Skip to main content

Amounts received from Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund and how it has been distributed

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

1240/5(8240)

WRITTEN QUESTION TO THE MINISTER FOR TREASURY AND RESOURCES BY DEPUTY M.R. HIGGINS OF ST. HELIER

ANSWER TO BE TABLED ON TUESDAY 1st APRIL 2014

Question

Will the Minister set out for the period 2003 to 2013 the amount of money received into the Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund in each year and detail, using main budgetary headings, how this money was distributed in each year?

Answer

The amount of money received and expenditure incurred between 2003 and 2013 as listed under their budgetary headings within the Annual Financial Report and Accounts were as follows;-

 

Area of Income and Expenditure

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

 

£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment Income

(106)

(455)

(535)

(378)

(721)

(392)

(28)

(76)

(146)

(102)

(51)

Other Income

(6,314)

0

0

(775)

(436)

(482)

0

(7,791)

(29,000)

(469)

(1,875)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenditure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Staff Costs

0

0

160

304

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Supplies and Services

0

0

0

0

0

0

23

7

1

1

2

Administrative Expenses

278

305

156

248

7

4

0

0

0

0

0

Other Operating Expenses

0

0

0

0

616

1

7,999

100

22,566

470

8

Grants and Subsidies Payments

0

0

750

455

4,608

3,374

3,616

1,202

404

506

108

Total

(6,142)

(150)

531

(147)

4,074

2,505

11,609

(6,557)

(6,176)

406

(1,808)

The level of income received and expenditure incurred by the Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund is dependent on case activity. For example, in 2011 a large confiscation (£29 million) and subsequent expense  (£22.6  million)  was  incurred  which  related  to  an  assets  sharing  agreement  following  the Bhojwani case.

The Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund is used in accordance with Article 24 of The Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999. Monies in the Fund do not form part of the annual income of the States and are a Special Fund for the purposes of the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005. They have been applied for the following purposes:

  1. (i) in preventing, suppressing or otherwise dealing with criminal conduct,
    1. in dealing with the consequences of criminal conduct, or
    2. without prejudice to the generality of clauses (i) and (ii), in facilitating the enforcement of any enactment dealing with criminal conduct;
  2. discharging Jersey's obligations under asset sharing agreements; and
  3. meeting the expenses incurred by the Minister in administering the Fund.

Applications for use of the Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund are submitted to the Treasury by Departments. Before supporting any measure and distributing any funds the Attorney General and other appropriate persons or bodies are consulted. Grants paid during the period 2003 to 2010 and in 2012 mainly related to payments made to Law Officers' Department, Judicial Greffe, Viscount Department and Bailiff 's Chambers for Court and Case Costs which exceeded base budgets in those years. The higher values relating to Court and Case Costs during the years 2007 to 2009, for example those relating to the complex Michel and Bhojwani cases, are shown below as a table:

 

Department

Year

Year

Year

 

2007 (£'000)

2008 (£'000)

2009 (£'000)

Law Officers'

1,768

1,843

1,864

Viscount

158

86

50

Judicial Greffe

1,580

553

1,235

Bailiff 's Chambers

139

96

187

Home Affairs

612

 456

275

In addition to the above, the Fund awarded grants in the sum of £340,000 in 2007 and 2008 to the Jersey Financial Services Commission.

In 2011 and 2013 grants were paid to the Home Affairs Department relating to the Fire and Rescue Service's No impairment of Service' Agreement and the Drunk and Incapable Unit and CCTV (£404,000 and £88,000 respectively), and in 2013 to the Judicial Greffe for Domestic Abuse Training.