Skip to main content

Supplementary Order Paper 3rd July 2001

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

STATES OF JERSEY ORDER PAPER

Tuesday, 3rd July 2001 SUPPLEMENTARY

  1. PRESENTATIONOFPAPERS

(a) Papers for information

Matters presented under Standing Order 6A(1)(a)

Projet de Loi (200-) (Amendement No.  9) réglant la P.37/2001 Rpt. procédure criminelle (P.37/2001): report - (2) addendum.

Legislation Committee.

(d) Papers to be lodged "au Greffe" under Standing Order 17A(1)(a)

Projet de Loi (200-) (Amendement No.  2) sur les P.101/2001. matières explosives.

Comité de Législation.

50 La Colomberie and 1 Little Green Street, P.102/2001. St.  Helier: conditions of sale.

Public Services Committee.

  1. STATEMENTSANDPROPOSITIONSRELATINGTO THE ARRANGEMENT OF PUBLIC BUSINESS AT THISORANYSUBSEQUENTMEETING

THE STATES are asked to agree that the following matter be considered at their next meeting on 17th July 2001 -

Projet de Loi (200-) (Amendement No.  2) sur les P.101/2001. matières explosives.

Logé le 3 juillet 2001.

Comité de Législation.

G. QUESTIONS

The following was inadvertently omitted from the principal Order Paper -

Deputy  M.E.   Vibert  will  ask  questions  of  the  President  of  the Policy and Resources Committee regarding the recently published Population Policy: interim report'.

C.M. NEWCOMBE Greffier of the States

29th June 2001

QUESTION PAPER (See Item G)

Deputy M.E. Vibert of St. Brelade will ask the following question of the President of the Policy and Resources Committee -

"1. In  the  Conclusion  of  the  Policy  and  Resources  Committee's

recently published Population Policy: Interim Report (R.C.21/2001) paragraph 54 states The one insight that perhaps can be said to have emerged from all this so far, and of which the Committee is particularly mindful, is that it is as easy - if not easier - to contemplate a medium-term scenario for Jersey of a falling population as much as a significantly rising one. There is no particular evidence of the latter, but a fair number of signs and pressures at least pointing towards the possibility of the former.'

In the light of the fact that Jersey's population has risen constantly over the past five decades, and in the Committee's own report (paragraph 17) it is estimated to have risen by 2,450 in the past four years alone, could the President justify the quoted statement in paragraph 54. In particular, could the President explain why the constantly rising population figure is not particular evidence' of a rising population and detail and explain what are the fair number of signs and pressures' which are said to be pointing to a falling population?

2. Will the President confirm the existing States' policy of a permanent resident population the same or less than the current level' as first agreed by the States in 2000 and Beyond' when the population was around 85,000, and re-affirmed in the Strategic Policy Review of 1997, is still being pursued by his Committee?"