Skip to main content

PPC Minutes 30th May 2003

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

PM/KAK/155.03  72

PRIVILEGES AND PROCEDURES COMMITTEE (14th Meeting)

30th May 2003

PART A

All members were present, with the exception of Deputy F.J. Hill, B.E.M. and Deputy J.A. Bernstein, from whom apologies had been received.

Senator C.G.P. Lakeman Connétable D.F. Gray Deputy C.J. Scott - Warr en Deputy R.G. Le Hérissier Deputy J-A. Bridge

In attendance -

M.N. de la Haye, Greffier of the States P. Byrne, Executive Officer

Mrs. J. Marshall, Executive Officer designate (for a time)

R.W. Whitehead, Principal Legal Adviser, Law Officers' Department C. Pastural, Assistant Legal Adviser P. Monamy, Senior Committee Clerk.

Note: The Minutes of this meeting comprise Part A and Part B.

Minutes. A1.  The Minutes of the Meetings held on 12th May (Part A) and 21st May 2003

(Part A), having been previously circulated, were taken as read and were confirmed.

Official Report of A2.  The Committee, with reference to its Act No.  A3 of 4th April 2003, gave the States further consideration to its draft report and proposition (version 5) on the proposed Assembly and its Official Report of the States Assembly and its Committees (Hansard').

Committees

(Hansard') - The Committee noted responses to its invitation for comments on the draft report and report and proposition which had been received from Deputy J.L. Dorey and also from the proposition. Bailiff . The Committee decided that it would wish to maintain its stance in relation to 1240/10/1(1) minimal' editing of members' contributions in the States Assembly, as it felt that

this should assist members in focussing upon the content of their utterances. The Ex.Off. Committee agreed, however, to amend the reference in the report to States members T.O.S. providing the Official Report Editor with a copy of their "speeches" in favour of the C.I.Aud. term "speaking notes."

F.E.C.C.

States (2) The  Committee  accordingly  approved  the  report  and  proposition,  subject  to  the Pub.Ed. abovementioned amendment, decided to lodge the proposition au Greffe' on 17th

June  2003,  and  invited  the  comments  thereon  of  the  Finance  and  Economics Committee in due course.

The Greffier of the States was directed to send a copy of this Act to the Finance and Economics Committee.

Scrutiny Panels A3.  The Committee, with reference to its Act No.  A3 of 21st May 2003, gave and Public further  consideration  to  its  draft  report  and  proposition  regarding  the  proposed Accounts Scrutiny  function  (Scrutiny  Panels  and  Public  Accounts  Committee:  Terms  of Committee: Reference, powers, privileges and method of appointment) within the new machinery Terms of of government.

Reference,

powers, Having noted that the draft had been amended so as to include most of the points privileges and which  had  been  raised  previously  by  H.M.  Attorney  General,  the  Committee method of considered  members' views  on  a  number  of  matters  of  principle  and,  where appointment - appropriate, agreed to amend the draft further. The Committee, however, maintained report and that it did not accept the Attorney General's view that it would not be appropriate for proposition. Scrutiny Panels to be conferred with all the powers of a Committee of Inquiry but 502/1(7) without any limit on what such a Committee might consider at any given time,

recognising that the Attorney General might wish to draw this matter to the attention Ex.Off. of the States during their consideration of the proposition.

T.O.S.

C.I.Aud. The Committee approved the report and proposition, subject to a number of further F.E.C.C. points of detail being resolved by members in conjunction with the Greffier of the States (2) States, with a view to the projet being lodged au Greffe' on 10th June 2003 and Pub.Ed. referred to the Finance and Economics Committee for comment in due course.

The Greffier of the States was directed to send a copy of this Act to the Finance and Economics Committee.

States members' A4.  The  Committee  considered  a  report  prepared  by  the  Executive  Officer remuneration: concerning  the  future  direction  of  States  members' remuneration,  following  the future direction - adoption by the States on 20th May 2003 of the proposition of Senator E.P. Vibert membership of (P.26/2003), as amended, whereby an independent States Members' Remuneration States Members' Review Body comprising persons who were not members of the States was to be Remuneration established, with the Privileges and Procedures Committee having been charged to Sub-Committee. take the appropriate steps to give effect to the proposals.

1240/3(70)

Having noted the options available to progress the matter, the Committee further Ex.Off. noted a summary of the responses arising from a recent consultation exercise which

had been received from members of the States. The Committee, having agreed that it

would be minded to present a proposition to the States to establish the terms of

reference of the Remuneration Review Body, including the requirement for the body

to review the existing means testing arrangements, decided that in the first instance it

would be appropriate for a Sub-Committee to discuss the issues involved.

The  Committee  accordingly  approved   Deputy  J-A.  Bridge  (Vice-President)  and Senator  E.P.   Vibert  as  members  of  the  States  Members' Remuneration  Sub- Committee, to be assisted by the Greffier of the States.

The Executive Officer was directed to take the necessary action.

Reports presented A5.  The  Committee  considered  a  report  prepared  by  the  Executive  Officer to the States: concerning a review of the current arrangements for the distribution of reports to distribution members of the States, departmental officers and others.

arrangements for

States members, The Committee recalled that the President had recently requested the views of States Chief Officers members and Chief Officers regarding the current distribution arrangements and that, and others - of  the  options  given,  there  had  been  an  overwhelming  preference  for  the review. establishment of a system whereby a list of reports would be circulated from which 465/1(36) the requisite copies could be ordered.

Ex.Off. The Committee noted that the undermentioned reports had recently been published to

date in 2003 -

The Dairy Industry in Jersey - A Strategic Review (February 2003)

Jersey Electricity Company Limited - Annual Report and Accounts 2002 Review of the Relationship Between the Parishes and the Executive - Phase 2

Recommendations for change (April 2003)

Proposed Translation Policy - Policy and resources Committee (April 2003) Nanny Accreditation Scheme - Jersey Child Care Trust

St. Helier Waterfront - The Waterfront Enterprise Board Limited

Jersey Competition Regulatory Authority - Annual Report 2002

Jersey Post - Annual Report and Accounts 2002

Jersey Business Venture - Annual Report (28 February 2003)

The Jersey New Waterworks Company Limited - Annual Report and Financial

Statements for 2002

Family Nursing and Home Care (Jersey) Incorporated - Annual Accounts;

with some of these having been produced in a high quality glossy' format.

The Committee considered the possibility that, in the longer-term, substantial savings could be made by means of a reduction in print-runs by reference to firm orders for specific publications. It was considered that, ideally, the documents could be made available to States members, departmental officers and others in electronic format, facilitating  their  reading  on-screen  and  reproduction  as  required,  possibly  with arrangements being made for on-demand colour-printing at the States Bookshop.

Having recognised that a communications strategy' was shortly to be developed for the  States,  the  Committee  decided  to  defer  further  consideration  of  this  matter pending the outcome of that review, which it considered would need to take into account differentiation as between reports formally presented to the States and other documents sent to States members for their information.

The Executive Officer was directed to take the necessary action.

Freedom of A6.  The Committee received the minutes of the first meeting of the joint Privileges Information and Procedures and Legislation Committees Freedom of Information Working Party Working Party: which had been held on 14th May 2003.

Terms of

Reference and Having  noted  that  the  Working  Party  had  agreed  the  undermentioned  terms  of development of reference, the Committee formally approved them accordingly -

existing Code of

Practice. "To review the Code of Practice on Public Access to Official Information, the 955(30) existing and proposed Official  Secrets and Data Protection legislation, the

Public Records (Jersey) Law 2002, and the existing arrangements for access to Ex.Off. official  information  by  members  of  the  States  and  to  make  such

recommendations  for  change  including  legislative  change  to  any  of  the

foregoing as the Working Party may think fit."

Although it was recognised that it was unlikely that the decision of the States on 26th July 1999 that the provisions of the Code of Practice, amended as appropriate in the light of practical experience, could be implemented prior to the introduction of the machinery  of  government  reforms,  the  Committee  expressed  the  hope  that  the existing Code could at least be improved in the interim period. The Committee asked for  the  Working  Party  to  be  provided  with  such  relevant  papers  from  when consideration had been given to the development of the original Code of Practice as might be appropriate in order to assist it in its deliberations.

The Executive Officer was directed to take the necessary action.

Tribunals A7.  The Committee received a copy of the report, dated 23rd April 2003, to the Working Group: Policy  and  Resources  Committee  which  had  been  presented  by  the  Tribunals report - Working Group.

methodology and

recommend- The Committee noted that the Working Party's task had been to examine disputes ations. and appeals procedures in Jersey, with particular reference to the court and tribunal 1423/2(2) systems. It was further noted that, having regard to the proposals to establish two new

tribunals (namely an Employment Tribunal and a Copyright Tribunal), the Working Ex.Off. Group had been asked to complete its work by 6th April 2003.

C.E., P&R

P.R.E.O. The Committee expressed concern that the limited time available to the Working P.R.C.C. Group might have resulted in it having undertaken only a superficial look at the

situation. This was evidenced by a number of its recommendations having been overtaken by events and also through the "List of Tribunals in Jersey" appended to the  report  appearing  to  contain  a  number  of  errors  and  some  duplication (i.e.  references to both the"Jersey Police Complaints Authority" and also to "Police Disciplinary Tribunals - States of Jersey Police and Honorary Police."). Additionally, the  Committee  recalled  that  it  had  not  been  consulted  during  the  course  of  the Working  Party's  review,  even  though  it  currently  had  responsibility  for  the Administrative Appeals Panel which was referred to in the report. Having recognised that H.M. Attorney General had been consulted by means of his attendance at a workshop held on 31st March 2003, organised by the Working Party, the Committee suggested that it would be appropriate to ascertain the Attorney General's views on the final report.

The Committee decided to invite Senator W. Kinnard, Chairman of the Working Party, to discuss the methodology which had been adopted by the Working Party and for  further explanation and/or  clarification  of some of  the Group's findings and recommendations.

The Executive Officer was directed to take the necessary action, and the Greffier of the States was directed to send a copy of this Act to the Policy and Resources Committee for information.

Directorship A8.  The Committee considered correspondence, and also Acts and papers from the payments to Finance and Economics Committee, concerning the Directorships of public utility States members. companies held by members of the States.

140/7(1)

140/6(21) The Committee noted that the Finance and Economics Committee, having considered 1240/9/1(118) the matter, was of the view that the selection of an individual should be based on

merit, the process of selection transparent and that a Committee should be prepared Ex.Off. to defend its selection if called upon to do so. The Committee recognised that in

appointing  representatives  to  the  public  utilities,  the  Finance  and  Economics

Committee acted as representative of the major shareholder (i.e.  the public). In this

regard, members of the States were not appointed as States members but as persons

of merit who possessed the relevant experience or expertise.

The  Committee,  having  recognised  that  the  methodology  for  appointing  such Directors was somewhat outside of its remit, nevertheless concluded that it would be preferable for members of the States not to be appointed for this purpose.

The President was requested to write to the President of the Finance and Economics Committee  setting  out  the  Committee's  views,  and  the  Executive  Officer  was

directed to take the necessary action.

Carry Forward A9.  The Committee considered correspondence, dated 25th April 2003, from the Balances: 2002 to Treasurer of the States concerning the Carry Forward Balances for the Privileges and 2003. Procedures Committee and former Special Committee to consider the relationship 465/2(4) between Committees and the States (which latter body had now been subsumed into

the former).

Ex.Off.

T.O.S. The Committee noted that the Finance and Economics Committee had agreed that the C.I.Aud. Privileges  and  Procedures  Committee  could  carry  forward  a  positive  balance  of F.E.C.C. £15,080 from 2002 to 2003 in order to fund ongoing expenditure relating to the Code

of Practice on Public Access to Official Information. Similarly, it was noted that approval had been given to carry forward a positive balance of £9,379 from the Special Committee to the specific service areas requested.

The Committee accordingly confirmed both carry forward amounts for the purposes stated and directed the Executive Officer to take the necessary action.

The Greffier of the States was directed to send a copy of this Act to the  Finance and Economics Committee.

Cash limit for A10.  The Committee considered a letter, dated 16th May 2003, from the Treasurer 2004: for of the States concerning the proposed Committee Cash Limits for 2004 for inclusion inclusion in in the Resource Plan 2004.

Resource Plan

2004. The Committee noted that its proposed Cash Limit for 2004 was £429,300, which 465/2(5) figure included the impact in 2004 of the June 2002 and June 2003 pay awards. It

was recognised that further adjustments had been included where transfers had been Ex.Off. agreed between Committees, generally as part of the transitional arrangements for the T.O.S. Machinery of Government Reforms. Similarly, it was noted that all cash limits had C.I.Aud. been allocated on the basis of the transitional Committee structure, which would also F.E.C.C. be followed in the Resource Plan and 2004 Budget.

The  Committee  accordingly  confirmed  its  cash  limit  for  2004  and  directed  the Executive Officer to take the necessary action.

The Greffier of the States was directed to send a copy of this Act to the Finance and Economics Committee.

Budget 2004: A11.  The Committee considered a report, dated 28th May 2003, prepared by the transfer of items Greffier of the States concerning proposals to transfer with effect from 1st January from the Finance 2004 certain budgets from the Finance and Economics Committee to the Privileges and Economics and Procedures Committee.

Committee.

465/2(5) The Committee recognised that the amounts to be transferred would be those which

had been identified in the proposed 2004 cash limits following the Fundamental Ex.Off. Spending  Review  (FSR)  process.  It  was  agreed  that,  whilst  the  transfers  would T.O.S. represent a logical way forward towards establishing a specific budget for the States C.I.Aud. Assembly, with a separate budget-setting mechanism in the future, there were a F.E.C.C. number of issues to be raised with the Finance and Economics Committee prior to

agreement in connexion with the undermentioned areas -

States Greffe - adequacy of budget provision;

States members' income support and expenses; Commonwealth Parliamentary Association annual grant; Assemblée Parlementaire de la Francophonie annual grant.

Also for consideration were the issues surrounding the suggestion that the Privileges and Procedures Committee should take-on responsibility for the areas of the States Building, Royal Square, St. Helier used by States members, involving an initial annual rent of approximately £83,000, subject to annual increase. It was recalled that no amounts had been identified within the FSR process to fund this item.

The Committee agreed that it would be logical for the management of the overall Privileges and Procedures Committee budget to be undertaken by the States Greffe, including  the  preparation  of  quarterly  and  end-of-year  financial  reports  for  the Committee, which it was noted could be managed within existing staff resources.

The President was requested to write to the President of the Finance and Economics Committee and the Greffier of the States was directed to take the necessary action.

Legal advice to A12.  The Committee considered issues in connexion with the conveyance of legal Committees: advice from Committee Presidents to members of the States.

disclosure .

499/3(17) Having noted the circumstances which had given rise to e-mail correspondence from

Senator  P.V.F..  Le  Claire  to  the  President,  the  Committee  was  advised  that Ex.Off. H.M.  Attorney General currently had under consideration the issue of guidance to all

Committees  indicating  that  legal  advice  should  not  be  divulged  by  Committees

without prior reference to the Law Officers' Department.

The  President  was  requested  to  write  to  Senator  Le  Claire  indicating  that  the Committee was currently awaiting guidance from the Attorney General on the matter of disclosing legal advice but that, for its part, the Committee considered that, in general, full advice should be disclosed rather than only part of such advice.

The Executive Officer was directed to take the necessary action.

Draft Corruption A13.  The Committee considered a letter, dated 22nd April 2003, from the President (Jersey) Law of the Legislation Committee, together with a copy of the draft Corruption (Jersey) 200-: provisions Law 200- and associated background report.

welcomed.

428(1) The Committee confirmed that it welcomed the provisions outlined in the proposals,

particularly  as  it  recognised  that  the  exact  scope  of  the  existing  customary  law Ex.Off. offence was uncertain, with the single statutory offence of bribery of States members Leg.C.(2) in Article  50 of the States of Jersey Law 1966 being the only statutory offence of its

kind in the Island.

The Greffier of the States was directed to send a copy of this Act to the Legislation Committee.

Home Affairs A14.  The Committee, having considered an Act dated 27th March 2003 of the Home Committee: Affairs  Committee,  decided  to  apprise  that  Committee  that,  in  relation  to  the scrutiny not to intention to trial shadow-scrutiny in the latter half of 2003, scrutiny' would not impinge upon impinge upon bodies which had statutory duties.

statutory bodies.

465/1(31) As  regards  details  of  the  terms  of  reference  and  proposed  working  practice  of

shadow-scrutiny, the Committee recalled that its report and proposition regarding Ex.Off. Scrutiny Panels' was to be lodged au Greffe' in the near future and that it would H.Aff.C.(2) become clearer in due course how such Panels might operate.

The Greffier of the States was directed to send a copy of this Act to the Home Affairs

Committee.

Acts of other A15.  The Committee noted the undermentioned Acts of other Committees - Committees:

noted. (a)  P olicy and Resources Committee - Act No.  A12, dated 3rd April 2003,

concerning a review of current procedures relating to the arrangement of Ex.Off. public business in the States Assembly;

  1. Policy and Resources Committee - Act No. A14, dated 3rd April2003, concerning a summary of the expenditure onmachineryofGovernment reforms (MOGR) to date;
  2. Policy and Resources Committee - Act No. A1, dated 16th April2003, concerning that Committee'sresponseto the draft Code ofConductfor Elected Membersof the States;'
  3. L egislation Committee - Act No. A7,dated 11th April 2003, instituting wide  consultation  for  a  three-month period  in relation  to  the  draft Corruption (Jersey) Law200-;
  4. Legislation Committee - Act No. A9, dated 11th April2003,concerning a matter to be incorporated in to the wider examination of electoral reform;
  5. L egislation  Committee - Act  No. A16, dated 11th  April 2003, delegating to Deputy J-A. Bridge authority to approve the proposed terms ofreferencefor the Freedomof Information Working Party;
  6. F inance and Economics Committee - Act No. A7, dated 14th May 2003, concerning budgetaryarrangements for the States Assemblyand other non-executive departments.

Next meeting. A16.  The Committee confirmed that its next meeting would be held on Friday, 13th

June 2003, commencing at 9.30  a.m. in the Halkett Room, Morier House, Halkett Place, St. Helier ,