The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.
The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.
12
WQ.240/2019
WRITTEN QUESTION TO THE MINISTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE BY DEPUTY I. GARDINER OF ST. HELIER
ANSWER TO BE TABLED ON TUESDAY 4th JUNE 2019
Question
Will the Minister state –
- the cost of the contract with I.P.M. for consultation in relation to Fort Regent;
- the length and a scope of the contract; and
- whether a tender process was used to select I.P.M. as a best value provider and, if not, what process was followed when deciding to engage I.P.M., whether any other companies were considered and if so, which ones?
Answer
Growth Housing and Environment has been working with a company called IPW, not IPM, the answer provided is given on the assumption that this is actually requesting.
- The total cost of the IPW contract for work in relation to Fort Regent was £28,000.
- The scope of the IPW contract included:
- A review of existing background information, previous studies and reports
- A review of relevant government strategy and other strategic market documentation
- A review of other UK and International case studies and benchmarks of facilities, destination and visitor attractions
- Key stakeholder consultations
- Secondary market analysis
- Facilitate Steering Committee and project officer group workshops
- Prepare report summarising preferred themes/options for the redevelopment of the Fort. The length of the contract was 10 weeks.
- The contract was awarded via a single appointment negotiation. This process was taken due the short limited nature of the project and IPW's relevant knowledge of Fort Regent, IPW provided advice on previous Fort initiatives, and their relevant experience with similar challenging projects.