  such  a  system  did previously operate, we also need to study the evidence from that time and ask whether such an approach can lead to over-use of GPs.

Financial and manpower implications

Given that a study appears to be underway, no additional costs should be required.

Page - 3

P.101/2014 Amd.