The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.
The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.
FINANCIAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2012 | CONTENTS
| Contents |
|
| ||||||
| Please note that the structure of the Accounts has changed due to the move to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and this is explained in Section 6: Introduction to the Accounts. |
|
| ||||||
| 1. Minister's Report | 04-07 |
| ||||||
| 2. Treasurer's Report | 08 |
| ||||||
| 2.1. Introduction | 08-09 |
| ||||||
| 2.2. General Revenue Income | 10-14 |
| ||||||
| 2.3. Ministerial and Non-Ministerial Departments Revenue Expenditure | 15-26 |
| ||||||
| 2.4. States Trading Operations – Net Revenue Expenditure | 27 |
| ||||||
| 2.5. Other Income and Expenditure and Accounting Adjustments | 28-31 |
| ||||||
| 2.6. Capital Expenditure | 32-36 |
| ||||||
| 2.7. The States Balance Sheet | 36-46 |
| ||||||
| 2.8. Explanation of the Structure of the States of Jersey | 47-49 |
| ||||||
| 2.9. Outline of Key Objectives, Strategies, Challenges and Opportunities | 49 |
| ||||||
| 2.10. The States of Jersey Business and Financial Planning Cycle | 49-51 |
| ||||||
| 2.11. Governance Structures | 51-58 |
| ||||||
| 2.12. Corporate Social Responsibility | 58-59 |
| ||||||
| 2.13. Conclusions | 59 |
| ||||||
| 3. Statement of Responsibilities for the Financial Report and Accounts | 60 |
| ||||||
| 4. Remuneration Report | 61-67 |
| ||||||
| 5. Statement on Internal Control | 68-81 |
| ||||||
| 6. Introduction to the Accounts | 82-83 |
| ||||||
| 7. Auditors' Report | 84-85 |
| ||||||
| 8. Primary Statements | 86 |
| ||||||
| 8.1. Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure | 86 |
| ||||||
| 8.2. Consolidated Statement of Financial Position | 87 |
| ||||||
| 8.3. Consolidated Statement of Changes in Taxpayers' Equity | 88 |
| ||||||
| 8.4. Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | 89 |
| ||||||
| 9. Notes to the Accounts | 91 |
| ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||
- Minister's Report Managing the Budget
The States' finances performed well in 2012, despite a This has been a busy year for the States, a year in which, challenging economic climate. Income of £628 million as a new Council of Ministers, we have been grappling exceeded the Budget by more than £15 million. Departments with major issues for the Island. The publication of White underspent by almost £28 million, most of which will be Papers on the future direction of Health and Social Care carried forward to ease funding pressures in 2013 and services and Housing demonstrate our preparedness to beyond.
tackle difficult issues which will make a positive difference
to the long term health and well being of Islanders in the On top of this over £28 million of contingency and future. In so doing we have been balancing competing restructuring expenditure remained at the end of the year. priorities, managing a growing demand for services whilst This will also be carried forward into 2013. Almost £2 million at the same time responding to these demands within was made available from contingencies to Health and constrained resources. Social Services to accelerate much needed improvements
in services. Over £3 million was spent in Social Security During the year Treasury has been supporting the delivery and Education to assist unemployed people to obtain work. of the Council of Ministers' service priorities in the areas of
health, housing and job creation. In some cases we have
been able to meet several priorities in one initiative. For Managing the Balance Sheet
example, providing funding for new social and affordable
housing will improve housing provision and at the same time The States' Property, Plant and Equipment assets were provide a fiscal stimulus to the local economy. Protecting fully revalued in 2012 for the first time since 2009 and are and retaining jobs in the construction industry has been a now worth nearly £3.2 billion. The revaluation increased particular focus for us this year. We are also working with the book value of assets by £277 million. The value of our Jersey Finance and Jersey Financial Services Commission Strategic Investments (JT, Jersey Water, Jersey Post and on major pieces of research work that will help shape the Jersey Electricity) decreased by £38 million in the year to future direction of our finance industry. Continuing with the £289 million. The value of the Common Investment Fund theme of developing new business for the Island during (CIF) increased by £133 million in 2012. The CIF manages the year I have visited Abu Dhabi, Dubai and Tokyo, visits investments for States funds, including those outside of which promoted new business for the Island and helped these Accounts such as the Social Security Funds, and the build productive relationships. portion relating to funds in the Accounts (like the Strategic
Reserve) saw returns of £63 million during the year, now All our services have to be paid for and local people and standing at £922 million for all funds. The Strategic Reserve businesses do not want to see increases in taxation. We itself stood at £651 million at the end of 2012. Pension fund have continued with our approach to tax policy: low taxes, past service liabilities reduced during the year, due to the broadly based and certain for the future. This means we application of a surplus in Jersey Teachers Superannuation have also been very busy in 2012 making savings and Fund (JTSF). I am pleased that the Public Accounts delivering against our savings targets in the Comprehensive Committee in their report on the 2011 Accounts recognised Spending Review. Ongoing savings of £20 million were the difference in emphasis between the valuation used in delivered in 2012 alone, and £31 million to date. This way the Accounts and the Actuarial valuation, which provides the we can keep taxes low and target available resources at most appropriate assessment of the long term sustainability our priority service areas where need is greatest. of the scheme, and paints a healthier and more realistic
picture. Notwithstanding that, we must make changes These accounts present an Island which has a robust to the States Pension Schemes to ensure that they are financial position against a backdrop of significant global sustainable for the future.
turbulence. Our balance sheet represents value net assets
exceeding 100% of GVA together with plans for balanced We are underspending, and the value of our assets is rising. budgets. Jersey is ahead of most other jurisdictions in This does not happen by accident and I am grateful to many ways, including in economic fundamentals. The job the Treasurer, her staff and my fellow Ministers and their of Treasury continues to be focused on maximising this departments. We must not be complacent. If we continue commonwealth and securing a positive, fair and optimistic to manage our finances carefully we can continue to direct Island for the future. taxpayers' money to where it is most needed and where
it will benefit most Islanders, particularly those who are in need of support in challenging times.
Managing the Budget: Income Managing the Budget:
Revenue Expenditure
I will now turn in more detail to some of the above matters,
beginning with States income. Turning now to revenue expenditure, Departments spent
just under £601 million in 2012. This was almost £28 million The forecast for general revenue income set out in the 2012 less than the amount available to them once unspent funds Budget was £612 million. Actual receipts were £628 million. from 2011 had been added to their budgets, as approved The main reason for the improvement was an increase in the 2012 Annual Business Plan. Most of the underspend in income tax receipts above forecast, mostly personal will be carried forward to 2013 including over £22 million income tax. This may seem unusual when the economy within Departments and £5.5 million to boost contingencies. is going through a difficult time, but perhaps reflects the
fact that whilst the number of Islanders unemployed is at At the same time as spending less than their available its highest known level, the number in work is also at its budgets, Departments have achieved over £20 million of highest level. We will continue to investigate the reasons for CSR savings in 2012, year two of the three-year programme the buoyant receipts so that we can continue to understand targeted to achieve £65 million savings. Whilst the time the economy better and forecast more accurately. frame to achieve the savings has now been extended
to 2016, and there is currently a projected £3.6 million Income Tax receipts in 2012 were £431 million. Our healthy shortfall due to the States' decision not to agree a reduction income tax receipts show that our zero/ten approach, in subsidies to fee paying schools. This is a tremendous confirmed as acceptable to the EU Code Group in 2011, achievement and I would like to thank all Departments for combined with the introduction of GST, was the right one. their efforts. A £20 million reduction, which permanently Whilst general revenue income is still not back to 2008 comes out of budgets, is the equivalent of, for example, a levels we have managed the transition and are returning 1% rise in GST.
to balanced budgets – indeed we showed a surplus of £27
million in 2012, compared with a forecast deficit of £3.5 Contingency and restructuring funding of £28 million were million. carried forward into 2013. Much of it is already earmarked
for specific purposes. I have said previously that I would The tax collection rate achieved by the Taxes Office is not expect contingency funding to be spent each year that enviable, being at an all time high and exceeding that it is available, but that it should be carefully managed. It is achieved by the UK government. GST (£80 million) and pleasing that so much funding remains at the end of 2012 Impôts, such as duties on cigarettes and alcohol (£54 and it is sensible that we retain the balance as a buffer million), brought in receipts very close to those forecast in against unforeseen circumstances without needing to go the 2012 Budget. Stamp Duty was almost £3 million below back to the States for additional funding.
the Budget forecast of £24 million, reflecting the economic
situation and the sluggish housing market. Other income
(largely dividends from the States-owned utilities and
returns on cash balances) was over £4 million higher than
forecast at almost £31 million due to an additional dividend
of over £4 million from Jersey Post. I will continue to work
with the Boards of the utilities to deliver the best returns
possible to the States to supplement our income, whilst at
the same time allowing them to retain sufficient working
capital to be able to grow their businesses.
5
Managing the Budget: Managing the Balance Sheet Capital Expenditure
2012 has seen a continued focus on managing the States' Capital expenditure is essential in order to maintain and balance sheet. This is an area that has, perhaps, been improve our asset base. It is also one of the key tools at overshadowed in the past by the emphasis on controlling our disposal to support and stimulate the economy at this expenditure and raising enough income to pay for it. time. For this reason I took a proposition to the States which Management of our assets and liabilities provides another was approved in May 2012 to allocate an additional £27 means of safeguarding us against future economic shocks million to the Housing Department to fund or bring forward and providing sources of significant levels of funding
six social housing schemes. This was welcomed by the
construction industry. The value of the States' Property, Plant and Equipment increased by £263 million in 2012 to nearly £3.2 billion. This
In 2012 Departments spent £33 million on capital projects. is almost entirely due to the full revaluation exercise which The three biggest spenders were Transport and Technical is required to be carried out by external valuers every 5 Services (almost £11 million) Jersey Property Holdings years. The revaluation increased the book value of property (within Treasury and Resources – over £9 million) and by £254 million and the Social Housing stock by £70 million Housing (over £9 million). Significant projects during the offset by a decrease in the value of infrastructure of £45.6 year included: million. This does not, of course, mean that our assets can simply be sold off to provide additional funding. They
• refurbishment projects at Clos Gosset, Jardin Des are needed to provide essential services to Islanders. We Carreaux, Pomme D'Or Farm and Le Squez; can, however, look at managing those assets better. This approach has the potential tp release assets for disposal
• the Phillips Street shaft, which will alleviate the flooding or alternative use. For example relocation of the Police risk to the North of Town; and Headquarters to Green Street will free the Summerland site for Social Housing, and Jersey Property Holdings is
• the creation of new visitor and staff facilities at the Prison. shortly to begin the first step towards rationalising and modernising office accommodation by relocating its staff In addition to this £33 million, Jersey Harbours spent almost from three different sites into one at Maritime House.
£2 million on various capital schemes.
The value of the States' Strategic Investments decreased One of the seven priorities in the Strategic Plan is sustainable by £38 million in 2012. These are:
long term planning. A significant piece of work was started
in 2012 to look at the Island's longer term requirements for • Jersey Water – increased in value by over £5 million. capital expenditure. High value issues under consideration
include replacing the General Hospital, improving the • JT – which fell in value by £27 million - although the States Island's housing stock and financing a new Liquid Waste now also has a £10 million infrastructure investment in the Strategy. The cost of these significant projects is likely to be company.
beyond that which can be financed from tax income and the
other usual sources. The Treasury is currently researching • Jersey Electricity – which decreased in value by £14 alternative funding mechanisms so that we can plan ahead million – largely due to its falling share price at the year in good time. end, which has recovered in subsequent months.
• Jersey Post – which stayed broadly the same.
The Treasury operates as an active shareholder of these investments, with regular meetings throughout the year. Together, the four utilities contributed £18 million in dividends to the States in 2012, which obviates the need for that funding to be raised by taxes.
I must make particular mention of the Gigabit project, • £28 million of contingency and restructuring funding which started in 2012 and has been attracting carried forward to 2013 to protect against the much attention. Jersey's investment in optical fibre unexpected and deliver more savings. infrastructure is one that I am confident will prove in the
future to have been far-sighted and pivotal to Jersey's The first Medium Term Financial Plan was approved economic recovery and resilience. We should not by the States.
let short-term timing issues overshadow what an
innovative and exciting decision this investment is. • There has been significant investment in health,
housing and jobs.
The balance on the Strategic Reserve (the "rainy
day fund") amounts to £651 million at the end of • The value of the States' Property, Plant and 2012. This increased by £57 million during the year Equipment increased by £262 million in 2012 to through sound investment management contributing nearly £3.2 billion.
to the strong performance of the Common Investment
Fund (CIF). The CIF was established in 2010 and • The value of the States' Strategic Investments in pools investments, from both the States and other Utility Companies decreased by £38 million to £289 participants such as the Social Security Funds, to million.
achieve better returns.
• The value of the Strategic Reserve increased by £57
In 2012 the value of the CIF increased by £133 million, million to £651 million.
with £63 million of this attributable to the States, and
£68 million to the Social Security Funds. This increase • The value of the CIF increased by £133 million to in value is not income to the States in the same way £1.5 billion.
as taxes or dividends: the increases in value remain
within the Funds. • A major review of PECRS is nearing completion.
Pension liabilities reduced by £39 million in 2012. This I am fortunate, as Minister for Treasury and was mostly due to a reduction of £37 million in the Resources, to have the benefit of inheriting wise and provision for the Jersey Teachers' Superannuation far sighted decisions by my predecessors as well as Fund pre-2007 liability. This was based on a to have an innovative and bold Treasurer and staff, Management Board proposal to the States on the who are delivering real change without ever losing treatment of the pension increase debt, based on the sight of the prudence needed when dealing with 2010 Actuarial valuation of the scheme. A Technical taxpayers' money. Together they have provided me Working Group was established comprising the Chair with the tools I need to make decisions, some of which of the Public Employees' Contributory Retirement are difficult, some of which are unpopular, but which Scheme (PECRS) Committee of Management, the are necessary if Jersey's economy is to survive and Treasurer of the States and other colleagues and prosper. I have described how Jersey States' finances PECRS committee members. The Working Group are the envy of much of the world. This has been spent considerable time in 2012 leading a project achieved through vigilance, decisiveness, and by to review and propose revisions to the PECRS to not squandering taxes when times are better. I am ensure that it is sustainable, affordable and fair. The proud to present the Financial Report and Accounts proposals were launched on 21st March and are for 2012 and look forward to continuing to prepare available on the States website. Jersey to take advantage of economic recovery.
Particular emphasis has been placed in 2012 on All that remains is for me to thank all the staff in the building on our relationships with the Corporate Treasury and Resources Department and across Services Scrutiny Panel and the Public Accounts the States for their hard work this year. In particular Committee. I hope that this approach continues in I want to thank Laura Rowley, the Treasurer, for her 2013: an effective and informed scrutiny and review leadership of the department. I also extend my thanks function can only add value to our work. to David Le Cuirot, the Acting Comptroller of Taxes,
Mike Robinson, Head of Customs and Immigration, In summary, 2012 has seen bold and progressive and my Assistant Minster, Eddie Noel, for his help steps forward in the health of the States' finances: and support.
• Income exceeded Budget by over £15 million.
• Departments underspent by almost £28 million.
• Ongoing savings of over £20 million were achieved
in the second year of the Comprehensive Spending
Review, and proposals for total CSR savings of £56.5
million have been delivered in the 2013 budget. Senator Philip Ozouf
7
- The Treasurer's Report
- Introduction
- Summary of Performance
The original Budget for 2012 was set to end the year with a net operating deficit of £3.5 million. We have in fact ended the year with a net operating surplus of £27.1 million.
States Net General Revenue Income was £15.4 million better than originally budgeted, at £627.7 million
• Net Income Tax was £14.5 million (3.5%) higher than the 2012 budget, primarily due to an increased tax yield relating to individuals.
• Other Income was £4.3 million (16.3%) higher than budgeted, primarily as a result of an additional Jersey Post dividend of £4.2 million, agreed after the Budget Statement.
• Stamp Duty was £2.8 million less than budgeted, due mostly to a slower than expected economic recovery, leading to fewer, lower value, transactions.
• Other lines of General Revenue saw smaller shortfalls in income totalling £0.6 million.
Departmental Near Cash Net Revenue Expenditure (the amount spent on day-to-day activities) was £15.2 million less than the Business Plan, and £27.6 million less than the approved amount after carry forwards and other allocations, at £600.6 million
• Social Security was £6.9 million less than approval due to lower than expected Social Benefit payments.
• Education was £3.6 million under budget as a result of the delegated financial management scheme which allows underspent schools' budgets to be carried forward.
• £6.3 million relates to funding for projects that extend over more than one year within the Chief Minster's and Treasury and Resources departments.
• Other departments had smaller underspends.
• Departments will be carrying forward nearly £23 million of these approvals into 2013 for projects and other spending pressures. The balance will help fund Capital Projects in future years (as identified in the MTFP).
In addition £28.4 million of Central Contingency was not needed in 2012, and this will be carried forward into 2013
After adjusting for Trading Operations, Special Funds and other accounting adjustments there was an accounting surplus of £70.0 million for the year – however, much of this relates to non-cash movements and amounts held in Special Funds and so is not available for everyday expenditure.
• Trading Operations incurred more expenditure than expected, but this is due to non-cash decreases in asset values as a result of the 2012 Valuation (£22 million), offset by other smaller variances.
• Depreciation and charges relating to the use of Property, Plant and Equipment by the States for Ministerial and Non- Ministerial departments were broadly in line with budget.
• Special Funds saw Net Income of nearly £60.0 million. The CIF generated significant income for the States of Jersey during 2012, earning net income of £132.5 million in total, representing a return on capital of around 9.8%. Whilst much of this gain was attributable to rallies in the markets in which the CIF invested, the CIF's investment managers also exceeded their combined benchmarks by 2% (equivalent to £14.8 million).
• Other Funds saw smaller amounts of income.
• The most significant Accounting Adjustment was associated with Pension liabilities (£41.6 million), due mostly to a revised estimate for the amount required to settle the JTSF pre-2007 debt, based on information in the latest Actuarial Valuation.
The States also spent £36.8 million on Capital projects in the year, including improvements to Social Housing and the Prison.
The States Balance Sheet remains strong.
• Property, Plant and Equipment was revalued in the year, and now totals £3.2 billion
• Strategic Investments in utility companies decreased by £37.6 million.
• Pensions liabilities relating to past service liabilities have reduced by £39 million - mostly due to a reduction of £37 million in the provision for the JTSF pre-2007 liability.
- At a Glance – Financial Results (Table 1)
£m
Final
Budget Approved
£m / Business Budget
Actual / Updated Actual2012
2011 Plan Forecast
2012
2012
586.9 States Net General Revenue Income 612.3 624.6 627.7
(598.6) Departmental Net Revenue Expenditure - Near Cash (615.8) (656.6) (600.6) (11.7) Operating (Deficit)/Surplus for the Year (3.5) (32.0) 27.1
0.9 Trading Operations Net Revenue Expenditure (1.6) (3.8) (20.7)
(10.8) (Deficit)/Surplus adjusted for Trading Operations (5.1) (35.8) 6.4 (40.6) Depreciation and other Non-Cash Expenditure (40.1) (40.1) (38.8)
15.6 Net Revenue Income of Special Funds and SOJDC - - 60.0
0.2 Other Income/(Expenditure) and Accounting Adjustments - - 42.4
(35.6) Net Accounting (deficit)/surplus for the Year (45.2) (45.2)(75.9) 70.0
9
- General Revenue Income
Figure 1 - Breakdown of States Income
£6m
£80m
£32m
Net General Revenue Income
Budget 2012 Actual 2012 2.5%
£612.3 £627.7 better than the million million 2012 Budget
The States receives income from a variety of sources, Income is voted net of directly related expenditure such including taxes, investment returns and charges raised as Irrecoverable Debts or Investment Management fees, by departments. Total gross income (before consolidation to represent the amount that is available to be spent on adjustments – see Note 4) for the States of Jersey in 2012 providing services. These expenses totalled £4.7 million in was £891 million, compared to £820 million in 2011. 2012 (2011 - £2.4m), giving Net General Revenue Income
of £628 million. This is the number used for comparison to approvals.
The largest element of income is "General Revenue Income", which is made up of income to the Consolidated Fund covered by the Annual Budget Statement. This represented 71% of Income in 2012, totalling £632 million (2011 – 72%, £589 million). In the Budget Statement, General Revenue
2.2.1 Net Income Tax 2.2.2 Goods and Services Tax
Budget 2012 Actual 2012 3.5% Budget 2012 Actual 2012 0.6%
£416.0 £430.5 more than the £80.0 £79.6 less than the million million 2012 Budget million million 2012 Budget
Income Tax comprises two main elements, Personal Goods and Services Tax is a consumption tax of 5% on Income Tax and Company Income Tax. imports and supplies made in Jersey. The underlying
principles are that the tax is low, broad and simple. As Personal Income Tax a result there are a limited number of reliefs. Businesses
within the financial services industry who generally have Personal Income Tax is a standard 20% rate of tax with the majority of their activity outside Jersey may apply to a limited number of allowances/reliefs. To protect the be approved as an International Services Entity (ISE) for lower to middle income earners, a separate calculation is GST purposes.They pay a flat rate annual fee instead of also performed using exemption thresholds and a greater accounting for GST.
number and value of reliefs, but with a higher tax rate
(27%). The lowest of the two tax calculations is then used
to determine the tax charge. Therefore individuals will be
charged no more than 20% tax on their income. This is
explained in a video available on the States' website:
http://www.gov.je/TaxesMoney/IncomeTax/Individuals/ AllowancesReliefs/Pages/MarginalCalculation.aspx
Company Income Tax
Companies pay tax under the zero/ten Regime. Three tax rates are possible:
• 0% - all non-financial service entities (except those at 20% below).
• 10% - Financial Services Companies (a company registered, or holding a permit, by virtue of various Laws administered by the Jersey Financial Services Commission).
• 20% - Utility Companies, Rental and Property Development Companies.
Until the 2011 year of assessment, companies could pay tax under the International Business Company (IBC) regime. IBC status was only available to companies owned by non-residents. Under this regime, tax was charged at 30% on Jersey-source income and at rates between 0.5% and 20% on international income. Typically, IBCs were banks, group service companies and other businesses which had a presence in Jersey but whose work was "international" in nature; i.e. derived from clients based outside the Island.
Net Income Tax was £14.5 million (3.5%) higher than the 2012 budget and £0.5 million higher than the most recent forecast included in the 2013 Budget Statement. This was primarily due to an increased tax yield relating to individuals, arising from a larger than expected impact of the 20 means 20 regime, and lower mortgage interest relief due to continuing low interest rates. A revised forecasting model with more detailed yield is now being use, which is expected to improve the quality of forecasting going for- ward. Other factors affecting the variance are an increase in tax from the finance sector, and lower than predicted write-offs.
11
- Impôts Duty
Budget 2012 Actual 2012 0.5%
£54.5 £54.2 less than the million million 2012 Budget
Impôts duties are duties charged on goods as they are imported to the Island. The duties apply to a range of commodities including alcohol, tobacco and fuel.
- Stamp Duty
Budget 2012 Actual 2012 11.9% £21.2 less than the
million£24.0 million 2012 Budget
Stamp duty is charged on property, equity and share transfer transactions according to the value of the transactions. Jersey operates a discount scheme for first time property buyers. Duty is also collected on Wills, Probate and Obligations.
A slower than expected economic recovery resulted in significantly lower volume and value of Stamp Duty transactions than forecast, culminating in £2.9 million less Stamp Duty than budgeted. Stamp Duty income is particularly sensitive to small volume but high value property transactions and these have been less frequent during 2012 than in previous years. The fall in Stamp Duty on property transactions has been partially offset by Probate duty where a small number of high value estates have been subject to Probate in 2012. 2012 is the last year where large estates will yield significant duty as the States agreed a cap of £100,000 on probate in the 2013 Budget to attract greater investment in the Island in the future.
- Island Rate
Budget 2012 Actual 2012 1.7%
£11.2 £11.4 more than the million million 2012 Budget
The 12 Parishes in Jersey levy rates to pay for parish services. In addition the Parishes collect an Island Wide Rate levied by the States. The Island Wide Rate was introduced in 2006 to provide a contribution to parish welfare costs which were incorporated into the Island's new Income Support system.
- Other Income
Budget 2012 Actual 2012 16.3%
£26.6 £30.9 more than the million million 2012 Budget
"Other Income" includes returns on States strategic investments in utility companies, returns on cash balances and various fees and charges.
Other Income is £4.3 million (16.3%) higher than budgeted primarily as a result of an additional Jersey Post dividend of £4.2 million. This was agreed with Jersey Post after the budget was agreed but was included in the latest forecast in the 2013 Budget Statement.
Summary Table 2 – Net General Revenue Income – Outcome compared to Budget Summary Table B
13
- Changes in Net General Revenue Income
Figure 2 shows how Net General Revenue Income has changed since 2002, and how it is projected to change in the coming years. Amounts have been restated to 2012 prices using the RPI(X), to take into account the effects of inflation. Budgets for 2002 – 2005 have been adjusted for accounting restatements made in the 2006 Accounts to improve comparability.
Where can I read more? |
Further details on the individual streams of General Revenue Income are included in the Annex to the Accounts. Individual Departments and Trading Operations also include an analysis of their income as part of the departmental pages in the Annex to the accounts. |
Figure 2 - General Revenue Income at 2012 Price s
- Ministerial and Non-Ministerial Departments Revenue Expenditure
The Business Plan and MTFP therefore approve Net Revenue Expenditure (NRE) limits for departments, which take into account this income, and so represent the amount that needs to be funded from taxes. Departmental income totalled £130 million in 2012 (2011: £126 million), giving Net Revenue Expenditure of £601 million, (2011: £599 million) on a near cash basis. Figure 3 shows how this is made up.
Ministerial and Non-ministerial Departments Near Cash Net Revenue Expenditure | ||
Business Plan 2012 Approval £ 615.8 million | Actual 2012 £600.6 million | 2.5% Less than the Final Approved Budget |
Budget Carried forward from £41.4£ 2011 41.4 million |
Total gross expenditure (before consolidation adjustments
– see Note 4) for the States of Jersey in 2012 was £820 million, compared to £855 million for 2011. The majority of expenditure by the States is incurred by Ministerial and Non-Ministerial departments through the consolidated fund. In 2012 near cash expenditure by these departments made up 73% of total expenditure (2011 – 70%). There were also non-cash amounts totalling £39 million (2011 £41 million), which represent the use of resources such as Property, Plant and Equipment, even though no cash is spent. Departments raise charges for some of the services that they provide, and may also receive other income.
15
Figure 3 – Ministerial and Non-Ministerial Departments -
Net Revenue Expenditure (Near Cash)
£33.9m
- Ministerial Departments Near Cash Expenditure
Near Cash Expenditure represents amounts that transacted in cash during the year, or shortly after (e.g. income charged that will be collected after the year end). It excludes amounts relating to the use of Property, Plant and Equipment, such as depreciation and impairments, which are covered in section 2.3.4. Accounting Officers are held accountable for Near-Cash amounts.
Business
Plan 2012 Near Cash
Approval Expenditure
£ 22.8 2012
million £20.1
Chief Minister's Budget million
Carried Carry The Chief Minster's Department provides support and forward from forward advice to the Chief Minister and Council of Ministers, and 2011 to 2013 co-ordinates policies and strategies across the States. £1.3 £2.3 million It is also responsible for a range of services, including million
international relations, constitutional issues, States staffing
and IT, statistics, and the Law Draftsman's Office. Underspend
Other £2.3 The underspend of £2.3 million is mostly due to the upfront Transfers million funding for Chief Minister's projects spanning multiple years (£1.6
and delayed projects. million) out
Education, Sport and Culture
Economic Development The Education, Sport and Culture Department provides
educational, sporting and cultural opportunities for the The Economic Development Department is responsible people of Jersey, supporting Jersey's commitment to for all areas of economic policy and development in encourage lifelong learning and enabling everyone to Jersey, including support for the agriculture, fisheries, realise their potential.
tourism, and finance industries. It also maintains an
overview of policies that may affect the harbours, airport, The majority of the underspend is due to the system postal and telecommunications services. It oversees of delegated financial management and delays in UK consumer and regulatory services too. university fee increases.
Business Business
Plan 2012 Near Cash Plan 2012 Near Cash
Approval Expenditure Approval Expenditure
£ 15.9 2012 £101.7 2012
million £17.3 million £103.2
Budget million Budget million
Carried Carry Carried Carry forward from forward forward from forward
2011 to 2013 2011 to 2013 £1.2 £0.9 million £3.4 £3.6 million
million million
Underspend Underspend Other £0.9 Other £3.6
Transfers million Transfers million
£1.1 £1.9
million in million in
17
Department of the Environment
The Department of the Environment is responsible for all planning and building control matters. It is also responsible for Jersey's environment in its widest sense, including environmental policy and regulation, and water resources and waste management regulation.
Business
Plan 2012 Near Cash
Approval Expenditure
£6.4 2012
million £6.2
Budget million
Carried Carry forward from forward
2011 to 2013 £0.3 £0.6 million
million
Underspend Other £0.6
Transfers million
£0.2 million in
Health and Social Services
The Health and Social Services Department promotes health and social wellbeing for the whole community, providing prompt services to all and protecting the interests of the frail and the vulnerable.
Business
Plan 2012 Near Cash
Approval Expenditure
£171.2 2012
million £175.5
Budget million
Carried Carry forward from forward
2011 to 2013 £1.6 £1.2 million
million
Underspend £1.2
TransfersOther million
£3.8
million in
Home Affairs
The Home Affairs Department is responsible for the States Housing
of Jersey Police, the Fire and Rescue Service, the Prison
Service, Customs and Immigration, criminal justice policy, The Housing Department is responsible for the provision and the registration of births, deaths and marriages. of social housing and estates management.
Business Business
Plan 2012
Plan 2012 Near Cash Approval Near Cash
Approval Expenditure (£24.6 Income
£48 2012 million) 2012
million £47.2 Income £24.4
Budget million Budget million
Carried Carry Carried Carry forward from forward forward from forward
2011 to 2013 2011 to 2013 £1.5 £1.9 million £1.4 £1.0 million
million million
Underspend Underspend £2.0 £1.0
TransfersOther million TransfersOther million
(£0.3 (£0.2
million) out million) out
19
Social Security
The Social Security Department is responsible for the administration of contributions and benefits, the Health and Safety Inspectorate, and a number of employment services, including the Work Zone.
The underspend is a result of lower Social Security benefits costs due to fewer claimants and slower uptake of employment grants. It also includes a one-off £2.4 million accounting adjustment for Medical Benefits.
Business
Plan 2012 Near Cash
Approval
£166.8 Expenditure
million 2012
£164.4
Budget million
Carried Carry forward from forward
2011 to 2013 £10.5 £2.9 million
million
Underspend £6.9
TransfersOther million
(£6.0
million) out
Transport and Technical Services
The Transport and Technical Services department manages the highway, public transport and traffic management network, and has the responsibility for all transport policy in Jersey. It also ensures vehicles are roadworthy, manages the disposal of the Island's waste and provides cleaning and parks and gardening services.
Business
Plan 2012 Near Cash
Approval
£26.9 Expenditure
million 2012
£26.9
Budget million
Carried Carry forward
forward from to 2013
2011 £1.8 million million£1.9
Underspend £1.8
TransfersOther million
(£0.1
million) out
Treasury and Resources
The Treasury and Resources department manages the Island's finances and assets, ensuring the protection and good use of public funds. It is responsible for the collection of tax and tax policy, States budgets and financial policies, pension fund investment and administration, treasury management, investment management and procurement policy. It also manages States property and represents the States shareholder interests in publicly-owned companies.
£2.4 million of the underspend is a result of the upfront
funding for Treasury projects spanning multiple years
including Procure to Pay and the Taxes Transformation
Programme. A further £1.6 million is due to delays in Allocations for Contingency backlog maintenance in Jersey Property Holdings.
Business
Plan 2012 Near Cash
million 2012 Business Plan Approval2012
Approval
£24.8 Expenditure
£30.2 £19.8
Budget million million Contingency Unused Carried Carry used in 2012 Contingency
forward from forward at the year 2011 to 2013 £7.9 end.
£1.5 £4.4 million million £28.4 million Amounts Unused million
Underspend Carried
Other £4.4 forward from
Transfers million 2011
£8.3 £16.5
million in million
21
- Non Ministerial Departments and the States Assembly Near Cash Net Revenue Expenditure
Business
Plan 2012 Near Cash
Approval
million£27.2 Expenditure 2012
£25.1
Budget million
Carried Carry forward from forward
2011 to 2013 £0.6 £1.9 million
million
Underspend Other £2.7
Transfers million
£0.1
million in
Non Ministerial Departments do not come under direct Ministerial control, due to the nature of the work they perform.
The States Assembly is the highest decision-making authority of the Island. More information about its operation is given in section 2.11.1.
The Bailiff 's Chambers provides support to the Bailiff who is head of the judiciary, president of the States and civic head of Jersey. The Law Officers' Department provides legal advice to the Crown and the States, including States Departments and other Departments. The Judicial Greffe provides administrative and secretarial support to ensure the effective operation of Jersey's courts, and the Viscount's Department is responsible for ensuring the decisions of Jersey's Courts and States Assembly are carried out. The Probation and After-care Service work with the judicial system, the courts, victims of crime and the community to help reduce criminal activity and its impact in Jersey.
The Official Analyst carries out authoritative and impartial scientific analysis to support the work of other States departments, local businesses and individuals.
The Lieutenant Governor of Jersey is the representative of Her Majesty the Queen in the Bailiwick of Jersey, and the Dean of Jersey is the leader of the Church of England in Jersey.
The Data Protection Commission promotes respect for the private lives of individuals through ensuring privacy of their personal information. The Commissioner also provides advice on data protection issues to the States, individuals and businesses.
The Comptroller and Auditor General examines how public bodies spend money, and looks at how best they can achieve value for money, by managing their finances to the highest standards.
23
Summary Table 3 - Net Revenue Expenditure – Outcome compared to Business Plan Summary Table A
Difference 2012 Final from Final Business Approved Approved
2011 Actual Plan Budget 2012 Actual Budget £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Ministerial Departments
25,332 Chief Minister 22,784 22,442 20,148 2,294 8,459 - Grant to the Overseas Aid Commission 8,881 8,886 8,878 8 18,253 Economic Development 15,898 18,213 17,299 914 103,434 Education, Sport and Culture 101,655 106,862 103,229 3,633 6,640 Department of the Environment 6,439 6,880 6,249 631 170,137 Health and Social Services 171,212 176,690 175,472 1,218 47,688 Home Affairs 47,991 49,144 47,163 1,981 (21,475) Housing (24,558) (23,335) (24,375) 1,040 164,433 Social Security 166,835 171,323 164,406 6,917 25,985 Transport and Technical Services 26,938 28,701 26,868 1,833
Treasury and Resources
26,115 - Department allocation 24,772 34,596 30,203 4,393
- Provision for Central Reserves 12,485 26,246 - 26,246
- Provision for Restructuring costs 10,000 2,137 - 2,137
- Corporate Procurement Savings Target (3,000) - - -
- Central Pay Provision 7,326 - - -
- Terms and Conditions Savings Target (7,000) - - -
Non Ministerial States Funded Bodies
1,489 - Bailiff 's Chambers 1,589 1,866 1,813 53 5,793 - Law Officers' Department 7,817 7,727 6,851 876 6,475 - Judicial Greffe 6,789 6,653 6,635 18 1,278 - Viscount's Department 1,455 1,486 956 530
544 - Official Analyst 606 582 573 9
739 - Office of the Lieutenant Governor 688 774 712 62
24 - Office of the Dean of Jersey 26 26 25 1
246 - Data Protection Commission 223 200 141 59 1,539 - Probation Department 1,961 2,220 2,043 177
693 - Comptroller and Auditor General 753 1,009 560 449
4,787 States Assembly and its services 5,280 5,294 4,795 499 598,608 Net Revenue Expenditure - Near Cash 615,845 656,622 600,644 55,978
Where can I read more?
Each department gives an explanation of differences between actual amounts and approvals as part of their departmental pages in the Annex to the Accounts. They also give further information on variances from 2011.
- Changes in Departments' Near Cash Net Revenue Expenditure
Figure 4 shows how Near Cash Net Revenue Expenditure Net Revenue Expenditure on a Business Plan basis has changed since 2002, and how it is projected to change increased by less than 1% from 2011, and taking inflation in the coming years. Amounts have been restated to 2012 at 2.2% equates to a £11 million decrease in real terms. prices using the RPI(X) to take into account the effects of
inflation. GAAP compliant figures have been included since The 2012 Business Plan identified £19 million of CSR 2009, but are not available from previous years, meaning savings and a reduction in Social Security supplement- that figures are not perfectly comparable (as explained ation of £7 million due to changes to contributions over below). Budget figures have been adjusted for previously the earnings ceiling. There were also £7 million of capital reported accounting restatements to allow comparability. to revenue transfers in 2012 to comply with accounting Prior to the move to GAAP some expenditure which would classification.
not now qualify as capital under accounting standards was
approved (and recorded) as capital expenditure. It is difficult Offsetting these reductions are provisions for Social to assess the magnitude of these amounts, and so these Security benefits of £4 million, adjustments for one off have not been reflected in the graph. savings in 2011 of £10 million and essential
growth of £4 million.
Figure 4 - Net Revenue Expenditure at 2012 Price s (excluding impairments)
25
- Departments Non Cash Expenditure
The 2012 Business Plan approved a total of £40,075,000 for depreciation as part of individual departments approved expenditure limits, and actual depreciation was slightly lower than this.
Impairments are recognised where required by the Jersey Financial Reporting Manual (JFReM), and further details are given in Note 14 – Property, Plant and Equipment.
Gains or losses on disposal of assets are also not included in the Business Plan, as these should be rare. An estimate of proceeds from the sale of property assets is included as part of the Capital Programme, but this is not comparable to gain or loss on disposal.
Summary Table 4 - Non-Cash Amounts
Table 5
Difference 2012 Final from Final
Business Approved 2012 Actual Approved
2011 Actual Plan Budget Budget £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Non-Cash Amounts
34,067 Depreciation and Amortisation 40,075 40,075 39,437 638 8,245 Impairments - - (534) 534 (1,674) (Gain)/Loss on Disposal of Assets - - (103) 103
(20) Other Non-Cash adjustments - - (43) 43
40,618 Total Non-Cash Amounts 40,075 40,075 38,757 1,318
- States Trading Operations
– Net Revenue Expenditure
Under the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005, the States Due to their commercial nature, Net Revenue Expenditure can designate any distinct area of operation as a States for the Trading Operations includes Non-Cash amounts Trading Operation. Estimates for Trading Operations are relating to the use of Assets such as depreciation and approved in the Annual Business Plan. At present, four such impairments. The valuation of assets in 2012 resulted in operations have been designated. £19.7 million of impairments in Jersey Airport and £2.3
million in Jersey Harbours. These movements are very Jersey Airport provides a wide range of facilities and difficult to predict, and so the Net Revenue expenditure services for passengers over an extensive network of position for both operations was higher than budgeted. scheduled and charter flight services across the UK and However, Jersey Airport received more income than Europe. Jersey Harbours is responsible for the operation budgeted (£1.0 million) and both Jersey Airport and of Jersey's commercial port of St Helier and outlying ports. Jersey Harbours achieved savings associated with their
integration.
Jersey Car Parking is responsible for administration, management, financing, development and maintenance of public parking places. Jersey Fleet Management is responsible for the acquisition, maintenance, servicing, fuelling, garaging and disposal of vehicles and mobile plant on behalf of the States.
Summary Table 5 - Net Revenue Expenditure – Outcome compared to Business Plan Summary Table B
Difference 2012 Final from Final Business Approved Approved
2011 Actual Plan Budget 2012 Actual Budget £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Trading Operations
(94) Jersey Airport 716 2,229 18,493 (16,264) (959) Jersey Harbours 270 920 1,691 (771) 539 Jersey Car Parking 890 890 639 251 (367) Jersey Fleet Management (272) (272) (137) (135) (881) 1,604 3,767 20,686 (16,919)
Where can I read more?
Each Trading Operation gives an explanation of differences between actual amounts and approvals as part of their departmental pages in the Annex to the Accounts.
27
- Other Income and Expenditure and Accounting Adjustments
- Special Funds and the States of Jersey Development Company
Special Funds
In addition to the Consolidated Fund, the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005 names three Special Funds – the Strategic Reserve, the Stabilisation Fund and the Currency Fund. These relate to the operation of the States of Jersey in general. The Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005 also allows the States to establish special funds (also known as Separately Constituted Funds) for specific purposes. These are usually established by legislation or a States decision. A summary of the purpose of the various funds is given in Table 7.
During 2012 Special Funds saw Net Revenue Income (NRI) of £59.9 million. The majority of this figure was income in the Strategic Reserve which saw returns on its investments of £56.9 million (9.6% on opening investment value). Income/expenditure approvals for Special Funds are not included in the Business Plan, and so results for these entities cannot be compared to budget.
States of Jersey Development Company
The States of Jersey Development Company (SOJDC) is a wholly owned subsidiary company of the States. It was originally incorporated in 1996 as the Waterfront Enterprise Development Board (WEB), and vested with responsibility for the co-ordination and promotion of development in the St Helier Waterfront Area on behalf of the States of Jersey. In 2010, the States approved proposition P73/2010, which set out proposals for the restructure of WEB into the SOJDC, clarifying the role of the company and widening the company's remit to cover all designated "Regeneration Zones".
The SOJDC is outside of the Budgeting Boundary, but for 2012 the SOJDC showed a small profit.
Summary Table 6 – Net Revenue Income of Special Funds and SOJDC
2011 Actual 2012 Actual £'000 £'000
Net Revenue Income of Special Funds and SOJDC
14,825 Special Funds Net Revenue Income 59,864 816 States of Jersey Development Company Limited Net Revenue Income 149 15,641 Net Revenue Income of Special Funds and SOJDC 60,013
29
Table 7 – Purpose of Special Funds
Special Fund Function
Established under the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005, this is a permanent reserve.
The policy for the Reserve was agreed by the States under P133/2006, stating that it
is to be used only in exceptional circumstances to insulate the Island's economy from Strategic Reserve severe structural decline (such as the sudden collapse of a major island industry) or Fund from major natural disaster. The States have subsequently approved P84/2009
which proposed that this policy is varied to enable the Strategic Reserve to be used,
if necessary, for the purposes of providing funding of to £100 million for a Bank Depositors' Compensation Scheme.
Established under the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005, the purpose of this Fund is
to provide a reserve which can be used to make Jersey's fiscal policy more Stabilisation Fund countercyclical in order to create a more stable economic environment. The Fund
receives cash allocations in more buoyant economic conditions and makes payments
at times of anticipated economic downturn.
Established under the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005, the Currency Notes
(Jersey) Law 1959, and the Decimal Currency (Jersey) Law 1971, the fund holds Currency Fund assets that match the value of Jersey currency notes and coinage in circulation, such
that the holder of Jersey currency could be repaid on request. It also produces and
issues currency notes and coins, and administers the currency in issue.
Established under the Building Loans (Jersey) Law 1950, to establish a building loans Dwelling Houses scheme to enable residentially qualified first-time buyers, who have never owned
Loans Fund
residential freehold property in Jersey, to purchase their first home.
Established in 1977, the purpose of this fund was to aid the recruitment of staff from Assisted House Purchase Scheme the UK, by facilitating the purchase of suitable properties by the States on behalf of
the employee. It is no longer making new loans.
Established by the former Housing Committee under the general powers of the
99 Year Building Loans (Jersey) Law 1950, this fund allowed the Committee to lend to Leaseholders Fund individuals offering leasehold property as security (at a time when there was no share
transfer or flying freehold legislation). It is no longer making new loans.
Established under the Agriculture (Loans and Guarantees) (Jersey) Regulations Agricultural Loans 1974, the fund makes loans to individuals engaged in work of an agricultural nature in Fund Jersey for the purpose of furthering their agricultural business. Approval of new loans
to farmers has been suspended.
Established under P170/2001 to replace the Tourism Investment Fund, this fund Tourism makes grants to stimulate investment in the tourism industry and infrastructure in Development Fund order to improve Jersey's competitiveness and to sustain the industry as an important
pillar of the economy.
Channel Islands Established by the Gambling (Channel Islands Lottery) (Jersey) Regulations 1975, Lottery (Jersey) the fund promotes and conducts public lotteries, the draws for which may be held in Fund Jersey or Guernsey.
Established under P74/99 and P84/99, the fund assists in meeting the requirements Housing for the development of social rented and first-time buyer homes by providing
Development Fund
development and interest subsidies.
Criminal Offences
Confiscation Fund These funds are established under the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999, Drug
Trafficking Offences (Jersey) Law 1988, and Civil Asset Recovery (International Co- Drug Trafficking operation) (Jersey) Law 2007 respectively.
Confiscation Fund
These funds hold amounts confiscated under law. Funds are then distributed in Civil Asset accordance with the relevant legislation.
Recovery Fund
- Other Income/(Expenditure) and Accounting Adjustments
There are some items of expenditure that are outside the scope of the budgeting boundary but don't form part of a Special Fund. One example is actuarial movements in pension liabilities, which is a non-cash accounting adjustment. In 2012 the value of Pension Liabilities reduced, mostly due to the change in the provision for the JTSF past service liability. This is explained more fully in Note 30.
Accounting Standards also require that all transactions and balances between entities within the States of Jersey are eliminated in the consolidated accounts. As well as eliminations between income and expenditure, the figure above also includes an elimination of amounts released from Capital Grants received from other States Funds in previous years. More details of consolidation adjustments are given in Note 4 (the segmental analysis).
Summary Table 8 – Other (Income)/Expenditure and Accounting Adjustments
2011 Actual 2012 Actual £'000 £'000
Other (Income)/Expenditure and Accounting Adjustments
4,384 Movements in Pension Liabilities (41,588) (5,448) Other (Income)/Expenditure (1,432)
883 Consolidation Adjustments 654
(181) Other (Income)/Expenditure and Accounting Adjustments (42,366)
31
- Capital Expenditure
2.6.1 Consolidated Fund – the Capital Programme
The 2012 Business Plan included a capital expenditure allocation from the Consolidated Fund of £37.6 million, with £16.3 million funded from expected proceeds from property and social housing disposals. During the year £3.2 million was transferred from Revenue to Capital and £27.1 million was approved for the P40/2012 Social Housing Schemes, giving an effective capital approval of up to £67.9 million. There were also £71.6 million of unspent approvals from previous years.
During 2012 actual capital expenditure from the Consolidated Fund amounted to a total of £33.3 million (including amounts funded through Fiscal Stimulus). The table below gives details of this expenditure against approvals; projects with a total allocated budget of greater than £1 million are shown separately.
Table 9 - Consolidated Fund Capital Programme
Chief Minister's Department Computer Development Vote Other projects | 2012 Expenditure £'000 - 894 |
| Total Project Expenditure £'000 - 377 1,927 |
| Total Allocated Budget £'000 2,200 3,831 |
| Remaining Unspent Budget £'000 1,823 1,904 |
Chief Minister's Department Total | 894 |
| 2,304 |
| 6,031 |
| 3,727 |
Education, Sport & Culture Other projects | 203 |
| 561 |
| 1,579 |
| 1,018 |
Education, Sport & Culture Total | 203 |
| 561 |
| 1,579 |
| 1,018 |
Department of the Environment Other projects | 119 |
| 677 |
| 1,297 |
| 620 |
Department of the Environment Total | 119 |
| 677 |
| 1,297 |
| 620 |
Health & Social Services Equipment, Maintenance & Minor Capital Other projects | 1,635 119 |
| 2,207 139 |
| 3,476 984 |
| 1,269 845 |
Health & Social Services Total | 1,754 |
| 2,346 |
| 4,460 |
| 2,114 |
Table 9 - Consolidated Fund Capital Programme (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Home Affairs Tetra Radio Replacement Prison Control Room Minor Capital Other projects | 2012 Expenditure £'000 7 41 199 81 |
| Total Project Expenditure £'000 1,800 1,606 582 2,105 |
| Total Allocated Budget £'000 2,534 1,839 1,748 3,368 |
| Remaining Unspent Budget £'000 734 233 1,166 1,263 |
| |
Home Affairs Total |
| 328 |
| 6,093 |
| 9,489 |
| 3,396 | |
Housing Housing Rolling Vote Other projects |
| 9,311 76 |
| 22,969 1,733 |
| 59,950 1,915 |
| 36,981 182 | |
Housing Total |
| 9,387 |
| 24,702 |
| 61,865 |
| 37,163 | |
Transport and Technical Services In-Vessel Composting EFW Plant La Collette Fire Fighting System Town park Sludge Thickener Project Phillips Street Shaft Infrastructure Other projects |
| 918 233 651 842 1,147 917 4,433 1,680 |
| 1,660 108,466 3,576 10,843 3,461 1,077 8,726 31,457 |
| 1,691 109,097 3,904 10,958 8,067 5,600 13,824 33,280 |
| 31 631 328 115 4,606 4,523 5,098 1,823 | |
Transport and Technical Services Total |
| 10,821 |
| 169,266 |
| 186,421 |
| 17,155 | |
Treasury and Resources On behalf of Education, Sport and Culture Highlands (A Block) Mont-a-l'Abbe Phase II Grainville Phase 4a Victoria College Capital Project Other projects On behalf of Health and Social Services A&E/Radiology Extension (Phase 2) Clinique Pinel Upgrade Intensive Care Unit Upgrade Main Theatre Upgrade New Maternity Theatre Oncology Extension & Refurbishment Rosewood House Refurbishment Other projects On behalf of Home Affairs Police Relocation (Phase 1) Prison Improvement Phase 4 Public Markets Maintenance HD Farm Building and Incinerator Repurchase of Land at Mont Mado Other projects |
| (114) 13 718 60 376 3 287 1,611 59 7 1,217 66 35 355 3,749 - 19 457 - 617 |
| 5,668 3,745 4,452 220 2,197 1,951 305 1,617 60 10 1,389 1,797 736 1,315 8,187 - 66 1,612 1,337 1,347 |
| 5,768 4,290 4,728 1,299 3,048 1,982 2,868 2,500 1,302 1,494 3,332 1,936 910 19,788 9,834 - 1,465 1,617 1,337 2,076 |
| 100 545 276 1,079 851 31 2,563 883 1,242 1,484 1,943 139 174 18,473 1,647 - 1,399 5 - 729 | |
Treasury and Resources Total |
| 9,535 |
| 38,011 |
| 71,574 |
| 33,563 | |
Non Ministerial States Funded Magistrates Court Other projects |
| - 211 |
| 9,154 263 |
| 9,289 289 |
| 135 26 | |
Non Ministerial States Funded Total |
| 211 |
| 9,417 |
| 9,578 |
| 161 | |
Total |
| 33,252 |
| 253,377 |
| 352,294 |
| 98,917 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
The most significant projects incurring Phillips Street Shaft: This project has been designed to expenditure in 2012 were: alleviate the flooding risk to the North of Town. The project
involves digging a 30 metre hole in Anne Court Car Park Housing Rolling Vote: The main areas of expenditure in and then tunnelling under Phillips Street to allow access the Housing Rolling Vote were the refurbishment projects for the surface and foul drain network. Then the North of at Clos Gosset, Jardin Des Carreaux, Pomme D'Or Farm Town is to be connected to the Cavern. The project began and Le Squez Phase 2. These projects are expected to enabling works in December 2012 and is planned to be complete in early 2013. In addition to this, planning and completed in 2014.
design work for refurbishment projects at Le Sqeuz Phase
2c, La Collette Phase 1 and Journeaux Street took place Prison Improvement Phase 4: This phase of the prison in 2012 with the building phases beginning over the winter improvement is the creation of new visitor and staff facilities, of 2012 / 2013. required as a consequence of cumulative increases in
the prison population over recent years. The project was Sludge Thickener Project: The sludge thickener project completed in December 2012 significantly under budget. begun in 2011 to replace the existing sludge thickener As a result the remaining budget will be used to build an plant at Bellozanne which had reached the end of its additional storage facility within the prison in 2013.
useful life. The enabling works were completed during
2012 and phase 2 of the project began on schedule. 2.6.2 Trading Operations
However, due to the current economic climate the main Capital Expenditure
contractor experienced financial difficulties and went into
administration. Transport and Technical Services are During 2012 actual capital expenditure from Trading currently in the process of appointing a new contractor to Funds amounted to a total of £3.6 million. Table 10 gives complete this project. details of this expenditure against approvals, projects with
a total allocated budget of greater than £1 million being shown separately.
Table 10 - Trading Operations Capital Expenditure
Total Remaining 2012 Total Project Allocated Unspent
Expenditure Expenditure Budget Budget
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Jersey Airport
Engineering/ARFFS Building (127) - 4,084 4,084 DVOR/Doppler DME - - 1,070 1,070 Arrivals/Pier/Forecourt (173) 538 4,764 4,226 Primary Radar Les Platons 279 2,637 3,464 827 Regulatory Compliance 2010 30 480 2,990 2,510 Secondary Radar Les Platons (265) 619 1,500 881 Telebag System (159) 2,492 2,492 - Other projects 328 590 3,455 2,865 Jersey Airport Total (87) 7,356 23,819 16,463
Jersey Harbours
St Helier Marina - - 1,810 1,810 Gorey Pierhead 174 174 3,000 2,826 Port Crane 74 138 1,900 1,762 Elizabeth Harbour EB/WB Walkways 241 550 2,975 2,425 Elizabeth Harbour Trailer Park 207 487 1,100 613 Other projects 1,276 2,133 5,175 3,042 Jersey Harbours Total 1,972 3,482 15,960 12,478
Jersey Car Parking
Anne Court Car Park - 34 9,000 8,966 Automated Charging System 129 129 1,000 871 Concrete Repairs - 1,297 2,519 1,222 Jersey Car Parking Total 129 1,460 12,519 11,059
Jersey Fleet Management
Vehicle & Plant Replacement 1,578 1,649 3,124 1,475 Jersey Fleet Management Total 1,578 1,649 3,124 1,475
Total 3,592 13,947 55,422 41,475
35
The most significant projects incurring expenditure in 2012 were:
Primary Radar Les Platons / Secondary Radar Les Platons: The Primary and Secondary Radars servicing Jersey Airport from Les Platons have been replaced. The project was undertaken in order to comply with Single European Skies directives. The construction phase was completed in January 2012 and the commissioning phase was undertaken throughout the year. The negative spend for the year relates to adjustments to expenditure which occurred in previous years.
Gorey Pierhead: The design phase for this project commenced in 2012 and tenders have been issued to the market. Work is expected to begin towards the middle of 2013.
Vehicle and Plant Replacement: From the beginning of 2012, all States vehicle purchases, servicing and repairs should be made through Jersey Fleet Management. To facilitate this, additional funding of £5 million will be injected into the Jersey Fleet Management Trading Fund from the Consolidated Fund between 2012 and 2015.
Automated Charging System: The trial phase of this project was undertaken over the winter of 2012/13 in Sand Street Car Park. The trial is expected to complete in March 2013. The results of this will allow for a roll out of the project into all multi storey car parks.
- The States Balance Sheet
- Key Movements in Assets and Liabilities
During the year the value of Property, Plant and Equipment held by the States increased by £262.8 million to nearly £3.2 billion. This was primarily due to the revaluation exercises that were carried out in the year which lead to an overall increase in values of £276.8 million. This included increases in the Property portfolio (Land, Buildings and Other structures) of £253.6 million and the Social Housing portfolio of £70.2 million, and a decrease in the value of networked assets of £45.6 million. More details of movements in the value of Property are set out in Note 14.
Overall the value of Strategic Investments' decreased by £37.6 million. There was a decrease in the Strategic Investment in JT of £27 million. The value of equity shares increased by £2.2 million, and the preference shares (valued at £29.5 million in 2011) were redeemed. There was also the issue of an infrastructure investment of £10 million which is accounted for separately from the Strategic Investment. The value of the States' investment in Jersey Water increased (£5.1 million), and there was a decrease in the value of the States' holdings in Jersey Electricity (£14.3 million). Further details on the valuations are given in Note 18.
The States held less cash at the end of 2012 than at the end of 2011, due to variations in the cash requirements of the organisation between the two years. The total value of non-strategic investments increased by £92 million. This was due to the increase in the value of investments in the Strategic Reserve, and also a higher level of investments held in the Consolidated Fund at the year end.
Provisions were lower in 2012, due to the settlement of the £22 million provision recognised in the Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund during 2011, associated with an asset sharing agreement regarding a confiscation.
Pensions liabilities relating to past service liabilities have reduced by £39 million, as set out in Note 29. This was mostly due to a reduction of £37 million in the provision for the Jersey Teachers' Superannuation Fund pre-2007 liability. This was based on a Management Board proposal to the States on the treatment of the pension increase debt, based on the 2010 Actuarial valuation of the scheme. There was also a small movement in the value of the Public Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme Past Service Liability.
Where can I read more?
The Notes to the Accounts give more details of the States Assets and Liabilities.
Figure 5 - States' Assets and Liabilities
Current Liabilities
- Financial Position of States Funds
The key results relating to the position of significant funds are highlighted below.
Consolidated Fund
As at the end of 2012, the unallocated Consolidated Fund Balance was £31.2 million. The 2012 Budget forecasted an unallocated balance in the Consolidated Fund of £7.4 million. This was revised in the 2013 budget to £32.7 million, mostly due to a better than expected opening balance (£47.2 million compared to £24.8 million). There were also several additional items incorporated into the forecast, such as the allocation of £27 million for Housing Schemes and the repayment of £20 million of preference shares by JT. More details can be found in the 2013 Budget Statement and the Medium Term Financial Plan.
The actual balance was £1.5 million less than expected. The MTFP forecast included a £5 million contribution to the Innovation Fund which has not yet been made, and adjusting for the effect of this item results in the balance being £6.5 million less than forecast. This difference is primarily as a result of a shortfall in Property receipts (which were £5 million less than forecast), and other, smaller variances.
Trading Operations
The Trading Fund balance increased for each of the Trading Operations during 2012. However, a significant amount of these balances has been earmarked for future projects, as detailed in the relevant pages in the Annex to the accounts.
Special Funds
The balance in the Strategic Reserve increased by £56.9 million during the year, and now holds over £651.2 million. This increase was due to returns on its investments held in the Common Investment Fund. Other Funds saw smaller movements in their fund balances, and details are given in their individual pages in the Annex to the Accounts.
Where can I read more?
The relevant pages in the Annex gives more information about the performance and position of the funds.
37
- Assessment of Liquidity Estate management Strategy
The States of Jersey's fiscal policy is to operate budget The States aims to provide safe and affordable surpluses during periods of economic growth with the accommodation for all States departments whilst objective of transferring surpluses to the Stabilisation striving to maximise asset values and minimise Fund in order to help fund any deficits that arise in periods property operating costs. The States' estate
of economic decline. In their fifth annual report published management policy has four main aspects.
in October 2012, the Fiscal Policy Panel (FPP), the States'
independent fiscal experts, made an assessment of the
economic outlook for Jersey and recommended that the
States should act to give discretionary fiscal support to
the economy in 2012 and 2013. The FPP recommended Maintaining a legally compliant Estate
that the extent of stimulus should not be limited by the
balances on the Consolidated or Stabilisation Funds. A fundamental requirement of the Estates Man-
agement function is to implement the policy of The Stabilisation Fund was used in the 2009-2011 period maintaining a legally compliant estate for staff, users
to provide fiscal stimulus funding and the current balance of facilities and the general public. Jersey Property is just over £1 million. The FPP does not recommend Holdings undertakes an ongoing assessment of the transfers into the Stabilisation Fund in 2012 or 2013. It is statutory compliance levels for buildings under its intended that this Fund will be rebuilt once the economy management. In 2012 a compliance approaching begins to recover. 90% was achieved as an average throughout the
year, which compares favourably with industry The Strategic Reserve is maintained as a permanent standards. Each test or inspection is certified as
reserve, where the capital value can be used in exceptional complete by competent contractors and is not circumstances to insulate the Island's economy from confirmed as compliant until certification has been severe structural decline. The Strategic Reserve Balance received by Jersey Property Holdings.
is £651 million. The FPP did not recommend a transfer in
or out of the Strategic Reserve in its October report. Office rationalisation process
The unallocated Consolidated Fund balance at the end
of 2012 was £31 million and this is broadly in line with A currentlyphased underway,review of offices which in aimsthe States to consolidateof Jersey theis the forecast in the MTFP. Historically, the FPP has
recommended that a working balance of £20 million be office working environment. estate, reduce its size and provide a modern maintained where possible on the Consolidated Fund. The relocation of the Police Headquarters and
The MTFP shows that this will not be achieved in 2014
and 2015 with respective balances of £12 million and £9 Sprtoagtiroanmfmaeci.l ities represents phase one of the million forecast. The next MTFP will consider the forecast The MTFP (Appendix 5) includes proposals for
consolidated fund balance from 2016. the future phases of the office rationalisation
programme.
- Financing, Treasury and
other policies These objectives are mutually supportive, as
rationalisation of the estate will result in the release
of disposal proceeds, deliver surplus sites with Financing the potential for affordable housing developments
and, by reducing the size of the gross built area States expenditure is substantially funded through maintained, reduce property operating costs.
accumulated and current year revenues rather than
borrowing. Only comparatively small amounts of
borrowings exist for specific assets in the form of Finance
Leases.
Significant Treasury Policies
The States of Jersey regards the successful identification, monitoring and control of risk to be the prime criteria by which the effectiveness of its treasury management activities will be measured. Accordingly, the analysis and reporting of treasury management activities will focus on their risk implications for the States of Jersey.
The States of Jersey acknowledges that effective treasury management will provide support towards the achievement of its business and service objectives. The Treasurer of the States is therefore committed to the principles of achieving value for money in treasury management, and to employing suitable comprehensive performance measurement techniques, within the context of effective risk management.
- Review of the Pension Schemes
The States two main public sector pension schemes are extremely important to the Island, with over 1 in 3 Jersey households relying on a public sector pension scheme. The pension schemes are an important tool in attracting key public sector workers, and funded public sector schemes reduce the reliance on social security benefits.
Life expectancy has improved greatly in recent years which
is impacting on the affordability of public service pensions. Review of operational property In addition, expectations of how much money will be
earned over the long term from the investments have been The States is also committed to reviewing the reducing and are now significantly lower than when the appropriateness of its operational properties. A schemes were established. The long term sustainability review of the operational portfolios of the Education of public sector pension schemes has been the subject of estates was completed in 2011 from which an action the Hutton report in the UK, and the States of Jersey has plan has been developed and is being delivered. recognised the need to consider its own schemes.
A similar review has commenced in respect of the A Technical Working Group (TWG) was formed in August Health estate. This is more complex as it involves 2011, with terms of reference to "Develop and prepare harmonisation with the requirements of the Health a report on possible options for changes to Public modernisation process, key to which is the provision Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme (PECRS) to of a new General and Acute Hospital. ensure its viability and sustainability for the future." The
key principles are that the scheme must be Sustainable, These reviews are likely to lead to a rationalisation Affordable and Fair for the long term.
of these portfolios through better utilisation of
buildings, with opportunities to dispose of buildings The TWG report was published in March 2013 with the aim with alternative use value. of introducing changes to PECRS in 2015. The high level
proposals include:
Disposals of surplus assets
• Career Average Revalued Earnings (CARE) Scheme
Theare surplusStates hasto arequirements,policy of disposingreducingof assetsthe States'which • Normal retirement age linked to Jersey state pension age property portfolio to a size which is more affordable
and efficient, and releasing capital proceeds to fund • Higher employee contribution rate (average increase in the States capital investment programme within the the UK public sector schemes is 3% of pay)
MTFP. Larger sites will be transferred to the States
of Jersey Development Company for development, • Equity and fairness – treat all employees fairly
subject to the necessary approvals, with Jersey
Property Holdings disposing of surplus small sites • Risk sharing between employer and employees
and parcels of land directly to the market.
• Contribution cap for employees, employers and tax-payers
A consultation process on this proposals was begun in early 2013. It is anticipated that the Jersey Teachers Superannuation Scheme (JTSF) will be considered at a later stage.
39
- Retirement Benefit Schemes not recognised on the Statement of Financial Position
In addition to the defined benefit schemes outlined in Note 30, the States of Jersey operates two further pension schemes: the Public Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme (PECRS) and the Jersey Teachers' Superannuation Fund (JTSF).
Financial Assumptions
The main financial assumptions made by the actuary where applicable were:
The PECRS and JTSF are both final salary schemes, but are not conventional defined benefit schemes as the employer is not responsible for meeting any ongoing deficency in the scheme. Due to that limitation on the States' responsibility as employer, the scheme deficit in each case is disclosed below but not recognised in the States Accounts. The figures below are prepared using the methodolgy set out in IAS 19, which differ from those used to assess the long-term sustainability of the funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2012 |
|
| % p.a. |
| % p.a. |
| % p.a. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.9 |
| 3.3 |
| 3.2 |
|
5.2 |
| 4.0 |
| 3.9 |
| |
5.3 |
| 4.6 |
| 4.3 |
| |
3.6 |
| 3.0 |
| 3.05 |
| |
3.9 |
| 3.3 |
| 3.9 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The States of Jersey employs a building block approach in determining the long-term rate of return on scheme assets. Historical markets are studied and assets with higher returns consistent with widely accepted capital market principles. The assumed long-term rate of assets is then derived by aggregating the expected return for each asset class over the actual asset allocation for the scheme.
The Public Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme (PECRS)
The PECRS is open to all public sector employees The States in agreeing P190/2005 on September 2005 (excluding teachers) over 20 years of age, and membership confirmed responsibility for the past service liability which is obligatory for all employees on a permanent contract. arose from the restructuring of the PECRS arrangements The Scheme is managed by a Committee of Management with effect from 1 January 1988. More details of the and five sub-committees. agreement are set out in Note 1, Accounting Policy 17.
This liability amounted to £250.5 million at 31 December The figures include the admitted bodies of the PECRS 2012 (2011: £252.0 million), and more details are given in other than JT Group Limited and Jersey Post International Note 29. The past service liability will be repaid over 82 Limited. years (from 2002), after which the employers' contribution
rate will revert to 15.16% of members' salaries. The The market value of the Scheme's assets as at 31 December payment relating to this liability made in 2012 was £4.1 2012 was £1,314 million (2011: £1,182 million). million (2011: £4.0 million).
The results of the most recent actuarial valuation of the PECRS indicated that the Scheme has an actuarial surplus of £ 40.6 million. This surplus will be treated in accordance with the terms of the Scheme's Regulations.
41
Demographic Assumptions
The principal demographic assumptions made by the actuary to calculate the liabilities under IAS 19 were:
|
|
|
| 2011 2012 |
|
Males |
|
|
| 25 years 25 years 27 years 27 years |
|
Females |
|
|
| 27 years 28 years 29 years 29 years |
|
Commutation | Each member assumed to exchange 17.5% of their pension entitlements |
|
|
|
|
Assets of the scheme and the weighted average expected rate of return on assets
2011 2012
Long-term rate Long-term rate
of return Value of return Value expected expected
% p.a. £'000 % p.a. £'000
8.00 878,047 8.00 1,052,727
7.50 - 7.50 88,056
2.80 6 2.70 -
2.60 - 2.50 -
3.90 279,941 3.10 140,627
1.80 24,420 1.00 32,857
Total market value of assets 1,182,414 1,314,267 (1,880,420) (2,081,084)
Net pension liability (698,006) (766,817)
Changes to the present value of the scheme liabilities during the year
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
1 January 1,791,829 1,880,420
54,067 52,883 311 46,271 95,389 87,055
(23,464) 53,378 12,253 12,411
(49,965) (51,334)
31 December 1,880,420 2,081,084
Changes to the fair value of the scheme
assets during the year 2011 2012 £'000 £'000
1,265,584 1,182,414
90,990 79,855 (171,956) 55,022
35,508 35,899 12,253 12,411
(49,965) (51,334)
31 December 1,182,414 1,314,267
l
Amounts for current period and previous four periods
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
924,254 1,110,963 1,265,584 1,182,414 1,314,267 (1,306,089) (1,680,165) (1,791,829) (1,880,420) (2,081,084) (381,835) (569,202) (526,245) (698,006) (766,817)
(260,192) 133,596 63,342 (171,956) 55,022
(23,258) 27,835 47,676 13,731 14,283
* This item consists of gains/(losses) in respect of liability experience only, and excludes any change in liabilities in respect of changes to the actuarial assumptions used.
The valuation at 31 December 2012 showed an increase in the scheme deficit from £698 million to £767 million.
43
The Jersey Teachers Superannuation Fund (JTSF)
Membership of the JTSF is compulsory for all teachers in full-time employment and optional for those in part- time employment. The Fund is managed by a Board of Management which has established sub-committees to investigate and report on complex and technical issues.
The figures include Non-Provided Schools that qualify as Accepted Schools under the law.
The market value of the Fund's Assets as at 31 December 2012 was £327 million (2011: £302 million).
The results of the actuarial valuation as at 31 December 2010 concluded that there was no surplus or deficit in the scheme after taking account of the States of Jersey's expected future payments to cover the pension increase debt. The details and timing of these expected future payments are currently being developed.
The JTSF was restructured with effect from 1 April 2007 and now generally mirrors the PECRS. A provision for the past service liability, similar to the PECRS Pre-1987 past service liability has been recognised although this has not yet been agreed with the Scheme's Board of Management. The employer's contribution rate rose to 16.4% and the actuary has confirmed that this will repay the past service liability over 80 years (from 2007).
Demographic Assumptions
2011 2012
Males
28 years 27 years 30 years 28 years
Females
31 years 30 years 33 years 31 years
Members who joined the Scheme after 31 March 2007 assumed to exchange
Commutation 16.67 of their pension entitlements. Nil
for other members.
Assets of the scheme and the weighted average expected
rate of return on assets
2011 2012 Long-term rate Long-term rate
of return of return
expected Value expected Value
% p.a. £'000 % p.a. £'000
- 255,265 8.00 275,863
7.50 14,699 7.50 23,533
2.80 - 2.70 25,168
2.60 25,148 2.50 -
3.90 - 3.10 -
1.80 6,738 1.00 2,288
Total market value of assets 301,850 326,852 (569,772) (624,842)
Net pension asset/(liability) on the balance sheet (267,922) (297,990)
Changes to the present value of the scheme liabilities during the year
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
1 January 561,106 569,772
13,969 13,504 29,792 26,208
(23,203) 28,902 3,102 2,994
(14,994) (16,538)
31 December 569,772 624,842
45
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
1 January 319,362 301,850
22,842 21,300 (36,989) 8,798
8,527 8,448 3,102 2,994
(14,994) (16,538)
31 December 301,850 326,852
ar (
ds
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
220,646 274,001 319,362 301,850 326,852 (403,047) (512,961) (561,106) (569,772) (624,842) (182,401) (238,960) (241,744) (267,922) (297,990)
(72,156) 39,847 27,765 (36,989) 8,798
(10,034) (302) 14,643 14,253 (31,453)
- Explanation of the Structure of the States of Jersey
- Principal Activities of the States Consolidated Fund
of Jersey The Consolidated Fund is governed by the Public
Finances (Jersey) Law 2005 and is the fund through The States Assembly raises taxes and other levies to which the majority of the States' income and expenditure
fund the provision of a wide range of public services is managed, including General Revenue Income and including Health Care, Education, Social Security and the departmental income and expenditure.
administration of Justice. These functions are primarily
carried out by Departments, both Ministerial and Trading Operations
Non-Ministerial.
Under the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005, the States can designate any distinct area of operation as a States
- The States of Jersey Trading Operation. Estimates for Trading Operations are Accounting Boundary approved in the Annual Business Plan
The entities included within the States of Jersey Special Funds
Accounting Boundary are shown in the following diagram. In addition to the Consolidated Fund, the Public Finances More information on specific entities is given below. (Jersey) Law 2005 names three Special Funds – the
Strategic Reserve, the Stabilisation Fund and the Currency Some functions of Government are carried out by entities Fund. These relate to the operation of the States of Jersey
outside of the accounting boundary including some social in general. The Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005 also benefits met by the Social Security Fund and Health allows the States to establish special funds (also known Insurance Fund. as Separately Constituted Funds) for specific purposes.
These are usually established by legislation or a States
decision.
States of Jersey Group
CONSOLIDATED TRADING STATES OF SPECIAL WHOLLY FUND OPERATIONS JERSEY GROUP FUNDS FOR OWNED
SPECIAL SPECIFIC COMPANY FUNDS NAMED PURPOSES
IN THE PFL
Ministerial Harbours Strategic Reserve Loans Funds States of Jersey Departments Development
Company Ltd Non-Ministerial Airport Stabilisation Fund Tourism [Formerly Water-
Departments Development front Enterprise
Fund Board Ltd] General Revenue Fleet Currency Fund CI Lottery Fund
Income Management
Car Parking Housing
Development Fund
Confiscation Funds
47
- Public Sector Bodies Outside of the Accounting Boundary
Major Public Sector Bodies that are outside of the Accounting Boundary (and so not included in these accounts) include:
Parishes Trust and Bequest Funds
The Parishes perform various Government Functions, The States administers a number of Trust and Bequest including Refuse Collection, Provision of Parks and Funds. These funds commonly set defined purposes for Gardens and issue of Licenses. Details of the functions of the use of their assets, and so are not controlled by the individual parishes can be found on the Parishes Website. States directly
http://www.parish.gov.je/
Social Security Funds
Fund | Purpose |
Social Security Fund | These funds collect Social Security Contributions, and pay related benefits and any associated expenses. The Reserve fund provides a buffer for these payments in the future. |
Health Insurance Fund | |
Social Security (Reserve) Fund |
Strategic Investments
Fund | Purpose |
Jersey Electricity plc | The States owns controlling investments in these utility companies, but as it does not exert direct control these are accounted for as Strategic Investments in the Accounts. More information about the valuation of these companies is given in Note 11. |
Jersey New Waterworks Company | |
JT Group Limited | |
Jersey Post International Limited |
Independent Bodies
Fund | Purpose |
Including, for example | These bodies mainly provide supervisory and regulatory functions, and are established by legislation to be independent from the States of Jersey. |
- Jersey Competition Regulation Authority | |
- Jersey Financial Services Commission |
- Common Investment Fund Current Process
The States of Jersey – Common Investment Fund The 2012 Annual Business Plan, debated in September (CIF) is only open to States Funds (including Reserves, 2011, is the last in the current format and approved Separately Constituted (Special) Funds, Trust Funds revenue and capital expenditure for 2012 and indicative and Bequest Funds), and allows them to benefit from expenditure totals for a further two years. The 2012 Budget greater investment opportunities and economies of scale. Statement proposed taxation changes and other revenue Investments in the CIF and associated transactions are raising measures for 2012.
included in these Accounts to the extent that they relate to
entities within the Accounting Boundary. More details on Departments have prepared their individual Business the operation of the CIF are given in Note 35. Plans for 2012 which set out their objectives for the year, and how these help deliver the strategic priorities
agreed in the Strategic Plan. The States two main controls
- Challenges and OpportunitiesOutline of Key Objectives, Strategies, on expenditure are through Net Revenue Expenditure limits, and Capital Project budgets voted by the States to
departments.
Jersey is facing a range of issues, including difficult
economic conditions and an ageing and growing New Medium Term Financial Planning Process population. The States Strategic Plan considers these
issues, and sets out how the States will address them. The Under the new process a Medium Term Financial Plan Strategic Plan sets out in detail the States Objectives and (MTFP) is approved in the place of an Annual Business Strategies and is available on the States Website: Plan. The MTFP extends the States budgeting period from
one to three years, and fits with the existing political cycle, http://www.gov.je/Government/PlanningPerformance/ where each Council of Ministers is elected for a three-year StrategicPlanning/Pages/StrategicPlan.aspx term.
The Strategic Plan 2012 sets the main aim of the States as The key changes are:
Inspiring confidence in Jersey's future'.
• States spending limits will be set for the length of a
Specifically, by working openly and inclusively with all Council of Ministers' term of office;
sectors of our community the States will:
• Minimum department spending limits will be set for the
• Get people into work same time period; and
• Manage Population growth and immigration
• House our community • There will be central allocations created for growth and
• Promote family and community values contingency spend.
• Reform Health and Social Services
• Reform government and the public service Criticisms of the previous annual process have been that
• Develop sustainable long term planning. it focuses decision making on the short term and makes no provision for unforeseen expenditure, which has led to The Strategic Plan goes on to outline Priorities that support urgent calls for additional funding and the perception that these aims, and Key Performance Indicators that can be the States is overspending.
used to measure progress against these priorities.
The MTFP will encourage longer term planning horizons, The financial implications of these matters are covered give greater certainty and flexibility for departments to more fully in the States of Jersey Medium Term Financial plan ahead and deliver improved value for money within Plan and Budget. an overall States spending limit.
An allocation for growth will allow the States to be 2.10Financial Planning CycleThe States of Jersey Business and responsive to changing needs without exceeding the
agreed limits, and allocations for contingency funding will
provide confidence that unforeseen events can be dealt
with without additional unplanned calls on the public purse. The States approved changes to the Public Finances
(Jersey) Law 2005 in July 2011 to introduce longer term Annual Budgets will continue to propose tax and funding financial planning and the approval of a three-year Medium measures as well as the detailed allocations to heads of Term Financial Plan from 2013. expenditure from the amounts set aside for Growth and
Capital expenditure. All the annual Budget expenditure allocations will be variations within the agreed overall limits.
49
Figure 5 - Summary of Medium Term Financial Planning Process
Debate Medium Term
The 2012 Annual Business Plan authorised Near-Cash Net Revenue Expenditure of £615,845,000.
Changes to Approvals
During the year, budgets can be varied for limited reasons and these revised amounts will be used for monitoring purposes:
• Carry forward of unspent revenue expenditure budgets voted in the previous year, approved by the Minister for Treasury and Resources.
• Amounts transferred between capital and revenue budgets, approved by the Minister for Treasury and Resources.
• Service transfers within a Department, although the overall total will not vary.
• Additional amounts voted by the States Assembly during the year.
• Amounts allocated from the central contingency.
As well as carry forwards from 2011, additional amounts of £2.6 million were allocated to departments during the year (including £1.4 million of fiscal stimulus funding allocated to Education to support careers and high educations). This amount is lower than in previous years, as the States have managed unforeseen events either within departmental limits or from the Contingency Allocations approved in the Business Plan for that reason.
Table 11 reconciles approvals in the Business Plan to the Final Approved Budget, which includes amounts carried forward from previous years' approvals (as set out in MD-TR-2012-0019), additional approvals by the States, and Revenue to Capital transfers.
Table 11 - Reconciliation of Final Approved Budget to the Business Plan Near-Cash Approval
£'000
Business Plan Approval (Near-Cash) 615,845 2011 departmental approvals carried forward to 2012 27,822 2011 contingency approvals carried forward to 2012 13,624 Additional amounts voted by the States of Jersey 2,571 Transfers between Capital and Revenue (3,240)
Final Approved Budget 656,622 In Year Monitoring
During 2012, reports on performance for Revenue Thus the States Assembly exhibits all the usual and Capital expenditure were prepared on a monthly characteristics of a parliament - legislature and debating and quarterly basis for consideration by the Corporate chamber - while at the same time taking executive Management Board. Quarterly reports were presented decisions on a wide range of issues.
to the Council of Ministers as part of the overall financial
monitoring and planning process. The constitution of the States and all general provisions
governing procedure, are set out in the States of Jersey Actual results were monitored against approved budget Law 2005, and in the Standing Orders of the States of amounts as well as updated Departmental forecasts. Jersey made under the Law.
These took account of any projected changes in income
and expenditure and timing of capital expenditure. The Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005 sets out the
procedures that govern the administration of the States' finances.
- Governance Structures
The present composition of the States, as determined by the States of Jersey Law 2005, is:
- The States Assembly Elected Members
• 10 Senators (Reduced from 12 in 2011)
The States Assembly is the highest decision-making • 12 Connétable s
authority of the Island and makes decisions about new • 29 Deputies
laws or major policy changes. The principal functions of
the States are - Non-Elected Members
- to pass Laws (which require the sanction of Her Majesty • the Bailiff
in Council) and Regulations on all domestic matters; • the Lieutenant-Governor
- to approve estimates of public expenditure (revenue • the Dean of Jersey
and capital); • the Attorney General and
• the Solicitor General
- to appoint a Council of Ministers charged with
responsibility for the different aspects of public business; Officers
- to appoint a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and • the Greffier of the States, who is clerk of the States scrutiny panels to hold the Executive to account; • the Deputy Greffier of the States, who is the clerk- assistant of the States
- to determine policy on propositions presented by • the Viscount, who is the executive officer of the States. Ministers, scrutiny panels and other bodies or individual
members, and executive matters such as compulsory Only the elected members have voting rights. In May purchases; 2012 the States established an Electoral Commission to review the number and categories of elected members
- to debate and decide issues of public importance; and the Commission's recommendations were published in January 2013. The recommendations will be considered
- to consider petitions for the redress of grievances; and by the States in 2013 and put to the electorate in a
- to represent the people of Jersey. referendum before being implemented, if approved, for the next elections that will be held in October 2014.
51
The Ministerial System of Government
In 2005 Jersey adopted a Ministerial system of government. A Council of Ministers works alongside Scrutiny Panels. Of the 51 States members with voting rights, a maximum of 22 members are in ministerial positions either as Ministers (ten members) or Assistant Ministers (up to 12 members). States members who are not Ministers or Assistant Ministers can sit on the Scrutiny Panels and the PAC.
- The Council of Ministers
The Council of Ministers is made up of a Chief Minister and nine other Ministers, who are chosen individually on a vote by all States Members. Each Minister is legally and politically accountable for their area of government, whilst the responsibility for taking general policy decisions (e.g. those affecting more than one ministry), and for the overall policy aim of departments, rests with the Council of Ministers. The ten Ministers leading the ten States
departments during 2012 were:
Department Minister Appointment Date Chief Minister's Senator Ian Gorst 18/11/2011
Economic Development Senator Alan Maclean 12/12/2008
Education, Sport and Culture Deputy Patrick Ryan 18/11/2011
Department of the Environment Deputy Robert Duhamel 12/07/2011
Home Affairs Senator Ian Le Marquand 12/12/2008
Health and Social Services Deputy Anne Pryke 28/04/2009
Housing Deputy Andrew Green 18/11/2011
Social Security Senator Francis Le Gresley 18/11/2011
Transport and Technical Services Deputy Kevin Lewis 18/11/2011
Treasury and Resources Senator Philip Ozouf 12/12/2008
There are up to 12 Assistant Ministers, each with an area of political responsibility.
The Council of Ministers is responsible for producing Jersey's Strategic Plan. Once the Plan is approved by the States Assembly, the Council will make sure the Strategic Plan is properly carried out throughout the public service.
Under this system, a team of politicians operates as the Executive' branch of government. The Council of Ministers is supported by the Chief Executive who is the head of the public service and a Corporate Management Board that is made up of the chief officers of the main departments.
53
| 2.11.3 Scrutiny | 2.11.4 Accounting Officers |
|
| Scrutiny reviews and comments on the policies and proposed policies of Ministers. It is an integral part of the States system and ensures democratic accountability and rigorous questioning of proposals at an early stage. In short, the Executive makes decisions about and on behalf of Jersey. Scrutiny works to ensure that the decisions taken are the best of the possible options. | Accounting Officers are appointed for each States funded body under the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005. The Accounting Officer of a States funded body is personally accountable for the proper financial management of the resources of the body in accordance with the Law. Some specific requirements are set out in the Law, and also in Financial Directions issued in accordance with it. |
|
| Scrutiny is made up of the following elements: | The following individuals held the post of Accounting Officers for all or part of 2012: |
|
| • Chairmen's Committee - a body that co-ordinates Scrutiny and ensures that it is effective and well run. It maintains regular contact with the Council of Ministers and acts as the link between Scrutiny and the Executive. The Committee is formed by the Chairmen of the Scrutiny Panels, and the Public Accounts Committee chairman. |
|
|
| • Public Accounts Committee - reviews all public expenditure. Works with the Comptroller and Auditor General. The Committee looks for value for money and elimination of waste. Membership includes non-States members. |
|
|
| • Five Scrutiny Panels |
|
|
| • Corporate Services' panel looks at corporate services, corporate policies, external relations and property holdings. |
|
|
| • Environment' looks at Planning and Environment and Transport and Technical Services, including waste, public transport and infrastructure. |
|
|
| • Economic affairs' looks at economic affairs and development. |
|
|
| • Education & Home Affairs' looks at Education, Sport and Culture including the Youth Service, and Home Affairs which includes Fire and Police services, Customs and Immigration and Registrar. |
|
|
| • Health, Social Security and Housing' looks at Health and Social Services, Social Security and Housing. |
|
|
| The Panels are able to scrutinise new laws, existing and proposed new policies, international agreements that might be extended to Jersey and the Medium Term Financial Plan and the Budget. Each Scrutiny Panel is free to choose which issues it works on and may also accept suggestions from the public. |
|
|
| The Public Accounts Committee and the five Scrutiny Panels have extensive powers to require witnesses to give evidence or to supply relevant documents. These powers ensure that Scrutiny can operate effectively. |
| |
States Funded Body/Fund | Position | Accounting Officer | Appointment Date 1 | |||
Ministerial Departments | ||||||
Chief Minister's Department2 (to include Legislation Advisory Board, Human Resources and Information Services, but exclude International Affairs) | Chief Executive | John Richardson | 18/05/2011 | |||
Chief Minister's Department (International Affairs) | Director International Affairs | Tom Walker | 20/05/2011 | |||
Economic Development (to include La Collette Reclamation Scheme) | Chief Officer | Michael King | 01/01/2006 | |||
Education, Sport and Culture | Chief Officer | Mario Lundy | 01/01/2008 | |||
Department of the Environment | Chief Officer | Andrew Scate | 26/08/2008 | |||
Health and Social Services | Chief Officer | Julie Garbutt | 01/06/2010 | |||
Home Affairs (excluding States of Jersey Police) | Chief Officer | Steven Austin- Vautier | 01/01/2006 | |||
States of Jersey Police | Chief Officer | Michael Bowron | 01/01/2012 | |||
Housing | Chief Officer | Ian Gallichan | 01/01/2006 | |||
Social Security (including Health Insurance Fund and Social Security Fund) | Chief Officer | Richard Bell | 01/06/2006 | |||
- Where more than one individual is included, the initial Accounting Officer's appointment ceased on the appointment of the new Accounting Officer, unless otherwise noted.
- Human Resources and Information Services were previously part of the Resources Directorate, for which John Richardson was appointed Accounting Officer from 01/11/2009.
55
States Funded Body/Fund | Position | Accounting Officer | Appointment Date 1 |
Transport and Technical Services | Chief Officer | John Rogers | 17/04/2009 |
Treasury Department3 (including Treasury, Taxes Office, Property Holdings and Procurement) | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 |
Non Ministerial Departments | |||
Bailiff 's Chambers | Chief Officer | David Filipponi | 02/10/2006 |
Law Officers' Department | Chief Clerk | Timothy Allen | 10/07/2006 |
Judicial Greffe | Judicial Greffier | Michael Wilkins | 01/01/2006 |
Viscount's Department | Viscount | Michael Wilkins | 01/01/2006 |
Official Analyst | Official Analyst | Nick Hubbard | 01/01/2006 |
Office of the Lieutenant Governor | Secretary and Aide de Camp | Charles Woodrow | 01/01/2006 |
Data Protection Commission | Data Protection Registrar | Emma Martins | 01/01/2006 |
Probation and After-care Services | Chief Probation Officer | Brian Heath | 01/01/2006 |
Comptroller and Auditor General4 | Comptroller and Auditor General | Christopher Swinson, OBE | 01/01/2006 |
States Assembly (including States Greffe, Scrutiny panels and Public Accounts Committee) Overseas Aid Commission | Greffier of the States | Michael De La Haye | 01/01/2006 |
Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |
Trading Operations | |||
Jersey Airport | Group Chief Executive Officer- Airport and Harbours | Douglas Bannister | 01/07/2011 |
Jersey Harbours | Group Chief Executive Officer- Airport and Harbours | Douglas Bannister | 01/07/2011 |
Jersey Car Parking | Chief Officer - TTS | John Rogers | 17/04/2009 |
Jersey Fleet Management | Chief Officer- TTS | John Rogers | 17/04/2009 |
States Funded Body/Fund | Position | Accounting Officer | Appointment Date 1 | |||
Special Funds Named in the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005 | ||||||
Strategic Reserve | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
Stabilisation Fund | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
| ||||||
Tourism Development Fund | Chief Officer - EDD | Mike King | 01/01/2006 | |||
Channel Islands Lottery (Jersey) Fund | Chief Officer - EDD | Mike King | 01/01/2006 | |||
Agricultural Loans Fund | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
Dwelling House Loan Fund | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
Assisted House Purchase Scheme | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
Housing Development Fund | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
Jersey Currency Notes | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
Jersey Coinage | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
99 Year Leaseholders Fund | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
Drug Trafficking Confiscation Fund | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
Civil Asset Recovery Fund | Treasurer of the States | Laura Rowley | 01/01/2011 | |||
- During 2011, responsibility transferred to the Treasury department, under the Treasurer of the States, for the Procurement (01/07/2011) and Property Holdings (10/11/2011) sections of the Resources department.
- Christopher Swinson resigned as Comptroller and Auditor General on 29/06/2012, and ceased to be Accounting Officer from this date.
57
- Interests of Senior Management
Under the Standing Orders of the States of Jersey, States Members are required to complete a return of their interests, and a register of these returns is publicly available at the offices of the States Greffe during normal working hours. Details of significant interests of members of the Council of Ministers are therefore available publicly as part of this register.
No Accounting Officers hold any interests significant to their roles.
- Auditor
The financial statements for the States of Jersey are audited by Price waterhouseCoopers LLP, who are appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General under the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005. The Report of the auditor on the accounts is included with the accounts.
Audit fees and Non-audit fess paid to the external auditor are disclosed in Note 7 of the accounts.
The accounts have been properly prepared under the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005, in accordance with IFRS as interpreted for the States of Jersey by the Jersey Financial Reporting Manual. The accounting policies are outlined in the accounts and have been fairly and consistently applied. Proper and up-to-date accounting records are kept and all reasonable steps to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities taken.
There is no relevant audit information of which the States of Jersey's auditors are unaware, and all steps have been taken to identify any relevant audit information and to establish that the States of Jersey's auditors are aware of that information.
The Audit Committee terms of reference and membership were reviewed and strengthened in 2011. The beneficial effects of this change have been felt in 2012, and the independent chair and two other independent members, operated effectively throughout the year.
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Environmental Responsibility
The States of Jersey recognises its environmental responsibilities and the effect of its many and varied operations upon the environment. The Eco-Active States (EAS) programme has been developed to assist the States of Jersey in managing its environmental performance and resource management with consequent efficiency savings. The programme was endorsed by Corporate Management Board in February 2011 and a renewed commitment was made in October 2012.
Achievements for the ECO-ACTIVE States Programme:
• 32 separate service areas have completed Eco-Active States dossiers; an over achievement on the target of 20.
• 5 departments are fully accredited - Chief Minister's, Housing, Environment, Social Security and Treasury and Resources.
• 32 Schools are now working on a sustainable school plan. 15 schools have achieved the required Eco Schools' Bronze level or above. The target is to have all schools at this standard by 2015.
• 25 pollution prevention plans have been undertaken to achieve compliance with environmental legislation. Two training sessions have been held for site managers.
• 8 CPD sessions have been run, including: Energy from Waste plant; Jersey Electricity power station; Jersey Water treatment works (Handois); States of Jersey – cavern.
• 8 Back to Bike sessions have been run for nervous cyclists working with Jersey Police Road Safety Unit.
• 300 employees attended energy saving roadshow.
• New States of Jersey policies agreed on Fairtrade and recycled paper and Eco-Active specifications included in procurement PQQ.
By the end of Q2 2013, the target is for 4 additional States Departments to have completed an Eco-Active States dossier, with the Health and Social Services Department completing one by end of 2013 (due to size and complexity of Department).
- Social Responsibility Employee Engagement
The States of Jersey consults with its staff on matters that affect their working lives and seeks to maintain an appropriate environment for the delivery of high quality public services. In doing so, the States of Jersey recognises a number of trade unions and staff associations for negotiation and consultation across the workforce for the purposes of collective bargaining. Formal meetings take place with the Manual Workers' Joint Council four times a year, or as required, and the Civil Service Forum meets twice a year, or as required. Departments also maintain local arrangements for meeting their accredited representatives to discuss matters of local interest. The States actively uses the talents of its workforce to develop and implement new working practices which contribute to the improvement of services throughout the island. The contribution of our staff is both recognised and appreciated.
Employment of Disabled People 2.13 Conclusions
The States of Jersey adopts a flexible and equitable
approach to the employment of people who have a special The economic climate has made 2012 another challenging employment need and encourages applications for all year for the States, but as these accounts show the public sector vacancies. At all times there are people with States' finances have performed well, including a strong special employment needs undertaking a wide variety of balance sheet position at the end of the year. One paid, therapeutic and unpaid roles across the range of aspect of introducing a Medium Term Financial Plan is to departments and occupational groups encourage longer term thinking by departments, by giving
them certainty over their approvals for future years and Payment of Suppliers flexibility in carrying forward unspent amounts to match
the exact timing of expenditure. Departments ended 2012 The States has a policy of paying suppliers 30 days after underspent against their Near Cash budgets by £27.6 invoice date. However, Jersey based companies are paid million, and will again be carrying forward some of these as soon as possible after the receipt of invoices. During unspent amounts to deliver essential projects and meet the year the average payment period was 33 days (2011: other emerging spending pressures in 2013. £28.4 million 32 days). of Central Allocations for Contingency were also not fully
required in 2012, and this will therefore be available in Personal Data Related Incidents 2013.
During 2012 there were 14 incidents of unauthorised For 2012 the States of Jersey has followed the UK disclosure of personal data information, and one incident government in adopting International Finance Reporting where an inadequately protected piece of electronic Standards. The use of internationally recognised stand- storage was lost. Each incident has been reported and ards helps ensure that the accounts are comparable to investigated in line with States policy. other organisations (such as Local Government in the
UK), and presented in a widely recognised format. The impact of this change is explained more fully in Section 6 of this report, and Note 3 to the Accounts.
The Treasury is also committed to making the Accounts more accessible to non-accountants, and so will again be publishing a summary document that collects the main points from the Accounts. The format of this report has also been adapted to try to highlight the key figures from the year for the reader.
Laura Rowley MBA CPFA Treasurer of the States
Date: 29 May 2013
59
FINANCIAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2012 | STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES
- Statement of Responsibilities for the Financial Report and Accounts
The Treasurer of the States is required by the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005 to prepare the annual Accounts and financial statements of the States of Jersey. The annual financial statements must be prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and accounting standards prescribed by an Order issued by the Minister for Treasury and Resources.
Under the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005, Accounting Officers are responsible for ensuring that proper financial records are kept which disclose with reasonable accuracy the financial position of the States of Jersey, and to provide those records when required by the Treasurer for the production of the annual financial statements. The statutory responsibilities of Accounting Officers are set out in full in the States of Jersey Statement on Internal Control.
In preparing the accounts, detailed in the following pages, the Treasurer has:
• applied the going-concern principle to all entities included within the accounts;
• applied appropriate accounting policies in a consistent manner; and
• made reasonable and prudent judgements and estimates.
Laura Rowley MBA CPFA Treasurer of the States
Date: 29 May 2013
- Remuneration Report
- Remuneration Policy
Pay for all States of Jersey Employees is determined by the States Employment Board (SEB). On behalf of the SEB, the Employment Relations Section negotiates with the main pay group Trade Unions and Associations. There are 23 such groups. As part of these negotiations, the economic environment (on and off Island), States of Jersey budget affordability and the pay claims made from individual pay groups are considered.
In December 2012, following 10 months of active negotiations, it was not possible to reach an agreement for the majority of pay groups. With the exception of the Police Service, who reached an agreement, and three pay groups where discussions are continuing, the SEB implemented the following award without agreement with its recognised Trade Unions:
- Council of Ministers
As elected members of the States of Jersey, members of the Council of Ministers are entitled to remuneration in line with recommendations of the States Members' Remuneration Review Body. For 2012 States Members were entitled to remuneration of £45,182, which includes a sum of £4,000 for expenses (2011: £44,832 with £3,650 expenses). Although States members are treated as being self-employed for Social Security purposes the States also pays a sum in relation to members which is equivalent to the amount of an employer's liability for persons who are employed.
• 2012, 1% non-consolidated award paid as one-off lump sum, with effect from 1st January 2012;
• 2013, 1% consolidated pay award plus 1% non- consolidated award paid as a one-off lump sum, with effect from 1st January 2013;
• 2014, 4% consolidated pay award with effect from 1st January 2014 in return for a modernisation agreement; and
• a guarantee of no compulsory redundancies until the end of 2014.
A non-consolidated amount is a one-off payment that is not incorporated into basic pay
61
- Accounting Officers Salaries and allowances
The table below gives details of Accounting Officers' salaries and allowances.
2011 Salary 2012 Salary £'000 £'000
Chief Executive/Acting Chief Executive
Mr W Ogley (to 31 May 2011) 90 – 95 - Full year equivalent salary 215 – 220 -
Mr J Richardson (from 18 May 2011) 110 – 115 190-195 Full year equivalent salary 175 – 180 -
Deputy Chief Executive (Resources Department)
Mr J Richardson (to 17 May 2011) 55 – 60 - Full year equivalent salary 145 – 150 -
Chief Officer – Economic Development
Mr M King 130 – 135 135-140 Chief Officer – Education, Sport and Culture
Mr M Lundy 130 – 135 130-135 Chief Officer – Department of the Environment
Mr A Scate 120 – 125 120-125 Chief Officer – Health and Social Services
Mrs J Garbutt 170 – 175 175-180 Chief Officer – Home Affairs
Mr S Austin-Vautier 115 – 120 115-120 Chief Officer - Housing
Mr I Gallichan 110 – 115 110-115 Chief Officer – Social Security
Mr R Bell 115 – 120 115-120 Chief Officer – States of Jersey Police
Mr M Bowron (Accounting Officer from 1 January 2012) - 130-135 Chief Officer – Transport and Technical Services
Mr J Rogers 125 – 130 130-135 Treasurer of the States
Ms L Rowley 140 – 145 145-150 Chief Officer – Bailiff 's Chambers
Mr D Filipponi 75 – 80 75-80 Chief Clerk – Law Officers' Department
Mr T Allen 80 – 85 80-85
2011 Salary £'000 80 – 85 |
135 –140 |
90 – 95 |
110 – 115 |
60 – 65 125 – 130 |
50 – 55 105 – 110 |
60 – 65 125 – 130 |
2012 Salary £'000 80-85 |
140-145 |
90-95 |
110-115 |
- - |
- - |
130-135 - |
Mr T Allen
Chief Executive/Acting Chief Executive Judicial Greffier and Viscount
Mr M Wilkins
Chief Probation Officer Mr B Heath
Greffier of the States Mr M De La Haye
Airport Director
Mr J Green (to 30 June 2011) Full year equivalent salary
Chief Officer – Jersey Harbours Mr H Le Cornu (to 30 June 2011) Full year equivalent salary
Group Chief Executive Officer- Airport and Harbours Mr D Bannister (from 1 July 2011)
Full year equivalent salary
No taxable benefits-in-kind were received by the Officers above during 2012.
63
Pension benefits
Total Accrued CETV at CETV at Real Increase or Pension at 31-Dec-112 31-Dec-12 (Decrease) in
Retirement as at 31 Dec 20121 CETV3
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Mr J Richardson4 Pension 1,348 1,996 635
90-95
Increase of
25-27.5
Mr M King Pension 171 251 74
10-15
Increase of
0-2.5
Mr M Lundy Pension 1,276 1,334 50
60-65
Increase of
0-2.5
Lump Sum 190-195 Increase of 5-7.5
Mr A Scate Pension 40 80 34
5-10
Increase of
0-2.5
Mrs J Garbutt Pension 1,263 1,381 109
85-90
Increase of
0-2.5
Mr S Austin-Vautier Pension 555 646 85
25-30
Increase of
0-2.5
Mr I Gallichan Pension 465 580 109
25-30
Increase of
0-2.5
Mr R Bell Pension 269 329 54
15-20
Increase of
0-2.5
Mr M Bowron Pension 46 93 40
0-5
Increase of
2.5-5
Mr J Rogers Pension 195 261 59
10-15
Increase of
0-2.5
Ms L Rowley Pension 28 61 26
0-5
Increase of
0-2.5
[1]Total Accrued CETV at CETV at Real Increase or Pension at 31-Dec-11 31-Dec-12 (Decrease) in
Retirement as at 31 Dec 2012[2] [3] CETV3
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Mr D Filipponi Pension 204 248 40
10-15
Increase of
0-2.5
Mr T Allen Pension 900 975 71
40-45
Increase of
0-2.5
Mr M Wilkins5 Pension 1,581 1,572 (18)
80-85
Increase of
0-2.5
Mr B Heath Pension 841 940 94
40-45
Increase of
0-2.5
Mr M De La Haye Pension 918 1,034 109
45-50
Increase of
0-2.5
Mr D Bannister (from 1 July 2011) Pension 14 33 12
0-5
Increase of
0-2.5
Notes 3. This increase is shown after deducting contributions
Compensation Payments
Compensation payments made to former senior managers are disclosed in the accounts, unless publication would:
• Prejudice the rights, freedom of legitimate interests of the individual; or
• Cause or be likely to cause substantial damage or substantial distress to the individual or another, and that damage or distress would be unwarranted.
There were no compensation payments made to former senior managers during 2012.
- Segmental Analysis of Staff
The table below gives details of the numbers of staff whose remuneration exceeds £100,000. Remuneration includes salaries and wages, benefits and pension
contributions paid by the States.
2011 2012
2012 Example Staff Groups Remuneration Non-Traders Traders Non-Traders Traders 100,000 - 109,999 34 5 41 8
Head uniformed ofTeachers, Police and other ficers, medical staff, 110,000 - 119,999 22 19 2
legal staff, Chief Officers and 120,000 - 129,999 33 2 30
Civil Servants 130,000 - 139,999 17 29
140,000 - 149,999 9 1 18 1
150,000 - 159,999 12 18 Senior Medical Staff, Senior 160,000 - 169,999 10 12 Legal Staff and Chief Officers 170,000 - 179,999 6 8 180,000 - 189,999 6 3
190,000 - 199,999 3 4
200,000 - 209,999 1
Senior Medical Staff, the Chief 210,000 - 219,999 1 1 Executive and the Attorney 220,000 - 229,999 1 General 230,000 - 239,999 1 1
240,000 - 249,999
250,000 - 259,999
260,000 - 269,999
The Bailiff and Deputy Bailiff 270,000 - 279,999 1 1
280,000 - 289,999
290,000 - 299,999 1
300,000 - 309,999 1
Laura Rowley MBA CPFA Treasurer of the States
Date: 29 May 2013
67
- Statement on Internal Control for 5.2. The purpose of the system of the year ended 31 December 2012 internal control
The system of internal control is designed to manage the risk of failure to appropriately manage and control the
5.1. Scope of responsibility resources for which an Accounting Officer is responsible. The system is intended to support the achievement of Under the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005 (hereafter departmental and strategic objectives; it cannot eliminate referred to as "the Law"), all States funded bodies have all risk of failure and therefore only provides a reasonable been designated an Accounting Officer. The Accounting and not absolute assurance of effectiveness.
Officer usually holds the post of Chief Officer of a
department. The Law permits the appointment of an A key element of the internal control system is the additional Accounting Officer for a States funded body. framework of Financial Directions. The Minister for
Treasury for Resources has delegated power to the Each Accounting Officer is personally accountable Treasurer of the States to issue Financial Directions and
for the proper financial management of the resources considerable progress continues to be made.
under their control in accordance with the Law, any sub-
ordinate legislation and Financial Directions. In particular, The system of internal control has been in place in the an Accounting Officer must ensure that the following States of Jersey for the year ended 31 December 2012 principles are adhered to: and up to the date of approval of the 2012 Financial Report
and Accounts.
• The expenditure of the body does not exceed the amount
appropriated to it by a head of expenditure and is used for 5.3. Capacity to handle risk
the purpose for which it was appropriated.
• In so far as practical, all money owed to the body is promptly The Corporate Management Board (CMB) Risk and collected and paid into an appropriate bank account, and Governance sub-group supports the Board in their that all money owed by the body is duly paid. responsibilities for monitoring and reviewing risk management, processes and good governance within the
• The body keeps proper accounts of all its financial States funded bodies and advise them on the adequacy transactions and proper records of those accounts. and effectiveness of risk management arrangements. The
• The records of the body are promptly provided when sub-group members include the Treasurer of the States required by the Treasurer for the production of the annual and several other Accounting Officers.
financial statement.
During 2012, the sub-group's Terms of Reference were
• The body is administered in a prudent and economical updated to better reflect the group's responsibility to manner. coordinate and update CMB on the different groups across the organisation with expertise in risk management, such
• The resources of the body are used efficiently and as the Insurance Risk Forum and the Emergency Planning effectively. Board.
• The provisions of the Law in their application to the body
are otherwise complied with. The States of Jersey approach to risk management is set out in a Financial Direction. The requirements of the
The same financial responsibility extends to the financial Direction cover identifying, evaluating and assessing resources of the special funds for which an Accounting risks, identifying responses to risk, and monitoring and Officer is also responsible. reviewing progress.
In discharging these statutory duties, an Accounting Officer 5.4. The risk and control framework is responsible for ensuring that there is a sound system of
internal control and corporate governance which includes Risk management
arrangements for the management of risk.
The CMB needs to be confident that their governance Each Accounting Officer has formally recorded in a arrangements are operating effectively. They have to Statement on Internal Control (SIC) the basis upon which know that they will identify, manage and minimise the risks they believe their duties have been properly discharged inherent in the provision of public services and that they during 2012 for their area(s) of responsibility. These will be able to achieve their strategic objectives. documents are a key element of the States of Jersey
internal control framework and outline the arrangements A proposed assurance framework as endorsed by the Audit in place and the improvements being made in internal Committee will be taken to the CMB Risk and Governance control procedures across the organisation. sub-group for them to facilitate its early adoption across the
States of Jersey via the CMB. This assurance framework The States of Jersey SIC summarises the high level provides the organisation with a simple but comprehensive arrangements, and considers controls, risks and action method for effectively managing the principal risks to plans from a States wide perspective. meeting its objectives. It also provides a structure for
acquiring and examining the evidence to support this
SIC. By contributing to more pertinent reporting and the
prioritisation of action plans, the framework will, in turn,
allow for more effective performance management.
The obligation for Accounting Officers to sign an annual SIC be debated by the States Assembly in 2013. The majority heightens the need for the CMB to be able to demonstrate of the proposed amendments aim to improve corporate that they have been properly informed about the totality of governance arrangements across the organisation their risks, whether in the provision of public services or and include, for example, the remit and authority of the public safety or in organisational matters. To do this they Treasurer of the States, the extension of the role of need to be able to show – to give "assurance" – that they Accounting Officers and the formal establishment of the have systematically identified their objectives, managed Fiscal Policy Panel within the Law.
the principal risks to achieving them and identified any The States of Jersey administers a variety of special funds significant weaknesses that need to be overcome. which consist of funds entrusted to the States of Jersey, or
given for a specific purpose. The Treasury, with the help of Departments continue to maintain and improve their the Bailiff , is in the process of setting up an oversight board departmental risk management strategies and control and drafting a Financial Direction on Charitable Funds and framework. These pieces of work will be used to feed into Bequests which will include governance arrangements, the overarching Risk Register. Further work has started on acceptance of funds and the day-to-day administration of the States of Jersey Risk Register, which includes looking those funds.
at other existing risk registers such as the Community Risk
Register, to ensure there is no duplication of effort. Financial Directions
Marsh Risk Consulting has been appointed to work with Financial Directions help ensure the proper stewardship departments to conduct an external evaluation of the and administration of the Law and of the public finances current business continuity management arrangements of Jersey. Accounting Officers are required to comply with across a range of States departments. The States of the Financial Directions and other key controls, including Jersey is committed to ensuring arrangements are in departmental risk management measures, and resource place to support an appropriate, effective response to management policies issued by Corporate Human any serious incident that may impact its ability to deliver Resources and, where appropriate, the Information critical services and support the community it serves, and Services Department.
this initiative will identify gaps in the current programme
and help develop a realistic action plan to improve its Work on ensuring that the framework of Financial organisational resilience where appropriate. Directions is fit for purpose continues in consultation with
key stakeholders. The process for the revision of existing In 2012, staff from every States department, the Directions and for the writing of new requirements not emergency services, religious leaders and voluntary already covered by the framework begins with the drafting organisations attended a three-day course training for of an initial version by the Treasury for technical review scenarios involving mass fatalities. Bringing these groups by officers with relevant expertise. Revisions are made together is vital for the authorities to be prepared and for where necessary and the updated draft is then issued for Islanders to be reassured that should an awful situation consultation. Post consultation, all stakeholder comments occur we are in a position to deal with it professionally and are collated and addressed, with further changes made to competently. the draft where appropriate. The Final draft of the Direction
is then presented to the Treasurer for her approval and A great deal of work has also been done to improve subsequent issue.
emergency planning relationships between Jersey,
Guernsey, the United Kingdom and France, with increased During 2012, a total of 10 Financial Directions went out to collaboration on testing our planning and response to any consultation and a further 8 were issued by the Treasurer, emergency, as well as exchanging good practice and new providing requirements on matters as diverse as ideas. contingency allocations and balance sheet reconciliations.
At the end of the year, 3 Directions were at the final drafting Emergency planning in Jersey is managed collaboratively stage of completion and 6 were pending issue.
by the States of Jersey Emergencies Council, the
Emergency Planning Board and the Emergency Planning Work on the framework will continue during 2013, and Officer. Each of the aforementioned has a key role to play it is envisaged that Directions covering the key areas in planning for, and responding to, any major emergency or of financial management will have been updated where disaster in Jersey, or one elsewhere that will have a direct necessary and issued by the end of the year. Additional impact on the Island. In 2010 a major incident exercise planned work on the framework in 2013 includes a review was carried out to test the strengths and weaknesses of of exemptions permitted under existing Directions. emergency plans in place. The plans were tested in a real
life situation in 2012 (and were still found to be adequate) Objective setting
when the gas works fire and gas leak was declared a major
incident. The Fire and Rescue Service and all of the other The States' strategic and financial planning process is used emergency services along with community groups played to set priorities and objectives and then allocate resources. a key role in bringing the incident to a safe conclusion, The States Strategic Plan proposes the strategic priorities despite thousands of people needing to be evacuated of each new Council of Ministers (CoM) which are then from their homes. approved in the States. In 2012, the first Medium Term
Financial Plan (MTFP) 2013-2015 was approved, and for Governance the first time provides the resources identified to deliver
the States strategic priorities over a period of three The Law was amended in 2011 to align with the move by years, equivalent to the current electoral cycle. The 2012 the States of Jersey to medium term financial planning. A Business Plan was the last under the previous process of second tranche of amendments to the Law are planned to one year budgeting and objective setting.
69
Each department has established its own management service pressures. The same information is also presented structure and processes to set key objectives. These to the CMB on a monthly basis. In addition to this a report objectives, which are now for three years and are linked is taken to the States Assembly every six months to inform to the States of Jersey strategic priorities, are set out in them of any budget movements approved in accordance the Annex to the MTFP 2013-15 and are used to manage with the Law and Ministerial Scheme of Delegation. performance. A structured process is in place to measure
progress against these objectives and the States Strategic Financial Reporting
Plan and this is used to inform the planning and decision
making processes. An annual Performance Report is From 2010 the Financial Report and Accounts have been produced in addition to the Financial Report and Accounts. prepared fully in line with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP), as interpreted for the States of Jersey The Treasury have developed a draft Long Term by the Financial Reporting Manual (JFReM). The JFReM Capital Plan, in conjunction with all States departments, is based on the UK version of the same document, which identifying the priorities for capital allocations over the is prepared by HM Treasury and is subject to scrutiny next 20 years, on which the detailed 3 year programme by an independent board, the Financial Reporting and for the MTFP was based. Extending planning horizons is a Advisory Board. Accounting Standards are not static, and recurrent theme within the States with work underway with the JFReM is updated on an annual basis.
Accounting Officers on sustainable long term planning and
the development of a Long Term Revenue Plan to cover a For 2010 and 2011, the States of Jersey adopted the period of 7 to 8 years and two MTFPs. standards implemented by the UK central government
with a two year delay. In 2010 the UK moved to reporting The current MTFP approves the savings proposals for all under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). departments from the Comprehensive Spending Review This was used as an opportunity to reduce the delay in (CSR) which will have delivered over £60 million of adoption of standards by the States of Jersey to a single recurring savings from 2011 to 2015. year, and so the JFReM for 2012 adopts IFRS in line with
the UK FReM for the year ending March 2011.
Ministerial decision-making
The move to IFRS involves considerable revision to the Each department is required to comply with the Guidelines Accounts and an increase in the depth of disclosures for Recording Ministerial Decisions issued by the Chief required in the notes, and in recognition of this the States Minister's Department so as to ensure that all Ministerial began preparation for the transition in 2010. As part of Decisions are properly and accurately recorded. this work, the UK version of the IFRS compliant manual
was reviewed in detail at an early stage, and the impact Financial Management of adopting the relevant standards assessed. This gave
sufficient time for the States to take appropriate action, There continues to be considerable effort made to continue including the delivery of training to members of the finance to improve financial management across the States of function on key matters relating to the conversion by an Jersey by means of training and development offered to external tuition provider in 2011 and by the Treasury in both finance staff and budget holders, including Managing 2012. In addition, the finance function, via the forums Finance workshops for primary and lower level budget of the Finance Advisory Board and of the Financial holders. Budget holders have access to the financial Management and Reporting Group, has been receiving reporting system which provides them with reports on regular progress reports on the implementation of IFRS. actuals, budgets and variances in order for them to This includes highlighting areas of work required before effectively manage their area(s). Regular meetings are the 31 December 2012 that departments needed to be held between departments and Treasury which allows aware of.
departmental financial positions to be understood in-year
and gives the Treasury the overall position for the States 5.5. Review of effectiveness of the which is reported to CMB and CoM.
system of internal control
The States of Jersey manages the cost of insurance by
operating a level of self-insurance. The current process Accounting Officers have responsibility for maintaining for doing this, while robust, is not formalised. Part of the a system of internal control and for monitoring its second tranche of Law amendments proposes the formal effectiveness. Their review is informed by:
inclusion of the Insurance Fund into the Law. This Fund
will continue to manage insurance claims up to agreed • The Audit Committee;
limits and allow for receipts and payments for insurance
matters within a formalised structure but outside of the • The plans and work of both internal and external normal financial allocation process. auditors and management's action in response to their
recommendations;
Corporate Reporting
• The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG);
Reports that cover both revenue and capital are taken
to the CoM on a quarterly basis. 2012 was also the first • The Public Accounts Committee (PAC);
year that a mid-year report was published to the States,
based on the second quarter position, to further improve • Scrutiny Panels; and
accessibility to States of Jersey financial performance
information. The increase in information provided has • Departmental processes including specific reviews been well received by the Council and allows Ministers an commissioned by management.
70 opportunity to ask questions that they may have around key
Audit Committee Internal Audit provides an independent and objective
review and advisory service to:
The Audit Committee met four times in 2012 and includes
three independent members. The Committee has taken 1. Provide assurance to the CMB that the States of the opportunity to modify its Terms of Reference, with Jersey's financial and operational controls designed 2012 being the first full year with its current membership. to manage the organisation's risks and achieve the A minimum of two independent members need to be organisation's objectives are operating in an efficient, present for the meeting to be deemed quorate, and the effective and ethical manner; and
following States officers are also required to attend: the
Chief Executive, the Treasurer of the States and the Chief 2. Assist management in improving the organisation's Internal Auditor. business performance.
The Audit Committee continues to make progress in terms The Chief Internal Auditor has a duty to prepare an Audit of discharging its responsibilities to provide constructive Strategic Business Plan which will outline the strategic challenge to assist Accounting Officers in their assurance direction of the States of Jersey's Internal Audit function on the adequacy of control and governance processes in over the same period as the MTFP and details the specific place. audit activity that will be undertaken in the first year.
During its meeting held on the 26th November 2012, the The Chief Internal Auditor prepares, for the Audit Audit Committee decided that it would change its annual Committee's consideration, an Internal Audit Annual cycle to find a better fit to the work it performs. To this Audit Work Plan in a form agreed with the Committee. In end, the Audit Committee will effectively meet its annual accordance with article 36 (2) of the Law, the times and objectives once the States of Jersey Financial Report and frequency of those audits shall be determined by the Chief Accounts have been completed and an opinion issued by Internal Auditor with the agreement of the Treasurer.
the external auditors. The Audit Committee annual cycle
has therefore moved from January to December, to July Internal Audit reviews cover all programmes and activities to June. of the States of Jersey over a period of time, together with
associated entities as provided for in relevant business Internal Audit agreements, memoranda of understanding or contracts.
Internal Audit activity encompasses the review of all The previous States of Jersey Chief Internal Auditor financial and non-financial policies and operations. resigned in January 2012. The subsequent appointment
of a new Chief Internal Auditor afforded the opportunity to Seven of the 33 reviews from the 2012 and 2011 Audit look at the processes and practices that were in place, and Plans, which have been completed, formally approved ways in which they could be improved to create a more by the relevant Accounting Officer and subsequently efficient and effective Internal Audit service. Whilst that formally issued, were not rated for adequacy of the control review is on-going, several improvements have already environment. A rating or grading of the control environment been implemented, such as a new Audit Charter, which may not be applicable where the review is advisory or has been approved by the Corporate Management Board investigatory.
on the advice of the States of Jersey Audit Committee and
that clearly sets out the framework for the conduct of the The remaining 26 reports provided ratings of the control Internal Audit function. environment operating in the areas and scope reviewed.
The grades attached to those reports are summarised in An Audit and Risk Management IT system has been the chart below together with a comparison to 2010 and purchased and is currently being implemented. This 2011.
will provide many benefits such as a structured filing
management process, more consistent reporting, with Management is responsible for implementing Internal clearer agreed action plans and greatly enhanced Audit recommendations within agreed timescales reporting analysis across the Internal Audit remit. and in a number of departments this is achieved by
senior management teams monitoring and considering In 2007 a decision was made to provide Internal Audit outstanding recommendations at their monthly/quarterly services by means of a co-sourced service, led by the Chief meetings. From 2013 Internal Audit will become Internal Auditor. The internal resource is being enhanced more active in confirming the implementation of Audit from 2013, and now consists of the Chief Internal Auditor, recommendations and declarations of implementation will a Project Director, 2 Audit Managers, a Senior Auditor be sampled and tested.
and an Administrator. This structure will lead to a reduced
requirement from the external provider. However, their Accounting Officers are asked to confirm any outstanding services remain key to the successful delivery of the Internal Audit recommendations in their 2012 Statement Internal Audit function to the States of Jersey. on Internal Control.
A tender process was held at the end of 2012, to appoint our external provider, which resulted in BDO being awarded the contract for a further 3 years.
71
80% 71% 73%
70%
60%
50%
40%
27%
30% 21% 23%
20%
10% 4% 8%
0% 2% 0% 0%
Performing Adequate Inadequate Unacceptable
well
Each Audit report rates the area of review on a four point scale, with 4 being the highest. A number of Internal Audit reports were finalised after 31 December 2012
and are excluded from the summary of results in
Table 1 below.
Table 1 – Summary of Internal Audit Reports finalised during 2012
External Audit "In recent weeks, discussion of a Report that I published
concerning the failed transaction to acquire Lime Grove The external auditors, Price waterhouseCoopers LLP, House has centred on issues of process which has make recommendations for improvement based on obscured the issues raised by the Report itself.
their annual audit of the States of Jersey Financial
Report and Accounts. The agreed actions are then It is unacceptable for my discharge of my responsibilities reported in communication to the Minister for Treasury to become a public issue in this way. Consequently, I have and Resources. Progress against implementation is decided that it is in the best interests of the Office that I monitored and routinely reported to the Audit Committee. should resign with immediate effect."
Any outstanding recommendations are picked up by the
external auditors as part of the audit for the following year. The resignation highlighted a lack of resilience in the current Reference can be made to the Auditors' Report in the 2012 structure of the C&AG's office. It left a regrettable gap in Financial Report and Accounts for further information on cover for a period of some months. For practical purposes the responsibilities of the external auditors. the external auditors remained in place uninterrupted and
therefore the States were able to conduct business with The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG) the auditors in the normal way.
The C&AG examines how public money is spent, and The appointment of a new C&AG with effect from 1 looks at how best value for money can be achieved by February 2013 was approved by the States in January managing finances to the highest standards. Specifically, 2013.
the C&AG considers and reports to the States on:
The new C&AG gave some initial feedback after having
- The effectiveness of the internal financial controls; met with her key stakeholders during her first visit in her new role. She is currently considering how best to develop
- Economical, effective and efficient use of resources; a framework that provides clarity both for the C&AG post and holder and their stakeholders.
- The corporate governance arrangements. Public Accounts Committee (PAC)
In each case, the Comptroller makes recommendations to The role of the PAC is to receive reports from the C&AG bring about any necessary improvement. and to report to the States on any significant issues arising.
It also examines the States of Jersey Financial Report Reports published by the C&AG during 2012 include and Accounts to assess whether public funds have been Utilisation of Compromise Agreements' (March 2012) and applied economically, efficiently and effectively. The PAC The proposed acquisition of Lime Grove House - Report' also reports directly to the States Assembly. Departments (May 2012). have continued to build productive working relationships
with the PAC during 2012, and a number of hearings and The C&AG resigned unexpectedly on 29 June 2012. This briefings took place during the year which included: followed a lengthy investigation and subsequent reports
into the proposed acquisition of Lime Grove House for use • Monthly meetings of the Treasurer with a PAC Officer as a replacement Police Station. This matter had become • Hearing on Compromise Agreements (April 2012)
the subject of press and public comment. In his resignation • Briefing on Tax Policy (June 2012)
letter the C&AG said: • Briefing on the 2011 Accounts process (Sept 2012)
• Hearing on Treasury and Resources matters (October 2012)
Reviews undertaken by the PAC during 2012 include Compromise Agreements - Following up the investigations of the Comptroller and Auditor General – Report' (July 2012) and Management of Bus Contracts: Following up the investigations of the Comptroller and Auditor General
– Report' (August 2012).
73
Scrutiny Panels
The role of the Scrutiny Panels is to protect the public interest by examining policy decisions. Scrutiny reports acknowledge good practice and, where necessary, recommend change and improvement to services or government policies. A summary of 2012 Scrutiny reviews are shown in Table 2 below. Scrutiny reports are followed up by the relevant panel to establish whether recommendations have been implemented.
Table 2 – Scrutiny Panel reviews during 2012
• • • • • • •
•
• •
• • •
• •
• •
Departments have also continued to build productive working relationships with the Scrutiny Panels during 2012. A number of hearings and briefings took place between the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel (CSSP) and Treasury and Resources during the year, the details of which are summarised in Table 3.
Table 3 – CSSP hearings
and briefings with Treasury
and Resources during 2012
Top Areas Covered
Topic areas covered:
Visit to Treasury and Resources – Treasury The work of the Minister for Treasury and and Resources (January 2012) Resources (T&R) and of the T&R
Department, and how they assist the CSSP in the achievement of its aims and objectives. Members of the T&R SMT provided a briefing to the Panel on their service areas.
CSSP Quarterly Hearing with the Minister for A number of areas were covered, for Treasury and Resources Quarterly Hearing example, the Strategic Plan, the MTFP, the (February 2012) CSR, developments in tax policy, property
matters and proposed changes to the Law.
Briefing on the MTFP (March 2012) The Resources Statement for the Strategic
Plan, the early work on the Long Term
Capital Plan and the timetable for the MTFP
process and how Scrutiny would be involved. Briefing on Pensions (April 2012) The States employees' pension schemes
(PECRS and JTSF), the main drivers for
change, the Technical Working Group Report
and the options for the way forward. There
was also discussion regarding repayment of
the PECRS pre-1987 debt.
Visit to Treasury and Resources – Gigabit Confidential meeting on the Gigabit Jersey Jersey (April 2012) proposals.
Meeting with the Minister for Treasury and The C&AG's recommendations in respect of Resources - C&AG's Reports (April 2012) compromise agreements.
CSSP Quarterly Hearing with the Minister for A number of topics were covered, for Treasury and Resources (May 2012) example, progress on the MTFP, monitoring
financial performance against budget, the impact on the MTFP of the Health White Paper and funding arrangements, proposed changes to the Law, developments in tax policy.
Briefing on the MTFP (May 2012) The 1st Draft (or working) version of the
MTFP document. A supporting presentation was given to the Panel.
Briefing on the MTFP (June 2012) Identification and assessment by the CSSP of
the impact of the MTFP on the T&R Department.
Briefing on the MTFP (July 2012) The updated MTFP pack, which contained a
revised presentation on the state of the Island's finances, a near final draft of the MTFP Report and Appendices, a copy of all departmental objectives approved by the CoM for inclusion in the Department Annex, and a sample of the format of a Department
Annex using EDD as an example.
Hearing on the MTFP (August 2012) A number of areas were covered, for
example, progress towards the achievement of corporate procurement savings and property matters.
Corporate Services (MTFP) Sub-Panel MTFP A number of topics were covered, for Review (Sept 2012) example, the Island's economic
circumstances and how they will develop during the course of the MTFP, development of anti-avoidance mechanisms, and departmental base budgets and growth bids.
Hearing on the 2013 Budget (November A number of areas were covered, for
2012) example Budget amendments, income tax
thresholds impots duties, and stamp duty and
land transaction tax proposals. 75
Departmental processes
Accounting Officers also rely on mechanisms imple- mented at departmental level to gain comfort over the effectiveness of internal control with their department, for example compliance/sample testing, internal reviews by senior management teams, external reviews, dedicated compliance teams, and the completion of Assurance Statements by key budget holders.
- Significant internal control issues
The Treasurer of the States has determined the most significant internal control issues to include in this Statement on Internal Control, based on her awareness of the major issues facing the organisation. The significant issues that have arisen in 2012 are shown in Table 4 below.
Table 4 – 2012 Significant internal control issues
Issue Potential Risk Action(s)
Legal action by Harcourt That the plaintiffs are The Solicitor General is representing the Developments: successful in their Minister for Treasury and Resources in
actions against the defending the case being made against the Legal action is being taken against the
Minister for Treasury States of Jersey.
States of Jersey Development Company and Resources.
by Harcourt Developments in relation to
their claim that terms within a
Development Agreement were not
negotiated in good faith and with due
diligence. Unexpectedly, the Minister for
Treasury and Resources from 2008 was
joined in to the action at a late stage.
The Solicitor General sought to get the
first Order of Justice struck out but an
adjournment was granted which resulted
in a further Order of Justice being
presented. The latest draft, the third
involving the Minister, is currently out for
comment.
Issue Potential Risk Action(s)
Office of the Comptroller and Auditor There was a On 29 January 2013, the States approved General: reduced level of the appointment of Ms. Karen McConnell as
testing of internal C&AG with effect from 1 February 2013. The C&AG resigned unexpectedly on 29 controls in the Ms. McConnell has been a full member of
June 2012. This followed a lengthy
second half of 2012. the Chartered Institute of Public Finance investigation and subsequent reports into and Accountancy (CIPFA) since 1986. She
the proposed acquisition of Lime Grove
There may be errors joined the Audit Commission in 1985, and House for use as a replacement Police in and/or omissions over her 28 year career with the
Station. This matter had become the
from the 2011 Social Commission has held several senior subject of press and public comment. In Security Funds' positions, mostly recently Senior Director
his resignation letter the C&AG said:
Accounts. and Acting Managing Director, Audit
Practice.
"In recent weeks, discussion of a Report
that I published concerning the failed The new C&AG gave some initial feedback transaction to acquire Lime Grove
House has centred on issues of process after having met her key stakeholders during her first visit in her new role. She is which has obscured the issues raised
currently considering how best to develop a by the Report itself. framework that provides clarity both for the
It is unacceptable for my discharge of C&AG post holder and their stakeholders. . my responsibilities to become a public
issue in this way. Consequently, I have
decided that it is in the best interests of
the Office that I should resign with
immediate effect."
The resignation highlighted a lack of resilience in the current structure of the C&AG's office. It left a regrettable gap in cover for a period of some months. For practical purposes the external auditors
remained in place uninterrupted and therefore the States were able to conduct business with the auditors in the normal way.
As a result, the 2011 Social Security Funds' accounts have not yet been certified.
Issue Potential Risk Action(s)
Incorrect accounting: Incorrect The accounting has been corrected and the
accounting. Treasury and external auditors informed. Inappropriate journal transfers between
The HIF accounts are to be restated.
the Health Insurance Fund (HIF) and the Satisfactory controls are now in place, Social Security Department originating in
with improved business knowledge in the 2008 and amounting to £2.5 million have Finance Team and much enhanced
been discovered. The HIF is a special
fund which falls outside of the States of variance analysis processes. An additional quarterly review process is planned which Jersey group boundary.
will further mitigate any risks.
The recruitment and retention of An inability to recruit All recruitment avenues are being explored Health and Social Services (H&SS) and retain the such as developing proposed new salary staff: correct levels of structures. Where possible bank, locum and
staff. agency staff are being employed to
The current terms and conditions for
maintain essential services.
medical staff are not attractive enough
to recruit and retain necessary staff,
particularly middle grade doctors and
specialist nurses.
The current General Hospital: The General Hospital WS Atkins International Limited (a highly
may fail to provide experienced hospital planning consultant) The current General Hospital is no longer
sufficient and was appointed in May 2012 to undertake a fit for purpose or capable of sustaining appropriate bed Pre-feasibility Spatial Assessment Project
the general and acute care requirements
capacity resulting in to identify the most appropriate location for for the population and one that is compromises to the General and Acute Hospital, taking into
embedded in the proposed new system
patient health care. consideration its needs and requirements for health and social care. Proposition both now and in the future.
P82 / 2012, as approved by the States,
makes clear that a new hospital will be
required within 10 years.
Social Services infrastructure: A poorly maintained Funds have been allocated to provide
portfolio of estates sufficient investment in these areas and
A number of areas within the Social may result in Health and Social Services have worked Services infrastructure have suffered as a
compromised with Jersey Property Holdings to make sure result of insufficient maintenance funding, patient safety and that the maintenance programme is robust
particularly in Mental Health.
care. and appropriate moving forward.
The use of compromise agreements and the position of the States Human Resources function:
The key issues identified by the PAC Value for money A succession plan for senior positions is
may not be achieved currently under development, and the policy during the follow up review on
compromise agreements include a lack of and improvement in on Reporting Serious Concerns is being
the delivery of updated as part of the States wide Policies a recognised and structured succession planning strategy for all senior positions, services may be Review. The Code of Conduct for Ministers
compromised. is in the final stages of being redrafted, and a need to act on all serious concerns
relating to behaviour promptly, a will embody an independent oversight to
facilitate greater understanding of what is deficiency in the Code of Conduct for Ministers which offers no sanctions for not acceptable behaviour and prevent past
situations from reoccurring. Funding for the transgressions. In addition, the current
States HR function is not fit for purpose HR Fit for Purpose programme has been
included in the MTFP to ensure that the HR in terms of delivering modern day HR
Progress against the significant issues identified in the 2011 Statement on Internal Control that are still ongoing in 2012 are shown in Table 5 below.
Table 5 – Progress on 2011 significant issues
Issue Action(s)
Court and Case Costs – In 2011 the Council of Ministers reviewed and agreed a proposal to deal budgeting: with the volatility of Court and Case Costs on a more permanent basis. A
Smoothing Reserve which will provide a mechanism for the States of Court and Case Costs can be Jersey to fund the peaks and troughs in costs has been agreed and
demand-led and exceptionally
implemented. To date, there has been no requirement to call on this volatile in a way that is difficult for an Reserve, which is presently held within Central Reserves and continues to
individual department to control. In
be available for exceptional Court and Case Costs.
addition, the expenditure can be so
large that departments cannot
absorb the effects of volatility in their
base line' budgets.
Comprehensive Spending Review The MTFP has approved States spending limits with agreed savings (CSR) – achievement of savings: targets which all departments are required to deliver. This approval
includes a reduced level of ESC savings, reflecting P72/2011. The ESC A Proposition to the States in June Department are committed to deliver savings of £4.801 million by 2013, 2011 (P72/2011) has restricted the increasing to £6.486 million by 2015 and £7.554 million by 2016, or to areas in which the Education, Sport identify equivalent alternative savings.
and Culture (ESC) Department can
take savings. make savings
Individual actions of Ministers – The development scheme at Uplands was revised through the formal Uplands: process of a planning application and formal review of the associated
planning obligation agreement. This is a normal planning process under The negotiation and agreement of a the remit of the Planning and Environment Minister, and in this case, the Minister for Planning and Environment and in this case, Planning Obligation Agreement by theTreasury were only asked to receive the planning gain, negTreasury were only asked to receive the planning gain,otiated via the negotiated the Minister for Planning and via the planning process.planning process.
Environment with a private
development company in respect of There was a clear reason for the developer to revise his planning approval Uplands has led to the Minister for and planning legal agreement, as the original permit required him to Treasury and Resources accepting a undertake a Homebuy scheme, which the States had subsequently
series of Housing Bonds on behalf of agreed not to pursue. It was therefore appropriate to revise the planning the public of Jersey. requirement.
The Public Accounts Committee, in their review of the 2011 Accounts, have examined accountability and responsibility matters arising from the corporation sole status of Ministers. The Committee has commented favourably on the role of the Chief Executive in addressing Jersey's "confederated" model.
Issue Action(s)
Ministerial Decision process - In early 2011 changes were made to the process whereby any significant Lime Grove: decisions were approved by the Accounting Officer prior to presentation to
the Assistant Minister.
Ministerial Decisions for Jersey
Property Holdings (JPH) followed a All Ministerial Decisions for JPH are now reviewed by the Treasurer and separate process to that adopted by other senior Treasury officers. The Assistant Minister then signs the
the rest of the Treasury and decisions. All property-related decisions above a delegation of £5 million Resources Department, with are also brought to the attention of the Minister for Treasury and decisions signed by the Assistant Resources.
Minister.
Lime Grove was the subject of reports in 2012 by the former C&AG. It had also previously been subject to a review and report by the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel. However, the procedural issues highlighted by the reviews, examples of which are detailed above, have now been in place for some time and are working well. The aim of the new C&AG is to avoid duplication of consideration of matters (such as Lime Grove) by
more than one body.
Jersey Teachers' Superannuation The JTSF Management Board has agreed the need to implement an Fund (JTSF) – administration industry standard pensions' administration system and the inherent process: controls and processes that such a system would provide. A detailed
specification and a plan are in place to deliver the new system. The
The JTSF is currently administered system has been developed and is undergoing user acceptance testing. on an Access Database with During 2012, the existing data held within the Access database has been calculations performed using Excel cleansed following analysis of the data by the new system provider. This spreadsheets. will aid the migration process and reduce the level of manual data creation
required on implementation.
Staff payments - receipt of All HR Managers receive a monthly communication reminding them of the documentation: timeframe for submission of appropriate documentation to the central
Human Resources Business Support Team and Payroll for that particular The appropriate documentation in month, which they then cascade to operational Line Managers within their respect of new starters and leavers department. Procedures in relation to under and over payments have
is not always provided by HR and been developed and are documented in a HR Policy.
line management to the Central
A Human Resources Information System Programme Board has been Payroll Unit in time for processing.
established to consider options for the delivery of a HR system that meets the business need for the future and supports the efficient processing of data.
Issue Action(s)
Grants issued by Jersey A number of policies, procedures and controls have been revised with a Enterprise (within the Economic view to clarifying and strengthening the process. This includes Development Department) – improvements to the Financial Direction on the management of grants, management of: which was re-issued in April 2012. The finance function within EDD has
supported a programme of work to promote awareness of the re-issued The management of grants awarded Financial Direction and to put some additional tools in place to assist by Jersey Enterprise has not always service directors, e.g. a new way of formulating business cases is being been effective. developed to improve decision-making and to help minimise the risks
associated with awarding grants, including better value and outcomes.
The PAC is currently reviewing the details of the grant of £200,000 to Canbedone Productions. The decision to invest in this new industry is documented in a Ministerial Decision, and the Accounting Officer and directors have not raised any concerns in terms of difficulty in complying with its provisions.
The States are due to debate the establishment of a Jersey Innovation Fund and approve the basis on which the Fund will operate and be managed. This will include procedures in relation to awarding grants. EDD have identified that there may be failures which may result in objectives not being met. This runs counter to the inherent risk averse' nature of public finance accountability, and therefore a level of failure' will need to be accepted by the States and be balanced against the positive benefits that the Fund is seeking to achieve.
- Closing statement
To the best of my knowledge, the internal control environment as summarised above has been effectively operated during the year, with the exception of the internal control matters identified above and in the individual departmental 2012 Statements on Internal Control.
John Richardson Laura Rowley
Chief Executive Officer Treasurer of the States
Date: 22 May 2013 Date: 22 May 2013
FINANCIAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2012 | INTRODUCTION TO THE ACCOUNTS
- Introduction to the Accounts
- Changes in Accounting Standards: The Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards.
The States has a strategic aim to deliver public services that are recognised as efficiently and effectively meeting people's needs. A key objective in order to achieve this is the implementation of GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) compliant accounts. 2010 was the first year in which the States produced accounts in accordance with UK GAAP as interpreted for the public sector in Jersey by the Jersey Financial Reporting Manual (JFReM).
Accounting Standards evolve over time, and the Minister for Treasury and Resources therefore decided to update the accounting standards adopted by the States on an annual basis. The JFReM is based on the UK version of the same document, which is prepared by HM Treasury and is subject to scrutiny by an independent board, the Financial Reporting and Advisory Board. In previous years
the JFReM has followed standards adopted by the UK Government with a two year delay.
In 2010 the UK moved to reporting under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and following the two year delay principle means that IFRS has been adopted by the States for 2012. However, this change has also been used as an opportunity to reduce the delay in adoption of standards to a single year. The Jersey FReM therefore adopts IFRS in line with the UK FReM for the year ending March 2011.
Note 3 of the Accounts gives details of the accounting differences between UK GAAP and IFRS, and restates in detail the previous years' statements. One of the most noticeable changes is that IFRS introduces several changes to the classification and terminology used in the Accounts, including the renaming of the Primary Statements. The table below highlights the most significant of these changes. IFRS also requires that where there has been a change in accounting policy, an opening Statement of Financial Position in addition to the current year and comparative. These accounts therefore also restate the 2010 SoFP as well as for 2011 and 2012.
Disclosures in the Accounts have also been enhanced in line with the new standards.
2011 Accounts (UK GAAP) | 2012 Accounts (IFRS) |
Operating Cost Statement (OCS) | Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure (SoCNE) |
Deficit/Surplus for the year | Net Revenue Expenditure/Income |
|
|
Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses (STRGL) | Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure (Other Comprehensive Income) |
|
|
Balance Sheet | Statement of Financial Position (SoFP) |
Fixed Assets | Property, Plant and Equipment |
Intangible Assets | |
Non-Current Assets held for Sale | |
Investments held at Fair Value through OCS | Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | |
Cash at hand and at Bank | |
Stock | Inventories |
Debtors | Receivables |
Creditors | Payables |
|
|
Reserves Note | Statement of Changes in Taxpayers' Equity (SoCiTE) |
|
|
Cash Flow Statement | Statement of Cash Flows (SoCF) |
FINANCIAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2012 | INTRODUCTION TO THE ACCOUNTS
6.1.1 Future Developments In contrast the SoCF summarises the actual movements in cash balances that have occurred in the year.
Following the Minister's new policy of following the
standards adopted by the UK Government with a one- Consolidated Statement of Changes in Taxpayers' year delay, the 2013 JFReM will be based on UK FReM Equity (previously the Reserves Note)
for the year ending 31 March 2012. Estimates of effects
of the changes in the 2013 JFReM are given in Note 1 The SoCiTE gives details of the movements in "Taxpayers'
– Accounting Policies, but would not have a significant Equity", which represents the taxpayers' interest in the impact on these Accounts. States of Jersey, and equates to both the total value of Net Assets held by the States, and an accumulation of net
- Explanation of the contents income and other gains and losses over the years.
of the Accounts
Notes to the Accounts
The main statements included in the accounts are
explained below along with an explanation of their purpose. The accounts also include a set of notes that provide
further analysis of the figures contained within the main Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net statements.
Expenditure (previously the Operating Cost Statement
(OCS) and Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Note 1 sets out the Accounting Policy used by the States Losses (STRGL) ) when preparing the Accounts, and Note 2 details any key
assumptions made when making estimates and the effect The SoCNE provides an informative analysis of the States of uncertainty in these estimates.
income and expenditure, highlighting income raised by the
States of Jersey, such as taxation and States expenditure Note 3 is a detailed restatement of previous years on social benefits, staff costs, grants and subsidies and statements, showing the changes resulting from the move other expenditure. to IFRS.
It encompasses all the entities that comprise the States Note 4 gives a Segmental Analysis of both the SoCNE of Jersey, and income and expenditure are shown net and SoFP, giving further details of how these numbers are of amounts resulting from charges within the States of made up.
Jersey.
Notes 5 to 13 give further information about the figures This statement also provides a summary of financial included in the SoCNE; and Notes 14 to 30, the SoFP.
gains and losses which are not recorded in Income and
Expenditure under the heading "Other Comprehensive The remaining notes give additional disclosures and Income". These are generally unrealised gains and losses, information about various items included in the Accounts.
such as those resulting from the revaluation of Property,
Plant and Equipment, Investments or Pension Liabilities. Annex to the Accounts
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position The Annex to the accounts primarily gives further (previously the Balance Sheet) information about the entities included within the States
of Jersey Accounts. This includes a SoCNE, a SoFP and The SoFP provides a snapshot of the States of Jersey's other information about the performance of Departments, financial position as at 31 December. It sets out what the Trading Operations, Reserves and Special Funds. States owns, what the States owes and what is owed to Additional information about General Revenue Income the States at that point in time. The figures shown exclude received is also included.
any amounts due between entities included in the States
of Jersey. It also provides further information about the changes
from the Original Business Plan which were agreed by
the States or by Ministerial Decision, and gives details of Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows all grants paid to organisations (other than those included
in Note 12). A Glossary is also included which provides Both the SoCNE and SoFP are prepared in accordance an explanation of the terminology used in this report and with the Jersey Financial Reporting Manual (which accounts.
interprets IFRS for the States of Jersey), and are therefore
prepared on an "accruals" basis, whereby income and
expenditure are matched to the period to which they
relate, not the period in which a movement of cash occurs.
FINANCIAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2012 | AUDITOR'S REPORT
- Auditors' report
This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting
policies are appropriate to the States of Jersey's
circumstances and have been consistently applied and Independent Auditors' Report to the adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant
Minister for Treasury and Resources of accounting estimates made by the Treasurer; and the the States of Jersey overall presentation of the financial statements. In addition,
we read all the financial and non-financial information in
the Financial Report to identify material inconsistencies
with the audited financial statements. If we become aware We have audited the annual financial statement on the of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies
Accounts of the States of Jersey ("the Accounts") for we consider the implications for our report. We are also the year ended 31 December 2012 in accordance with required to obtain evidence sufficient to give reasonable the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005. The Accounts assurance that the expenditure and income recorded in comprise the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive the Accounts properly represented the activities of the Net Expenditure, the Consolidated Statement of Financial States.
Position, the Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Taxpayers' Equity, the Consolidated Statement of Cash Opinion on the Accounts
Flows and the related notes. The financial reporting In our opinion the Accounts:
framework that has been applied in their preparation
is applicable law and International Financial Reporting • give a true and fair view, in accordance with the Public Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union as Finances (Jersey) Law 2005, of the state of the States of interpreted for the States of Jersey by the Jersey Financial Jersey's affairs as at 31 December 2012 and of the income Reporting Manual. and expenditure and cash flows for the year then ended;
• properly represent the activities of the States;
Respective responsibilities of the Treasurer of the
States of Jersey, the Comptroller and Auditor General • have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs of the States and auditors as adopted by the European Union as interpreted for
the States of Jersey by the Jersey Financial Reporting As explained more fully in the Statement of Responsibilities Manual; and
for the Financial Report and Accounts, the Treasurer
is responsible for the preparation of the Accounts in • have been prepared in accordance with the requirements accordance with the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005 of the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005.
and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view in
accordance with the Jersey Financial Reporting Manual. Opinion on other matters
The Comptroller and Auditor General's responsibilities are In our opinion, the information given in the Minister's to ensure that the Accounts are audited within 5 months of Report, the Treasurer's Report, the Remuneration Report, the end of the financial year. We have been appointed by the Statement on Internal Control and the Annex is the Comptroller and Auditor General to audit and express consistent with the Accounts.
an opinion on the Accounts in accordance with relevant
legal and regulatory requirements and International Matters on which we are required to report by Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards exception
require us to comply with the Auditing Practices We have nothing to report in respect of the following Board's Ethical Standards for Auditors. matters where the Comptroller and Auditor General
requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
This report, including the opinion, has been prepared for
and only for the Minister for Treasury and Resources of the • proper accounting records have not been kept, or proper States of Jersey in accordance with the Public Finances returns adequate for our audit have not been received (Jersey) Law 2005 and for no other purpose. We do not, in from States' funded bodies not visited by us; or
giving this opinion, accept or assume responsibility for any
• the States' Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
other purpose or to any other person to whom this report
Net Expenditure, the Consolidated Statement of Financial is shown or into whose hands it may come save where
Position are not in agreement with the accounting records expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.
and returns; or
The maintenance and integrity of the States of Jersey's • we have identified any evidence in the course of our website is the responsibility of the States of Jersey; normal audit work that suggests that proper practice and the work carried out by the auditors does not involve the requirements of the 2005 Law may not have been consideration of these matters and, accordingly, the followed by any of the Accounting Officers; or
auditors accept no responsibility for any changes that may
have occurred to the financial statements since they were • we have not received all the information and explanations initially presented on the website. Legislation in Jersey we require for our audit.
governing the preparation and dissemination of financial
statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Scope of the audit of the Accounts
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts Price waterhouseCoopers LLP
and disclosures in the Accounts sufficient to give Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors
reasonable assurance that the Accounts are free from 7 More London Riverside, London, SE1 2RT 84 material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. Date: 30 May 2013
FINANCIAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2012 | AUDITOR'S REPORT
Reporting of financial performance of individual Report of the Comptroller and Auditor services and against budget
General to the States Assembly
The financial statements by their nature provide information
about the States as a whole. They are an essential tool
of accountability but do not on their own provide all the In accordance with Article 47(3) of the Public Finances information that is necessary to demonstrate effective
(Jersey) Law 2005, I report the following matters that stewardship of funds raised by compulsory taxation. There should receive the attention of the States. is a strong interest, including on the part of the States
Assembly, in information about financial performance at a Accounting boundary disaggregated level over time and against budget.
Financial statements record what an entity owns and The financial statements are accompanied by a very what it owes, what it raised and earnt and what it spent. detailed annex providing disaggregated information. This Defining the entity is therefore crucial to what the financial annex is not subject to audit.
statements contain. Where an entity controls' another
entity, alongside the single entity' accounts group In my view the usefulness of the information could be accounts' are prepared that include the transactions of the enhanced by:
controlled entity. The preparation of such group accounts
provides a more comprehensive view of the financial • Considering whether greater value could be secured by performance of the entity. presenting less information more targeted at the needs
of users; and
In the commercial sector the accounting boundary' and • Adopting clear definitions for coding of expenditure within the identification of entities for inclusion in group accounts both estimates and the annex to enhance the ability to are determined by accounting standards. For the States, scrutinize performance across time and against budget. these matters are determined by the Jersey Financial
Reporting Manual. The assets, liabilities and transactions I will be discussing these issues with the Treasurer with of the Health Insurance Fund, Social Security Fund and a view to establishing a timetable for changes to be Social Security (Reserve) Fund are not included in the introduced.
financial statements of the States and, in my view, this
makes it more difficult for the reader of the financial
statements to gain a full understanding of the financial
position and financial performance of the States.
In my view the States should reconsider the accounting
boundary and whether or not to prepare group accounts
so as to provide more meaningful and comprehensive financial information. Presenting the results of the Health Insurance Fund, Social Security Fund and Social Security (Reserve) Fund within the financial statements of the States would of course in no way change the status of those funds or the controls over the application of the Karen McConnell
funds. Comptroller and Auditor General
I have started discussions with the Treasurer and the Morier House, St Helier, Jersey, JE1 1DD external auditors with a view to changes being introduced
to the 2013 financial statements. 30 May 2013
- Primary Statements
States of Jersey Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure (Operating Cost Statement) for the year ended 31 December 2012
Notes 2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Revenue
Levied by the States of Jersey
Taxation revenue 5 477,056 513,542 Island rates, duties, fees, fines and penalties 5 93,124 95,779 Total Revenue Levied by the States of Jersey 570,180 609,321
Earned through Operations
Sales of goods and services | 5 |
| 142,134 |
| 147,340 |
Investment income | 5, 8 |
| 29,993 |
| 86,968 |
Other revenue | 5 |
| 50,709 |
| 18,735 |
Total Revenue Earned through Operations 222,836 253,043 Total Revenue 793,016 862,364
Expenditure
Social Benefit Payments 6, 10 166,256 164,793 Staff costs 6, 11 348,827 351,540 Other Operating expenses 6 212,414 198,774 Grants and Subsidies payments 6, 12 37,960 35,463 Depreciation and Amortisation 6 46,426 51,934 Impairments 6 9,858 26,066 Gains on disposal of non-current assets (2,718) (492) Finance costs 6, 13 15,465 15,048 Net foreign-exchange losses 438 168 Movement in pension liability (5,911) (50,956)
Total Expenditure 829,015 792,338 Net Revenue Expenditure/(Income) 35,999 (70,026)
Other Comprehensive (Income)/Expenditure
Revaluation of Property, Plant and Equipment (137,374) (304,500) (Gain)/Loss on Revaluation of Strategic Investments during the period (72,400) 8,100 Reclassification adjustments for gains/losses included in Net Revenue Expenditure - 9,500
Loss/(Gain) on Revaluation of Other Available for Sale Investments during the period 458 (73) Reclassification adjustments for gains/losses included in Net Revenue Expenditure - -
Actuarial Loss in respect of Defined Benefit Pension Schemes 92 452
Total Other Comprehensive Income (209,224) (286,521) Total Comprehensive Income (173,225) (356,547)
States of Jersey Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (Balance Sheet) as at 31 December 2012
Notes 1 Jan 2011 31 Dec 2011 31 Dec 2012
£'000 £'000 £'000
Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment 14 2,752,125 2,908,734 3,171,573 Intangible Assets 15 10,319 10,163 9,823 Loans & Advances 17 15,848 12,600 10,083 Strategic Investments 18 254,000 326,400 288,800 Other Available for Sale Investments 18 14,397 14,335 14,589 Infrastructure Investments 19 - - 10,000 Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss 20 513,019 557,104 577,623 Derivative Financial Instruments expiring after more than one year 28 - 201 230 Trade and Other Receivables 22 11 9 7 Total Non-Current Assets 3,559,719 3,829,546 4,082,728
Current Assets
Non-Current Assets classified as held for sale 16 6,094 3,264 538 Inventories 21 29,767 32,195 33,113 Loans & Advances 17 2,049 2,446 1,739 Derivative Financial Instruments expiring within one year 28 - 98 263 Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss 20 272,050 241,090 312,756 Trade and Other receivables 22 110,518 117,982 114,735 Cash and Cash Equivalents 23 207,916 163,228 143,137 Total Current Assets 628,394 560,303 606,281
Total Assets 4,188,113 4,389,849 4,689,009
Current Liabilities
Trade and Other Payables 24 117,339 125,713 138,830 Currency in Circulation 25 92,779 90,596 90,470 Finance Lease Obligations 26 2,862 3,076 1,964 Provisions for liabilities and charges 27 4,448 22,660 1,327 Total Current Liabilities 217,428 242,045 232,591
Total Assets Less Current Liabilities 3,970,685 4,147,804 4,456,418
Non-Current Liabilities
Trade and Other Payables 24 - - - Finance Lease Obligations 26 14,062 10,986 9,022 Provisions for liabilities and charges 27 6,263 8,180 6,861 Derivative Financial Instruments expiring after more than one year 28 2 2 4 PECRS Pre-1987 Past Service Liability 29 265,435 247,852 246,127 Provision for JTSF Past Service Liability 29 114,000 135,100 97,747 Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Net Liability 30 11,152 11,493 9,282 Total Non-Current Liabilities 410,914 413,613 369,043
Assets Less Liabilities 3,559,771 3,734,191 4,087,375 Taxpayers' Equity
Accumulated Revenue and Other Reserves 3,125,745 3,093,384 3,168,355 Revaluation Reserve 230,005 364,875 664,110 Donated Asset Reserve 39,084 39,053 35,558 Capital Grant Reserve - - - Investment Reserve 164,937 236,879 219,352
Total Taxpayers' Equity 3,559,771 3,734,191 4,087,375
Senator Philip Ozouf Laura Rowley MBA CPFA
Treasurer of the States Date: 29 May 2013 Date: 29 May 2013
States of Jersey Consolidated Statement of Changes in Taxpayers' Equity for the year ended
31 December 2012
States of Jersey Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
for the year ended 31 December 2012
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Cash Flows from Operating Actvities
Net Revenue (Expenditure)/Income (35,999) 70,026
Adjustments for non-operating activities
Investment Income (40,203) (45,926) Losses/(Gains) on Financial Assets 10,210 (41,042) Interest Expense 15,336 14,901
Adjustments for non-cash transactions
Depreciation of Property, Plant and Equipment 44,004 49,899 Amortisation of Intangible Assets 2,422 2,035 Impairments of Non-Current Assets 7,793 21,515 Gain on disposal of Non-Current Assets (2,718) (492) Impairments of Available for Sale Financial Assets 31 (31) Movement in Pension Liabilities 3,895 (41,584) Interest on Past Service Liaiblities (14,256) (13,979)
Increase/(Decrease) in Provisions 20,129 (22,652) Decrease in Currency in Circulation (2,183) (126)
Operating Cash Flows before movements in working Capital 8,461 (7,456)
Adjsutments for movements in Working Capital
Increase in Inventories (2,428) (918) (Increase)/Decrease in Trade and Other Receivables (7,437) 3,122 Increase inTrade and Other Payables 6,002 14,327
Net cash generated from Operating Activities 4,598 9,075
Cash flows from Investing Activities
Purchase of Property, Plant and Equipment (69,344) (36,626) Purchase of Intangible assets (2,266) (1,695) Proceeds on disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment 796 476 Proceeds on disposal of Intangible Assets - - Proceeds on assets held for sale 6,052 4,705
Interest received 18,862 19,779 Dividends received 21,263 26,274
Loans and Advances made - - Loans and Advances repaid 2,862 3,224
Proceeds on available for sale financial assets 40 40 Proceeds on settlement of Derivatives - 190 Proceeds on redemption of Strategic Investment - 20,000
Issue of Infrastructure Investment - (10,000)
Purchases of Financial Assets held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss (1,056,373) (667,118) Proceeds on disposal of Financial Assets held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss 1,032,785 615,504
Net Cash used in from Investing Activities (45,323) (25,247)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Capital Element of Finance Lease Rental Payments (2,862) (3,076) Interest element of Finance Lease payments (1,036) (843) Other Interest Paid (44) (79)
Net Cash used in Financing Activities (3,942) (3,998) Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents (44,667) (20,170)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the beginning of the period 207,916 163,228 (Losses)/Gains on Cash and Cash Equivalents (21) 79
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the end of the period 163,228 143,137
Contents: Notes to the Accounts
- Accounting Policies 92-102
- Critical Accounting Judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty 103-104
- First Time Adoption of IFRS, and Prior Period Amendments 105-111
- Segmental Analysis 112-115
- Revenue 116
- Expenditure 117
- Non-Cash Items and other Significant Items included in Net Revenue Expenditure 118-119
- Investment Income 120
- Gains and Losses on Financial Assets 121
- Social Benefit Payments 122
- Staff Costs 123
- Grants 124-125
- Finance Costs 126
- Property, Plant and Equipment 127-130
- Intangible Assets 131
- Non-Current Assets Held for Sale 132-133
- Loans and Advances 134
- Available For Sale Financial Assets 135-137
- Infrastructure Investments 138
- Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss 139
- Inventories 140
- Trade and Other Receivables 141-142
- Cash and Cash Equivalents 143
- Trade and Other Payables 144
- Currency in Circulation 145
- Finance Lease Obligations 146
- Provisions 147
- Derivative Financial Instruments 148-150
- Past Service Liabilities 151-152
- Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Recognised on the Statement of Financial Position 153-155
- Capital Commitments 156
- Commitments under Operating Leases: The States as Lessee 157
- Commitments under Operating Leases: The States as Lessor 158
- Risk Profile and Financial Instruments 159-162
- SOJ Common Investment Fund 163-166
- Contingent Assets and Liabilities 167-168
- Losses and Special Payments 169
- Gifts 170
- Related Party Transactions 170-172
- Third Party Assets 173
- Entities within the Group Boundary 174
- Events after the Reporting Date 175
- Publication and Distribution of the Financial Report and Accounts 175
Note 1 – Statement of Significant Accounting Policies
- Introduction
- These accounts have been prepared in accordance with the States of Jersey Financial Reporting Manual (JFReM) issued by the Treasurer of the States in order to meet the requirements of the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005. The accounting policies contained in the JFReM apply International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adapted or interpreted for the Public Sector in Jersey. These Accounts are prepared on a going concern basis.
- The JFReM applicable to the 2012 financial year (including comparators) is based on the UK Financial Reporting Manual for the UK financial year ending March 2011.
- Where the JFReM permits a choice of accounting policy, the accounting policy which has been judged to be most appropriate to the particular circumstances of the States of Jersey for the purpose of giving a true and fair view has been selected. The accounting policies have been applied consistently in dealing with items considered material in relation to the accounts.
- This is the first time that accounts have been prepared under IFRS. Note 3 reconciles the previously reported figures for 2011 (including opening balances) to the IFRS compliant figures reported in these accounts.
- IFRS in issue but not yet effective
- A number of new standards and amendments to standards and interpretations are effective for annual periods beginning after 1 January 2010, and have not been applied in preparing these consolidated financial statements. None of these is expected to have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements of the group, except the following set out below.
- IFRS 13, Fair value measurement', aims to improve consistency and reduce complexity by providing a precise definition of fair value and a single source of fair value measurement and disclosure requirements for use across IFRSs. The requirements do not extend the use of fair value accounting but provide guidance on how it should be applied where its use is already required or permitted by other standards within IFRSs.
- IAS 19, Employee benefits', was amended in June 2011. Under the amended standard: all past service costs would be immediately recognised; and interest cost and expected return on plan assets replaced with a net interest amount that is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit liability (asset).
- IFRS 9 Financial instruments' was issued in November 2009 and October 2010. It replaces the parts of IAS 39 that relate to the classification and measurement of financial instruments. IFRS 9 requires financial assets to be classified into two measurement categories: those measured as at fair value and those measured at amortised cost, i.e. the available-for-sale and held-to- maturity categories currently allowed under IAS 39 are not included in IFRS 9.
- The impact of these new and amended standards will be considered as part of the implementation of the version of the JFReM that adopts them.
- There are no other IFRSs or IFRIC interpretations that are not yet effective that would be expected to have a material impact on the group.
Other Planned Amendments to the JFReM Donated Assets
- Under the proposed 2013 JFReM (based on the UK FReM 2011-12) the donation of assets, or funding of assets through grants, is recognised as income rather than in the Donated Asset or Capital Grant Reserves.
- In previous periods, Donations of Assets will be recognised as income, and the Donated Asset Reserve will be reclassified into the Accumulated Reserve (for donations in previous periods) and Revaluation Reserve (for revaluations).
- Amounts released from the Donated Asset Reserve to the Statement of Net Comprehensive Expenditure will also be removed (as income would have been recognised on receipt).
- Other amendments to the JFReM due to come in to effect in 2013 are considered to have no material impact on the Accounts.
- Accounting Convention
3.1 These accounts have been prepared on an accruals basis under the historical cost convention modified to account for the revaluation of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and available for sale financial assets and financial assets and financial liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit or loss. A summary of the more important accounting policies is set out below.
- Basis of Consolidation
- These accounts comprise the consolidation of all entities within the States of Jersey consolidation boundary (the accounting boundary') as set out in the JFReM. The accounting boundary is defined with reference to applicable accounting standards except that the inclusion or exclusion of an entity is based on direct control rather than strategic control.
Impact of changes proposed in the 2013 JFReM
| 2011 £'000 | 2012 £'000 |
Statement of Financial Position | ||
Accumulated Reserves | 24,726 | 18,529 |
Revaluation Reserve | 14,327 | 17,029 |
Donated Asset Reserve | (39,053) | (35,558) |
|
|
|
Reserves | - | - |
|
|
|
Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure | ||
Other Revenue | 70 | 130 |
|
|
|
Depreciation | 99 | 111 |
Impairments | 2 | 6,216 |
|
|
|
Net Revenue Expenditure/(Income) | 31 | 6,197 |
- Direct control is normally evidenced by the States, 5 Non-Current Assets: Property, Plant the Council of Ministers or a Minister exercising in-year and Equipment
control over operating practices, income, expenditure,
assets or liabilities of the entity. Therefore the principles 5.1 Property, Plant and Equipment are initially recognised of IAS 27, IAS 28 and IAS 31 for the determination of at cost. The States of Jersey capitalisation threshold is whether entities are subsidiary undertakings, associated £10,000 for an initial purchase. There is no threshold for undertakings or joint ventures are restricted to the first the capitalisation of subsequent expenditure on an asset. principle of direct control. Where this principle is not met On completion, Assets Under Course of Construction are and an entity within the group boundary has an investment transferred into the appropriate asset category.
in an entity outside the group boundary, this holding is
treated as an investment in the group accounts. 5.2 Property, Plant and Equipment are subsequently measured at fair value, as interpreted by the JFReM. More
- For clarity, the relationships with JT Group Limited, details of the basis for valuation are given in Accounting Jersey Post Limited, Jersey Electricity plc and Jersey Policy 7.
New Waterworks Company Limited do not meet the
first principle of direct control and therefore these are 5.3 Finance costs incurred during the construction of accounted for as strategic investments in these accounts. tangible fixed assets are not capitalised.
- The Social Security Fund, the Social Security Components of Assets
(Reserve) Fund and the Health Insurance Fund are
outside the accounting boundary. 5.4 Components of an asset are separated where their value is significant in relation to the total value of the asset
- Entities that fall within the group boundary, but which (at least 20%) and where those components have different are immaterial to the accounts as a whole, have not been useful lives to the remainder of the asset. Assets with a consolidated where to do so would result in excessive time gross book value over £750k are reviewed to identify or cost to the States. Entities that fall within the accounting whether they comprise of significant components with boundary but which have not been consolidated are listed different useful lives.
in Note 41.
- Land and Buildings are always identified as separate
- Material transactions and balances between entities components.
that fall within the group boundary have been eliminated
as part of the consolidation process. 5.6 Where a component is replaced or restored, the
carrying amount of the old component is derecognised and the new component added.
Networked Assets Amounts equal to the donated asset depreciation charge, impairment costs and any in-year gain/loss on disposal are 5.7 Networked assets represent the road network, released from this reserve to Net Revenue Expenditure/ the foul and surface water network and the Island's sea Income. defence network.
Disposal
The road network consists of carriageways, including
5.17 On disposal of an item of Property, Plant and
earthworks; tunnelling and road pavements; roadside
Equipment, the surplus or deficit of proceeds over carrying communications and land within the perimeter of highways.
value is included in Net Revenue Expenditure/Income Non-network assets include bridges and other structures.
The foul and surface water network consists of foul sewers,
surface water sewers, combined sewers and rising 6. Non-Current Assets: Intangible Assets
mains. Non-network assets include pumping stations and
associated land and plant/machinery, and the Bellozanne
and Bonne Nuit Sewage Treatment Works. 6.1 Purchased computer application software licences The Sea Defences network consists of walls, slipways and are capitalised as intangible assets.
outfalls. Non-network assets include harbours and quays.
6.2 Internally produced intangible assets, such as
- Non-network assets are accounted for under their application software or databases, are capitalised if it respective asset categories. meets the criteria specified in IAS 38. The criteria are that completion is technically feasible; that there is an
- Subsequent expenditure on networked assets is intention to complete and then use or sell the asset; that capitalised where it enhances or replaces the service the States is able to use or sell the asset; that the asset potential. Spending that does not replace or enhance will generate future probable benefits; that there are service potential is expensed. sufficient resources to complete the development and to use or sell the asset, and that it is possible to measure IT Software the expenditure attributable to the asset during the development phase reliably. Expenditure on research is
- Operating software, without which the related not capitalised. Expenditure that does not meet the criteria hardware cannot be operated, is capitalised, with the for capitalisation is treated as an operating cost in the year value of the related hardware, as Property, Plant and in which it is incurred.
Equipment. Application software, which is not an integral
part of the related hardware, is capitalised separately as 7. Valuation of Non-current assets other an intangible asset (see Accounting Policy 6). than Financial Instruments
Heritage Assets 7.1 Property, Plant and Equipment and Intangible assets are expressed at their current value through the application
- Heritage assets are those assets that are intended of the Modified Historical Cost Accounting Convention to be preserved in trust for future generations because (MHCA). In accordance with the JFReM, historical cost of their cultural, environmental or historical associations. carrying amounts are not disclosed. The valuation of all Non-operational assets are those held primarily for this Property, Plant and Equipment should be current value, purpose. Operational heritage assets are those that are which is the lower of replacement cost and recoverable also used for other activities or to provide other services. amount, which is the higher of net realisable value and value in use. Where value in use cannot be measured
- Operational Heritage Assets are accounted for within in terms of income it is assumed to be at least equal to the principle asset category to which they relate. the cost of replacing the service potential provided by the asset. In certain circumstances depreciated historical cost
- Non-operational assets (including for example is used as a proxy for current value.
works of art and antiques), have not been valued where
the incomparable nature of the assets means a reliable 7.2 Property assets are valued in accordance with IAS valuation is not possible, or level of costs of valuation 16. An external valuation is performed by a RICS qualified greatly exceed the additional benefits derived by users valuer every 5 years. Interim valuations are performed of the accounts. In these cases, no value is reported for after 3 years.
these assets in the Statement of Financial Position.
7.3 Assets under course of construction are valued at
- Information about the Non-operational Heritage cost and are not revalued until completion and transfer Assets held by the States is included in Note 14. into the appropriate asset category.
Donated Assets 7.4 Networked assets, which are intended to be maintained at a specific level of service potential by
- Donated assets are capitalised at their current continuing replacement and refurbishment, are valued valuation on receipt and are revalued/depreciated on the at depreciated replacement cost. Annual valuations of same basis as purchased assets. The amount capitalised networked assets are performed by professional valuers. is credited to the Donated Assets Reserve.
- Operational heritage assets are valued in the same
- The Donated Assets Reserve represents the value way as other assets of that general type. Non-operational of the original donation and any subsequent revaluation. heritage assets are valued as follows:
- Depreciation and Amortisation
• Where purchased within the accounting period, at cost;
• Where there is a market in assets of that type, at the lower of depreciated replacement cost and net realisable value; or
• Where there is no market, at depreciated replacement cost, unless the asset could not or would not be physically reconstructed or replaced, in which case at nil.
- There are some instances where valuation of non- operational heritage assets may not be practicable. In these cases the asset is carried at a value of nil.
- Other non-current assets are carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation or amortisation. This is a suitable proxy for fair value and is allowable per the JFReM for those assets with short useful lives or low values. This includes assets held as fixtures and fittings, IT equipment and intangible non-current assets.
- Revaluation gains are recorded in the revaluation reserve and presented in Other Comprehensive Income. Downward revaluations are recorded in the revaluation reserve to the extent that they reverse previous upward revaluations. Downward revaluations below the original carrying value of the asset are recorded in Net Revenue Expenditure/Income.
- Depreciation for Property, Plant and Equipment, other than networked assets is provided on a straight line basis over the anticipated useful lives of the assets. The principle asset categories and their range of useful economic lives are outlined below:
Asset Category Life
Land Asset Category Not depreciated Life Land Not depreciated
Buildings Up to 75 years Social Housing Up to 75 years Other Structures Up to 250 years Plant, Machinery, Furniture & FixturesPlant, Machinery and Fittings 3 to 50 years Transport EquipmentTransport Equipment 2 to 20 years Information Technology EquipmentIT equipment and software 3 to 10 years
- Residual Values and Useful Economic Lives of Property Plant and Equipment assets are reviewed and, if appropriate, amended at the end of each reporting period.
- The annual depreciation charge for networked assets is the value of the service potential replaced through the maintenance programme, adjusted for any change in condition as identified by a condition survey. The value of the maintenance work undertaken is used as an indication of the value of the replaced part.
- Intangible assets are amortised over their useful lives, which are typically between three to ten years, on a straight-line basis. The estimated useful life and amortisation method are reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period.
- Impairments of non-current assets another entity; or a contractual obligation to exchange financial instruments with another entity under conditions
- Impairments are permanent diminutions in the that are potentially unfavourable.
service potential of non-current assets. All assets are
assessed annually for indications of impairment, and 12.5 An equity instrument is any contract that evidences where indications exist an impairment test is carried out a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting by comparing their carrying value with their recoverable all of its liabilities.
amount, this being the higher of the value in use and the
fair value less costs to sell.
Categories of financial instruments
- Impairment losses due to a loss in economic value
or service potential are recognised in Net Revenue 12.6 The States' financial instruments have been Expenditure. Other impairments (for example due to classified into the following categories:
movements in market conditions) are recognised in Net
Revenue Expenditure to the extent that it cannot be • Loans and Receivables
offset against the Revaluation Reserve. Any reversal of • Strategic Investments
an impairment changes is recognised in Net Revenue • Other Available for Sale Investments
Expenditure to the extent that the original charge, adjusted • Infrastructure Investments
for subsequent depreciation, was previously recognised in • Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss the Net Revenue Expenditure. The remaining amount is • Derivative Financial Instruments
recognised in the revaluation reserve. • Other Financial Liabilities
- Non-Current Assets: Loans and Receivables
Assets held for Sale
12.7 Loans and Receivables are non-derivative financial
10.1 Assets held for sale are items of Property, Plant and assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not Equipment, which are available for immediate sale in their quoted in an active market, other than: present condition and are being actively marketed for sale,
are valued at the lower of carrying amount and fair value • Those that the entity intends to sell immediately or in the less costs to sell and are not depreciated. short term, which are classified as Held-For-Trading, and
those that the entity upon initial recognition designates as at Fair value through profit or loss;
- Investment Properties • Those that the entity upon initial recognition designates as Available-For-Sale; or
11.1 The States of Jersey does not, in general, hold • Those for which the holder may not recover substantially assets only for the purpose of earning rentals or for all of its initial investment, other than because of credit capital appreciation or both. As such no assets have been deterioration. classified as Investment Properties, and will instead be
accounted for as Property, Plant and Equipment. 12.8 For the States of Jersey, these include:
• Loans issued by Housing Funds
- Investments and other Financial • Loans issued through the Agricultural Loans Fund Instruments • Miscellaneous Loans made through the Consolidated fund
• Debtors arising within the normal course of operations
12.1 The States recognises, measures and discloses
financial instruments following the guidance in the JFReM Strategic Investments and Accounting Standards
12.9 Strategic Investments are companies outside the accounting boundary in which the States of Jersey has a
Definitions controlling interest.
12.2 Financial Instruments are contracts that give rise to 12.10 Strategic Investments are accounted for as a financial asset in one entity and a financial liability or "Available-For-Sale" financial assets, although it should equity instrument in another. be noted that this does not indicate an intention to dispose
of the States' interest. 12.3 A financial asset is any asset that is; cash; an equity
instrument of another entity; a contractual right to receive 12.11 Specifically, the States of Jersey recognised its cash or another financial asset from another entity; or investments in the following companies as Strategic a contractual right to exchange financial instruments Investments:
with another entity under conditions that are potentially
favourable. • JT Group Limited
• Jersey Post Limited
12.4 A financial liability is any liability that is; a contractual • Jersey Electricity plc
obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset to • Jersey New Waterworks Company Limited
Other Available For Sale Investments Derivative Financial Instruments
- Available-For-Sale investments are non-derivative 12.19 A derivative is a financial instrument or other financial assets that are either designated in this category contract within the scope of IAS 32 with all three of the or not classified in any other categories and are intended following characteristics:
to be held for an indefinite period of time (but may in some a) its value changes in response to the change in an cases be sold in response to policy decisions). underlying variable (e.g., interest rates, equity share
prices, exchange rates etc.);
12.13 For the States of Jersey, other Available For Sale b) it requires no initial net investment or an initial net Investments include: investment that is smaller than would be required for
• Housing Property Bonds issued under either P7 or the other types of contracts that would be expected to have Homebuyer scheme. a similar response to changes in market factors; and
• Infrastructure Investments c) it is settled at a future date.
12.14 Infrastructure Investments involve taking 12.20 Derivative instruments held as part of a managed an ownership interest in an infrastructure business portfolio held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss are (commonly defined as providing an essential service included in the relevant investment line, unless they are to the community.) Most infrastructure assets are either material.
bought from a government, a private equity firm, or are
part of a listed company that is sold off. This is a long 12.21 Other Derivative instruments held by the States of term investment option providing higher returns than Cash Jersey include:
investments while generating positive externalities for the • Letters of Comfort issued by the Housing Development Island. Infrastructure investments can be split into two main Fund to various housing associations, which are in effect categories, Economic (e.g. Transport, Communications or interest rate caps.
other Utilities) or Social (e.g. Schools, Hospitals, Housing • Forward contracts in foreign currency to mitigate the risk etc). of fluctuations in FX rates.
Investments held at Fair Value through 12.22 The States does not designate any derivatives as Profit or Loss part of hedging arrangements.
- This category has two sub-categories: Other Financial Liabilities
• Financial assets Held-For-Trading; and
• Those designated at fair value through profit or loss 12.23 Other Financial Liabilities include Financial at inception. guarantee contracts. These are contracts that require the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder
- A financial asset or liability is classified as Held- for a loss it incurs because a specified receivable fails to For-Trading if it is acquired or incurred principally for the make payments when due, in accordance with the terms purpose of selling or repurchasing in the near term or if it of a debt instrument.
is part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that
are managed together and for which there is evidence of a Initial measurement of financial
recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking. Derivatives instruments
are also categorised as Held-For-Trading unless they are 12.24 Financial assets carried at Fair Value through profit designated as hedging instruments. or loss are initially recognised at fair value, and transaction
costs are expensed in the OCS.
- Financial assets and financial liabilities are
designated at fair value through profit or loss when: 12.25 Financial assets and liabilities not carried at Fair
• Doing so significantly reduces measurement inconsis- Value through profit or loss are initially recognised at Fair tencies that would arise if the related derivatives were Value plus transaction costs.
treated as Held-For-Trading and the underlying financial
instruments were carried at amortised cost such as loans Subsequent measurement of financial instruments and advances to customers or banks and debt securities
in issue; 12.26 Loans and Receivables are subsequently
• A group of financial assets, financial liabilities or both measured at amortised cost using the effective interest is managed and evaluated on a fair value basis in method.
accordance with a documented risk management or
investment strategy; 12.27 Strategic Investments are subsequently
• Financial instruments, such as debt securities held, measured at Fair Value, with movements taken to equity containing one or more embedded derivatives significantly through Other Comprehensive Income.
modify the cash flows, are designated at Fair Value
through profit or loss. 12.28 Other Available For Sale Investments are subsequently measured at Fair Value, with movements
- Investments held in the Common Investment taken to equity through Other Comprehensive Income. Fund or with the States' Cash Manager are managed as
a portfolio reported at Fair Value, and so the States has 12.29 Infrastructure Investments can take a range of designated these investments at Fair value through profit legal forms, and are accounted for using the measurement or loss. Individual Participants' investments in units in the rules for the most relevant category of Financial Instrument Common Investment Fund are also designated as at Fair as set out in IAS 39. Details of measurement bases for Value through profit or loss for the same reasons. individual assets are given in Note 19.
- Investments held at Fair Value through Profit 12.39 The amount of the loss is measured as the or Loss are subsequently measured at Fair Value, with difference between the asset's carrying amount and the movements taken to Net Revenue Expenditure. present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted
- Derivative Financial Instruments are subsequently at the financial asset's original effective interest rate. The measured at Fair Value, with movements taken to Net carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use Revenue Expenditure. of an allowance account in the Statement of Financial
- Other Financial Liabilities are measured at the Position and the amount of the loss is recognised in Net higher of: Revenue Expenditure. If a loan has a variable interest rate, the discount rate for measuring any impairment loss
• the initial measurement, less amortisation calculated to is the current effective interest rate determined under the recognise in Net Revenue Expenditure the fee income contract. earned as the service is provided; and
• the best estimate of the probable expenditure required 12.40 When a loan is uncollectible, it is written off against to settle any financial obligation arising at the reporting the related provision for loan impairment. Such loans are date, in line with the definitions of IAS 37 – Provisions, written off after all the necessary procedures have been Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. completed and the amount of the loss has been determined.
Any increase in the liability is taken to Net Revenue 12.41 If, in a subsequent period, the amount of Expenditure. Where cash flows significantly differ from the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can those used in the initial fair value calculation a revised be related objectively to an event occurring after the calculation will be performed, and any movement taken impairment was recognised (such as an improvement to Net Revenue Expenditure. in the debtor's credit rating), the previously recognised
impairment loss is reversed by adjusting the allowance Fair Value Estimation account in the Statement of Financial Position and the
amount of the reversal is recognised in Net Revenue
- The Fair Value of loans, receivables and non-
Expenditure.
derivative financial liabilities with a maturity of less than
one year is judged to be approximate to their book values.
Assets classified as Available-For-Sale
- The Fair Value of loans, receivables and non-
12.42 In the case of equity investments classified as
derivative financial liabilities with a maturity of greater
Available-For-Sale, a significant or prolonged decline in than one year are estimated by discounting the future
the fair value of the security below its cost is considered in determinable cash flows at the higher of the discount rate
determining whether the assets are impaired.
set by the Treasurer and the intrinsic rate in the underlying
financial instrument in accordance with the JFReM. 12.43 If any such evidence exists, the cumulative loss – measured as the difference between the acquisition cost
- The Fair Value of investments designated at
and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on Fair Value through profit or loss, Strategic Investments,
that financial asset previously recognised in Net Revenue Other Available For Sale Investments and derivatives
Expenditure – is removed from equity and recognised in the is estimated using observable market data. Where no
Net Revenue Expenditure. Impairment losses recognised observable market exists, the Fair Value has been
in Net Revenue Expenditure on equity instruments are not determined using valuation techniques.
reversed through Net Revenue Expenditure.
Impairment of financial Assets 12.44 If, in a subsequent period, the fair value of a debt instrument classified as Available-For-Sale increases
- At each reporting date an assessment of whether
and the increase can be objectively related to an event there is objective evidence that a financial asset is impaired
occurring after the impairment loss was recognised in Net is carried out.
Revenue Expenditure, the impairment loss is reversed through Net Revenue Expenditure.
Assets carried at Amortised Cost
- A financial asset is impaired and impairment De-recognition of Financial Instruments
losses are incurred only if there is objective evidence of
impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred 12.45rights to receive cash flows from the financial Financial assets are de-recognisedassets have when the after the initial recognition of the asset (a loss event') and expired or where the States has transferred substantially
that loss event (or events) has an impact on the estimated all risks and rewards of ownership.
future cash flows of the financial asset that can be reliably
estimated. 12.46 Financial liabilities are de-recognised when they are extinguished – that is, when the obligation is
- The criteria that the States uses to determine that discharged, cancelled or expires.
there is objective evidence of an impairment loss include:
• delinquency in contractual payments of principal or 13. Accounting for investments held in interest;
• cash flow difficulties experienced by the borrower (for the Common Investment Fund
example, equity ratio, net income percentage of sales);
• breach of loan covenants or conditions; and 13.1 Investments held in the Common Investment Fund
• deterioration in the value of collateral. (CIF) and associated transactions and balances are consolidated to the extent that they relate to members of the States of Jersey group, based on relative holdings in each investment pool.
13.2 Individual Participants in the CIF account for their PECRS and JTSF
holding in the CIF as an investment in CIF units.
- The PECRS and JTSF, whilst final salary schemes, are not conventional defined benefit schemes as the
- Inventory employer is not responsible for meeting any ongoing deficiency in the schemes. These schemes are therefore
- Inventory is held at the lower of cost and net accounted for as defined contribution schemes. realisable value (NRV).
- Employer contributions to the schemes are charged
- Inventory held for distribution at no/nominal charge to Net Revenue Expenditure in the year they are incurred. and inventory held for consumption in the production As both these schemes limit the liability of the States as the process of goods to be distributed at no/nominal charge employer, scheme surpluses or deficits are only recorded are valued at the lower of cost and current replacement within the States' accounts to the extent that they belong cost. to States.
- Whilst the PECRS and JTSF are not included as
- Where a reduction in the carrying value of inventory defined benefit schemes in the States Accounts, additional held is identified, the value of the inventory is written disclosures required under IAS 19 for defined benefit down and the cost charged to Net Revenue Expenditure/ schemes are included for the information of the users of Income. the accounts.
- Currency not issued is accounted for as inventory at Pensions Increases Liability the lower of cost and net realisable value.
- During 2010, the PECRS committee of management made the decision to reducing future annual increases
- Cash and Cash Equivalents (from 2011) to 0.3% below the Retail Price Index to address a deficit in the scheme. During 2012, this was
- Cash comprises cash in hand, current balances with modified to 0.15% below the Retail Price Index. Under banks and similar institutions and amounts on deposits the 1967 PECRS regulations and the Federated Health that are immediately available without penalty. Scheme (FHS), pensioners are guaranteed an increase in line with RPI, and as a result the balance of 0.15% will be
- Overdrafts are shown separately in the accounts funded by the States for States Employees. This liability except where there exists a formal right of offset, and the is accounted for as an unfunded defined benefit scheme, States intends to settle on a net basis. referred to as the Pensions Increase Liability (PIL).
- Cash Equivalents are short-term, highly liquid 17.7 Liabilities relating to the PIL are measured using the investments that are: projected unit credit method, discounted at the current rate of return on a high quality bond of equivalent term and
• readily convertible to known amounts of cash; currency to the liability.
• subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value; and
• are held for the purpose of meeting short term cash Other Schemes
commitments rather than for investment or other purposes.
- The JPOPF is a funded scheme which relates
For the States, this includes amounts held by the States to Jersey Post International Limited (a wholly owned Cash Manager. strategic investment), and is closed to new members. The
last active member left service during 2009.
- Investments held in the Common Investment Fund
- The DPS has only one member and is not open to
may have short maturity, but are held in line with the
new members.
individual funds' Investment Strategies rather than to meet
cash requirements, and so are not accounted for as cash 17.10 The JPOPF and the DPS are accounted for as equivalents. conventional defined benefit schemes in accordance with
IAS 19, and scheme assets are held in separate funds.
- Currency in Circulation
17.11 The CSS relates to a non-contributory scheme
16.1 Currency in circulation is accounted for at that existed before the formation of PECRS in 1967, and face value. as such is closed to new members. This is a non-funded scheme, and is accounted for as conventional defined benefit schemes in accordance with IAS 19. There are no
- Pensions active members remaining in service.
- The States of Jersey operates two principal pension 17.12 For the JPOPF and DPS pension scheme assets schemes for certain of its employees: Public Employees' are measured using market values.
Contributory Retirement Scheme (PECRS) and Teachers' 17.13 For the JPOPF, DPS and CSS scheme liabilities Superannuation Fund (JTSF). are measured using the projected unit credit method,
discounted at the current rate of return on a high quality
- In addition three further pension schemes exist, bond of equivalent term and currency to the liability.
the Jersey Post Office Pension Fund (JPOPF), the
Discretionary Pension Scheme (DPS) and the Civil 17.14 Where appropriate, as detailed in the preceding Service Scheme (CSS). paragraphs, actuarial gains and losses arising in the year 99
from the difference between the actual and expected 17.16 This liability is recognised in the accounts based returns on pension scheme assets, experience gains on the present value of future cash payments made under and losses on pension scheme liabilities and the effects the agreement, with details given in Note 29.
of changes in demographics and financial assumptions
are included in the Statement of Comprehensive Net 17.17 The Teachers' Superannuation Fund was Expenditure only in so far as they belong to the States. restructured in April 2007. The restructured scheme mirrors PECRS. A provision for past service liability, similar to the
Other Liabilities relating to Pensions PECRS pre-87 past service liability, has been recognised, although this has not yet been agreed with the Scheme's
17.15 In agreeing P190/2005 the States agreed a 10-point board of management. agreement, the text of which is reproduced below:
- Leases
- The States confirms responsibility for the Pre-1987
Debt of £192.1 million as at 31 December 2001 and 18.1 Leases are agreements whereby the lessor conveys for its servicing and repayment with effect from that the right to use an asset for an agreed period in return date on the basis that neither the existence of any for payments. At their inception, leases are classified as part of the outstanding Debt nor the agreed method operating or finance leases, except in the case of leases of servicing and repayment shall adversely affect the pre-existing the transition to IFRS, when the assessment benefits or contribution rates of any person who has is made as at that date.
at any time become a member of the Scheme.
18.2 Leases in which substantially all of the risks and
- Atcalculatedthe start toof thebe servicing82 yearsandwithrepaymenteffect fromperiod,1st rewards of ownership are transferred to the lessor are January 2002, the Employers' Contribution rate will classified as finance leases, other leases are classified
as operating leases. Where a lease covers the right to beTheseincreasedcontributioby 0.44%nswill tobethesplitequivalentinto2parts,of namely15.6%. use both land and buildings, the risks and rewards of the
a contribution rate of 13.6% of annual pensionable land and the buildings are considered separately. Land is salary and an annual debt repayment. The generally assumed to be held under an operating lease Employer's Contribution rate will revert to 15.16% unless the title transfers to the Department at the end of after repayment in full of the Debt. the lease.
- During the repayment period the annual Debt 18.3 Arrangements whose fulfilment is dependent on the repayment will comprise a sum initially equivalent use of a specific asset or which convey a right to use an to 2% of the Employers' total pensionable payroll, asset, are assessed at their inception to determine if they re expressed as a cash amount and increasing each contain a lease. If an arrangement is found to contain year in line with the average pay increase of Scheme a lease, that lease is then classified as an operating or members. finance lease. Transactions involving the legal form of a lease, such as sale and leaseback arrangements, are
- A statement of the outstanding debt as certified by accounted for according to their economic substance.
the Actuary to the Scheme is to be included each
year as a note in the States Accounts. The States as Lessee
- In the event of any proposed discontinuance of the Scheme, repayment and servicing of the outstanding 18.4 Assets held under finance leases are capitalised Debt shall first be rescheduled by the parties on the in the appropriate category of non-current assets and advice of the Actuary to ensure that paragraph (1) depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or their above ("Point 1") continues to be fulfilled. estimated useful economic lives.
- For each valuation the States Auditor shall confirm 18.5 Finance leases are capitalised at the lease's the ability of the States to pay off the Debt outstanding commencement at the lower of the fair value of the at that date. leased asset and the present value of the minimum lease
- If any decision or event causes the Actuary at the time payments. The interest element of the finance lease of a valuation to be unable to continue acceptance payment is charged to Net Revenue Expenditure/Income of such servicing and repayment of the Debt as an over the period of the lease at a constant periodic rate in asset of the Scheme, there shall be renegotiation in relation to the balance outstanding
order to restore such acceptability.
- Operating leases are charged to Net Revenue
- In the event of a surplus being revealed by an Expenditure/Income on a straight-line basis over the term Actuarial Valuation, negotiations for its disposal of the lease. Where the arrangement includes incentives, shall include consideration of using the employers' such as rent-free periods, the value is recognised on a share to reduce or pay off the Debt. straight-line basis over the lease term.
- As and when the financial position of the States
improves there shall be consideration of accelerating The States as Lessor
or completing repayment of the Debt.
- Where the States of Jersey is the lessor under an
10.The recent capital payment by JTL of £14.3m (plus operating lease, leased assets are recorded as assets and interest) reduced the £192.1m total referred to in depreciated over their useful economic lives in accordance (1) by £14.3m and if any other capital payments are with the relevant accounting policy. Rental income from similarly made by other Admitted Bodies these shall operating leases is recognised on a straight line basis over similarly be taken into account. the period of the lease.
- Provisions Revaluation Reserve
- A provision is recognised when the following three 21.3 The revaluation reserve reflects the unrealised criteria are met, in line with the requirements in IAS 37 balance of cumulative revaluation adjustments to Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets: Property, Plant and Equipment and Intangible Non-Current Assets other than donated assets. Details of the basis of
• there is a present obligation (either legal or constructive) valuation are set out in Accounting Policy 7. When an as a result of a past event; asset is disposed any balance in the revaluation reserve is
• it is probable that a transfer of economic benefits will be transferred to the Accumulated Reserve. required to settle the obligation; and
• a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the Donated Asset Reserve
obligation.
21.4 The donated asset reserve represents the net book
- The amount recognised as a provision is the best value of assets donated to the States. A reserve balance estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present equal to the value of the asset is created upon donation, obligation at the reporting date. and then adjusted for its revaluation, impairment and depreciation (as set out in Accounting Policy 5).
- No discounts are applied to provisions unless the
impact of the time value of money is material. Where a Investment Reserve
discount is applied this is stated in the notes to the accounts
together with the discount rate applied. The discount rate 21.5 The investment reserve reflects the unrealised is set by the Treasurer of the States. balance of cumulative revaluation adjustments to the States' Strategic Investments, Housing Bonds, and other
Financial Assets for which gains and losses are not
- Contingent Liabilities and recognised in Net Revenue Expenditure during the year. Contingent Assets
- Contingent liabilities and contingent assets are not 22. Revenue Recognition
recognised as liabilities or assets in the statement of
financial position, but are disclosed in the notes to the 22.1 Revenue is divided into two main categories – accounts. revenue levied by the States of Jersey (non-exchange
income) and revenue earned through operations.
- A contingent liability is a possible obligation arising
from past events whose existence will be confirmed only Revenue earned through operations
by uncertain future events or it is a present obligation
arising from past events that are not recognised because 22.2 Revenue earned through operations is accounted for either an outflow of economic benefit is not probable or the in line with IAS 18, which requires specifically that: amount of the obligation cannot be reliably estimated.
• income from the sale of goods should be recognised on
- A contingent asset is a possible asset whose transfer of the risks and rewards of ownership in those existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non- goods;
occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not • income from the performance of services should be wholly within the control of the States. recognised on the degree of performance;
• interest income should be recognised using the effective
- Where the time value of money is material, the interest method;
contingent liabilities and assets are stated at discounted • dividends receivable should be recognised when the amounts. Department becomes entitled to them; and
• income from permitting others to use the Department's assets should be recognised on an accruals basis in
- Taxpayers' Equity accordance with the terms of the contract.
- Taxpayers' Equity represents the taxpayers' interest Revenue levied by the States of Jersey
in the States of Jersey, which equates to both the total value
of Net Assets held by the States, and an accumulation of 22.3 Revenue levied by the States of Jersey (non- net income and other gains and losses over the years. exchange income) is measured at the value of the Reserves are split based on how the interest has arisen consideration received or receivable net of:
(as explained below).
• Repayments; and
Accumulated Revenue and Other Reserves • Adjustments following appeals (in the case of Income Tax).
- The Accumulated Revenue and Other Reserves 22.4 Revenue is recognised when: a taxable or other represent the cumulative balances of surpluses and relevant event has occurred, the revenue can be measured deficits recorded by the States of Jersey. reliably and it is probable that the economic benefits from the taxable or other event will flow to the States of Jersey.
22.5 Taxable or other relevant events for the material income streams are as follows:
• Income Tax: when an assessment is raised by the Comptroller of Taxes. Tax collected in the year under the Income Tax Instalment Scheme which is due for assessment in the following year (tax collected on a current year basis) is recognised as receipts in advance;
• Goods and Services Tax (GST): when a taxable activity is undertaken during the taxation period by the taxpayer. Fees payable by International Service Entities are recognised on an accruals basis and are included in total GST receipts in Net Revenue Expenditure;
• Impôts Duties: when the goods are landed in
Jersey;
• Stamp Duty: when the stamps are sold;
• Fees and Fines: when the fee or fine is imposed;
• Seizure of assets: when the court order is made; and
• Island rates: when the assessment is raised. Island Rates are charged on a calendar year basis and assessments are raised in the second half of the calendar year. Income is recognised in the period for which the rates are charged.
- Staff
- Staff Costs include expenditure relating to States Staff, Non-States staff and other expenditure relating to the employment of Staff.
- States Staff are defined as: Persons employed under an employment contract directly with the States of Jersey, Persons holding an office or appointment in the States (by crown appointment or otherwise), and States Members.
- Non-States Staff are defined as: Persons who do not qualify as States Staff (defined above), but are acting as employees of the States of Jersey.
- Employee benefits
24.1 The States accrues for the cost of accumulated compensated absences. This is accounted for when an employee renders services that increase their entitlement to future compensated absences. It is calculated based on salary and allowances.
- Grants
- Revenue grants received and all grants made are recognised in Net Revenue Expenditure/Income so as to match the underlying event or activity that gives rise to a liability.
- Where a grant is received as a contribution towards the cost of an asset the grant is credited to the capital grant reserve and released to Net Revenue Expenditure/Income as grant income over the useful economic life of the asset. On disposal of an asset financed by a grant the remaining balance on the capital grant reserve is recognised as grant income in the year of disposal.
- Accounting for Goods and Services Tax
26.1 GST charged/paid is fully recoverable, and so income and expenditure is shown net of GST.
- Foreign Exchange
- Both the functional and presentation currency is Sterling.
- Transactions that are denominated in a foreign currency are translated into Sterling at the rate ruling at the date of each transaction.
- Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the closing rate applicable at the reporting date or on the date of settlement. Exchange differences are reported in the Net Revenue Expenditure.
- Third Party Assets
- The States of Jersey holds certain monies and other assets on behalf of third parties. These are not recognised in the accounts where the States of Jersey does not have a direct beneficial interest in them.
- Where assets have been seized following a court order, these are held within the Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund, Civil Assets Recovery Fund or the Drug Trafficking Confiscation Fund which are consolidated into the group results of the States of Jersey.
- Losses and Special Payments
- Special Payments are those which fall outside the normal day-to-day business of the entity.
- Losses are recognised when they occur. Special Payments are recognised when there is a legal or constructive obligation for them to be paid.
- Losses and Special Payments are accounted for net of any directly recoverable amounts, but gross of insurance claims.
- Related Party Transactions
30.1 For the purpose of disclosure of Related Party Transactions, Key Management Personnel are considered to be the Council of Ministers, Assistant Ministers and Accounting Officers subject to remuneration disclosures. These include short term employee benefits, post- employment benefits (pensions) and termination benefits.
Note 2 – Critical Accounting in measuring fair value. Fair values determined through the Judgements and key sources of use of models or other valuation methodologies will have a estimation uncertainty higher degree of judgement due to the assumptions used
in the valuation.
In the application of the States' accounting policies, Valuation of Pensions
which are described in this note, it is necessary to make
judgements, estimates and assumptions about the The States provides various pension schemes for carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not its employees (see Accounting Policy 17 for details) readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and including some accounted for in accordance with IAS 19 associated assumptions are based on historical experience Employee Benefits'. The Statement of Comprehensive and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual Net Expenditure, and Statement of Financial Position results may differ from these estimates. items relating to the States' accounting for pension
schemes under IAS 19 are based on valuations by The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed professional actuaries. Inherent in these valuations are key
on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates assumptions, including discount rates, earnings increases, are recognised in the period in which the estimate is mortality rates and inflation. These actuarial assumptions revised if the revision affects only that period, or in the are reviewed annually in line with the requirements of IAS period of the revision and future periods if the revision 19 and are based on prior experience, market conditions affects both current and future periods. and the advice of the scheme actuaries.
Valuation of Assets The valuation of the PECRS past service liability is based
on a discount rate that is derived, from a gilt yield of 3.07% In determining the value of property assets under IAS and the expected returns from investments in the Fund 16 Property, Plant and Equipment', there is a degree itself (2.35%). The expected returns from investments in of uncertainty and judgement involved. The Statement the Fund are relevant because the 10 point agreement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure, and Statement of and the scheme regulations allow for surpluses arising in Financial Position items relating to the States' accounting the Fund to be used to extinguish or repay the past service for valuation of properties under IAS 16 are based on liability.
external professional valuations. The States use external
professional valuers to determine the relevant amounts. The judgement of the independent external actuary is that With market conditions that currently prevail there is likely it is more likely than not that surpluses in the Fund
to be a greater than usual degree of uncertainty. a) will arise and
b) be used to extinguish or repay the past service liability.
Investments, other than those held for strategic purposes,
are accounted for at fair value. If a market value cannot The discount rate used in the valuation of the JTSF past be readily ascertained, the investment is valued in line service liability is based on that used for the Actuarial with the applicable standards, using methods determined valuation of the Fund. While the mechanism for repaying by the Treasurer of the States to be appropriate in the the debt has not yet been formally agreed with the circumstances. Market value is impacted by a number Scheme's board of management, the judgement of the of factors, including the type of investment and the independent external actuary is that any future agreement characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with will allow for surpluses in the Fund to be used to extinguish quoted prices will have a lesser degree of judgement used or repay the past service liability
Strategic Investments
The States hold a number of strategic investments (see Accounting Policy 12 for details).
For Jersey Electricity plc the value has been determined by using the market value of the shares inflated by a controlling interest factor (20%) and with a marketability discount (10%) applied. The valuation methodology and adjusting factors are determined by the Treasurer taking into account industry guidelines on valuation, and have limited impact of the valuation which is most significantly influenced by the underlying share price at the year end. Variations in the share price (for example as a result of market and investor sentiment as a result of significant events/press releases) will directly affect the valuation of the States' Investment in the company.
A discounted cash flow valuation methodology has been used for the valuation of the equity share elements of the other Strategic investments, the projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) for five years, and the use of an appropriate terminal multiple . Projections are prepared based on forecasts provided by the entities (where available) and other publicly available information. The discount rate applied is based on the relevant entities' weighted average cost of capital (WACC) with appropriate adjustments for the risks associated with the investments. Estimates of EBITDA, terminal multiples and WACC involve a significant degree of judgement. The
values for WACC's and Terminal Multiples used in the valuation are set out below: | JT Group Ltd | Jersey New Waterworks Company Limited | Jersey Post International Limited |
WACC | 9.41% | 6.81% | 8.67% |
Market Multiple | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Although best judgement is used in determining the fair value of these investments, there are inherent limitations in any valuation technique. Therefore the values presented herein may not be indicative of the amount which the States could realise on sale of its holdings.
An analysis of the impact of a change in the key
assumptions used is set out in the table Jersey New
Waterworks Jersey Post JT Group Ltd Company International
Limited Limited WACC
An increase/decrease of 1% in the WACC used would lead to an £9m £1m £1m approximate decrease/increase in value of:
Terminal Multiple
A increase/decrease of 1 in the terminal multiple used would lead to £30m £4m £2m
an approximate increase/decrease in value of:
EBITDA
A increase/decrease in forecast EBITDA of 5% per annum would £25m £4m £2m lead to an approximate increase/decrease in value of:
Preference Shares have been valued using a Dividend Valuation Model, which applies discounted cash flow methodologies to the dividends expected to be received in relation to the shares. The discount rate applied is the higher of the intrinsic rate of the instrument (based on market information on comparable instruments), and the discount rate set by the Treasurer of the States (currently 6.1%).
Note 3 IAS 16 - Property, Plant and Equipment
Under IAS 16, Each part of an item of property, plant First Time Adoption of IFRS, and Prior and equipment with a cost that is significant in relation to Period Amendments the total cost of the item is depreciated separately. The
2012 Property valaution was carried out in line to include
componentisation. Using a componentised approach Under IFRS 1 (First-time Adoption of International Financial did not have a material effect on depreciation charges Reporting Standards), there is a general requirment to compared to a non-componentised approach, and it has apply IFRS retrospectively to all previous periods. This not been necessary to restate previous years figures.
has meant that some restatement of the figures previously
reported in the States of Jersey Financial Report and IAS 38 - Intangible Assets
Accounts has been necessary, and this note explains
what these adjustments are, and shows how they have
affected the statements. Under UK GAAP all Fixed Assets were shown in a single
line in the Accounts. Under IAS 38, any intangible assets There are also several changes in terminology between (including purchased and internally produced software) are UK GAAP and IFRS, and this note illustrates which lines shown seperately on the Statement of Financial Position.
in the financial statements under UK GAAP correspond to
which under IFRS.
IAS 19 - Employee Benefits
IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Under IAS 19 there is a requirement to accrue for any short Statements term employee benefits, including the cost of accumulating
compensated absences. This was not common practice Under IAS 1, any amount expected to be received or settled under UK GAAP, and so accruals for previous periods after no more than 12 months should be recognised as a have been recognised.
current asset. The Common Investment Fund holds some
assets with short maturities as part of the agree investment IAS 32 - Financial Instruments:
strategies, and these have been seperately identified on
the Statement of Financial Position in accordance with the Presentation and IAS 39 Financial Standard. In practice, on maturity any proceeds will be Instruments: Recognition and
reinvested in line with the investment strategy. Measurement
In the 2010 UK GAAP Accounts, Housing Bonds were IAS 7 - Statement of Cash Flows included as Debtors: amounts falling due after more than
one year. Under FRS 25 (adopted in 2011), and IAS 32, Under IAS 7, highly liquid investments that are held to these are classified as Available for Sale Investments. meet short term cash commitments are classified as "Cash Whilst there was no requirement to restate the 2010 Equivalents". For the States this includes amounts held by figures, they have been reclassified in the IFRS Accounts the States Cash Manager, which were previously reported to aid comparison.
as investments.
In addition, some amounts previously included as Loans and Advances have been reclassified as Receivables.
IFRS 5 - Non-current Assets Held for
Sale and Discontinued Operations Finally, the Finance charge recognised on Past Service
Liabilities has been revised to reflect the discount rates
used in the valuation calculation in line with the standards. Under IFRS 5, Non-current assets may be classified as As this does not affect the value of the liability, any increase held for sale if certain conditions are met that indicate that in Finance Costs is offset by the movement in the liability.
its carrying amount will be recovered principally through a
sale transaction rather than through continuing use. These
assets are shown as current assets on the Statement of
Financial Position.
Previously Property held for Disposal (PhfD) have been classified as part of Tangible Fixed Assets, and so an adjustment has been required. All assets classified as PhfD on each Statement of Financial Position have also been assessed against the criteria in IFRS 5, and any assets not meeting these criteria have been included in Property, Plant and Equipment.
Note 3a
Restated Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2011
UK GAAP
IAS 1 IAS 7 IFRS 5 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Tangible Fixed Assets 2,922,161 - - (3,264)
- - - -
- - - -
Financial Assets
Loans & Advances 12,609 - - - Strategic Investments 326,400 - - -
- - -
Other Available for Sale investments 14,335 - - - Investments held at Fair Value through OCS 896,321 (241,090) (98,127) - Derivative Financial Instruments expiring after more than one year 201 - - - Debtors: amounts falling due after more than one year - - - - Total Fixed Assets 4,172,027 (241,090) (98,127) (3,264)
Current Assets
- - - 3,264
Stock and Work in Progress 32,195 - - - Loans & Advances 2,446 - - - Derivative Financial Instruments expiring within one year 98 - - - Investments held at Fair Value through OCS - 241,090 - - Debtors 117,982 - - - Cash at Bank and in Hand 65,101 - 98,127 -
Total Current Assets 217,822 241,090 98,127 3,264
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Current Liabilities
Creditors 125,872 (3,076) - - Currency in Circulation 90,596 - - -
- 3,076 - -
Provisions for liabilities and charges 22,660 - - - Total Current Liabilities 239,128 - - -
Net Current Assets / (Liabilities) (21,306) - - - Total Assets Less Current Liabilities 4,150,721 - - - Long Term Liabilities
Finance Lease Obligations Provisions for liabilities and charges Derivative Financial Instruments expiring after more than one year PECRS Pre-1987 Past Service Liability Provision for JTSF Past Service Liability Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Net Liability Other Financial Liabilities | - 10,986 8,180 2 247,852 135,100 11,493 - |
| - - - - - - - - |
| - - - - - - - - |
| - - - - - - - - |
Total Long Term Liabilities 413,613 - - - Net Assets 3,737,108 - - -
Reserves
Accumulated Revenue and Other Reserves 3,096,301 - - - Revaluation Reserve 364,875 - - - Donated Asset Reserve 39,053 - - - Capital Grant Reserve - - - - Investment Reserve 236,879 - - -
Total Reserves 3,737,108 - - -
IFRS IAS 16 IAS 38 IAS 19 IAS 32/39
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
(2,908,734) (10,163) - - Non-Current Assets
2,908,734 - - 2,908,734 Property, Plant and Equipment
- 10,163 - - 10,163 Intangible Assets
- - - - - - - |
| - - - - - - - |
| - - - - - - - |
| (9) - - - - - 9- |
| 12,600 326,400 14,335 557,104 201 9 | Loans & Advances Strategic Investments Other Available for Sale Investments Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss Derivative Financial Instruments expiring after more than one year Trade and Other Receivables |
- - - - 3,829,546 Total Non-Current Assets
Current Assets
- - - - 3,264 Non-Current Assets classifed as held for sale
- - - - 32,195 Inventories
- - - - 2,446 Loans & Advances
- - - - 98 Derivative Financial Instruments expiring within one year
- - - - 241,090 Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss
- - - - 117,982 Trade and Other Receivables
- - - - 163,228 Cash and Cash Equivalents
- - - - 560,303 Total Current Assets
- - - -
- - - - 4,389,849 Total Assets
- - - -
Current Liabilities
- - 2,917 - 125,713 Trade and Other Payables
- - - - 90,596 Currency in Circulation
- - - - 3,076 Finance Lease Obligations
- - - - 22,660 Provisions for liabilities and charges
- - 2,917 - 242,045 Total Current Liabilities
- - - - -
- - (2,917) - 4,147,804 Total Assets Less Current Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities
- - - - - Trade and Other Payables
- - - - 10,986 Finance Lease Obligations
- - - - 8,180 Provisions for liabilities and charges
- - - - 2 Derivative Financial Instruments expiring after more than one year
- - - - 247,852 PECRS Pre-1987 Past Service Liability
- - - - 135,100 Provision for JTSF Past Service Liability
- - - - 11,493 Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Net Liability
- - - - - Other Financial Liabilities
- - - - 413,613 Total Non-Current Liabilities
- - (2,917) - 3,734,191 Assets Less Liabilities
Taxpayers' Equity
- - (2,917) - 3,093,384 Accumulated Revenue and Other Reserves
- - - - 364,875 Revaluation Reserve
- - - - 39,053 Donated Asset Reserve
- - - - - Capital Grant Reserve
- - - - 236,879 Investment Reserve
- - (2,917) - 3,734,191 Total Taxpayers' Equity
Note 3b
Restated Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 1 January 2011
UK GAAP
IAS 1 IAS 7 IFRS 5 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Tangible Fixed Assets 2,768,538 - - (6,094)
- - - -
- - - -
Financial Assets
Loans & Advances 15,859 - - - Strategic Investments 254,000 - - - Other Available for Sale investments - - - Investments held at Fair Value through OCS 898,952 (272,050) (113,883) - Derivative Financial Instruments expiring after more than one year - - - Debtors: amounts falling due after more than one year 14,457 - - - Total Fixed Assets 3,951,806 (272,050) (113,883) (6,094)
Current Assets
- - - 6,094
Stock and Work in Progress 29,767 - - - Loans & Advances 2,049 - - - Derivative Financial Instruments expiring within one year - - - - Investments held at Fair Value through OCS - 272,050 - - Debtors 110,518 - - - Cash at Bank and in Hand 94,033 - 113,883 -
Total Current Assets 236,367 272,050 113,883 6,094
Current Liabilities
Creditors 117,679 (2,862) - - Currency in Circulation 92,779 - - -
- 2,862 - -
Provisions for liabilities and charges 4,448 - - - Total Current Liabilities 214,906 - - -
Net Current Assets / (Liabilities) 21,461 - - - Total Assets Less Current Liabilities 3,973,267 - - - Long Term Liabilities
- - - -
Finance Lease Obligations 14,062 - - - Provisions for liabilities and charges 6,263 - - - Derivative Financial Instruments expiring after more than one year - - - - Other Financial Liabilities - - - - PECRS Pre-1987 Past Service Liability 265,435 - - - Provision for JTSF Past Service Liability 114,000 - - - Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Net Liability 11,152 - - -
Total Long Term Liabilities 410,912 - - - Net Assets 3,562,355 - - -
Reserves
Accumulated Revenue and Other Reserves 3,110,089 - - - Revaluation Reserve 230,005 - - - Donated Asset Reserve 39,084 - - - Capital Grant Reserve - - - - Investment Reserve 183,177 - - -
Total Reserves 3,562,355 - - -
IFRS IAS 16 IAS 38 IAS 19 IAS 32/39
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
(2,752,125) (10,319) - - Non-Current Assets
2,752,125 - - - 2,752,125 Property, Plant and Equipment
- 10,319 - - 10,319 Intangible Assets
- - - (11) 15,848 Loans & Advances
- - - - 254,000 Strategic Investments
- - - 14,397 14,397 Other Available for Sale Investments
- - - - 513,019 Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss
- - - - - Derivative Financial Instruments expiring after more than one year
- - - (14,446) 11 Trade and Other Receivables
- - - (60) 3,559,719 Total Non-Current Assets
Current Assets
- - - - 6,094 Non-Current Assets classifed as held for sale
- - - - 29,767 Inventories
- - - - 2,049 Loans & Advances
- - - - - Derivative Financial Instruments expiring within one year
- - - - 272,050 Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss
- - - - 110,518 Trade and Other Receivables
- - - - 207,916 Cash and Cash Equivalents
- - - - 628,394 Total Current Assets
4,188,113 Total Assets
Current Liabilities
- - 2,522 - 117,339 Trade and Other Payables
- - - - 92,779 Currency in Circulation
- - - - 2,862 Finance Lease Obligations
- - - - 4,448 Provisions for liabilities and charges
- - 2,522 - 217,428 Total Current Liabilities
- - - - -
- - (2,522) (60) 3,970,685 Total Assets Less Current Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities
- - - - - Trade and Other Payables
- - - - 14,062 Finance Lease Obligations
- - - - 6,263 Provisions for liabilities and charges
- - - 2 2 Derivative Financial Instruments expiring after more than one year
- - - - - Other Financial Liabilities
- - - - 265,435 PECRS Pre-1987 Past Service Liability
- - - - 114,000 Provision for JTSF Past Service Liability
- - - - 11,152 Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Net Liability
- - - 2 410,914 Total Non-Current Liabilities
- - (2,522) (62) 3,559,771 Net Assets
Taxpayers' Equity
- - (2,522) 18,178 3,125,745 Accumulated Revenue and Other Reserves
- - - - 230,005 Revaluation Reserve
- - - - 39,084 Donated Asset Reserve
- - - - - Capital Grant Reserve
- - - (18,240) 164,937 Investment Reserve
- - (2,522) (62) 3,559,771 Total Taxpayers' Equity
Note 3c
Restated Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure for 2011
|
|
|
| |||||
UK GAAP |
|
|
|
| ||||
£'000 | IAS 1 £'000 | IAS 7 £'000 | IFRS 5 £'000 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
477,056 |
| - | - | - | ||||
93,124 |
| - | - | - | ||||
570,180 |
| - | - | - | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| - |
|
| ||||
142,134 |
| - | - | - | ||||
29,993 |
| - | - | - | ||||
50,709 |
| - | - | - | ||||
222,836 |
| - | - | - | ||||
|
| - |
|
| ||||
793,016 |
| - | - | - | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
166,256 348,432 214,479 37,960- 46,426 7,793 5,170 |
| - - - - - - | - - - - - - - | - - - - - - - | ||||
826,516 |
| - | - | - | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
438 4,384 (2,718) |
| - - - | - - - | - - - | ||||
2,104 |
| - | - | - | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
828,620 |
| - | - | - | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
35,604 |
| - | - | - | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(137,374) (72,400) - 458 - 92 |
| - - - - - - | - - - - - - | - - - - - - | ||||
(209,224) |
| - | - | - | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(173,620) |
| - | - | - | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
IFRS IAS 16 IAS 38 IAS 19 IAS 32/39
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Revenue
Levied by the States of Jersey
- - - - 477,056 Taxation revenue
- - - - 93,124 Island rates, duties, fees, fines and penalties
- - - - 570,180 Total Revenue Levied by the States of Jersey
Earned through Operations
- - - - 142,134 Sales of goods and services
- - - - 29,993 Investment income
- - - - 50,709 Other revenue
- - - - 222,836 Total Revenue Earned through Operations
- - - - 793,016 Total Revenue
Expenditure
- - - - 166,256 Social Benefit Payments
- - 395 - 348,827 Staff costs
- - - (2,065) 212,414 Other Operating expenses
- - - - 37,960 Grants and Subsidies payments
- - - - 46,426 Depreciation and Amortisation
- - - 2,065 9,858 Impairments
- - - 10,295 15,465 Finance costs
- - - -
- - - - 438 Net foreign-exchange losses
- - - (10,295) (5,911) Movement in pension liability
- - - - (2,718) Gains on disposal of assets
- - - -
- - 395 - 829,015 Total Expenditure
- - 395 - 35,999 Net Revenue Expenditure
Other Comprehensive (Income)/Expenditure
- - - - (137,374) Revaluation of Property, Plant and Equipment
Gain on Revaluation of Strategic Investments during the
- - - - (72,400)
period
- - - - - Reclassification adjustments for gains/losses included in Net Revenue Expenditure Loss on Revaluation of Other AFS Investments during the
- - - - 458
period
- - - - - Reclassification adjustments for gains/losses included in Net Revenue Expenditure
- - - - 92 Actuarial Loss in respect of Defined Benefit Pension Schemes
- - - - (209,224) Total Other Comprehensive Income
- - 395 - (173,225) Total Comprehensive (Income)/Expenditure
Note 4 Note 4a
Segmental Analysis Segmental Analysis - Statement of
Comprehensive Net Expenditure for the year ended 31 December 2012
The Corporate Management Board receive financial
reports quarterly that include information on General
Revenue Income Streams, Ministerial Departments, General Non-Ministerial Departments (in aggregate) and Trading Revenue Operations, and these are therefore considered to be the Income
operating segments of the States of Jersey. This split is £'000 based on lines of accountability within the organisation. Gross Revenue 632,477 Amounts charged and paid to other entities within the Less: Intra/Inter-Segment Revenue (6,464) Accounting Boundary are not eliminated in these reports. Revenue 626,013
Gross Expenditure 4,744 The Accounts and accompanying Annex include a large Less: Intra/Inter-Segment Expenditure (495)
Expenditure 4,249 amount of detailed information on these segments (and other
entities in the Accounting Boundary, such as Special funds). Net Revenue Expenditure/(Income)
Before Consolidation Adjustments (627,733) In particular, the Treasurer's Report includes tables Less: Intra/Inter-Segment Income and Expenditure 5,969
showing Net Revenue Income/Expenditure for each Net Revenue Expenditure/(Income) (621,764) income stream and department compared to prior years
results. Other Comprehensive Expenditure/(Income) 17,600 Total Comprehensive Expenditure/(Income) (604,164)
Statements of Comprehensive Net Expenditure and Statements of Financial Position for individual departments are also included in the Annex to the Accounts. These pages also include information about the income streams comprising each departments revenue.
The tables below reconcile amounts included in Note 4b
these statements to that included in the Consolidated
Statements.
Segmental Analysis - Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2012
Non- Total General Ministerial Other
Revenue Ministerial Depts Depts and Consolidated Consolidated Income the States Fund Fund
Assembly
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Non-Current Assets 506,755 2,784,683 493 230 3,292,161 Current Assets 153,060 27,507 650 4,457 185,674 Interfund Balances - - - (60,846) (60,846) Current Liabilities (69,962) (53,132) (1,740) (8,818) (133,652) Non-Current Liabilities - (2,735) - (344,337) (347,072)
Net Assets/(Liabilities) 589,853 2,756,323 (597) (409,314) 2,936,265
Taxpayers' Equity 6,075,506 (3,263,754) (298,466) 422,979 2,936,265 Intrafund Balances (5,485,653) 6,020,077 297,869 (832,293) -
Taxpayers' Equity 589,853 2,756,323 (597) (409,314) 2,936,265 Note 4c
Ministerial Ministerial Depts and Non- Consolidated Other Consolidated Trading Funds, and Special SOJDC Total SOJ
Total
Depts the States Fund Fund Operations the CIF
Assembly
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
126,605 3,023 3,693 765,798 54,069 68,949 2,137 890,953 (18,267) (833) (2,438) (28,002) (6,310) 6,730 (1,007) (28,589) 108,338 2,190 1,255 737,796 47,759 75,679 1,130 862,364
731,899 37,129 (39,210) 734,562 74,638 9,085 1,988 820,273 (19,305) (1,418) - (21,218) (7,855) 1,993 (855) (27,935) 712,594 35,711 (39,210) 713,344 66,783 11,078 1,133 792,338
605,294 34,106 (42,903) (31,236) 20,569 (59,864) (149) (70,680) (1,038) (585) 2,438 6,784 (1,545) (4,737) 152 654
604,256 33,521 (40,465) (24,452) 19,024 (64,601) 3 (70,026)
(151,491) - 452 (133,439) (152,007) - (1,075) (286,521) 452,765 33,521 (40,013) (157,891) (132,983) (64,601) (1,072) (356,547)
Special Total before
Trading Funds, and Consolidation Consolidation
Operations the CIF SOJDC Adjustments Adjustments Total SOJ
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
399,660 744,141 11,149 4,447,111 (364,383) 4,082,728 4,592 38,334 32,807 261,407 344,874 606,281 53,014 7,832 - - - - (5,399) (92,778) (264) (232,093) (498) (232,591) (20,095) (1,876) - (369,043) - (369,043)
431,772 695,653 43,692 4,107,382 (20,007) 4,087,375
431,772 695.653 43,692 4,107,382 (20,007) 4,087,375
- - - - - -
431,772 695,653 43,692 4,107,382 (20,007) 4,087,375
Note 4c
Segmental Analysis - Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure for the year ended 31 December 2011
Non-
General Ministerial Other Total Revenue Ministerial Depts and Consolidated Consolidated
Income Depts the States Fund Fund Assembly
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Gross Revenue 589,362 121,065 4,684 6,426 721,537
Less: Intra/Inter-Segment Revenue (5,355) (13,916) (590) (3,773) (23,634) Revenue 584,007 107,149 4,094 2,654 697,904
Gross Expenditure 2,443 728,093 36,881 7,016 774,433 Less: Intra/Inter-Segment Expenditure (461) (15,834) (1,994) - (18,289) Expenditure 1,982 712,259 34,887 7,016 756,144
Net Revenue Expenditure/(Income)
Before Consolidation Adjustments (586,919) 607,028 32,197 590 52,896 Less: Intra/Inter-Segment Income and Expenditure 4,894 (1,918) (1,404) 3,773 5,345
Net Revenue Expenditure/(Income) (582,025) 605,110 30,793 4,363 58,241 Other Comprehensive Income (72,400) (138,299) - 92 (210,607)
Total Comprehensive Expenditure/(Income) (654,425) 466,811 30,793 4,455 (152,366) Note 4d
Note 4d
Segmental Analysis - Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2011
Non- Total General Ministerial Other
Revenue Ministerial Depts and Consolidated Consolidated Income Depts the States Fund Fund
Assembly
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Non-Current Assets 488,053 2,644,166 405 201 3,132,825 Current Assets 167,092 30,296 615 6,791 204,794 Interfund Balances - - - (50,641) (50,641) Current Liabilities (63,215) (46,869) (1,943) (8,610) (120,637) Non-Current Liabilities - (4,800) - (385,627) (390,427)
Net Assets/(Liabilities) 591,930 2,622,793 (923) (437,886) 2,775,914
Taxpayers' Equity 6,073,097 (2,806,626) (264,362) (226,195) 2,775,914 Intrafund Balances (5,481,167) 5,429,419 263,439 (211,691) -
Taxpayers' Equity 591,930 2,622,793 (923) (437,886) 2,775,914
Reserves,
Trading Special SOJDC Total SOJ Operations Funds, and
the CIF
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 54,046 43,151 1,126 819,860
(6,662) 3,607 (155) (26,844) 47,383 46,758 971 793,016
51,907 28,325 311 854,976 (8,510) 847 (9) (25,961) 43,397 29,172 302 829,015
(2,139) (14,826) (815) 35,116 (1,848) (2,760) 146 883
(3,987) (17,586) (669) 35,999 1,422 - (39) (209,224)
(2,565) (17,586) (708) (173,225)
Special Total before
OperationsTrading Funds, and SOJDC Consolidation Consolidation Adjustments Total SOJ
the CIF Adjustments
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 278,644 443,384 9,995 3,864,848 (35,302) 3,829,546 4,118 302,968 32,991 544,871 15,432 560,303 45,075 5,566 - - - - (6,498) (114,255) (518) (241,908) (137) (242,045) (21,312) (1,874) - (413,613) - (413,613)
300,027 635,789 42,468 3,754,198 (20,007) 3,734,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,027 |
| 635,789 |
| 42,468 |
| 3,754,198 |
| (20,007) |
| 3,734,191 |
- |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
300,027 635,789 42,468 3,754,198 (20,007) 3,734,191
Note 5 Revenue
2011 2012 Note £'000 £'000
Levied by the States of Jersey
Taxation Revenue
Personal 335,818 353,993 Companies 74,980 79,489 GST 66,258 80,060 Taxation Revenue 477,056 513,542
Island rates, duties, fees, fines and penalties
4,018 4,091 6,465 6,783
6,295 5,974 12,479 15,825 20,866 20,396 148 328
894 839 Stamp Duty and Land Transfer Tax 22,567 21,172 Island Rates 10,915 11,480 Other Fees and Fines 8,477 8,891 Island rates, duties, fees, fines and penalties 93,124 95,779
Earned through Operations
Sales of goods and services 142,134 147,340
Investment Income
Investment Income 8 40,203 45,926 (Losses)/Gains on financial assets 9 (10,210) 41,042 Investment Income 29,993 86,968
Other Revenue
Financial Returns 3,710 3,685 Other Income * 46,999 15,050 Other Revenue 50,709 18,735
Total Revenue 793,016 862,364
*Other income includes: European Union Savings Tax Directive Income; Criminal Offences Confiscations Fund, grants, and recharges between departments.
Note 6 Expenditure
2011 2012 Note £'000 £'000
Social Benefit Payments
Social Benefits 10 100,908 103,643 States Contributions to Social Security Fund and Health
10 65,348 61,150 Insurance Fund
Total Social Benefit Payments 166,256 164,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staff costs |
|
|
|
|
|
States Members Remuneration States Staff Salaries and Wages States Staff Pension Costs States Staff Social Security Non-States Staff Costs Other Staff Costs Charges of Staff to Capital Projects | 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 |
| 2,515 280,744 35,804 15,345 12,451 3,233 (1,265) |
| 2,369 285,409 36,306 16,532 10,214 845 (135) |
Total Staff Costs 348,827 351,540 Other Operating expenses 212,414 198,774 Grants and Subsidies payments 12 37,960 35,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortisation |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment Intangible Assets | 7 7 |
| 44,004 2,422 |
| 49,899 2,035 |
Total Depreciation and Amortisation 46,426 51,934 Impairments
Property, Plant and Equipment Intangible Assets Trade Receivables Available for Sale Financial Assets | 7 7 7 |
| 7,793 - 2,034 31 |
| 21,515 - 4,582 (31) |
Total Impairments |
|
| 9,858 |
| 26,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on disposal of non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment Gains on disposal of assets classified as held for sale | 7 |
| (1,034) (1,684) |
| (405) (87) |
Total Gains on disposal of non-current assets (2,718) (492) Finance costs 13 15,465 15,048 Net foreign-exchange losses 438 168 Movement in pension liability 29, 30 (5,911) (50,956) Total Expenditure 829,015 792,338
Note 7
Non-Cash Items and other Significant Items included in the Net Revenue Expenditure
2011 2012 Net Revenue Expenditure/(Income) for the year is stated after
charging / (crediting) the following Non-Cash items: Note £'000 £'000
Non Cash Items
Depreciation of PPE1 44,004 49,899 Impairments of PPE and NCAhFS 2 7,793 21,515 Amortisation of Intangible Assets 2,422 2,035 Unwinding of Discount on Deferred Consideration (25) (20) Impairment loss recognised on Trade and Other Receivables 2,034 4,582 Impairment loss recognised on Available-for-Sale Investments 31 (31) Impairment loss recognised on Loans and Advances - - Increase/(Decrease) in Provisions 20,129 (22,652)
- Depreciation includes £1,117,779 of depreciation relating to assets funded by Finance Leases (2011: £1,118,295). £111,160 was released from the Donated Asset Reserve to the SoCNE to offset depreciation on Donated Assets during 2012 (2011: £98,720)
- £6,216,155 was released from the Donated Asset Reserve to the SoCNE to offset impairments on Donated Assets during 2012 (2011: £1,900)
2011 2012 Note £'000 £'000
Other Significant Items
Gain on Disposal of PPE (1,034) (405) Gain on Disposal of Intangible Assets - - Gain on Disposal of Non Current Assets held for Sale (1,684) (87) Loss/(Gain) on Investments 9 10,210 (41,042)
Auditors' Remuneration
Audit Fees 1 296 331
1. Other fees of £95,000 payable to the external auditor relate to the audit of the Social Security Funds' Accounts and agreed upon procedures in relation to Trust and Bequest Funds administered by the States (2011: 157,500).
Included in Sales of Goods and services are the following lease
rentals:
2011 2012 Note £'000 £'000
Lease Rentals as Lessor
Rentals Under Operating Leases 40,985 43,546
No rentals under Finance Leases were received in either 2012 or 2011.
During the year, the States recorded the following operating lease rentals as an expense:
2011 2012 Note £'000 £'000
Lease Rentals as Lessee
Land and Buildings 1,169 1,220 Plant and machinery 8 3 Other 191 176
Total 1,368 1,399
Note 8
Investment income
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Interest Income
Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss 16,899 17,594 Infrastructure Investments - 132 Loans and receivables 928 812 Cash and Cash Equivalents 1,088 1,094 Other 25 20
Total Interest Income 18,940 19,652
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
Strategic Investments Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss | 14,448 6,815 |
| 17,602 8,672 |
Total Dividends | 21,263 |
| 26,274 |
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Income 40,203 45,926
Investment revenue earned on financial assets analysed by category of asset is as follows:
Strategic Investments 14,448 17,602 Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss 23,714 26,266 Infrastructure Investments - 132 Loans and receivables 928 812 Cash and Cash Equivalents 1,088 1,094 Other 25 20
Total Investment Income 40,203 45,926
Note 9
Gains and Losses on Financial Assets
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Gain on disposal of Other Available-For-Sale Investments 16 9 Change in Fair Value of Investments held at Fair Value
(10,515) 40,572 through Profit or Loss
(Loss)/Gain on Cash Equivalents (21) 79 Change in Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments 310 382
Total Gains and Losses (10,210) 41,042
Note 10
Social Benefit Payments
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Social BenefitsSocial Benefits
Social Security: Income Support
Weekly Benefit1 66,940 68,995 Special Payments 1,430 1,530 Residential Care 16,613 16,694 Winter Fuel 345 562 Transitional Relief 2,004 1,060
Social Security: Other Benefits 4,601 5,417
Education, Sport and Culture: Student Grants 7,991 8,421 Health and Social Services: Allowances 984 964
Total Social Benefits 100,908 103,643 States Contributions to Social Security Fund and Health
65,348 61,150 Insurance Fund
Total Social Benefit Payments 166,256 164,793
1. For 2012 the Weekly Benefit figure includes a correc- tion of £2.3 million relating to previous years. Removing this correction gives a total of £71.3 million for weekly benefit payments in 2012.
Note 11 Staff Costs
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Year End FTE | Department | Salaries and Wages | Pension1 | Social Security | Total | ||||||
|
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
200 | Chief Minister's Department | 10,322 | 1,308 | 562 | 12,192 | ||||||
56 | Economic Development | 3,053 | 383 | 173 | 3,609 | ||||||
1,531 | Education, Sport and Culture | 69,484 | 9,849 | 4,155 | 83,488 | ||||||
105 | Department of the Enivronment | 5,701 | 758 | 317 | 6,776 | ||||||
2,333 | Health and Social Services | 103,466 | 12,287 | 6,043 | 121,796 | ||||||
640 | Home Affairs | 31,884 | 4,023 | 1,841 | 37,748 | ||||||
39 | Housing | 2,082 | 266 | 119 | 2,467 | ||||||
184 | Social Security | 5,859 | 853 | 357 | 7,069 | ||||||
507 | Transport and Technical Services2 | 18,633 | 2,066 | 1,065 | 21,764 | ||||||
235 | Treasury and Resources | 10,962 | 1,430 | 618 | 13,010 | ||||||
27 | States Assembly (excluding States Members) | 1,286 | 157 | 68 | 1,511 | ||||||
184 | Non Ministerial States Funded Bodies | 10,171 | 1,431 | 519 | 12,121 | ||||||
174 | Jersey Airport | 8,790 | 1,066 | 494 | 10,350 | ||||||
67 | Jersey Harbours | 3,157 | 358 | 180 | 3,695 | ||||||
| Other3 | 559 | 71 | 21 | 651 | ||||||
6,282 | Total | 285,409 | 36,306 | 16,532 | 338,247 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Staff costs charged to capital |
|
|
| (135) | ||||||
| Non-States staff costs4 |
|
|
| 10,214 | ||||||
| Other staff costs5 |
|
|
| 845 | ||||||
| States Members remuneration |
|
|
| 2,369 | ||||||
| Total Staff costs |
|
|
| 351,540 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
- Figures exclude costs associated with the PECRS pre-87 liability.
- Jersey Car Parking and Jersey Fleet Management FTE figures are included in the Transport and Technical Services figures
- Other includes the costs of States of Jersey Development Company (SOJDC) employees. Further details can be found in the separately published SOJDC accounts
- Non-States staff costs includes the costs of individuals who are not, but who are acting as, States Employees.
- Other staff costs includes redundancy, voluntary redundancy, allowances, severance payments and adjustments for the cost of accumulated compensated absences.
2011 Staff Figures are available in the 2011 Financial Report and Accounts.
Note 12 Grants
The note below summarises grants of £100,000 and over made by the States of Jersey in 2012.
Full details of Grants below £100,000 are given in Appendix A of the Annex to the Accounts.
2011 Grant 2012 Grant
£ £ Grantee
Humanitarian aid provided in response to Overseas Aid Grants 8,366,780 8,779,362 1 sustainable grant projects, disaster and
JOAC emergency relief and community work project
initiatives (n/a)
Market and promote the Finance Industry and Jersey Finance Limited 2,302,500 3,784,048 EDD
provide technical assistance to Government (1)
Support the operations of the Jersey Heritage Jersey Heritage Trust 2,443,430 2,775,422 ESC
Trust (4)
Beaulieu School 1,876,747 1,898,192 ESC Support the operation of Beaulieu School (1, 4)
Support the operation of De La Salle College (1, De La Salle College 1,975,990 1,895,612 ESC
4)
Assist people with disabilities by providing
H&SS and sheltered work and additional training and
The Jersey Employment Trust 1,050,410 1,073,188
SSD development for the most severely disabled (1, 4,
5)
Support the operation of non-provided schools Non-provided schools 1,609,113 822,119 ESC
(1, 4)
Deliver outreach, hostels, drunk and incapable Shelter Trust 681,020 681,010 H&SS
unit, and resettlement services (3, 4, 5)
Jersey Arts Trust - 571,956 ESC To repay the Opera House refurbishment loan (4)
Provide employment opportunities for those with The Jersey Employment Trust 559,010 558,693 SSD learning difficulties or on the Autistic spectrum
(1)
Subsidy in respect of the operation of the
Serco (Jersey) Ltd 476,822 483,822 ESC
Waterfront Pool (4)
Support the operations of the Jersey Opera
The Jersey Opera House 1,038,910 469,000 ESC
House (4)
Support the operations of the Jersey Arts Centre Jersey Arts Centre Association 453,061 454,447 ESC
(4)
2 Grant aid to various registered Jersey Charities Association of Jersey Charities 419,572 401,709 CILF (4)
Grant for the operation of the Channel Islands Channel Islands Brussels Office - 401,474 CMD
Brussels Office (1, 7)
Provide a free employment relations service to Jersey Advisory and Conciliation help employers, employees and trade unions
316,272 322,755 SSD
Service work together for the prosperity of Jersey
business and the benefit of employees (1)
Jersey Business Ltd - 304,000 EDD Grant support to cover operating costs (1, 2)
Work with the JCRA to create a more competitive Jersey Competition Regulatory
300,000 300,000 EDD commercial environment through the application Authority
of the Competition (Jersey) Law (1)
Area Payments support to underpin a base level The Jersey Royal Company 275,876 271,485 EDD
of farming activity in the countryside (1, 7) Assist with the costs of the Anti Money
Jersey Financial Services Commission 248,965 248,965 EDD
Laundering Unit (1)
Royal Jersey Agricultural and Services to support the dairy industry, e.g. bull
239,000 245,156 EDD
Horticultural Society proving and artificial insemination (1, 7)
Provide information and advice to members of Citizen's Advice Bureau 238,630 223,130 H&SS
the public (4, 5)
2011 Grant 2012 Grant
£ £ Grantee
Jersey Conference Bureau Limited Jersey Women's Refuge Alcohol Advice Centre Jersey Childcare Trust Jersey Arts Trust Canbedone Productions Ltd Le Don Balleine Trust Digital Jersey Foreshore Ltd Jersey Product Promotion Ltd Battle of Flowers Association | 220,500 204,350 190,810 175,000 156,310 50,000 140,930 - - 160,290 130,000 | 220,500 204,350 190,810 175,005 158,778 150,000 140,097 134,168 130,573 130,000 130,000 | EDD H&SS H&SS ESC ESC EDD ESC EDD EDD EDD EDD | Support the operation of the Jersey Conference Bureau (1) Provide temporary safe accommodation for women and children, helpline, guidance, support and counselling services (4, 5) Provide accommodation and support, residential and rehab and client support (4, 5) Support the operations of the Jersey Childcare Trust (1, 4) Support the operations of the Jersey Arts Trust (4) Funds to explore economic effects of the filming of a mainstream movie in Jersey (1) Support the operation of Le Don Balleine (4) Grant support to cover operating costs (1) Grant support to cover operating costs (1) Support for promoting Jersey products e.g. Genuine Jersey (1, 7) Battle of Flowers 2012 - Event grant (1) |
Jersey Focus on Mental Health | 120,880 | 120,880 | H&SS | Provide residential home, respite bed, wardened units and flats and advocacy service (4, 5) |
Jersey Legal Information Board Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust Bureau de Jersey Jersey Consumer Council Jersey Mencap Society | 100,000 - 95,000 100,000 61,183 | 120,000 115,000 105,000 103,695 101,784 | Judicial Greffe TDF3 CMD & EDD EDD SSD | Assist with running costs (4) Contribution towards a new accomodation offering in a niche market (1) Grant for the operation of Bureau de Jersey in Caen (1, 7) Funding of all functions and activities (1) To provide employment opportunities for those with learning difficulties or on the Autistic Spectrum (1) |
Total significant grants awarded in 2012 |
| 29,396,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other Grants and Subsidies - see Annex Appendix A |
| 6,066,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Total - Grants and Subsidies awarded in 2012 |
| 35,462,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes on Strategic Priorities
Information on which of the States of Jersey Strategic Priorities are supported in awarding each grant is provided in the table above.
nd
it rvi pu m
Initialisations:
ssi
Note 13 Finance Costs
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Interest Expense
PECRS Pre-1987 Debt Expense 14,256 13,979 Finance Lease Interest 1,036 843 Other Interest 44 79
Total Interest Expense 15,336 14,901 Finance Charges
Bank and Other Charges 129 147
Total Finance Charges 129 147 Total Finance Costs 15,465 15,048
During the year ended 31 December 2012 the States Procedures for Revaluations
of Jersey under took a full property valuation exercise.
The impact of this valuation exercise on the value of the All Property Assets with the exception of Assets Under Property, Plant and Equipment held by the States was an Construction, are subject to a quinquennial revaluation increase of £276.8 million to the total portfolio. In addition (QQR), with an Interim Valuation after 3 years. A full there was a decrease in the asset base of £14.0 million property valuation was under taken by District Valuer (additions of £38.2 million less depreciation of £50.0 Service (part of the Valuation Office Agency) during the million, disposals and transfers of £2.2 million). year. A seperate valuation of the Social Housing Portfolio
was carried out by Jones Lang LaSalle.
The results of the valuation included increases in the
Property portfolio (Land, Buildings and Other structures) Property Valuations are undertaken in accordance with of £253.6 million and the Social Housing portfolio of £70.2 the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors Appraisal and million, and decrease in the value of networked assets of Valuation Manual and are completed on the basis of the £45.6 million. existing use value to the Department. Where valuation is
made on a "Value in Use" basis, there is no significant An additional impact of the valuation process was a difference between Open Market Value and Value in
significant change in the useful economic lives of various Use.
assets. In particular Elizabeth Marina which increased by Infrastructure Assets are revalued annually, with the 38 years. Other assets which saw significant movements valuation in 2012 being carried out by District Valuer include the multi storey carparks which increased on Services (part of the Valuation Office Agency).
average by 20 years and various buildings which increased
on average by 5 years. Other non-property assets are valued in accordance
with IAS 16 as adapted by the JFReM. This may include
valuations by employees of the States of Jersey. Impairments
During the year impairment reviews were carried out in line with the States accounting policies and the requirements of the Jersey Financial Reporting Manual (JFReM). This included the consideration of downwards movements in value assessed as part of the revaluation process. Impairments recognised relate primarily to Transport and Technical Services (£45.6 million), where the value of the infrastructure was written down due to a reduction in the location factor applied to all civil works commissioned in Jersey used in the 2012 valuation.
No material impairments of assets, except those due to changes in market value identified as part of the valaution process, occurred during the year.
Investment Properties
Whilst the States does not generally hold assets solely for investment purposes, assets valuing £2.4 million are now held primarily for income generation and are included within Property, Plant and Equipment.
Heritage Assets Paintings, sculptures, and other
works of art
The States of Jersey owns a number of assets which are
held because of their cultural, environmental or historical The States of Jersey owns a number of pieces of Art, associations, rather than for operational purposes. These including paintings, sculptures, statues, fountains, and assets have not been valued where the incomparable other pieces of art in public places. Where a reliable nature of the assets means a reliable valuation is not valuation is available these assets have been included on possible, or level of costs of valuation greatly exceed the the Statement of Financial Position under the Antiques and additional benefits derived by users of the accounts, and Works of Art asset class. However, in a number of cases in these cases, no value is reported for these assets in no valuation is available, and the cost of obtaining one the Statement of Financial Position. would exceed the benefits, and in these cases no asset is
recognised. Thirty one pieces of art have been identified There were no significant acquisitions or disposals of but not recognised on the Statement of Financial Position, States' heritage assets during 2012. including 6 paintings and 20 sculptures in public places.
The principle advisor to the States in matters relating to
public heritage assets is the Jersey Heritage Trust. The Other Heritage Assets
Trust is an independent body incorporated in 1983, and
receives an annual grant from the States of Jersey to Other heritage assets held by the States of Jersey include: support its running costs. • Rare books at Jersey Library (with an estimated value of
£265,000)
• Antique Cannon at Fort Regent (no reliable estimate of
Heritage Properties value available)
• Various organs1 and pianos (recognised only where a
The States owns a number of Heritage Properties, reliable estimate exists)
including Elizabeth Castle, Mont Orgueil Castle, 11 forts • The Bailiff 's Mace and the Royal Seal (no reliable estimate and towers, 6 ruins, the Opera House and St James of value available)
Concert Hall . • Honours Boards, Memorials, Clocks, etc (recognised only
where a reliable estimate exists)
The Jersey Heritage Trust has been granted by deed
of gift the usufruct of both Castles, and as such has
responsibility for these properties, although the States
retains legal ownership, and as such they would not be
recognised as an asset of the States. 1. In particular, The Chapel Organ at Highlands has been
awarded a certificate Grade I by The British Institute of Some of the towers and forts are occupied, either by Organ Studies in recognition of it being a rare example the States or by external organisations, but any rental of instrument by Mutin/Cavaille-Coll 1913, in original amounts received are not reflective of the value of the condition. Whilst the value of the organ has been structure. As any such use is not the principle reason for approximated at £600,000, the cost of obtaining a formal retaining the properties, these are considered to be non- valuation is considered to outweigh the benefits that would operational heritage assets. For example, St Aubin's Fort be obtained."
is retained due to its historic and cultural relevance, not as
a residential facility. These properties are not valued due
to the difficulty in obtaining a reliable estimate of value,
and the costs that would be involved in valuation.
The Opera House and St James Concert Hall are both leased to the Jersey Arts Trust, although the States retains the responsibility for maintenance of these properties. These are both treated as operational heritage assets, and are valued and included within the Land and Building asset class on the Statement of Financial Position.
Note 15 Intangible Assets
Information Assets Under
Technology Course of Total
Software Construction
£'000 £'000 £'000
Cost or Valuation at 1 January 2012 15,053 794 15,847 Additions - 1,695 1,695 Transfers 1,212 (1,212) -
At 31 December 2012 16,265 1,277 17,542
Amortisation at 1 January 2012 (5,684) - (5,684) Amortisation charge (2,035) - (2,035) At 31 December 2012 (7,719) - (7,719)
Net Book Value: 31 December 2012 8,546 1,277 9,823 Net Book Value: 1 January 2012 9,369 794 10,163
Asset Financing
Owned 8,546 1,277 9,823 Net Book Value: 31 December 2012 8,546 1,277 9,823
| Information Technology Software £'000 |
| Assets Under Course of Construction £'000 |
| Total £'000 |
Cost or Valuation at 1 January 2011 | 10,540 |
| 3,041 |
| 13,581 |
Additions Transfers | 402 4,111 |
| 1,864 (4,111) |
| 2,266 - |
At 31 December 2011 | 15,053 |
| 794 |
| 15,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortisation at 1 January 2011 | (3,262) |
| - |
| (3,262) |
Amortisation charge | (2,422) |
| - |
| (2,422) |
At 31 December 2011 | (5,684) |
| - |
| (5,684) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value: 31 December 2011 | 9,369 |
| 794 |
| 10,163 |
Net Book Value: 1 January 2011 | 7,278 |
| 3,041 |
| 10,319 |
Asset Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
Owned | 9,369 |
| 794 |
| 10,163 |
Net Book Value: 31 December 2011 | 9,369 |
| 794 |
| 10,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16
Non-Current Assets Held for Sale
Non Current Assets Held for Sale £'000
Cost or Valuation at 1 January 2012 3,362 Transfers 1,930 Disposals (4,708) Revaluations 136 Impairments (88)
At 31 December 2012 632 Depreciation at 1 January 2012 (98)
Disposals 90 Revaluations 3 Impairments (91) Impairment Reversal 2
At 31 December 2012 (94)
Net Book Value: 31 December 2012 538
Net Book Value: 1 January 2012 3,264 Asset Financing
Owned 538
Net Book Value: 31 December 2012 538
All Non-Current Assets held for Sale as at 31 December 2012 are residential properties, in the process of being disposed by the States.
Non Current Assets Held for Sale £'000
Cost or Valuation at 1 January 2011 6,488 Transfers 1,421 Disposals (4,758) Revaluations 211 Impairments -
At 31 December 2011 3,362 Depreciation at 1 January 2011 (394)
Disposals 390 Revaluations - Impairments (94) Impairment Reversal -
At 31 December 2011 (98)
Net Book Value: 31 December 2011 3,264
Net Book Value: 1 January 2011 6,094 Asset Financing
Owned 3,264
Net Book Value: 31 December 2011 3,264
Note 17
Loans and Advances
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Analysed by Fund:
Consolidated Fund 5,602 4,674 3,150 Dwelling Houses Loan Fund 6,025 5,413 4,689 99 Year Leaseholders Account 173 169 165 Assisted House Purchase Scheme 4,273 3,367 2,654 Agricultural Loans Fund 1,824 1,423 1,164
Total Loans and Advances 17,897 15,046 11,822
Maturity Analysis:
Receivable within one year 2,049 2,446 1,739 Receivable between one and two years 2,457 1,874 1,331 Receivable between two and five years 4,559 3,579 3,008 Receivable in five years or more 8,832 7,147 5,744
Total Loans and Advances 17,897 15,046 11,822
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Changes to Loans and Advances
Opening Balance 21,118 17,897 15,046 Additional Advances made 103 -
Repayments (3,316) (2,851) (3,224) Write Offs (8) -
Closing Balance 17,897 15,046 11,822
No provisions for diminution of value have been required during the year. Investments in Leases
The States of Jersey does not act as Lessor in any Finance Lease
Note 18
Available-For-Sale Financial Assets
Available-For-Sale investments are non-derivative financial assets that are either designated in this category or not classified in any other categories and are intended to be held for an indefinite period of time. At present the States has no plans to sell any of the assets below.
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Strategic Investments: Equity Shares
Jersey Electricity plc 71,700 67,600 53,300 Jersey New Waterworks Company Limited 20,200 20,200 25,300 JT Group Limited 106,700 180,800 183,000 Jersey Post International Limited 30,900 20,900 19,800 Total: Equity Shares 229,500 289,500 281,400
Strategic Investments: Irredeemable Preference Shares
Jersey New Waterworks Company Limited 4,500 7,400 7,400 JT Group Limited 20,000 29,500 -
Total: Preference Shares 24,500 36,900 7,400 Total Strategic Investments 254,000 326,400 288,800
Other Available for Sale investments held at Fair Value
Homebuyer Housing Property Bonds 8,638 8,190 8,229 P7 Housing Property Bonds 5,759 5,847 6,057 Other - 298 303
Total Other Available for Sale Investments 14,397 14,335 14,589
Strategic Investment Holdings: Jersey Electricity plc
The States of Jersey holds all the ordinary shares in Jersey Electricity plc which represents approximately 62% of the Company's total issued share capital as at 31 December 2012 (86.4% of the total voting rights). Jersey Electricity plc also has "A" shares in issue which are listed on the London Stock Exchange, and two classes of preference shares, which hold 3% of the voting rights.
Jersey New Waterworks Company Limited
The States of Jersey hold 100% of the issued A' Ordinary shares, 50% of the issued Ordinary shares and 100% of the 7.5%-10% cumulative 5th Preference shares in the Jersey New Waterworks Company Limited as at 31 December 2012.
In addition, Jersey New Waterworks Company Limted has 6 other classes of preference shares issued.
Each ordinary share carries one vote. Whilst A' ordinary shares are in the ownership of the States of Jersey, the total number of votes carried by these shares is twice the number of votes cast in respect of all other shares.
Every holder of a preference share holds one vote, irrespective of the number and class of such preference shares.
States of Jersey Investment Limited
The States of Jersey owns 100% of the share capital of States of Jersey Investments Limited (SOJIL), a company used to hold the investments in JT Group Limited and Jersey Post International Limited. Due to its nature as a holding company, SOJIL is consolidated in full and included inside the Consolidated Fund. This has the effect of treating the investments in JT and Jersey Post as part of the Consolidated Fund.
JT Group Limited
SOJIL holds all the Ordinary shares in the JT Group Limited. During the year, the 9% cumulative preference shares were redeemed by the company at their par value of £20 million.
Jersey Post International Limited
SOJIL holds all the Ordinary shares in Jersey Post International Limited.
States of Jersey Development Company Limited
The States of Jersey holds 100% of the issued share capital for the States of Jersey Development Company Limited. However, this is consolidated in full in the accounts and therefore not accounted for as a strategic investment.
These valuations are intended to represent the accounting fair value in respect of these companies and are prepared solely for inclusion in the accounts. Such valuations do not indicate the value that might be sought or received from a full or partial sale of any holding. The States' investments in these companies are held on a long term basis; there is no intention to sell any of the States holdings at the present time.
Preference Shares are valued using the Dividend Valuation Model. Due to the method of valuation, increases in the value of preference shares will reduce the value of the equity shares. In 2010 Preference Shares were valued at par, and comparatives have not been restated.
Results of the 2012 Valuation
Overall the value of Strategic Investments decreased by £37.6 million. There was a decrease in the Strategic Investment in JT of £27 million. The value of equity shares increased by £2.2 million, and the preference shares (valued at £29.5 million in 2011) were redeemed. There was also the issue of an infrastructure investment of £10 million which is accounted for separately from the Strategic Investment (see Note 19). The investment in Jersey Water increased by £5.1 million, partly due to improved revenue forecasts and partly due to a lower Weighted Average Cost of Capital.
The investment in Jersey Electricity decreased in value (by £14.3 million), reflecting the drop in the traded share price at the year end. The valuation of Jersey Post was relatively stable.
Basis of Valuation of Strategic Investments
Strategic Investments are valued in line with the JFReM, IAS 39 and the Accounting Policies specified in Note 1.
Specifically, the following methodologies have been used to value Ordinary Share Capital:
| |
|
|
Other Available for Sale investments held at Fair Value
These investments are bonds that arise from the sale of properties to States tenants as part of the Social Housing Property Plan 2007-2016 (SHPP), sales to first time buyers qualifying under the Homebuy scheme and other similar arrangments.
The purchasers of properties under these two schemes are required to pay a proportion of the market value in cash on purchase and also enter into an agreement (bond) relating to the remaining value of the property. During the year new bonds with a value of £181,250 (2011: £451,250) were issued.
Upon the next sale and/or transfer of the property, the greater of the bond value and a proportion (as stated in the bond agreement) of the market value is paid to the States. During 2012, £31,430 of bonds were redeemed (2011: £23,500), with a gain of £8,570 being recognised.
There is no history of default rates within the scheme. Where the likelihood of recovering the bond amount is in doubt, an impairment review is carried out, and the value of the bond adjusted accordingly. Where a mortgage exists the mortgagor will have first call upon that property.
The Bonds are valued to reflect:
- the increase, and expected future increases, in the market value of the relevant property (calculated with reference to the Jersey HPI)
- the time value of money (using the States nominal discount rate of 6.1%)
- any indication of impairment of the bonds.
Some variants of the bond scheme in the SHPP include an element where the percentage of the bond value reduces. It is not expected that these bonds will be redeemed before the amount has reduced to a minimum, and therefore the value of these bonds is calculated based on this assumption.
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Movement in Fair Value |
|
|
Opening Fair Value Issue of New Bonds Redemption of bonds Movement in Fair Value Other Movements | 14,397 451 (24) (458) (31) | 14,335 181 (31) 73 31 |
Closing Fair Value | 14,335 | 14,589 |
|
| |
As bonds mature on the sale of the underlying property, which is outside of the States control, no Housing Bonds have been classified as Current Assets.
Note 19
Infrastructure Investments
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Currency Fund: JT - Gigabit Jersey - - 10,000 Currency Fund: Parish of Trinity - - -
Total Infrastructure Investments - - 10,000
Parish of Trinity
JT - Gigabit Jersey
A £10 million investment was approved in 2011 to provide support to JT for the financing of the Gigabit Jersey project. The Currency Fund carried out an Infrastructure Investment in JT Group Limited (JT) in line with its current Investment Strategy. The Infrastructure investment has taken the form of a 2.5% Redeemable Preference Share instrument. During 2012 all of the £10 million 2.5% Redeemable Preference shares were issued (£4 million in April, £3 million in June and £3 million in September).
A £6 million investment was approved in 2012 to provide financing to the Parish of Trinity for their phase one building project on Field No 578 to construct 25 first time buyer homes. The Currency fund will carry out an Infrastructure investment in the Parish for this specific purpose, in line with its current Investment Strategy. An Infrastructure Investment Agreement and a letter of support was signed by the Parish. During 2013 and 2014 these monies are expected to be drawn down. The Investment is expected to last for approximately 18 months and the investment returns will exceed the current level of returns the Currency Fund receives from its cash investments.
Note 20
Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss
Investments held in the Common Investment Fund are managed as a portfolio reported at Fair Value, and so the States has designated these investments at Fair Value through Profit or Loss. More details of CIF investments are included in Note 35. Investments held with the States' Cash Manager are classified as Cash Equivalents, and included in Note 23.
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Equities 213,970 295,330 340,997 Government bonds 235,465 206,283 207,273 Corporate Bonds 107,777 121,266 115,550 Certificates of Deposit 227,857 175,315 226,559 Other - - -
Total Investments at FVTPL 785,069 798,194 890,379
Investments are carried at market value in the accounts, which is not materially different from fair value.
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Maturity Analysis
Less than one year 272,050 241,090 312,756 Between one and two years 85,207 93,215 57,017 Between two and five years 158,549 111,301 115,396 More than five years 55,293 57,258 64,214 Equities 213,970 295,330 340,996
Total Investments at FVTPL 785,069 798,194 890,379
Note 21 Inventories
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Analysed by Fund:
Consolidated Fund 4,304 5,314 5,216 Jersey Currency Fund 2,129 1,829 1,987 Jersey Fleet Management 55 33 50 Jersey Airport 256 346 350 States of Jersey Development Company Limited. 23,023 24,673 25,510
Total Inventories 29,767 32,195 33,113
Analysed by Type:
Raw Materials, Consumables, Work in Progress and Finished Goods 6,790 7,568 7,649 Development Property Inventories 22,977 24,627 25,464
Total Inventories 29,767 32,195 33,113
Note 22
Trade and Other Receivables
Taxation Receivables
The Taxes Office actively monitors taxation receivables, and provides for doubtful debts based on the whole portfolio of receivables.
The provision is established as follows: receivables in excess of a defined threshold are reviewed individually to identify cases where there is a significant risk of non- collection - a specific provision is then made for these receivables. The remainder of the receivables are stratified by age, based on the year of assessment, and a set percentage provision is applied to each age category. The percentage provision increases with the age of the receivable, and is based on past experience.
The balance of taxation receivables after the provision for doubtful debts is therefore representative of the amount that is expected to be recovered for taxation receivables as a whole, and takes into account the risks of non- collection.
Non-Taxation Receivables
Included in the non-taxation receivables balance are debtors with a carrying value of approximately £3.3 million (2011: £4.0 million) which are past due at the reporting date for which the States has not provided as there has not been a significant change in credit quality and amounts, and are still considered recoverable.
2011 2012
£'000 £'000
2,459 1,504 404 335 249 121 894 1,389
4,006 3,349
2011 2012
£'000 £'000
1,437 1,325 312 903 (164) (227)
(38) (51) (222) 241
Balance at 31 December 1,325 2,191
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
2 99 14 70 11 54 1,298 1,968
1,325 2,191
Note 23
Cash and Cash Equivalents
| 2010 £'000 | 2011 £'000 | 2012 £'000 |
Bank deposit accounts | 90,718 | 62,948 | 62,203 |
Bank current accounts | 2,575 | 1,928 | 6,470 |
Cash in hand and in transit Cash Equivalents1 | 740 113,883 | 225 98,127 | 290 74,174 |
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents | 207,916 | 163,228 | 143,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Cash Equivalents include highly liquid investments held by the States Cash Manager. These were previously accounted for as investments under UK GAAP.
Note 24
Trade and Other Payables
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Amounts falling due within one year
Trade Payables 36,834 35,154 39,027 Current Portion of PECRS Past Service Liability 4,038 4,167 4,324 Income Tax Payables and Receipts in Advance 55,917 62,897 69,275 Accruals and deferred income 11,964 14,281 16,486
Receipts in advance 8,586 9,214 9,718
Total Payables due within one year 117,339 125,713 138,830
The average credit period taken for purchases is 33 days The States considers that the carrying value of trade (2011: 32 days). payables approximates to their fair value.
Note 25
Currency in Circulation
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Jersey Notes issued 96,062 91,158 88,984 Less: Jersey Notes held (10,835) (8,451) (6,703) Total Jersey Notes in Circulation 85,227 82,707 82,281
Jersey Coinage issued 8,986 8,987 9,172 Less: Jersey Coinage held (1,434) (1,098) (983) Total Jersey Coinage in Circulation 7,552 7,889 8,189
Total Currency in Circulation 92,779 90,596 90,470
Under the Currency Notes (Jersey) Law 1959 the States At the end of their useful life they are removed from produce and issue bank notes and coins. These are circulation and destroyed, at which time they are removed accounted for, at cost, as stock until they are formally from the issued currency account. Issued currency is issued by the Treasury and Resources Department. They either held at the Treasury or in circulation. The creditor in are then accounted for as issued currency. the accounts reflects the value of currency in circulation.
Note 26
Finance Lease Obligations
The States of Jersey have entered into finance lease and sale and lease back arrangements to finance the development of certain capital projects, Morier House, Maritime House and the airport alpha taxiway. At 31 December 2012, the States had commitments to make the following payments under these arrangements.
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Amounts payable under finance leases
3,936 3,962 2,692 12,058 9,630 8,462 5,509 3,984 2,460
Gross Minimum Lease Payments 21,503 17,576 13,614
(4,579) (3,514) (2,628)
Total Finance Lease Obligations 16,924 14,062 10,986
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Amounts payable under finance leases
2,862 3,076 1,964 9,373 7,485 6,796 4,689 3,501 2,226
Total Finance Lease Obligations 16,924 14,062 10,986
Note 27 Provisions
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Provisions as at 31 December made up of:
1,205 1,508 2,254 4,448 22,660 1,327
5,058 6,672 4,607
Total Provisions 10,711 30,840 8,188
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Movement in Provisions
10,711 30,840 26,346 1,425
(6,047) (24,048) (170) (29)
Balance 31 December 30,840 8,188
Material amounts included in "Other 2010 2011 2012 Provisions" include: £'000 £'000 £'000
Note 4,448 - - i
- 22,600 - ii
2,080 2,080 1,287 iii
- 2,080 2,080 iv
1,871 1,871 1,871 v
Note 28
Derivative Financial Instruments
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Derivative Liabilities
HDF Letters of Comfort 2 2 4
Total Derivative Liabilities 2 2 4 Derivative Assets
Other Financial Derivatives - 299 493 Total Derivative Assets - 299 493
Housing Trusts Letters of Comfort
The Treasury and Resources Department have agreed to provide financial support to various Housing Trusts in respect of bank loans. To this end, the department has issued a total of 33 Letters of Comfort to 6 Housing Trusts, covering loans totalling £125.4 million as at 31 December 2012 (2011: £128.8 million). These loans do not consitute guarantees, but provide a cap on interest rates - if rates exceed an agreed threshold the States will provide a subsidy (through the Housing Development Fund) equal to the excess. Due to low interest rates, no subsidies have been paid since 2009. The letters cover a range of periods, with the last exposure currently expiring in 2034.
Valuation
The value of the liability that these letters represent has been determined using Discounted Cash Flow methods, using estimations of future interest rates to project subsidy payments.
Sensitivity
The values of interest rate caps are dependent on several factors, including year end loan balances, commercial expectations of future interest rates, and changes in the markets' expectations. Changes in these factors could lead to changes in the future value of the liability recognised, to reflect expected changes in the subsidies that are expected to be paid.
Whilst latest market indications are that interest rates are not expected to increase to levels that will trigger the payment of a subsidy for several years, the table below shows what the approximate level of subsidy payments would be in 2013 if rates were at various levels for the year.
Value of Subsidies
Interest Rate (LIBOR)
(2013) £'000
3% 0 4% 685 5% 1,580 6% 2,752 7% 3,966 8% 5,179
Other Financial Derivatives
Fair Value Fair Value Nominal
of of Amount
Contract Contract Hedged
Year of Expiry 2011 2012
£'000 £'000 £'000 2012 3,255 98 - 2013 5,056 114 263 2014 4,884 87 230 Total Derivative Assets 299 493
The States of Jersey receives some income in Euros, particularly with respect of the Channel Islands Air Control Zone (approximately £7 million per annum). The States has entered into a number of forward contracts to sell Euros in excess of operational requirements at a fixed rate between 2012 and 2014.
Whilst these instruments hedge foreign exchange risk, they have not been designated as hedging instruments and are accounted for at Fair Value through the Operating Cost Statement. More details on the management of Foreign Exchange risk is given in Note 34.
Details of Gains and Losses recognised on these instruments are given in Note 9.
Other derivatives may be held on a short term basis where this is appropriate for the management of the States investments. No such instruments were held at the year end. As gains and losses are small and relate directly to investments held at Fair Value through the Profit or Loss, any gains and losses on these derivatives are included within gains and losses on these investments.
Note 29
Past Service Liabilities PECRS pre-1987 debt
The framework for dealing with the pre-87 debt is debt to increase or decrease over the course of a financial documented in the ten-point agreement. Under this year due to changes in market conditions. During 2012 agreed framework, annual repayments are due to be paid the value of the pre-87 debt decreased by £1.6 million. until 31 December 2083. The amount payable increases Changes in these assumptions can affect the value of the each year in line with the average pay increase of Scheme liability included in the Accounts. For example, an increase members who are States employees. This means that the of 0.1% in the Discount Rate, or a decrease of 0.1% in repayment of the debt is weighted towards the end of the the staff increase assumption, would result in a decrease loan period. Due to the relative size of the annual payment in the liability of approximately £8 million. Conversely, a the States does not consider that this liability leads to any decrease of 0.1% in the Discount Rate, or an increase of significant liquidity risk. 0.1% in the staff increase assumption would lead to an
increase of approximately £8 million. Such movements in The debt is valued as a salary-like bond and the long term the liability amount are recognised within the "Movement nature of this arrangement means that the level of the debt in Pension Liabilities" line in the SoCNE.
is sensitive to changes in the market conditions that are
used to value the debt. It is possible for the level of the
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Balance at 1 January 269,473 252,019 Finance Charge 14,256 13,979 Payment in Year (3,961) (4,111) Movement in Liability amount (27,749) (11,436)
Balance at 31 December 252,019 250,451
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Amounts Falling due
Within one year 4,167 4,324 After one year 247,852 246,127
Total 252,019 250,451
The calculation of the Closing Liability amount uses the following assumptions:
2011 2012
% %
Average future increase in Staff Expenditure 5.00 4.87 Discount Rate 5.45 5.42
JTSF Past Service Liability
The Teachers' Superannuation Scheme was restructured in April 2007 and as a result a provision for past service liability, similar to the PECRS pre-87 past service liability, was recognised. In 2012, as part of the process for completing the 2010 Actuarial Valuation, the Scheme's Management Board made a proposal to the States on the treatment of the pension increase debt.
On the basis of the Management Board proposal the Scheme Actuary has calculated the value of this past service debt at the actuarial valuation date and an updated value as at 31st December 2012. As a result the provision has decreased from £135.1 million to £97.7 million, with the movement being recognised within the "Movement in Pension Liabilities" line in the SoCNE.
This represents the expected amount that will be required to settle the liability, based on the latest information available in the 2010 Actuarial Valuation of the Scheme and the Management Board proposal. The reduced level of debt reflects the Management Board decision to set the level of the Pre-2007 debt at a level that ensures there is no actuarial surplus or deficit in the Scheme at the 2010 Actuarial Valuation.
The liability had not been formally agreed as at 31 December 2012, but a proposition will be taken to the States during 2013 to amend the relevant orders to formally recognise the liability, and determine how it will be repaid. In subsequent years the liability would then be likely to be valued in a similar way to the PECRS Pre-1987 Debt.
level that ensures there is no actuarial surplus or deficit in the Scheme at the 2010
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Balance at 1 January 114,000 135,100 Movement in Liability amount 21,100 (37,353)
Balance at 31 December 135,100 97,747
Note 30
Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Recognised on the Statement of Financial Position
The States of Jersey operates three defined benefit pension schemes: the Jersey Post Office Pension Fund (JPOPF), the Discretionary Pension Scheme (DPS) and the Civil Service Scheme (CSS). In addition, the States also has responsibility for the unfunded Pensions Increase Liability (PIL). The States also operates a further two schemes which are not recognised on the Statement of Financial Position, details of which are given in the Treasurer's Report.
Assumptions
The main financial assumptions made by the actuary where applicable were:
Demographic Assumptions for each scheme are made by the Actuary, as are assumptions about the long term returns on various asset classes.
2010 2011 2012
% p.a. % p.a. % p.a.
Jersey Price Inflation 3.9 3.3 3.2 Rate of general long-term increase in salaries 5.2 4.0 3.9 Rate of increase to pensions in payment 3.9 3.3 3.2 Rate of increase to pensions in payment payable by PECRS 3.6 3.0 3.05 Discount rate for scheme liabilities 5.3 4.6 4.3
Scheme Assets and Liabilities
The JPOPF holds assets in several classes, with the majority being Gilts. The DPS has a single asset, in the form of a Secured Pension.
The JPOPF had reported a small surplus for a number of years, but this is not recognised as an asset due to the restrictions of paragraph 58 of IAS 19, which only allows assets to be recognised to the extent that they are recoverable.
Liability2010Net Liability201Net 1 Liability LiabilityNet
2012
Asset
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Jersey Post Office Pension Fund - - (9,106) 9,694 588 1 Discretionary Pension Scheme 335 298 (238) 530 292 Jersey Civil Service Scheme (pre-67) 6,153 6,167 - 5,973 5,973 1972 Pensions Increase Act 4,664 5,028 - 2,429 2,429 Total Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Net (Asset)/Liability 11,152 11,493 (9,344) 18,626 9,282
Amounts recognised in Net Revenue Expenditure
The difference between expected returns on scheme assets and interest on scheme liabilities is recognised in Net Revenue Expenditure.
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Jersey Post Office Pension Fund 210 137 161 Discretionary Pension Scheme 28 20 14 Jersey Civil Service Scheme (pre-67) 6,599 315 274 Pensions Increase Liability 4,664 266 (2,616)
Total Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Charges 11,501 738 (2,167)
Amounts recognised in Other Comprehensive Income
Actuarial Gains and Losses on both scheme assets and liabilities are recognised through Other Comprehensive Income.
The Jersey Civil Service Scheme (pre-1967) (CSS) was first recognised in 2010. The profit and loss charge for this scheme was combined with the amount recognised in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses for 2010.
2010 2011 2012 £'000 £'000 £'000
Jersey Post Office Pension Fund 1,420 137 (427) Discretionary Pension Scheme 25 31 12 Jersey Civil Service Scheme (pre-67) - (140) 22 Pensions Increase Liability - (120) (59)
Total Gains/(Losses) recognised in Other Comprehensive Income 1,445 (92) (452)
Note 31
Capital Commitments
At the reporting date the States had authorised capital This amount includes the following amounts which are expenditure of £98.9 million. (2011: £71.6 million) from committed via a contractural arrangement, but not yet
the consolidated fund which had not yet been incurred. incurred/provided for.
A further £41.5 million was authorised from the Trading
Funds, but not incurred (2011: £40.7 million).
|
| 2011 |
| 2012 | ||
|
| £'000 |
| £'000 | ||
|
| - |
| 558 | ||
|
| 1,424 |
| 4,868 | ||
|
| 257 |
| 4,039 | ||
|
| 262 |
| 11 | ||
|
| 2,565 |
| 600 | ||
|
| 4,896 |
| 1,548 | ||
|
| - |
| 1,327 | ||
|
| - |
| 169 | ||
|
| - |
| 368 | ||
|
| - |
| 179 | ||
|
| 1,514 |
| 70 | ||
|
| 789 |
| 20 | ||
|
| - |
| 254 | ||
|
| - |
| 655 | ||
|
| - |
| 141 | ||
|
| 144 |
| 1,044 | ||
|
| - |
| 499 | ||
|
| - |
| 610 | ||
|
| 637 |
| - | ||
|
| 3,056 |
| 71 | ||
|
| 479 |
| - | ||
|
| 101 |
| - | ||
|
| 285 |
| 17 | ||
|
| - |
| 1,059 | ||
|
| - |
| 166 | ||
|
| - |
| 112 | ||
|
| - |
| 546 | ||
Total Capital Committments |
| 16,409 |
| 18,931 | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Note 32
Commitments under Operating Leases: The States as Lessee
Total Minimum lease payments under operating leases are given below:
2011 2012 £'000 £'000
Land and Buildings
Within one year 757 682 In the second to fifth years inclusive 2,143 2,420 After five years 1,008 1,055 Total Land and Buildings 3,908 4,157
Plant and Machinery
Within one year 3 3 In the second to fifth years inclusive 5 2 After five years - - Total Plant and Machinery 8 5
Other Operating Leases
Within one year 184 165 In the second to fifth years inclusive 7 - After five years - - Total Other Operating Leases 191 165
Total Operating Lease Commitments 4,107 4,327
Note 33
Commitments under Operating Leases: The States as Lessor
The States acts as lessor in a number of operating lease arrangements.
Included in Property, Plant and Equipment are assets held for use in operating leases:
| 2011 £'000 | 2012 £'000 |
Cost Accumulated Depreciation | 684,255 (65,533) | 751,176 (28,234) |
Net book Value | 618,722 | 722,942 |
|
|
|
The majority of this amount relates to Social Housing Assets, with a NBV of £582 million (2011: £508 million). At the reporting date, the States had contracted with tenants for the following minimum lease payments:
| 2011 £'000 | 2012 £'000 |
Within one year In the second to fifth years inclusive After five years | 43,546 181,109 47,603 | 43,930 184,782 48,549 |
Total | 272,258 | 277,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 34
Impact of a 3% Impact of a 3% Risk Profile and Financial Equity fall in equity fall in equity
Instruments Denomination value value
£m £m
This note provides certain information relating to particular Sterling (2.9) 2.9 financial instruments which are material in the context of
the accounts as a whole. Euro (4.7) 4.7
US Dollar $ (1.0) 1.0
This year represents the second full year of operation of
the Common Investment Fund (the "CIF") following its Other (1.6) 1.6 establishment on 1st July 2010. The CIF was instigated
as an arrangement to allow States Funds and other Funds
managed by the States to pool their assets for investment Currency/Foreign Exchange Risk
purposes. (Overseas & Global Pools)
The Global Equity Pools may invest in equities denomi- ThelatestMinisterinvestmenfort Treasurystrategy onand1stResourcesOctober 2012presentedsetting outhis nated in currencies other than sterling.
the strategy for each Fund; including Strategic Aims and As a result, changes in the rates of exchange between investment limits to mitigate risk. The Minister has also currencies may cause the value the Pools to vary in line published a policy on corporate governance and ethical with the value of the investments held within them. This investment. risk is managed through the asset selection of the underly-
ing Investment Managers.
The identification, understanding and management of
risk are, by necessity, a major part of the management Exposure to currency risk through the buying and selling activities. of investments is managed though permitting Investment Managers to utilise forward foreign exchange contracts for
- Common Investment Fund hedging purposes. Hedging is permitted into sterling, and cross hedging (hedging into a currency other than ster- ling) is not permitted unless the cross hedge is part of a
Market Risk set of deals which are designed to achieve in aggregate a hedged position back into sterling. The maximum amount
Equity Price Risk of hedging permitted is 100% of the value of the securities in the relevant country.
The States of Jersey is exposed to equities price risk
as it holds £341 million in equity instruments traded on The sensitivity analysis below has been determined based a range of global stock exchanges. The price of units in on the exposure to investments held in foreign currencies the Investment Pools will therefore vary subject to market at the reporting date.
fluctuations.
The table below illustrates how a 10% variation in equity Over long periods of time the Investment Pools are values in different currency exchange rates would have
expected to produce positive total returns; in the short term affected net revenue income for the year ended 31 De- the value of the Investment Pools will fluctuate according cember 2012. If there was a 10% movement in the value to market conditions, generating gains and losses on Pool of the pound against all currencies the total impact would values. Investment Strategies for Investment Pools are be £24.5 million.
developed for generally long-term growth and it is possible
that investment objectives may not be fully met over a
short-term horizon. Investment Impact fall in equity of a 10% Impact fall in equity of a 10%
Denomination value value TheequityStatesgrowthof inJersey2013 Investmentwith a 3% Advisorrange aroundhas estimateda mean £m £m
estimate to give an optimistic and pessimistic expected Euro (15.7) (15.7) scenario. This range has been applied to give an estimate US Dollar $ (3.4) (3.4)
of the exposure to equity price risk at the reporting date.
Other (5.4) (5.4)
The table below illustrates how a 3% variation in equity values in different currency denominations would have affected net revenue income for the year ended 31 December 2012. If there was a 3% rise or fall in global equity prices the total impact is estimated to be £10.2 million (methods and assumptions are consistent with the prior period).
Investment Manager Risk
An advantage in pooling funds for investment purposes is the ability to achieve greater economies of scale than would be available to each participant investing individually.
Investment Manager Risk has been addressed through placing limits on the amount which may be placed with each Manager therefore limiting the risk exposure of any single Investment Manager. Where the maximum limit on a Pool is reached, the Pool can be expected to be closed to new investments, but increases in market value above the maximum amount may still occur due to market movements and would not necessitate the closure of the Pool. Similarly a minimum amount is set for each Pool below which the Pool may not be viable as a separate entity.
The following table sets out the ranges each Investment Manager should be responsible for, for each different Pool type within the CIF:
Pool Asset Minimum Maximum Classes Amount Amount
£m £m Equities 75 250* Bonds 100 500 Cash 0 100,000
An in principle' minimum and maximum value is set for the amount which may be invested per individual Investment Manager, dependent on respective class of Investment they manage.
Maximum values are set to limit to concentration risk with any single manager and is dependent on asset class; higher risk classes, such as equities, receive a lower investment ceiling'. Minimum values are set per manager in accordance with their fee scales in order to ensure asset allocations remain efficient.
*During the year money was withdrawn from the Global Equity Managers as high returns pushed asset values to in excess of their £250 million limit. As at the year end, further gains driven by rallies in the Equity Markets have pushed holdings in the Global Equity Pools to in excess of their prescribed limits. Arrangements are in place to expand the capacity in Global Equity Pools; this will decrease the concentration with any single manager back to within the preset limits.
Operational Risk
The Custodian and Investment Managers provide monthly reports confirming compliance with the agreed Investment Manager mandates and controls. The Investment Management Department investigates any breaches to determine the cause and any actions required.
As at 31st December 2012 there were no breaches outstanding.
Liquidity and Cash flow Risk
The Treasury forecasts cash flow for Funds to ensure that sufficient short-term cash is available to meet monthly
cash requirements. Each Fund's asset strategy is prepared to take account of cash/liquidity requirements, and investments are held in accordance with these strategies. When required, units are sold from the CIF to provide the necessary liquidity.
Credit and Counterparty Risk
Equity investments
To mitigate against the risk that an investment defaults and to limit the exposure to a particular investment performing poorly the following restrictions are in place.
- Only investments that are, at the time of acquisition, quoted on Regulated, Recognised or Designated Investment Exchanges as determined by the UK Financial Services Authority or new issues with a quotation after issue or traded on an Approved Stock Exchange and EEA Regulated Markets published by the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group on its website from time to time are allowed. Grey (unofficial) market or over the counter transactions are not permitted.
- Each Investment Manager may hold up to 5.0% of the Fund in warrants, nil and partly paid securities, provided that it is reasonably foreseeable that the warrants could be exercised or the calls paid without breaching the investment restrictions in this Agreement.
- No Investment Manager is permitted to acquire share holdings greater than 3% of the issued share capital in any one company.
Compliance with these limits has occurred throughout the year.
Bonds and gilts
Investments in bonds and gilts are dependent on the solvency of financial institutions which have issued instruments. To mitigate this risk a number of issuers are used to manage and diversify the risk. The following restrictions are placed on the Investment Manager to ensure there is no reliance on one issuer.
- The maximum percentage of the total market value of the fixed income portfolio that may be directly invested in any single issue at the date of the purchase is as follows:
Corporate
Bond Credit Bonds Gilts
Ratings Maximum % Maximum %
AAA 5 5 AA 4 3
A 3 2 BBB 2 11/2
- The maximum proportion of the Corporate Bond Pools which can be directly invested in securities of an "A" credit rating and below is equal to that of the benchmark of the Pool plus 5%. In the case of the Short Term Corporate Bond this benchmark is the Merrill Lynch Corporate
& Collateralized 1-5 Years index. For the Long Term Corporate Bond Pool this is the Merrill Lynch Corporate
& Collateralized 5+ Years index.
- The maximum proportion of the Corporate Bond Pools which can be directly invested in securities of credit rating BBB (or if applicable below) is again equal to their respective benchmark plus 5%.
- The Gilt Pool must retain a minimum of 85% of the portfolio in UK government bonds, up to 10% of the portfolio may be invested in overseas government bonds; however these bonds must be of investment grade. Up to 5% of the portfolio may be held in cash.
Compliance with these limits has occurred throughout the year.
Cash
The same cash manager controls the CIF Cash Pools and the deposit accounts of the States of Jersey. The risks faced inside the CIF are similar to those faced by the cash assets held outside the CIF, detailed below.
- Cash Management
The States Cash Manager is restricted in the asset classes that he/she may invest in and the proportion of funds that may be invested in each asset class. The main control is the restriction on the industry rating which limits which institutions deposits can be held with.
Deposit term Minimum Industry
Rating
Standards & Poor's A1 Short term (up to 3 months) and Moody's P1
Standards & Poor's AA- Long term (over 3 months)
and Moody's Aa3
Assets are required to be sold when an Institution holding a deposit is downgraded to A3 or lower.
Compliance with these limits has occurred throughout the year.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk exists as unexpected changes in interest rates will lead to variations in the level of income received by the States of Jersey from investments that pay variable interest. Placement decisions are made based on expectation of future interest returns and the requirements to hold cash and are actively managed by the States of Jersey Cash Investment Manager.
During 2012 interest rates have remained relatively low when compared to historic averages. As detailed later in this note, the States of Jersey currently hold £48.3 million in variable rate instruments, and a sensitivity analysis has been performed over these accounts to estimate the impact of a rise or fall in 3m LIBOR of 0.4% (double the estimated range expected by the States of Jersey Investment Advisor).
The effect of such a movement on net revenue income if it is perfectly reflecting in the rates applied to the variable accounts will be £0.2 million.
Estimated Estimated impact of a impact of a
Investment 0.4% fall in 0.4% rise in LIBOR rates LIBOR rates
£m £m Return from
variable rate (0.2) 0.2 accounts
Foreign currency risk management
The States of Jersey may undertake certain transactions denominated in foreign currencies as part of its operations, and this leads to an exposure to exchange rates fluctuations. Exchange rate exposures are managed within approved policy parameters and reviewed by the Treasury Advisory Panel on a quarterly basis. When large future flows of foreign currency balances are known forward foreign exchange contracts are utilised to hedge against movements in rates. The States also holds some cash denominated in foreign currency to meet its cash flow needs.
The carrying amounts of the States of Jersey foreign currency denominated monetary assets at the reporting date are as follows:
Foreign currency
denominated 2011 2012 monetary assets:
£m £m US Dollar $ 2.9 1.9 Euro 1.6 6.4 Other - -
Note 34
Financial Instruments
- Interest rate disclosures
No interest payable/
Fixed rate Variable rate Total
receivable
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Financial Assets
Sterling £
10,043 1,614 165 11,822
- - 96,259 96,259
321,495 1,328 - 322,823 226,559 - - 226,559 95,698 38,837 291 134,826
US Dollars $
- - 157,086 157,086
1,789 96 - 1,885 Euros
- - 33,677 33,677
- 6,425 - 6,425
Other
- - 53,975 53,975
- 1 - 1
Total Financial Assets 655,584 48,301 341,453 1,045,338
Financial Liabilities
10,986 - - 10,986
Total Financial Liabilities 10,986 - - 10,986
- Maturity analyses
Weighted average Weighted average rate
period (months)
Fixed rate financial assets
4.68% 130.7
5.04% 70.9 1.39% 5.3
- Fair Value Estimation
Level 1
The Fair Value of financial instruments carried at Fair Value is determined using an Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or Loss (see Note 20) appropriate valuation method. The different levels are Cash Equivalents (see Note 23)
• quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
(Level 1); Level 2Derivative Forward Contracts (see Note 28)
• inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable
for the asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, Level 3
derived from prices) (Level 2)
• inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data Strategic Investments (see Note 18)Other Available for Sale Financial Instruments (see Note 18) (unobservable inputs) (Level 3). Derivative Letters of Comfort (see Note 28)
In these accounts, the following classes of financial instruments are valued using the following valuation methods:
FINANCIAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2012 | TREASURER'S REPORT
Note 35
SOJ Common Investment Fund a) Explanation of the CIF
The States of Jersey – Common Investment Fund ("the CIF") was established in 2010 by proposition P35/2010, lodged by the Minister for Treasury and Resources. The purpose of the proposition was to amend several existing regulations to enable the pooling of States Funds' assets for Investment Purposes and was approved by the States of Jersey on 12th May 2010.
The purpose of the CIF is to create an administrative arrangement which is open only to States Funds including, Special Funds and Trust and Bequest Funds to provide them with the opportunity to pool their resources and benefit from greater investment opportunities and economies of scale.
The CIF pools together the assets from a number of Funds and collectively invests the underlying assets, enabling them to invest in accordance with their own agreed asset allocations as published in their strategies.
The Minister for Treasury and Resources presented his latest investment strategy on 1st November 2011. Investing through a single investment vehicle allows economies of scale to be exploited increasing the potential return of the investments held and diversity of asset classes.
The CIF became operational on 1st July 2010 and as at 31 December 2012 contained 9 active pools holding a range of asset classes (including equity, bonds, gilts and cash).
The following are participants in the CIF that are not part of the States of Jersey Accounts:
• Health Insurance Fund
• Social Security (Reserve) Fund
• Le Don De Faye
• Rivington Travelling Scholarship Fund
• Greville Bathe Fund
• Ann Alice Rayner Fund
• A H Ferguson Bequest
• Estate of E J Bailhache
2010 2011 2012
Attributable to
Included in the Included in the Entities Included in the Total CIF
SOJ Accounts SOJ Accounts Outside the SOJ Accounts
SOJ Accounts
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Revenue
11,183 23,416 42,621 16,213 26,408
11,576 (10,515) 98,491 57,921 40,570
Total Revenue 22,759 12,901 141,112 74,134 66,978
Expenditure
921 2,149 7,389 4,609 2,780 45 294 1,124 4 1,120
169 154 59 54 5 Total Expenditure 1,135 2,597 8,572 4,667 3,905
Net Revenue Income (21,624) (10,304) (132,540) (69,467) (63,073)
c) CIF - Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2012
2010 2011 2012
Attributable to
Included in the Included in the Included in the
Total CIF Entities Outside
SOJ Accounts SOJ Accounts SOJ Accounts
the SOJ Accounts
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Non-Current Assets
Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or
Loss 513,018 557,104 1,174,173 596,550 577,623 Total Non-Current Assets 513,018 557,104 1,174,173 596,550 577,623
Current Assets
Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or
Loss 272,050 241,090 326,224 13,468 312,756 Trade and Other receivables 6,435 6,496 8,957 1,810 7,147 Cash and Cash Equivalents 27,730 9,005 41,892 16,897 24,995 Total Current Assets 306,215 256,591 377,073 32,175 344,898
Current Liabilities
Trade and Other Payables 1,138 200 1,521 1,004 517 Total Current Liabilities 1,138 200 1,521 1,004 517
Assets Less Liabilities 818,095 813,495 1,549,725 627,721 922,004
Taxpayers' Equity
Accumulated Revenue and Other Reserves 39,505 49,808 203,402 90,523 112,879 Net contributions 778,590 763,687 1,346,323 537,198 809,125
Total Taxpayers' Equity 818,095 813,495 1,549,725 627,721 922,004
2011 2012
Investment Change in Fair Operating
Net Income Net Income
Income Value Expenditure
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
(2) - - - -
(4) - - - -
7,024 8,256 (6,847) (208) 1,201
(8) - - - -
1,437 3,683 1,643 (163) 5,163 4,158 4,212 6,659 (188) 10,683 752 47 (50) (10) (13) 413 - - - - 2,147 3,517 769 (219) 4,067 2,154 7,803 23,522 (1,576) 29,749
(5,125) 6,033 41,669 (3,807) 43,895 (6,225) 5,408 30,170 (1,845) 33,733
- 3,662 956 (556) 4,062
CIF Total 6,721 42,621 98,491 (8,572) 132,540 Less:amount attributable to Participants
(3,583) 16,213 57,921 (4,667) 69,467 outside the Accounting boundary
Total - SOJ Accounts 10,304 26,408 40,570 (3,905) 63,073
stablis
- CIF - Income and Expenditure Attributable to Participantf) CIF - Income and Expenditure Attributable to Participant funds
Participants do not hold individual investments, rather a share of a pool of investments. The table below shows the income and expenditure in the CIF apportioned by the relevant holdings of participant funds.
2011 2012
Net Income Income Expenditure (Losses)Gains/ Net Income £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Strategic Reserve 7,302 22,230 (3,530) 38,226 56,926
Stabilisation Fund 10 47 (2) (1) 44
Jersey Currency Fund 1,133 1,422 (206) 1,921 3,137
Consolidated Fund 1,772 2,512 (157) 555 2,910
CI Lottery (Jersey) Fund 3 8 (1) - 7
Dwelling House Loan Fund 84 189 (9) (131) 49
Total - SOJ Group 10,304 26,408 (3,905) 40,570 63,073 3905 Amounts attributable to Participants outside the (3,583) 16,213 (4,667) 57,921 69,467 4667
Group boundary
Total CIF 6,721 42,621 (8,572) 98,491 132,540 8572
Gains/(Losses) includes the following amounts which had not yet been realised at the date of the Financial Statements.Gains/Losses includes the following amounts which had not yet been realised at the date of the Financial Statements.
2011 2012
Gains/ Gains/ (Losses) not (Losses) not yet realised yet realised
£'000 £'000
Strategic Reserve (131) 38,484 Stabilisation Fund (14,809) (1) Jersey Currency Fund (319) 1,857 Consolidated Fund (4) 544 CI Lottery (Jersey) Fund - 2 Dwelling House Loan Fund (16) (100) Total - SOJ Group (15,279) 40,786
Amounts attributable to Participants outside the (18,301) 52,267 Group boundary
Total CIF (33,580) 93,053
- CIF - Analysis of Net Asset Value by Participant and Pool
Jersey CI Lottery Dwelling
Strategic Reserve Stabilisation Fund Currency (Jersey) House Loan Consolidated Fund Total - SOJ Group Outside Group Total CIF
Fund Fund Fund
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
UK Equities Pool - - - - - - - - - Overseas Equities Pool - - - - - - - - - Short Term Govt Bonds Pool 198,241 - 6,191 - 4,236 - 208,668 14 208,682 Long Term Govt Bonds Pool - - - - - - - - - Short Term Corporate Bonds Pool 65,492 - - - - - 65,492 7,025 72,517 Long Term Corporate Bonds Pool 53,693 - - - - - 53,693 28,214 81,907 Index Linked Bonds Pool - - 1,332 - - - 1,332 2,733 4,065 Short Term Cash & Cash Equivalents Pool - - - - - - - - - Long Term Cash & Cash Equivalents Pool 1,227 1,049 43,111 539 1,410 195,798 243,134 15,289 258,423 UK Equities II Pool 73,289 - 5,436 - - - 78,725 133,322 212,047 Global Equities I Pool 112,595 - 5,043 - - - 117,638 146,272 263,910 Global Equities II Pool 110,108 - 4,924 - - - 115,032 144,852 259,884 Passive Global Equities Pool 36,650 - 1,640 - - - 38,290 150,000 188,290 Total 651,295 1,049 67,677 539 5,646 195,798 922,004 627,721 1,549,725
651295 1049 67677 539 5646 922004 627721 1549725
Note 36
Contingent Assets and Liabilities Contingent Assets
There are no Contingent Assets as at 31 December 2012.
Guarantees not recognised as Financial Liabilities
Jersey New Waterworks Company Student Loan Guarantees
The States of Jersey have provided a guarantee to HSBC Faced with increasing tuition fees and increased numbers Plc up to a maximum of £16.2 million (2011: £16.2 million) of local young people seeking entry to higher education, for amounts outstanding in respect of a loan to the Jersey the Education, Sport and Culture Department has worked New Waterworks Company Limited. As at the year end with local banks to offer a loan facility valued at up to the amount guaranteed was £14.9 million (2011: £14.9 £1,500 per year to all students attending programmes of million). This guarantee was first provided in its current higher education in the UK. The introduction of this facility form in 1999, and historically no amounts have been drawn helps to spread the costs of tuition by enabling the student down in relation to it. Due to the stability of the company to take responsibility for part of the costs. The interest rate and the resulting low likelihood of default, the current value is set at 1% above base rate and young people taking up of total expected outflows under this guarantee will be very the offer commence repayments one year after graduation. low and so no amount is recognised on the Statement of
Financial Position. The States of Jersey has given guarantees against these
loans to the banks. As at the year end the value of the Jersey Arts Trust loans amounted to £1.9 million (2011: £1.7 million).
The States of Jersey has provided a guarantee to Barclays There is no experience of default in the Jersey Scheme, Bank Plc for £3.5 million (2011: £3.8 million) for amounts and the equivalent scheme in the UK experiences defaults outstanding in respect of a loan to the Jersey Arts Trust on approximately 1% of the total balance each year. Using in connection with the renovation of the Opera House (as a simplified analysis of the guarantees this would suggest approved by P167/98). In the same proposition the States that the current value of total expected outflows under increased the funding provided to the Trust to allow them the scheme will be very low (less than £50,000) and so to cover the loan repayments. Without this funding it is no amount is recognised on the Statement of Financial unlikely that the Trust could meet the repayments, and Position for these guarantees.
so the States would become liable under the guarantee.
However, as there are no plans to reduce the funding at
present, no amounts are recognised on the Statement of
Financial Position.
Small Firms Loan Guarantee Scheme
The Small Firms Loan Guarantee Scheme (SFLGS) commenced in January 2007. The Scheme approves lending by the Economic Development Department (by way of loan guarantees of up to £2 million), consisting of four separate £500,000 agreements with four banks. The underwriting of bank loans taken out by local businesses aims to encourage entrepreneurial activity in the Island. The main principle of the SFLGS is to provide security to lenders in the cases where would-be entrepreneurs or growing businesses do not have the necessary security to obtain a business loan.
As at the year end the value of the total loans guaranteed amounted to £354,345 (2011: £525,547), of which the States has exposure to 75% in accordance with the terms of the Scheme, giving a total exposure of £265,759 (2011: £365,160). During 2011 the States provided for £187,500 losses against these guarantees, leaving a remaining exposure of £78,259. No amount is recognised on the Statement of Financial Position for this exposure due to their relevant size and the uncertainties in the measurement of expected outflows.
Other Contingent Liabilities
There are several cases where a possible obligation may exist (as a result of past events), and where the existence of the liability will be confirmed only by future events outside of the States control.
Civil claims against the States of Jersey still continue to be a present obligation that arises from past events with regards to the Historic Child Abuse Enquiry. Although the quantum has been estimated within the banding set by a UK specialist counsel based on a sample of claims, there is a substantial process to be undergone before the matter can be finalised. A provision for this liability cannot be made in the Accounts because the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient accuracy.
A number of other potential liabilities may exist, but details are not included in these accounts as they may prejudice the outcome of the actions in question.
These include potential claims in the following areas:
- Health and Safety
- Employment issues
- Contract Terms
- Medical Claims
- Public Liability Claims
Note 37
Losses and Special Payments
| 2011 £'000 | 2012 £'000 |
Losses |
|
|
|
| |
Losses of cash: |
| |
309 131
- 36
Total loss of cash 309 167
Bad debts and claims abandoned
1,553 2,041 324 139
43 - 233 107
Total bad debts and claims abandoned 2,153 2,287
Damage or loss of inventory
(522) 681 77 211
Total damage or loss of inventory (445) 892
Impairments of Property, Plant and Equipment
577 - (452) -
Total impairment of Property, Plant and Equipment 125 -
Other Losses
277 - 109 71
Total Other Losses 386 71
Special Payments
Compensation payments
100 19 Total compensation payments 100 19
Ex gratia and extra contractual payments
117 878 Total ex gratia and extra contractual payments 117 878
Severance payments
2,537 318 Total severance payments 2,537 318
Total Losses and Special payments 5,282 4,632
Note 38 Gifts
No Gifts were made in 2012 (2011: nil)
Note 39
Related Party Transactions
Transactions between entities within the States of Jersey Group have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note.
Transactions with utility companies and government departments that are a result of their role as such are excluded in line with accounting standards. This includes:
• Electricity provided by Jersey Electricity
• Water provided by Jersey Water
• Postage services provided by Jersey Post
• Telephone charges from JT
• Social Security Contributions to the Social Security Fund and Health Insurance Fund
All transactions are at arms length and undertaken in the ordinary course of business unless otherwise stated.
Where the party is related through a Minister or Assistant Minister, only transactions occurring whilst they were in office are included.
2012
Balances Due Balances Due
Income Expenditure Notes
to the States by the States
Organisation
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Directly Controlled Entities - Strategic Investments
Jersey Electricity 2,076 1,759 176 35 Expenditure includes grants of £45k Jersey Post 495 90 25 8 Expenditure includes grants of £11k JT 418 82 43 4
Jersey Water 136 151 1
Directly Controlled Entities - Minor Entities
A Maclean and P Ryan are Board Bureau de Jersey Ltd 105 Members. Expenditure is a grant of
£105k.
Jersey Dental Scheme 116 Expenditure is in support of the scheme
A Maclean, Economic Development Jersey Legal Information Board 120 Minister, is a Board Member.
Expenditure is a grant of £120k
Directly Controlled Entities - Other
Health Insurance Fund 11 602
Social Security Fund 64,068 1,156
Social Security (Reserve) Fund 17
Haute Vallee School Fund 15
Hautlieu School Fund 11
Jersey College for Girls School Fund 21
Victoria College School Fund 53 Expenditure includes grants of £35k Victoria College Prep School Fund 7
Indirectly Controlled or Influenced Entities - through Strategic Investments
Jersey Deep Freeze Ltd 216 5 Subsidiary of JEC
Subsidiary of JEC. Expenditure Jersey Energy 26 2
includes grants of £8k
Joint Venture JEC.
Foreshore Ltd 131
Expenditure is a grant of £131k
Retirement Schemes
Income related to services provided by PECRS 546 444
the Treasury Department
Income related to services provided by JTSF 299 417
the Treasury Department
Controlled or influenced by Key Management Personnel or members of their close family
P Ozouf , Treasury and Resources Alliance Francaise de Jersey 64 Minister is Vice Chair. Expenditure
includes grant of £12k
P Ryan, Education, Sport and Culture Augres Landscape 5 15
Minister, is the Owner.
P Bailhache , Chief Minister's Assistant Governing body of Institute of Law 4 92 30 Minister, is the Chairman. Expenditure
includes grants of £32k.
J Baker, Economic Development Grafters Ltd 21
Assistant Minister, is a Shareholder.
J Martin, P Ryan and S Pinel are Jersey Employment Trust 34 1,656 33 Members of the Board.
Expenditure includes grants of £1,632k.
L Farnham , Home Affairs Assistant Jersey Hospitality Association 67 Minister, is the President. Expenditure
includes a grant of £66k.
P Routier, Chief Minister's Assistant Jersey Mencap 1 102 Minister is a Member.
Expenditure is a grant of £102k
P Routier, Chief Minister's Assistant Minister, is Vice-President.
Jersey Table Tennis Association 4 4 102 Expenditure includes a grant of £4k.
Amounts due relate to a loan from the States.
E Noel, Treasury and Resources
Assistant Minister and P Routier, Chief Les Amis Incorporated 2 1,611 17
Minister's Assistant Minister, are Trustees.
J Le Fondré, Transport and Technical Services Assistant Minister, is the Honorary Secretary. This balance
Les Vaux Housing Trust 101 183
relates to loans from the States, and income to interest charged on these loans.
A Pryke, Health and Social Services Trinity Youth Club 24 3
Minister, is President.
L Farnham , Home Affairs Assistant Yacht Hotel Limited 3 15 2
Minister, is a Director.
J Refault, Housing and Health and Parish of St Peter 33 34 Social Services Assistant Minister, is
the Connétable .
2011
Balances Due Balances Due
Income Expenditure Notes
to the States by the States
Organisation
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Directly Controlled Entities - Strategic Investments
Jersey Electricity 221 2,077 24
Jersey Post 460 99 43 3 JT 239 301 38 56 Jersey Water 160 117 3
Directly Controlled Entities - Minor Entities
|
|
| 97 |
|
|
|
|
| A Maclean, Economic Development Minister is a Director. Expenditure includes grant of £95k |
|
|
| 129 |
|
|
| 28 |
| Expenditure is in support of the scheme |
|
|
| 100 |
|
|
| 100 |
| A Maclean, Economic Development Minister is a Director. Expenditure and amounts due is a grant of £100k |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bureau de Jersey Ltd
Jersey Dental Scheme
Jersey Legal Information Board
Directly Controlled Entities - Other
Hautlieu School Fund
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
| 536 |
| 11 |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
|
|
| 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 68,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
| 42 |
|
|
|
|
| Expenditure includes grants of £34k |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Insurance Fund
Jersey College for Girls Fund Social Security (Reserve) Fund Social Security Fund
Victoria College School Fund
Indirectly Controlled or Influenced Entities - through Strategic Investments
Jersey Deep Freeze Ltd 63 1 Subsidiary of JEC
Jersey Energy 28 3 Subsidiary of JEC
Associate of JEC, All shares sold in Newtel Cable Limited 20 127
April 2011.
Retirement Schemes
Income related to services provided by PECRS 519 505
the Treasury Department
Income related to services provided by JTSF 231 196
the Treasury Department
Controlled or influenced by Key Management Personnel or members of their close family
P Ozouf , Treasury and Resources Alliance Francaise de Jersey 57 Minister is Vice Chair, Expenditure
includes grant of £12k
P Ryan, Education, Sport and Culture Augres Landscape 24
Minister is the Owner.
T Le Sueur , former Chief Minister is a Beaulieu Convent School Ltd 43 2,188 2 Director. Expenditure includes a grant
of £2,182k
A Green, Housing Minister is a Director. Headway (Jersey) Ltd 30
Expenditure Includes grants of £28k
A Maclean, Economic Development Jersey Conference Bureau 11 227 Minister is Chairman. Expenditure
includes grant of £221k
S Pinel, R Bryans and J Martin are members of the board as
Jersey Employment Trust 31 1,625 9 representitives of their respective
departments.
Expenditure includes a grant of £1,609k
L Farnham , Home Affairs Assistant Jersey Hospitality Association 17 Minister is President. Expenditure is a
grant of £17k
P Routier, Chief Minister's Assistant Jersey Mencap 129 Minister was the President until May
2011. Expenditure is grants of £171k.
P Routier, Chief Minister's Assistant
Minister is Vice President.
Jersey Table Tennis Association 11 16 102 Expenditure is a grant of £16k.
Amounts due relate to a loan from the States.
J Le Fondré, Transport & Technical Services Assistant Minister is the Honorary Secretary.
Les Vaux Housing Trust 130 1,829
The balance relates to loans from the States, and income to interest charged on these loans.
M Jackson , former Transport &
Technical Services Minister is the Parish of St Brelade 2 25
Connétable .
Amounts due include a loan of £25k.
L Norman, Former Economic
Parish of St Clement 6 60 Development Assistant Minister, is the
Connétable
J Refault, Housing and Health and Parish of St Peter 7 Social Services Assistant Minister, is
the Connétable .
Note 40
Third Party Assets
The States of Jersey, in the course of its normal activities, has reason to hold assets on behalf of third parties.
The Viscount of the Royal Court undertakes a number of activities that give rise to holding assets on behalf of third parties. The majority of these are held as part of the anti- money laundering regime. The main activities that give rise to this are:
• Désastres: assets relating to bankruptcy cases for onward payment to creditors;
• Curatorship: funds held on behalf of those who cannot manage their own affairs;
• Enforcement: judgements and compensation monies for onward payment to creditors and beneficiaries;
• Criminal injuries: funds held on behalf of minors until age of maturity;
• Bail: monies held on behalf of bailors;
• Saisies Judiciaires: assets seized pending investigation and court cases relating to drug trafficking and proceeds of crime. Following a conviction, property adjudged to represent the benefit or proceeds of crime is remitted to the Drug Trafficking Confiscations Fund or the Criminal Offences Confiscations Fund; if a third party is found not guilty, property is returned.
In addition to the liquid assets listed the Viscount's Department holds real property and contents with an approximate total value of £13.6m (2011: £9.2 million).
In addition to monies listed the Health and Social Services Department holds equipment on trial and various consignment stocks, valued at £0.4 million (2011: £0.4 million)
The States arrangement to pool funds for investment purposes, is known as the Common Investment Fund'. The Common Investment Fund invests monies in respect of funds included within these accounts, such as the Strategic Reserve, as well as funds not included in these accounts but still under the responsibility of the Minister for Treasury and Resources and the Treasurer of the States, for example the Social Security Reserve Fund. Further details of the Common Investment Fund, including the value of investments falling into both these categories can be found in Note 35.
The Health & Social Services Department holds monies on behalf of patients, equipment on loan or trial and various consignment stocks.
Monies held on behalf of third parties are set out below:
2011 2012 Total Total £'000 £'000
Viscount's 32,702 30,745 Health and Social Services 386 332
Note 41
Entities within the Group Boundary
Consolidated Fund Entities Subsidiary Companies
Ministerial Departments States of Jersey Development Company Limited
Chief Minister's Department (previously theWaterfront Enterprise Board Limited), Economic Development Department including subsidiary companies.
Education, Sport & Culture Department
Department of the Environment Minor Entities
Health & Social Services Department There are a number of small entities funded by the States Home Affairs Department
Housing Department thatGroupmeet(i.e.thetheyrequirementsare directlyto controlledbepartoftheby Statesthe States)ofJerseybut Social Security Department are immaterial to the financial statements as a whole, and
Transport and Technical Services Department have not been consolidated (see Accounting Policy 4.4. Treasury and Resources Department These entities are referred to as "Minor Entitites" and are
generally funded by a grant from a department, which will Non-Ministerial Bodies form part of the cash limit of the department making this
Overseas Aid Commission grant.
Bailiff 's Chambers
Law Officers' Department An entity can be classified as a minor entity if they meet Judicial Greffe certain criteria, namely that:
Viscount's Department
Official Analyst • Gross annual expenditure during the year; and
Office of the Lieutenant Governor • Net book value of Property, Plant and Equipment at Office of the Dean of Jersey year end; and
Data Protection Commission
Probation Department • Level of Net Assets at year endare all below a Comptroller and Auditor General designated threshold
• The threshold is calculated as 1% of the lowest of
The States Assembly and its Services • Gross annual expenditure during the year; and [Including Assemblée Parlementaire de la Francophonie • Net book value of Property, Plant and Equipment at
- Jersey Branch and Commonwealth Parliamentary year end; and
Association (Jersey Branch)]
• Level of Net Current Assets at year end (excluding
Subsidiary Holding Company Non-Current Assets held for Sale, the current portion
of Investments held at Fair Value through Profit or States of Jersey Investments Limited Loss and Currency in Circulation)
States Trading Operations
Jersey Airport for the States of Jersey in the previous financial year. Jersey Harbours
Jersey Car Parking For 2012, the threshold was therefore £1,645,000 (based Jersey Fleet Management on Net Current Assets for 2011).
Special Funds In all cases the qualitative nature of the entities is also
considered, to ensure that exclusion would not distort the Strategic Reserve true and fair view of the accounts.
Stabilisation Fund
Currency Fund (comprising Jersey Currency Notes Minor Entities are considered to be related parties, and and Jersey Coinage) transactions with them are included as part of Related Dwelling Houses Loans Fund Party Transactions Disclosures
Assisted House Purchase Scheme
99 Year Leaseholders Fund For 2012, the following are considered to be Minor Agricultural Loans Fund Entities:
Tourism Development Fund
Channel Islands Lottery (Jersey) Fund • Bureau de Jersey
Housing Development Fund • Ecology Fund
Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund • Jersey Dental Scheme
Drug Trafficking Confiscation Fund • Jersey Legal Information Board
Civil Asset Recovery Fund
Fishfarmer Loan Scheme (Dormant)
ICT Fund (Dormant)
Note 42
Publication and Distribution of the Financial Report and Accounts
In accordance with the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005, the Financial Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 December 2012 have been approved by the Minister for Treasury and Resources and were presented to the States for publication and distribution.
Note 43
Events after the Reporting Date
There are no significant events after the reporting date requiring disclosure in these financial statements.
States of Jersey Treasury
Cyril Le Marquand House PO Box 353
Jersey, Channel Islands JE4 8UL
Telephone: +44 (0)1534 440215 Facsimile: +44 (0)1534 445522
www.gov.je