Skip to main content

Jersey Financial Services Commission: Companies’ Register (P.87/2010) – comments.

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

STATES OF JERSEY

JERSEY FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION: COMPANIES' REGISTER (P.87/2010) – COMMENTS

Presented to the States on 28th September 2010 by the Minister for Economic Development

STATES GREFFE

2010   Price code: A  P.87 Com.

COMMENTS

The  Minister  for  Economic  Development  will  oppose  the  proposition  lodged  by Deputy P.V.F. Le Claire of St. Helier on the following grounds –

  1. Relations with the Jersey Financial Services Commission fall within the remit of the Minister for Economic Development and not that of the Minister for Treasury and Resources, and therefore if a consultation were to be carried out as suggested, this ought properly to be done by the Minister for Economic Development.
  2. The issues mentioned raise questions of wider concern and therefore, before any decision is made, a widespread consultation exercise ought to be carried out (not only a consultation with the Jersey Financial Services Commission).
  3. In  relation  to part (a)  of  the  proposition,  the  registrar  of  companies  has existing powers to prevent companies being registered with names which are "misleading  or  otherwise  undesirable".  The Registrar  of  Companies  has informed me that he uses these powers to prevent companies from being incorporated with the names of dissolved companies in circumstances where this might give rise to confusion. This system allows for greater flexibility than  would  be  the  case  if there  were  explicit  provisions  forbidding  the incorporation  of  companies  with  identical  or  similar  names  to previously dissolved companies.
  4. In relation to part (b) of the proposition, the proposed new duty on financial services providers will impose an extra cost on them. It is not clear whether financial  services  providers  currently  have  in place  systems  which  would allow them to conduct a search of the kind envisaged. This year, the registrar has issued strike-off notices in relation to over 1,500 companies, which gives some idea of the number of searches which financial services providers would have to carry out. Any addition to the cost of doing business in the Island will adversely affect our competitiveness internationally.
  5. Also in relation to part (b) of the proposition, I am not aware that there is a significant problem in relation to transactions purportedly being carried out on behalf of dissolved companies. Such transactions would in any case be void. It therefore seems possible that the proposed solution would impose costs out of proportion to its benefits.

Page - 2

P.87/2010 Com.