The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.
The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.
Environment Scrutiny Panel
Thursday 4th May 2006
Le Capelain Room, States Building
14th Meeting
Present Deputy R.C. Duhamel (Chairman)
Deputy G.C.L. Baudains (Vice Chairman) Deputy Le Hérissier (From item 3) Deputy S. Power
Apologies
Absent Connétable K. A. Le Brun of St Mary In attendance I. Clarkson, Scrutiny Officer
M. Robbins, Scrutiny Officer
Item (Ref Back) | Agenda matter | Action |
1 | Minutes The Minutes of the meetings held on 21st April, having been circulated previously, were taken as read and were confirmed. | None |
2 | Matters Arising There were no matters arising from the minutes | None |
3 | Items to Note The Panel noted the Transport and Technical Services Survey, and ministerial decisions taken during the period 21st April to 4th May 2006. The Panel also noted that an article in the Jersey Evening Post suggested that fridges and electrical goods would be sent to Brittany for disposal as the local system was unable to process these goods. The Panel decided to write to the Maison de la Normandie et de la Manche to notify them that it was revisiting the processing of electrical goods in France. It further determined that the Chairman should write to the Transport and Technical Services Department to establish why the goods could not be processed locally. The Panel noted that once again, Scrutiny had not been party to matters directly involving a Scrutiny Panel. | IC / MR IC / MR |
4 | Referral From Social Affairs During consideration of a referral to the Panel by the Social Affairs Panel relating to a review on Social Housing and First Time Buyer Property, the Panel accepted that the rationale, "Evaluate affordable first time buyer properties, achieved through the States sponsored shared equity and / or interest free deposit loans." fell within its remit. After further deliberation the Panel concluded that if the Social Affairs Panel were to pursue the review, the Environment Panel would be minded to offer one member to assist with that part of the review. The Panel decided that the Social Panel should be informed of their willingness to cooperate. | IC / MR |
5 (21/04/06 | Design Of Homes Review. The Panel noted that the Sub Group had met on 28th April and had |
|
Item 4) | discussed progress made on the review. The Chairman advised the Panel that he had spoken with some architects who had offered their services in relation to the interactive exercise but that the Panel would have to finance the project. It was considered appropriate to invite the Planning and Environment Minister Senator F. E. Cohen along with the Planning Applications Panel members to a meeting with the Panel to discuss Planning Advice Note Number 1, which was currently in draft form only. The Panel discussed unoccupied properties and speculative purchasing in the Island and considered that this fell outside the Terms of Reference of current reviews and would need a separate review. The Panel was minded to consider conducting a review of the extent of speculative property purchasing and the implications for planning policy in Jersey; accordingly it decided to write to Senator T.J. Le Main, Minister for Housing, seeking data on the number and type of unoccupied homes purchased in recent months. The Panel instructed officers to write to the Association of Jersey Estate Agents seeking data regarding the number of unsold one and two bedroom homes in the Island, together with specific details of the location and type of any such properties which had remained unsold after a period of six months or more on the market. | IC / MR IC / MR IC / MR |
6 (21/04/06 Item 4) | Planning Review Submissions were still being received although not as many as had been hoped for. The Panel was disappointed to note that, although over 40 individual letters had been sent to a selection of companies and organizations in the Island, relatively few responses from professional organizations had been received. Having considered possible reasons for the limited responses, the Panel recalled that members of the Association of Jersey Architects had previously informed the Scrutiny Office that they were minded to respond to the published call for evidence. Accordingly the Panel decided that officers should make contact with the President of the Association of Jersey Architects and confirm that the Association had received its invitation to make a submission. Deputy S. Power reported that he was representing residents concerned by new proposals for development of the Category A housing site at Fields Nos. 190, 191 and 192, St. Brelade . As it was considered that issues arising from the proposed development were of relevance to the Planning Process review, Deputy Power advised that he had invited the residents to write to Deputy G.C.L. Baudains directly. Deputy Power was invited to consider whether his efforts to assist constituents might have implications for both the Planning Process and Design of Homes reviews in terms of generating a conflict of interest. The Panel noted the position and Deputy G.C.L. Baudains undertook to attend the Scrutiny Office on or around 10th May 2006 in order to begin the process of reviewing the submissions received. | GB IC / MR |
7 (21/04/06 Item 4) | Waste Review The Panel considered P.45/2006, entitled Solid Waste Strategy: Locations for Proposed Facilities', lodged au Greffe' by the Minister for Transport and Technical Services on 11th April 2006. Recalling that the proposition invited the States to express a view on its preferred site for both an Energy from Waste plant and a composting facility, the Panel was informed that an amendment was being drafted by Deputy Duhamel. The amendment intended | RD |
| to have the wording changed to have regard for the decision made by the States during the debate of 13th July 2005 in paragraph 4 of Amendment 3 to P. 95/2005. The Panel noted that the second part of the amendment related to a "Strategic Environmental Assessment" and that such an assessment had been called for prior to the debate on the location of the waste facilities. |
|
8 | Review Proposals The Panel considered a report, dated 13th April 2006 and prepared by the Scrutiny Office, concerning new and deferred review topic proposals. The Panel confirmed that it intended to complete all three current reviews prior to the end of July 2006, so as to allow for work to commence on anticipated policy proposals concerning transport and energy. Although the Panel also discussed ongoing developments regarding the St. Helier Waterfront, it concluded that there were insufficient resources to conduct six major reviews in the current year. |
|
9 | Next Agenda The Panel was informed that it had been invited to meet the Waste Strategy Steering Group to discuss composting at South Hill at 10.00 am on Friday 5th May 2006. The Panel decided to accept the invitation. | Panel |
10 | Date of next meeting The Panel agreed that its next meeting should be held at 9.30 am on Thursday 18 May in Le Capelain Room, States Building. | IC/MR |
Signed Date
.. Chairman, Environment Panel