The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.
The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.
From:
Sent: 11 January 2007 12:19
To: Alan Breckon
Subject: RE: telephone masts ***********************************************************************
Dear Mr Breckon
Thank you for your reply. I confirm that you may pass this on to the
Scrutiny Officer and I am happy for it to be put in the public domain. By
"our land" I mean that the proposed masts are to be put on land that I own
namely Mont Mallet which borders National Trust land around Victoria Tower. I hope this answers your queries and I hope you can be of help to me with
this mattter.
Kind regards
>From: "Alan Breckon" <A.Breckon@gov.je>
>Subject: RE: telephone masts
>Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:48:56 -0000
>
> >********************************************************************** >
>
>
>Ms xx Thank You for the attached for the benefit of doubt please
>can you confirm that I can pass this to the Srutiny Officer And that if
>you do you will agree to it becoming in the public domain I say this
>because there are some Data Protection issues and I can't just pass
>information on. My only comment at this that you mention both in the
>email & letter "Our land" what exactly do you mean by this
>Alan Breckon
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
>Sent: 10 January 2007 14:56
>To: Alan Breckon
>Subject: telephone masts
>
> >*********************************************************************** >
>Dear Mr Breckon
>
>I have attached a copy of a letter sent to various relevant parties
>stating some concerns regarding unanswered questions ref health
>concerns
>
>associated with proposed phone masts on our land.
>Naturally, I am aware that I am far from alone in my worries but as one
>of the proposed, and now approved sites is on my land, my concerns
>increase daily. Contrary to the "no surprise" expressed by the Jersey
>Mobile Mast Concern Group, I was amazed by the passing of these sites
>prior to a result from the scrutiny panel. I have from the initial
>talks with the phone co's expressed nothing but concern on many >levels.The area to which I refer is Mont Mallet, St. Martin . This is a >heavily built up area and one where we already have a mast on Gorey >Pier and another ( J.Telecoms) looming above our property and extremely >close to others who also have great fears for their health. I believe
>J. Telecoms have made some noises about moving their mast but to where >and when? This piece of land is also environmentally important and >fragile and for
>
>me to commit to this sort of ground and air impact is, I feel, unfair
>to many others who enjoy leisure time here. I was amazed to hear that a >meeting had taken place with one of the phone companies and the >planning dept when they assured me that their application would be >passed (even quoting the date), When we requested a meeting early on in >these discussions in order to talk about the sensitivity of the area,
>it was denied on the grounds of the dept being too busy.
>It may seem strange to have allowed the proceedings to go this far but >a) during a telephone conversation with a member of staff at planning we >
>were told that masts were definitely going to go up at this site and we >felt so directly affected that we needed some sort of control as to
>where and b) I also had some confidence in planning to put the health
>
>of locals above the needs of these non local companies and allow The >Scrutiny Panel to pursue and complete a report. I am grateful for your >time in reading the above and my attached letter and would request if
>at all possible, a short time to show you the land in question. This is
>a major concern for myself and family and I have found it extremely >difficult to know from whom to seek advice. Thanking you in >anticipation,
>