Skip to main content

Corporate Services - Approved Panel Minutes - 23 May 2006

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.

Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel

Minutes of 15th meeting held on 23rd May 2006

Present Deputy P J D Ryan, Chairman

Connétable D Murphy

Connétable J L S Gallichan

Deputy J Gallichan

In attendance Senator L. Norman

Senator B. Shenton

Absent Senator J L Perchard, Vice-Chairman In attendance Mr. M. Haden

Miss S. Power

 

Ref Back

Agenda matter

Action

1.

Item 1 18.05.06

Review of Financial Framework of States Strategic Plan

The Panel noted that the Sub Panel had met earlier in the day to consider its findings following the public hearing with the Minister on the financial framework of the draft Strategic Plan.

The Panel was informed that the Sub Panel was in agreement on the following principal issues -

  1. that the balance of the Dwelling House Loan Fund should not be used to fund initiatives in the Strategic Plan;
  2. that the balance DHLF should be applied to the establishment of a Provisional Stabilisation Fund;
  3. that both £16 million revenue efficiency savings and £4 million capital  savings  should  be  applied  to  the  a  provisional Stabilisation  Fund.  This  would  prove  to  the  public  that  the States  was  serious  about  reducing  expenditure.  (It  was suggested that if an amendment regarding the £16 efficiency savings was approved the States would have to account for a transfer of the money. However, it was recognised that the savings  were  not real  money' but  represented  rather reductions in cash limits);
  4. that it would be irresponsible to increase States expenditure above previously agreed levels at this stage when the Island is embarking on a high risk fiscal strategy, the future financial impact of which is yet unknown;
  5. that the purpose of the Stabilisation Fund should be clarified in the Strategic Plan as at present there is a blurring between (a) the  concept  of  a  Stabilisation  Fund,  as  conceived  in the Economic  Growth  Plan,  to  address  cyclical  periods  of recession in the economy, and (b) the requirement for a fund in which to deposit budget surpluses arising from the introduction of GST to address subsequent structural deficits arising from the introduction of Zero/ten;
  6. that  the  Anti-inflation  strategy  should  seek  to  establish  a discipline whereby the States reduced the money supply in periods of financial growth rather than increasing spending. Although the Strategic Plan did take money out of the economy through higher taxes this was being spent elsewhere.

The Sub Panel had agreed that the Chairman's draft amendment could be supported in the name of the full Panel subject to

 

  1. Additional item (b) (iii) to include transfer of £16 million inefficiency savings to provisional Stabilisation Fund ratherthan allow it to be re-invested' in Strategic Plan initiatives;and
  2. Agreement of the whole Panel to the revised amendment.

The Panel, having noted the views of the Sub Panel decided unanimously to support the revised amendment and agreed that it should be lodged in the name of the Corporate Services Panel. The Chairman undertook to consult with Senator Perchard on the Panel's decision. The Scrutiny Officer was instructed to prepare a report to accompany the amendment for the consideration of the Panel.

Signed Date . ..

Chairman, Corporate Services Panel