This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost. Let us know if you find any major problems.
Text in this format is not official and should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.
STATES OF JERSEY
ISLAND PLAN 2022-25: APPROVAL (P.36/2021) – TWENTY-EIGHTH AMENDMENT
TRADITIONAL FARM BUILDINGS
Lodged au Greffe on 12th July 2021 by Deputy K. F. Morel of St. Lawrence
STATES GREFFE
2021 P.36/2021 Amd.(28)
ISLAND PLAN 2021: APPROVAL (P.36/2021): TWENTY-EIGHTH AMENDMENT
____________
PAGE 2 –
After the words "the draft Island Plan 2022-25" insert the words "except that –
- within Policy ERE3 (Conversion or re-use of traditional farm buildings), in the fourth paragraph, after the words "appearance of the building" add the words "or changing or affecting the employment use or the nature of surrounding agricultural land";
- the draft Island Plan 2022-25 should be further amended in such respects as may be necessary consequent upon the adoption of paragraph (a).
DEPUTY K. F. MOREL OF ST. LAWRENCE
Note: After this amendment, the proposition would read as follows – THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion
to approve, in accordance with Article 3(1) of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002, as amended by the Covid-19 (Island Plan) (Jersey) Regulations 2021, the draft Island Plan 2022-25, except that
- within Policy ERE3 (Conversion or re-use of traditional farm buildings), in the fourth paragraph, after the words "appearance of the building" add thewords "or changing or affecting the employment use or the nature ofsurrounding agricultural land";
- the draft Island Plan 2022-25 should be further amended in such respects as may be necessary consequent upon the adoption of paragraph (a).
Page - 2
P.36/2021 Amd. (28)
REPORT
There may well be instances where traditional farm buildings are unable to be maintained within agricultural use and so it is preferable that they are restored in line with their heritage value in order to be put to other uses.
However, where such an alternative use is permitted, this use should only be for the traditional farm buildings themselves and should not be for surrounding agricultural land, which should remain in agricultural use irrespective of the new use for the farm buildings.
Financial and manpower implications
There are no financial and manpower implications to this proposed amendment. CRIA statement
This amendment has been assessed in relation to the Bridging Island Plan CRIA and indirectly benefits children by seeking to preserve the natural environment adjoining traditional farm buildings around the Island.
Page - 3
P.36/2021 Amd. (28)