European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR): Protocol 15.

STATES OF JERSEY

EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS (ECHR): PROTOCOL 15

Presented to the States on 26th June 2013 by the Chief Minister

STATES GREFFE

2013   Price code: B  R.68

REPORT

Summary

1. On 20th April 2012, a ministerial conference of all the States Parties to the European  Convention  on  Human  Rights  (ECHR)  adopted  the  Brighton Declaration'1.  This statement  represented  political  agreement  to a comprehensive package of reforms of the operation of the European Court of Human Rights ("the Court").
2. Some parts of the Brighton Declaration require amendment of the Convention itself, and will therefore be given  effect  by  an  amending  protocol  to  the Convention; this will be numbered as Protocol 15 to the Convention.
3. The Government of Jersey has confirmed formally that itis content for Jersey to be included in the United Kingdom's ratification of Protocol 15.

This paper outlines the provisions of Protocol 15 and its implications for Jersey. Background

Protocol 15 was adopted on the 16th May 2013 and will be opened for signature on the 24th June. It will come into effect once ratified by all existing High Contracting parties to the ECHR.

Protocol 15 implements 5 changes to the ECHR in response to some elements of the Brighton Declaration –

1. to add a reference to the principle of subsidiarity2 and the doctrine of the margin of appreciation3to the Preamble to the Convention, giving visibility  to these  key  concepts  that  define  the  boundaries  of  the Strasbourg Court's role;
2. to change the rules on the age of judges of the Strasbourg Court, to ensure that all judges are able to serve a full 9 year term;
3. to remove the right of parties to a case before the Strasbourg Court to veto a Chamber's relinquishing jurisdiction to the Grand Chamber, a measure intended to improve the consistency of the Court's case law;

1 http://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=BrightonDeclaration

2  The  principle  that  national  governments,  parliaments  and  courts  have  the  primary

responsibility for  securing to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention, and for providing an effective remedy before a national authority for everyone whose rights and freedoms are violated. By extension, the role of the Court is to interpret authoritatively the Convention, and to act as a safeguard for individuals whose rights and freedoms are not secured at the national level.

3  The  doctrine  that,  depending  on  the  circumstances  and  the  rights  engaged,  national

authorities may choose with a range of responses how they implement the Convention.

4. to reduce the time limit for applications to the Court from 6 months to 4 months; and
5. to tighten the admissibility criteria in the Convention to make it easier for the Court to throw out trivial applications.

The predominant purpose of these changes is to streamline the functioning of the Court in response to concern, voiced in particular by the UK, that the Court was habitually engaged in cases in which its involvement was unnecessary and that its decisions did not accord sufficient weight to the principle of subsidiary and doctrine of margin in appreciation. This is part of a rolling programme of reforms that are intended to reduce the considerable backlog of cases before the Court.

Collectively, these changes constitute positive steps from the point of view of the United Kingdom and all the territories to which it has extended obligations under the Convention.

The official texts of Protocol 15 and its Explanatory Report are attached in the Appendix.

Implications for Jersey

Under Article 63 of the Convention, the United Kingdom has extended its obligations under the ECHR to Jersey. Protocol 15 will change how the Court works, and will need to be ratified by all 47 States Parties to the Convention to come into force. When the United Kingdom ratifies Protocol 15, it will therefore do so also on behalf of all the territories to which its Convention obligations extend.

Whilst the Protocol 15 will have no impact on Jersey's domestic law, residents of Jersey enjoy the protection of the ECHR and the right to apply to the Court in the event that they have no remedy for an infringement of their ECHR rights domestically. Protocol 15 will, in particular by reducing the time limit for making applications, tighten the existing restrictions on access to the Court.

It is considered that none of these changes require that any amendment be made to the content of the Human Rights (Jersey) Law 2000 ("the 2000 Law"). Leaving aside the amendment to the Preamble to the Convention, the remaining changes all relate to the handing of proceedings before the Court or to the judges composing it. These changes do not impact on the Convention rights brought home' by the enactment of the 2000 Law[4] or the way that cases are dealt with in a domestic setting.

The change to the Preamble to the ECHR is somewhat different from the other changes and has a greater potential to influence Jersey's domestic application of the Convention rights. The Preamble to the ECHR is not incorporated into Jersey's domestic law and Jersey's courts are not required by the 2000 Law to have regard to it when interpreting either the Convention rights or domestic legislation. However, it may have an effect on the way that the Court interprets the ECHR in cases that come before it. Article 3 of the 2000 Law requires the courts in Jersey, when interpreting

Convention rights, to take into account the decisions of the Court. So, once the change to the Preamble comes into effect, there may be some impact on the jurisprudence on which Jersey's courts draw when interpreting the Convention rights brought home by the 2000 Law. However, no change is required to the 2000 Law to facilitate that process.

APPENDIX