Skip to main content

Households falling between the Income Support and Income Tax thresholds

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

1240/5(3599)

WRITTEN QUESTION TO THE MINISTER FOR TREASURY AND RESOURCES BY DEPUTY G.P. SOUTHERN OF ST. HELIER

ANSWER TO BE TABLED ON TUESDAY 4th DECEMBER 2007

Question

  1. Will the Minister estimate how manyhouseholds/individuals fall into the gap' identified betweenIncome Support andIncome Tax thresholds andwhowill able to receive the type of special paymentannouncedin the Assemblyat the last meeting?
  2. Will the Minister explain when and how such numberswere identified and when andhowthe sums ofmoney required were calculated?
  3. Will the Minister advisemembershow this policy creates and supports independence' in line with the first key principle of the Social Policy Framework and isnotsimply a quick fix'which is identified as a fault of current social policy in the Framework?

Answer

  1. It isnotpossible to accurately estimateat present howmanyhouseholds will neither receive incomesupport nor payincome tax. Indications are,however, that it is likely tobeless than half a householdincomequintile i.e. less than 3,500 households. A detailed schemeisbeingdeveloped,including the criteria to receive the special payment.Thisscheme will be broughttotheAssembly for approval.
  2. As stated above, such numbers have not been accurately identified as yet, but basedon it beingless than the 3,500 householdsthesumofmoney required for the refunds couldbe in the region of£300,000.
  3. The prime purpose of this policywastoavoid a taxgiveaway of over £2m to the highest earners in society, incur more than £0.5m inadministration, and increasebusinessescostsand complexity, in ordertoprovide only £300,000 in benefittosomeoftheless well off, through thezero rating offood. Accordingly its prime purpose was not to create and support independence'. Its purpose was simply to provide a simpler and fairer solution to the effect of imposing GSTon food onthesame basis as the U.K.