Skip to main content

The impact of financial service sector growth in 2005

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

1240/5(2825)

WRITTEN QUESTION TO THE MINISTER FOR TREASURY AND RESOURCES BY DEPUTY G.P. SOUTHERN OF ST. HELIER

ANSWER TO BE TABLED ON TUESDAY 4th APRIL 2006

Question

The financial service sector reports strong growth in 2005, with bank deposits up 16.8% to £184.6 billion, and the net asset value of funds under administration rising by 32% to £134.7 billion. Will the Minister inform members what impact, if any, such increases will have on

  1. em  ployment;and,
  2. ta x revenuesinthe financial services sector, in both realand percentage terms?

Answer

Growth in bank deposits and net asset value of funds are indicators of a strong performance  in the financial  services  sector,  but  do  not  necessarily  translate  into  higher  profits,  tax  revenues  or employment.

There  is  no  direct  link  to  growth  in  employment  because  growth  in  volumes  could  simply reflect higher  productivity  in  the  sector. There  might  be  some  broadly  beneficial  impacts  on employment if  increases in volumes are greater than expected and soak up what spare capacity remains in the  industry.  We can not be sure of the immediate impact on employment in 2005 until the  Labour Market Statistics are released on 5th April 2006, and it may well be that any beneficial impacts are not apparent for some time after that.  That said, the trend in the first six months of 2005 was for broad stability in banking employment (with some growth in the other sectors) and it is unlikely that this picture will have altered dramatically in the last six months of the year on the basis of these figures.

In terms of the impact on tax revenues,  bank deposit interest is largely received by  non residents and is not, therefore, taxed and  similarly the net value of assets under management is not  taxed but rather  the fees received by the managers in Jersey who look after the funds.  However, there  is likely to be  a mildly positive impact on revenues in a year or two when the assessments of 2005 profits are  done because the net interest margin on a higher volume base should be good for banks and fees on higher assets under management should also rise. It is extremely difficult to say exactly what this means for growth in tax revenues  in real or % terms.