Skip to main content

Protecting our Marine Environment - Jersey Harbours - Harbour Water Quality Report 2009 - Submission

The official version of this document can be found via the PDF button.

The below content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments.

 

Assessment of  Water Quality in  St Helier Harbour

Report No 14.

Fisheries and Marine Resources  Planning & Environment  Department  

Howard Davis Farm  

Trinity  

Jersey  

July 2009  

Harbour Sampling Programme.

  1. Introduction

In 1998 an Environmental Review was undertaken by Jersey Harbours. Within this review, which covered a wide range of environmental issues, the subject of water quality was highlighted. The review suggested that some form of monitoring was implemented for public health and general environmental well-being. Aesthetics were also considered.

This report presents the 14th review of certain physical, biological and chemical parameters, following sampling on Wednesday 8 July 2009.

  1. Methods and Results

Biological and chemical parameters were analysed at the States Analyst. Physical parameters were recorded in situ and the location of the 12 sample sites can be found in Appendix 1.

A detailed description of the techniques involved in the collection and subsequent laboratory analysis extends beyond the remit of the report suffice to say that all collections followed the protocols laid down in the Environmental Review as did the analysis within the guidelines of the laboratory.

  1. Weather

Wind   W-NW F4/5

Temperature  Max 200C  Min140C

Cloud  2

Visibility  Good

Rain   Nil

Tide   0757 (BST)   1428 (BST)

9.66m  2.50m Sampling regime  HW +/- 1hr

  1. Physical Parameters.

The physical parameter data are shown in Table 1 (see page 2). The average (mean) sea temperature within the confines of the harbour complex was 17.060C +/- 0.50C.

These temperatures are approximately consistent with the average sea temperature for this time of year. Slight temperature variations are to be expected given the various depths of water, surface heating, water exchange and fresh water input.

The average (mean) levels of dissolved oxygen were 6.0mg/L +/- 0.2mg/L. The % saturation of the water with reference to dissolved oxygen ranged from 79.7% to 74.8%. These levels are less than previous years, where a fully saturated body of water (>100%) was detected. The lower levels detected this year may be due to increased  biological  activity  and  growth  of  phytoplankton.  Such  an  increase  in Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) can be associated with raw sewage pollution. However there was no uniform increase in faecal coliforms across sites, as one would expect from a pollution problem (Table 2.). At the time of sampling there had been a prior period of high water temperatures and fair weather, which may have driven an increase in phytoplankton growth and BOD.

 

Year

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Station

Temperature/0C

1

15.6

20.4

15.7

16.9

16

13.6

14.4

15.4

16.7

17.3

2

16.1

18.5

15.5

16.7

16.4

13.6

14.1

15.4

17.0

17.2

3

16.3

18.5

15.6

16.7

16

13.6

14.1

15.3

16.2

17.1

4

16.0

18

15.4

16.6

15.5

13.6

14.0

15.5

16.9

17.2

5

15.4

17.2

15.7

16.6

15.5

13.8

14.2

15.3

17.1

17.1

6

15.3

17.1

15.6

16.6

15.3

13.7

14.7

15.0

16.7

17

7

15.6

16.9

15.7

16.6

15.5

13.7

14.2

14.8

16.3

16.9

8

16.3

16.8

15.3

16.6

15.4

-

14.3

15.0

16.4

16.9

9

15.3

16.8

15.7

16.7

15.3

13.5

14.1

14.9

16.1

16.8

10

15.3

19.1

15.5

16.7

15.2

13.9

14.2

15.0

16.2

17.6

11

15.8

18.6

15.2

16.8

15.5

13.7

14.2

14.8

16.3

17.2

12

15.4

16.6

15.3

16.4

15.2

13.5

14.4

14.9

15.7

16.5

 

Mg/L O2

1

9.0

8.2

8.5

7.8

8.1

8.2

8

8

11.8

6.2

2

8.9

7.2

11.1

7.9

8.1

8.8

9.2

7.5

11.4

6.1

3

7.7

7.1

9.7

7.8

8.7

10

9.2

9

10.4

6.1

4

7.8

6.9

7.9

8.0

9.0

10.8

8.2

10.6

10.4

6.1

5

9.4

7.1

7.5

8.5

9.1

9.1

10.3

11

10.7

6

6

10.3

7.3

9.0

8.1

8.4

9.4

9.3

10.3

10.1

6.1

7

8.9

7.8

9.2

7.6

8.9

9.3

10

10.2

10.1

6

8

7.5

9.1

9.2

7.5

9.0

-

10.2

10.2

11.7

5.9

9

8.2

9.1

9.2

7.7

8.7

9.4

9.7

11.1

11.6

6.1

10

8.5

7.8

7.4

7.8

8.4

11

9

10.4

11.6

5.9

11

9.9

6.4

7.5

7.7

8.4

9.6

8.9

9.1

11.6

5.8

12

9.6

11.7

12.2

7.9

9.1

9.2

10

12

11.7

6.2

 

% O2 Saturation

1

108

111

102

99

101

101

100

96

124

79.7

2

108

93

120

99

101

105

101

89

130

79.3

3

95

139

104

98

111

104

104

106

123

78.9

4

95

88

99

100

112

120

97

120

122

79.5

5

113

70

104

100

110

107

104

121

124

77.4

6

121

75

99

101

101

111

101

115

121

79.4

7

105

77

102

96

108

109

101

111

119

77.3

8

91

149

101

94

120

-

102

111

123

75.4

9

99

137

107

99

106

101

101

122

123

78.3

10

104

144

90

101

103

100

100

116

124

75.2

11

119

140

100

100

103

101

101

90

122

74.8

12

115

145

107

99

127

101

101

130

122

78.4

Table 1. Physical Parameters (Temperature; mg/L O2; % O2 saturation)

  1. Biological Parameters.

The biological parameter data are shown in Table 2. Most stations sampled had very low levels of total coliforms, E. coli and faecal streptococci, below the stringent guide levels set in the bathing water directive. Noticeably, St. Helier Marina had high levels of  total  coliforms  and  faecal  coliforms,  suggesting  sewage  pollution  from  either vessels in harbour, or terrestrial run-off.

 

Year

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Station

Total Coliforms (cfu/100ml)

1

327

-

300

700

100

100

200

<100

<100

22200

2

100

-

1600

500

200

<100

<100

<100

100

<100

3

400

-

600

800

<100

<100

<100

<100

<100

<100

4

100

-

1500

100

<100

<100

100

<100

<100

<100

5

200

-

100

100

<100

100

<100

<100

<100

<100

6

100

-

100

300

1100

<100

6700

300

<100

300

7

200

-

<100

100

<100

<100

<100

<100

100

<100

8

200

-

100

<100

<100

-

<100

<100

<100

<100

9

<100

-

100

100

<100

<100

100

<100

<100

100

10

<100

-

1000

<100

<100

<100

<100

<100

<100

<100

11

<100

-

500

<100

<100

<100

<100

<100

<100

<100

12

<100

-

<100

<100

300

<100

<100

<100

<100

<100

 

Faecal Coliforms (cfu/100ml)

1

60

20

245

130

90

<10

20

<10

<10

335

2

90

82

927

60

18

10

<10

<10

<10

<10

3

20

95

227

50

5

<10

10

<10

<10

50

4

<10

15

573

40

<10

<10

45

<10

<10

<10

5

10

<10

<10

40

<10

<10

20

<10

<10

20

6

50

73

10

327

927

27

6800

218

70

36

7

20

<10

27

40

10

10

10

20

<10

10

8

<10

<10

10

40

<10

-

<10

<10

<10

<10

9

30

100

10

110

<10

20

10

10

<10

10

10

20

<10

82

10

30

10

<10

<10

10

<10

11

10

<10

136

18

20

<10

10

<10

<10

<10

12

18

<10

10

10

<10

<10

30

<10

<10

10

 

Faecal Streptococci (cfu/100ml)

1

20

<3

17

5

17

3

3

10

10

67

2

17

17

717

10

267

<3

<3

3

<3

<3

3

67

76

593

30

33

7

3

<3

10

27

4

7

14

793

7

7

20

10

3

<3

3

5

7

<3

17

3

7

<3

<3

<3

50

<3

6

43

13

<3

23

117

<3

353

10

<3

7

7

47

3

17

3

7

<3

<3

<3

<3

3

8

13

<3

43

7

<3

-

3

17

<3

3

9

7

<3

3

3

3

<3

3

<3

<3

<3

10

3

<3

10

<5

13

<3

<3

<3

<3

13

11

3

<3

13

<3

10

3

<3

3

<3

<3

12

<3

<3

3

3

<10

<3

7

3

<3

<3

Table 2. Biological Parameters (Total coliforms; faecal coliforms; faecal streptococci)

  1. Chemical Parameters

As with previous surveys very low levels of hydrocarbon pollutant was detected with the harbour complex. Levels of less than 0.01 mg/L were recorded at three sample stations with a slightly higher level at the La Collette Yacht Basin. However this level is still below the 0.05 mg/L found in previous years.

 

Year

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Station

Hydrocarbon content (mg/L)

1

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

0.09

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

0.02

2

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

0.05

0.09

<0.05

<0.05

<0.01

3

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.01

4

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

-

<0.05

<0.05

0.07

<0.01

Table 3. Chemical Parameter (Hydrocarbon content)

  1. Comment.

In general, the water quality within the Harbour complex remains good, comparable with previous surveys and conforms to the high standards laid down for EU bathing waters, with the exception of the high coliform counts found in St. Helier Marina. The uniformly low dissolved O2 at all sites is most likely not associated with a pollution problem due to the absence of uniformly high coliform counts across all sites. This may be the result of high BOD from a period of comparatively good weather. The high coliform result for St. Helier Marina maybe caused by flushing of heads whilst in the Marina and may warrant further investigation by Jersey Harbours.

.

JPS 6/8/21

Appendix 1 Sampling stations

 

Station Number

Station Location

Biological Sampling

Hydrocarbon Sampling

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

St Helier Marina Old Harbour

English Harbour French Harbour

St Helier Harbour London Berth

JEC Outfall LCYB Tanker Berth

Elizabeth Harbour E berth Elizabeth Marina SE Elizabeth Marina NE Small Roads

x x x x x x x x x x x x

x - x - - - x x - - - -

Appendix 2

EU Bathing Water Directive (76/160/EEC)

 

Standard

Organism

Imperative  Guide

Total Coliform Faecal Coliform Faecal Streptococci

10,000 cfu/100ml  500 cfu/100ml 2,000 cfu/100ml  100 cfu/100ml

-  100 cfu/100ml

Note  cfu  colony forming unit