Skip to main content

Corporate Services - Approved Panel Minutes - 30 March 2006

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel

Minutes of 10th meeting held on Thursday 30th March 2006

Present Deputy P J D Ryan, Chairman

Senator J L Perchard

Connétable J L S Gallichan Connétable D.J. Murphy (for a time) Deputy J Gallichan

In attendance Mr M Haden, Scrutiny Officer

Miss S Power, Scrutiny Officer

 

Ref Back

Agenda matter

Action

1

Item 4 23.03.06

Questions to the Chief Minister

Senator F H Walker , Chief Minister, and Mrs J Marshall, Scrutiny Liaison Officer, Chief Minister's Department, attended upon the Panel. The Chief Minister was questioned on various areas of interest to the Panel.

Deputy Gallichan was requested to prepare a report in liaison with the Scrutiny officer on the issues discussed and the actions arising from the meeting

Deputy Gallichan

SP

2.

Minutes The Panel approved the Minutes of the meeting held on 23rd March 2006.

 

3.

Chairman's report The Panel received notes of the regular

weekly meeting between the Chairman and officers, dated 29th March 2006 and noted the following –

  1. Call from Paul Bradbury, Director, Population office Officers to meet him within the first two weeks of April to discuss the general concept  of  scrutiny  and  possible  future  review  of  the  draft legislation. Following this, he would be invited to a future Panel meeting to brief the Panel on the progress in establishing the Population Office and the development of law drafting instructions for the migration licensing system.
  1. Briefing  on  Chief  Minister's  Department The  Panel  was advised that agreed that the Chief Executive was unavailable on any Thursday up till July. The Panel agreed that this was not a priority in its current work programme and decided to defer this opportunity for the time being.
  1. Letter from Mr P Hobbs regarding public sector staff costs.

MH

MH

4.

Item 2.3 23.03.06

Scrutiny of States Business Plan and Budget

The Panel noted the response, dated 24th March 2006, from the Treasury and Resources Liaison Officer to the Scrutiny Officer's e- mail,  dated  22nd  March  2006,  which  had  raised  a  series  of questions relating to the information to be supplied to the Panel on the Treasury's draft financial forecasts and other reports which would be incorporated in the States Business Plan for 2007.

The Panel noted that the June forecasts would be presented to the Minister on 19th June 2006 at which point they would be made available to Scrutiny. This was shortly before the next scheduled meeting with the Minister on the 22nd June 2006 and so there would be an opportunity to discuss the forecast figures on that date.

The  Panel  considered  the  role  it  might  play  in  the  Business

 

Planning process but agreed that its principal focus for the time

being would be on developing its reviews of the various work Deputy streams of the Fiscal Strategy. Gallichan

The  Panel  agreed, however,  to  continue to  press for  updated MH information on the financial forecasts and departmental cash limits

and confirmed that it wished to receive an early draft of the States

Business Plan and Budget when it became available.

  1. Fiscal Strategy

Item 3 a. Engagement of an expert adviser -

23.03.06 The appointment panel would be meeting Richard Teather at 11 am and John Hasseldine at 3 pm on Monday 3rd April 2006.

The  appointment  panel  would  consist  of   Deputy  Ryan; Senator Perchard; Brian Curtis and Robert Behan.

Draft  agreement  for  adviser The  Panel  requested  for MH Treasury  and  Resources  to  be  contacted  to  establish whether any additional information needed to be included in

the contract.

  1. Meetings with relevant consultation organisations –

Relevant groups to be informed that scheduling of these meetings MH had been deferred until the planning and terms of reference for the

GST review had been finalised.

  1. Use of Sub Panels -

The Panel gave further consideration to the use of Sub Panels in taking forward the work on the various elements of the Fiscal Strategy  and  noted  the  relevant  section  of  the  draft  Code  of Practice. The Panel agreed that -

  1. whilst the full Panel must retain overall responsibility for

the allocation of resources and the final report produced by

a sub Panel, the sub Panel should be allowed the flexibility

to proceed with its review without undue restrictions placed

on it to seek the Panel's agreement for every development.

  1. the Chairman of the Sub Panel should be allowed to select

the  membership  of  the  Sub  Panel,  subject  to  the  final endorsement of the Panel. Chairman

  1. to establish two sub Panels, one to examine the proposed Senator legislation  for  the  implementation  of  the  Goods  and Perchard Services  Tax,  the  second  to  examine  the  proposals

relating to look through provisions and 20% means 20%'.

Deputy Ryan agreed to lead the work on GST, assisted by

Connétable  Gallichan,  and  Senator  Perchard  agreed  to

lead the second sub Panel. It was agreed that Connétable

Murphy would be asked to assist the second Sub Panel. Chairman

  1. the  two  Sub  Panels  would  be  entitled  to  invite  other Senator members,  both  elected  non-Executives  and  suitably Perchard qualified unelected members to assist them in their work

on  the  fiscal  strategy.  The  Chairman  proposed  that  an

invitation should be extended to all non-executive States

members  to  express  an  interest  in  assisting  the  Sub

Panels with their work. Scrutiny

  1. Senator Shenton and Brian Curtis would be invited to be Panel involved  in  the  Review  process,  once  the  scoping

document had been completed. MH

  1. The Panel requested to be provided with the date when 20

means 20 legislation would be available.

  1. the remit and limits of responsibility for the sub Panels Chairman should be clearly understood from the outset. The Scrutiny Senator Officer  was  requested  to  draw  up  a  draft  protocol  for Perchard consideration at the next meeting.

viii. the two Sub Panels would meet on 6th April to plan the

work  programme  for  their  reviews,  following  which  this would be reported back to the full Panel for approval on 13th April and then to the Chairmen's Committee meeting

on 21st April for endorsement.

  1. Draft States Strategic Plan
  1. The Panel noted the submission from Mr P Hobbs on the draft Strategic Plan.
  2. The Panel  agreed that Deputy Gallichan would lead the Deputy work in drafting a paper detailing the Panel's comments on Gallichan the draft States Strategic Plan. This paper would then be

brought before the full Panel for comment and approval on

5th May.

  1. Public engagement

The  Panel  noted  that  the  Chief  Minister  had  welcomed  the

initiative by the Chairman to invite members of the public to submit

written questions which could then be put to the Minister in the

course  of  a  public  meeting.  It  was  agreed  that  further consideration should be given to the manner of handling such Deputy

questions. It was agreed that the Communication Unit should be Gallichan contacted  with  a  view  to  giving  this  initiative  some  media

coverage.

  1. Dates of future meetings

The Panel agreed the following meeting dates:

Thursday 13th April to approve the scoping documents for GST Look Through and 20 means 20 Reviews

Friday  5th  May to  approve  the  paper  on  the  draft  States

Strategic Plan

Thursday 18th May

Signed Date . ..

Chairman, Corporate Services Panel