Skip to main content

Concessionary bus fares for the disabled: discussions with LibertyBus (P.140/2015) – comments.

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

STATES OF JERSEY

CONCESSIONARY BUS FARES FOR THE DISABLED: DISCUSSIONS WITH LIBERTYBUS (P.140/2015) – COMMENTS

Presented to the States on 14th December 2015 by the Council of Ministers

STATES GREFFE

2015   Price code: A  P.140 Com.

COMMENTS

Deputy M. Tadier of St. Brelade has lodged a proposition –

"to request the Minister for Transport and Technical Services to enter into formal  discussions  with  LibertyBus  to  investigate  the  provision  of concessionary bus passes for those with a prescribed disability, and to bring forward proposals to the States no later than 31st May 2016 detailing both the potential cost implications and the criteria which applicants would have to meet in order to access this service."

The Council of Ministers accepts this Proposition.

This  work is  already being undertaken  corporately by the  Social Policy Unit, in conjunction  with  the  Transport  and  Technical  Services  and  Social  Security Departments. The initial high-level findings  are to be reported to the  Council of Ministers in early 2016.

This work on bus passes forms a sub-set of the work being undertaken to develop an Island-wide Disability Strategy, and needs to be concluded before informed decisions can be taken about costs and funding routes. This work on a Disability Strategy includes a wide-ranging independent survey, establishing the prevalence of disability and long- term conditions in Jersey, and the profile and needs of such people.

In making policy and investment decisions, the key objective should be to remove barriers to mobility for as many people as possible, as opposed to simply providing free or subsidised bus travel to those who are sufficiently able to access buses, or fortunate enough to have an accessible route to and from bus stops. Indeed, the funding of free or subsidised bus travel may be at the expense of more targeted and effective forms of mobility service.

For example, Sweden, which is amongst the most progressive nations in providing mobility for people with a disability, does not have concessionary bus passes. Rather, it provides financial support which is targeted to those with the highest need, with a range of transport options. The individual may then choose the mobility solution which best suits their lifestyle and requirements.

Nevertheless, the Social Policy Unit and Transport and Technical Services Department are  in the  process  of  collating  the  data  required  to  make  informed  decisions  on concessionary passes. However, based on initial assumptions, it is likely the bus pass alone could cost in the region of £500,000 per annum.

In making final decisions about bus passes for people with a disability in addition to the existing passes for older people, consideration must be given to the long-term financial impact.

In the United Kingdom, 30% of all bus travel is free to the user and, as a result, rural bus services are being decimated by the associated funding pressures. The end result is that there are no or very limited buses for pass-holders to access. Any concessionary scheme must be sustainable, and must be properly funded. Given the constraints on budgets that we face as our population ages, and as we invest, in particular, in health, social services and in education, this will entail difficult decisions.

Page - 2

P.140/2015 Com.

In  conclusion,  the  Council  of  Ministers  recommends  that  the  Proposition  is accepted. This work is underway, having been instigated earlier this year by the Council of Ministers, and will be reported by May 2016.

It is important to remove barriers to mobility for as many people as possible, supporting increased social inclusion, which is a clear priority of this Council of Ministers.

Page - 3

P.140/2015 Com.