Skip to main content

Environment - Approved Panel Minutes - 31 January 2006

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

Environment Scrutiny Panel

Date: 31st January 2006 Location: Le Capelain Room, States Building

Present Deputy R.C. Duhamel (Chairman)

Connétable K. A. Le Brun of St Mary Deputy Le Hérissier

Deputy S. Power

Apologies Deputy G.C.L. Baudains (Vice Chairman) Absent

In attendance I. Clarkson, Scrutiny Officer

M. Robbins, Scrutiny Officer

 

Item

(Back Reference)

Agenda matter

Action

1

Meeting with Transport and Technical Services Minister

The Panel confirmed that it had arranged an informal meeting with Deputy G.W.J. de Faye, Transport and Technical Services Minister, on Wednesday 1st February 2006. Officers were not to attend the meeting. The Panel instructed officers to order a sandwich lunch for those attending and to make the necessary room bookings.

IC / MR

2

(24.01.06 Item 7)

Strategic Travel and Transport Plan

The Panel recalled that Deputy G.W.J. de Faye, Transport and Technical  Services  Minister,  had  made  a  statement  to  the States Assembly that day advising that the Council of Ministers had approved the Strategic Travel and Transportation Plan (P. 174/2005) as a high level framework document on which to develop some specific and detailed proposals for a number of key  areas,  namely  buses,  (including  the  provision  of  bus shelters),  taxis  and  parking.  It  was  further  explained  that detailed proposals would be developed within 3 months and that the Minister intended to work with Scrutiny to achieve this target.

Concerns were expressed that, depending on the nature and scale of the policies proposed, the timescale as outlined might be optimistic. The Panel resolved to monitor developments and to discuss the matter at its informal meeting with the Transport and Technical Services Minister on 1st February 2006.

Panel / IC / MR

3.

(24.01.06 Item 11)

Public Meeting St. Clement s Parish Hall

The Panel discussed arrangements for the forthcoming public meeting to be held on Thursday  2nd February 2006 at St. Clement s Parish Hall .

It was agreed that the meeting would operate as an informal discussion forum. The Chairman would outline the rôle of the Panel. He would also encourage input from those attending concerning  the  Panel's  proposed  work  programme  for  the coming year and invite other members of the Panel to answer questions from the floor. Officer attendance was required so as

IC / MR

to allow for a record of any proposals made by members of the IC/MR public to be kept.

The Panel approved a press release concerning the meeting and  instructed  its  officers  to  issue  the  press  release

immediately.

4. St. Helier Waterfront

(24.01.06 The Panel formed the view that Senator F.E. Cohen, Planning

Item 9) and Environment Minister, was keen to adopt a cooperative

approach  to  the  St.  Helier  Waterfront.  Although  the  Panel

agreed that cooperation might well be productive, it expressed

the view that it would be reluctant to become involved unless it

was agreed that objective consideration would be given by both

parties to all schemes proposed from the year 1987 onwards. A

thorough review of all previous schemes and proposals was considered  necessary  in  order  to  determine  whether  the

direction  taken  by  the  States  and,  latterly,  the  Waterfront Enterprise  Board,  had  been,  or  remained,  appropriate.  In

addition,  the  Panel  questioned  whether  consultation  on  the

report  produced  by  Sandover  Associates  entitled, Draft Supplementary Planning Guidance on Tall Buildings for the St.

Helier Waterfront' would produce satisfactory answers to all RD / MR outstanding questions concerning the development process.

The  Panel  agreed  that  the  Chairman would  write  to  the Planning and Environment Minister requesting clarification on whether that Minister considered that there were flaws in the existing planning process for the Waterfront. It further agreed that the Minister should be invited to explain whether, in his view,  public  consultation  on  the  Waterfront  issue  might  be improved.

Signed Date ..

Chairman, Environment Panel