Skip to main content

Chairmen's Committee Minutes - Chairmen's Committee - 9 July 2013

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

Chairmen's Committee

Record of Meeting

Date: 9th July 2013

 

Present

Deputy T.A Vallois, President

Deputy J.G. Reed, representing Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel Deputy J.M. Maçon

Deputy K.L. Moore

Connétable S.W. Pallett, representing Economic Affairs Scrutiny Panel

Apologies

Deputy S.G. Luce , Vice-President Senator S.C. Ferguson

Deputy J.H. Young

Absent

 

In attendance

Mrs K. Tremellen-Frost, Scrutiny Manager

 

Ref Back

Agenda matter

Action

 

1. Minutes of previous meetings

The records of the meetings held on 11th, 14th, 19th, 27th June and 2nd July 2013 were approved and signed.

 

 

2. Minutes of this meeting

It was agreed that, given that the next meeting of the Committee was after the summer recess, that these minutes would be circulated electronically for approval so that they could be uploaded to the website.

 

510/1(77)

3. Ministerial Information prior to debates in States Assembly.

The Committee considered an issue raised by the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel in relation to all material being available prior to debates in the States Assembly to provide sufficient time for Members to be fully conversant with all the facts. It was noted that Scrutiny Panels made every effort to present its reports to the States in sufficient time for them to be read  by  States  Members  prior  to  debate  but  it  was  also  noted  that Ministerial Responses were not always available prior to debate.

Notwithstanding the fact that the ideal situation would be for all States Members  to  have  full  information  prior  to  debates,  the  Committee considered there was little it could do in respect of timing its reports to afford time for the Ministerial Responses to also be available prior to debates. The main reason for any delays was that frequently Ministers did not meet their planned target deadlines and factor in sufficient time for Scrutiny. The Committee agreed that reviews in this term of office had had an impact on policy development and implementation.

 

27.06.13 Item 1

510/1(3)

4. Questioning Training

The  Committee  evaluated  the  questioning  training  provided  by  H.M. Solicitor General which had taken place during June. It was noted that all returned feedback forms had been praiseworthy and had commented on how useful the course had been. The only criticisms had been that the first practical session was too rushed to provide feedback at the end, that there

 

 

had been no access to H.M. Solicitor General until the very end of the entire questioning process and that feedback from the video footage had not been given due to lack of time.

The Committee noted that the first practical session had been amended for the  second  session  so  that  feedback  was  given  to  the  questioners immediately after each witness. There was also a time limit imposed on each  questioner  and  the  session  was  not  video-recorded  as  this  had proved  unnecessary.  The  Committee  also  noted  that  H.M.  Solicitor General himself had commented that these changes made the second session more focussed and the methodology made it more beneficial from a teaching/learning perspective than the first.

It was agreed that the next questioning training was likely to be at the start of the next term of office.

 

 

5. Panel Activity Reports

The Committee noted the Scrutiny Panels' Activity Reports.

 

515/28

6. Digital Skills

The Committee noted difficulties being experienced by a Sub-Panel of the Economic Affairs Scrutiny Panel in respect of gathering information for the above review. On one hand the Sub-Panel had been advised that the Minister  would  be  signing  off  the  Ministerial  Decision  for  the  above strategy at th end of June but had subsequently learnt that no work has yet been undertaken on the matter.

The  Committee  suggested  that  the  Minister  for  Education,  Sport  and Culture should be questioned about this matter at a public hearing. It was also agreed that the President should discuss this issue with the Chief Minister at their next meeting.

TV/ KTF

21.05.13 Item 9

510/3(5)

7. Newsletter

The Committee recalled that it had previously agreed to the production of an  autumn/winter  newsletter  but  that  it  had  also  requested  costs  for printing on-Island.

The Committee noted the costs for both on-Island and off-Island printing with  on-Island  printing  being  slightly  more  expensive,  however,  the Connétable of St. Brelade advised that he had approached a printing company  which  had  quoted  a  cheaper  price  than  that  cited  in  the Committee paper. The Committee also considered the weight and type of paper which would be used, noting that on-Island would be a Gloss paper as opposed to the more matt finish of Silk which had been used for previous  newsletters.  It  was  noted  that  some  readers  could  have difficulties with Gloss paper as it could make it more difficult to read.

The Committee agreed that further investigation into the costs for on- Island printing should be undertaken in the first instance but agreed that the importance of on-Island printing in terms of value to the local economy outweighed other matters and agreed to the principle of using a local printing company.

KTF

22.01.13 Item 14

1443(1)

8. Comptroller and Auditor General

The Committee welcomed the Comptroller and Auditor General to the meeting  who  gave  an  explanation  of  her  rôle,  information  about  the

 

 

establishment of her office, her planned work programme and relationship with Scrutiny Panels, the Public Accounts Committee and other bodies.

 

510/1(15)

9. Financial Report – 2nd quarter

The Committee received and noted the second quarter financial report.

 

510/1(11)

10. Financial Support for Scrutiny

The Committee considered whether the drawing up of a contract with a local firm of accountants would be beneficial to the Scrutiny Panels. It was noted that this did not apply to the Public Accounts Committee as it had access to the staff of the Comptroller and Auditor General.

There  was  some  uncertainty  about  the  value  of  a  contract  with  one particular firm as the work required would be subject specific and may not necessarily be within the skill area of that firm. It was agreed that it would be more useful to have a list of accountancy firms which would be content to undertake some work for Scrutiny and information about the areas of expertise of each.

KTF

11.06.13 Item 3

510/1(79)

11. Departmental Workflow template

It was noted that the Chief Executive had instructed all Chief Officers to ensure that the Scrutiny work programming template be completed and forwarded to the relevant Scrutiny Officer by the start of the summer recess.

 

 

12. Future meetings

Chairmen's Committee 17th September 2013, 9.30am-11.30am